Enhanced POE Model: It’s Effect on Grade 10 Learners’ Conceptual Understanding and Engagement in Biology

This study investigated the effectiveness of the enhanced Predict–Observe–Explain–Assess– Evaluate (POEAE) Model on Grade 10 learners’ conceptual understanding and engagement in Biology, specifically in the topic Nervous System. Using a one-group pretest–posttest quasi-experimental design, the intervention was implemented among 26 students from a private school in Lanao del Norte during the 2024–2025 academic year. Researcher-developed and expert-validated instruments—including a 20-item conceptual understanding test and a 10-item engagement checklist—were utilized to measure learning outcomes. Data were analyzed using descriptive statistics and the Wilcoxon Signed-Rank Test. Results from the Wilcoxon Signed-Rank Test revealed a statistically significant increase in learners’ conceptual understanding (p < .05), with the mean score increasing from 4.85 in the pretest to 15.62 in the posttest, indicating a shift from Beginning/Developing Proficient to Approaching/Advanced Proficient levels. The mean gain score of 10.77 further demonstrated consistent learning improvement among participants. Engagement levels were also notably high, with an overall mean of 4.09, indicating that learners found the POEAE activities stimulating, reflective, and supportive of deeper understanding. Findings confirm that integrating Assess and Evaluate phases strengthens the traditional POE cycle by promoting metacognition, evidence-based reasoning, and sustained engagement. The study concludes that the enhanced POEAE Model is an effective instructional approach for improving both conceptual understanding and learner engagement in Biology.

Enhanced POE Model, engagement, Biology instruction, Achievement level

1. Duit, R., & Treagust, D. F. (2012). How can conceptual change contribute to science education? Science Education, 96(2), 281–285. https://doi.org/10.1002/sce.21018 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

2. Fredricks, J. A., Blumenfeld, P. C., & Paris, A. H. (2004). School engagement: Potential of the concept, state of the evidence. Review of Educational Research, 74(1), 59–109. https://doi.org/10.3102/00346543074001059 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

3. Karamustafaoğlu, S., & Mamlok-Naaman, R. (2015). Understanding electrolysis through the POE approach. International Journal of Science and Mathematics Education, 13(5), 1015–1033. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10763-014-9545-3 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

4. Zohar, A., & Dori, Y. J. (2012). Metacognition in science education: Trends in current research. Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-007-2132-6 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

5. Kearney, M., Treagust, D., Yeo, S., & Zadnik, M. (2001). Student and teacher perceptions of the use of multimedia supported Predict– Observe–Explain tasks to probe understanding. Research in Science Education, 31(4), 589–615. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1013120314313 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

6. Joshi, A., Kale, S., Chandel, S. and Pal, D. (2015) Likert Scale: Explored and Explained. British Journal of Applied Science & Technology, 7, 396-403. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

7. https://doi.org/10.9734/BJAST/2015/14975 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

8. The jamovi project. (2023). Jamovi (Version 2.3) [Computer software]. https://www.jamovi.org [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

• Problem-Based Learning Strategy: Effect on Achievement of Genetics among Biology Students in Colleges of Education Oyo, Oyo State
• Gut Content Analysis of Siganus canaliculatus (Danggit)
• Predicting Human Neurotherapeutic Response through Preclinical Imaging Intelligence
• Can Algicidal Bacteria be the Solution to Successfully Manage Freshwater Algal Blooms?
• Boosting Carbon Capture: Progress in Enhancing RuBisCO’s Carboxylase Activity