Enhancing English-Speaking Readiness Through Community Engagement: Evidence from a Malaysian Secondary School

English speaking proficiency is increasingly important for Malaysian secondary school students preparing for higher education and future employment, yet many face barriers such as limited vocabulary, weak grammatical control, and communication anxiety. This study examined the effectiveness of a community-engaged English-Speaking and Communication Program conducted through a collaboration between a local university and a secondary school in Melaka. The program, facilitated by university lecturers, emphasized interactive activities, including role-plays, debates, group discussions, and storytelling, to create supportive opportunities for communication. Using a quantitative pre–post survey design, 82 Form 4 students (aged 16) completed structured questionnaires measuring readiness, communication anxiety, speaking practices, and program evaluation. Reliability analysis showed acceptable to high internal consistency (Cronbach’s α = .73–.88). Findings revealed significant improvements across key domains: readiness and confidence increased (Δ = +0.64, Cohen’s d = 0.65), communication anxiety decreased (Δ = 0.61, Cohen’s d = 0.61), and speaking practices improved (Δ = +0.47, Cohen’s d = 0.50). Students also expressed strong approval of the program, highlighting the value of interactive tasks and the supportive learning environment. These results suggest that short-term community-based interventions can reduce affective barriers and encourage willingness to communicate in English. Despite limitations such as the absence of a control group, a small sample size, and reliance on self-reported data, the study underscores the potential of university–school partnerships to complement classroom instruction. Such initiatives align with national education priorities and demonstrate how community engagement can strengthen students’ confidence and communicative competence in academic and real-world contexts.

English speaking proficiency; Communication anxiety; Community-engaged learning; University

1. Ali, M. M., Hamzah, M. H., & Rahman, N. A. A. (2018). Malaysian secondary school students’ perceptions of speaking anxiety in English language classrooms. International Journal of Education and Literacy Studies, 6(4), 1–9. https://doi.org/10.7575/aiac.ijels.v.6n.4p.1 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

2. Bringle, R. G., & Hatcher, J. A. (2002). Campus–community partnerships: The terms of engagement. Journal of Social Issues, 58(3), 503–516. https://doi.org/10.1111/1540-4560.00273 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

3. Bygate, M. (2009). Teaching and testing speaking (2nd ed.). Pearson Education. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

4. Cohen, J. (1988). Statistical power analysis for the behavioral sciences (2nd ed.). Lawrence Erlbaum Associates. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

5. Creswell, J. W., & Creswell, J. D. (2018). Research design: Qualitative, quantitative, and mixed methods approaches (5th ed.). SAGE Publications. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

6. Dörnyei, Z., & Ryan, S. (2015). The psychology of the language learner revisited. Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315779553 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

7. Ellis, R. (2003). Task-based language learning and teaching. Oxford University Press. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

8. Horwitz, E. K., Horwitz, M. B., & Cope, J. (1986). Foreign language classroom anxiety. The Modern Language Journal, 70(2), 125–132. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-4781.1986.tb05256.x [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

9. Jacoby, B. (2015). Service-learning essentials: Questions, answers, and lessons learned. Jossey-Bass. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

10. Krashen, S. D. (1982). Principles and practice in second language acquisition. Pergamon Press. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

11. Liu, M. (2012). Exploring EFL learners’ anxiety in oral English classroom. Theory and Practice in Language Studies, 2(6), 1195–1202. https://doi.org/10.4304/tpls.2.6.1195-1202 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

12. Liu, M., & Jackson, J. (2008). An exploration of Chinese EFL learners’ unwillingness to communicate and foreign language anxiety. The Modern Language Journal, 92(1), 71–86. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-4781.2008.00687.x [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

13. MacIntyre, P. D. (1999). Language anxiety: A review of the research for language teachers. In D. J. Young (Ed.), Affect in foreign language and second language learning (pp. 24–45). McGraw-Hill. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

14. MacIntyre, P. D., & Gardner, R. C. (1991). Methods and results in the study of anxiety and language learning: A review of the literature. Language Learning, 41(1), 85–117. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-1770.1991.tb00677.x [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

15. MacIntyre, P. D., Clément, R., Dörnyei, Z., & Noels, K. A. (1998). Conceptualizing willingness to communicate in a second language: A situational model of second language confidence and affiliation. The Modern Language Journal, 82(4), 545–562. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-4781.1998.tb05543.x [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

16. Ministry of Education Malaysia. (2013). Malaysia Education Blueprint 2013–2025. Ministry of Education Malaysia. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

17. Ministry of Education Malaysia. (2015). English language education reform in Malaysia. Ministry of Education Malaysia. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

18. Ministry of Education Malaysia. (2018). Pelan pembangunan pendidikan Malaysia: Laporan tahunan. Ministry of Education Malaysia. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

19. Nguyen, H. T. M., & Tran, T. T. T. (2020). Improving EFL students’ speaking performance through interactive activities. Journal of Language and Education, 6(3), 22–35. https://doi.org/10.17323/jle.2020.10520 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

20. Peng, J. E., & Woodrow, L. (2010). Willingness to communicate in English: A model in the Chinese EFL classroom context. Language Learning, 60(4), 834–876. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9922.2010.00576.x [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

21. Richards, J. C. (2015). Key issues in language teaching. Cambridge University Press. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

22. Tan, S. K., & Farashaiyan, A. (2012). The impact of language anxiety on English language learners’ oral performance. Journal of Language Teaching and Research, 3(4), 760–767. https://doi.org/10.4304/jltr.3.4.760-767 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

23. Tavakol, M., & Dennick, R. (2011). Making sense of Cronbach’s alpha. International Journal of Medical Education, 2, 53–55. https://doi.org/10.5116/ijme.4dfb.8dfd [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

24. Tóth, Z. (2010). Foreign language anxiety and the advanced language learner. Cambridge Scholars Publishing [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

• Assessment of the Role of Artificial Intelligence in Repositioning TVET for Economic Development in Nigeria
• Teachers’ Use of Assure Model Instructional Design on Learners’ Problem Solving Efficacy in Secondary Schools in Bungoma County, Kenya
• “E-Booksan Ang Kaalaman”: Development, Validation, and Utilization of Electronic Book in Academic Performance of Grade 9 Students in Social Studies
• Analyzing EFL University Students’ Academic Speaking Skills Through Self-Recorded Video Presentation
• Major Findings of The Study on Total Quality Management in Teachers’ Education Institutions (TEIs) In Assam – An Evaluative Study