Enhancing Educational Quality and Institutional Development: Perspectives from Malcolm Moffat College of Education Stakeholders

This study explored stakeholder perspectives on educational quality and institutional development at Malcolm Moffat College of Education (MMCE). The study was guided by the following objectives: to evaluate the academic quality of the programmes at MMCE, analyse how well MMCE prepares students for the job market, and identify key areas for institutional improvement. The study was purely qualitative and employed a case study design to allow for a holistic and detailed exploration of the phenomenon within its real-life context. Data was collected through semi-structured interviews and focus group discussions. The sample size was twenty-five stakeholders, including educators, administrators, students, policymakers, unions, business representatives, NGOs, traditional leaders, and religious institutions. Data was analyzed thematically, with charts and graphs used to visually present recurring patterns and stakeholder perspectives, thereby enhancing clarity and accessibility of findings. Findings indicated that teacher training diplomas had the highest recognition, while bachelor’s degree programmes were less familiar. On the overall quality of the College’s programmes, stakeholders expressed high satisfaction, with 85% rating the academic programmes as good and 15% as excellent, recognising MMCE’s commitment to competence and professional preparation. However, some respondents emphasized the need for greater holistic student development, particularly in social engagement and interdisciplinary learning. Furthermore, perceptions regarding the curriculum’s ability to foster research and critical thinking varied, with 31% affirming its effectiveness and 69% indicating uncertainty, highlighting the need for curriculum refinement. The study recommends strengthening research components, enhancing programme awareness, integrating learner-centered teaching methodologies, and balancing academic rigor with holistic student development. These insights support efforts to accredit degree programmes in Primary Education and Educational Leadership and Management, ensuring their alignment with national educational priorities and workforce demands.

Enhancing, Educational Quality, Institutional Development, Perspectives

1. Best, J. W., & Kahn, J. V. (2016). Research in Education. Boston: Pearson. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

2. Bowen, G. A. (2009). Document analysis as a qualitative research method. Qualitative Research Journal, 9(2), 27-40. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

3. Braun, V., & Clarke, V. (2006). Using thematic analysis in psychology. Qualitative Research in Psychology, 3(2), 77-101. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

4. Bryman, A. (2012). Social Research Methods. Oxford: Oxford University Press. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

5. Cohen, L., Manion, L., & Morrison, K. (2018). Research Methods in Education (8th ed.). London: Routledge. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

6. Corbin, J., & Strauss, A. (2015). Basics of Qualitative Research: Techniques and Procedures for Developing Grounded Theory (4th ed.). Thousand Oaks: Sage. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

7. Creswell, J. W. (2014). Research Design: Qualitative, Quantitative, and Mixed Methods Approaches (4th ed.). Thousand Oaks: Sage. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

8. Freeman, R. E. (1984). Strategic Management: A Stakeholder Approach. Boston, MA: Pitman Publishing. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

9. Field, A. (2018). Discovering Statistics Using SPSS (5th ed.). Thousand Oaks: Sage. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

10. Fullan, M. (2007). The New Meaning of Educational Change. (New York: Teachers College Press. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

11. Geertz, C. (1973). The Interpretation of Cultures. New York: Basic Books. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

12. Government of the Republic of Zambia. (2022). Eighth National Development Plan (2022-2026). Lusaka: Ministry of Finance and National Planning. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

13. Krueger, R. A., & Casey, M. A. (2015). Focus Groups: A Practical Guide for Applied Research (5th ed.). Thousand Oaks: Sage. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

14. Kvale, S., & Brinkmann, S. (2009). Interviews: Learning the Craft of Qualitative Research Interviewing. Thousand Oaks: Sage. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

15. Kombo, D. K., & Tromp, D. L. A. (2006). Proposal and Thesis Writing: An Introduction. Nairobi: Pauline Publications Africa. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

16. Lincoln, Y. S., & Guba, E. G. (1985). Naturalistic Inquiry. Beverly Hills, CA: Sage Publications. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

17. Merriam, S. B. (2009). Qualitative Research: A Guide to Design and Implementation. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

18. Miles, M. B., Huberman, A. M., & Saldaña, J. (2014). Qualitative Data Analysis: A Methods Sourcebook. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

19. Patton, M. Q. (2015). Qualitative Research and Evaluation Methods (4th ed.). Thousand Oaks: Sage. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

20. Shenton, A. K. (2004). Strategies for ensuring trustworthiness in qualitative research projects. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

21. Education for Information, 22(2), 63–75. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

22. Silverman, D. (2013). Doing Qualitative Research (4th ed.). Thousand Oaks: Sage. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

23. Tashakkori, A., & Teddlie, C. (2010). Handbook of Mixed Methods in Social & Behavioral Research (2nd ed.). Thousand Oaks: Sage. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

24. United Nations. (2015). Transforming our world: The 2030 Agenda for Sustainable Development New York: United Nation. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

• Assessment of the Role of Artificial Intelligence in Repositioning TVET for Economic Development in Nigeria
• Teachers’ Use of Assure Model Instructional Design on Learners’ Problem Solving Efficacy in Secondary Schools in Bungoma County, Kenya
• “E-Booksan Ang Kaalaman”: Development, Validation, and Utilization of Electronic Book in Academic Performance of Grade 9 Students in Social Studies
• Analyzing EFL University Students’ Academic Speaking Skills Through Self-Recorded Video Presentation
• Major Findings of The Study on Total Quality Management in Teachers’ Education Institutions (TEIs) In Assam – An Evaluative Study