Enhancing Learners’ Performance Using the Numeracy Kit Booklet Among Grade 2 In Banicain Elementary School, Olongapo City

This study examined the use of the Numeracy Kit Booklet (NKB) as a remedial instructional material to strengthen the numeracy skills of Grade 2 learners at Banicain Elementary School, Olongapo City. Using a one-group pre-test/post-test design, learners’ baseline performance was measured through the Rapid Mathematics Assessment (RMA), followed by intervention sessions utilizing the NKB, and a subsequent post-test to assess learning gains. Results showed measurable improvement, with learners progressing from low proficiency in the pre-test to nearly proficient in the post-test. Teacher validation affirmed the NKB’s usability, content quality, and instructional design. While statistical analysis indicated significant differences between pre-test and post-test scores, practical significance was also observed through gain scores and proficiency shifts across domains. Given the absence of a control group, findings are interpreted as exploratory evidence of the NKB’s potential effectiveness, warranting replication with more rigorous designs.

Numeracy Kit Booklet, Rapid Mathematics Assessment, Grade 2 learners, MELCs

1. Abdullah, N. H., Rahman, N. A., & Ismail, S. (2022). Early numeracy development through pattern recognition among lower primary learners. International Journal of Instruction, 15(3), 911–926. https://doi.org/10.29333/iji.2022.15350a [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

2. Abengoza, G. B., Agubang, J. C., Bagayawa, M. L. S., Berjuela, M. H., Calagoyo, E. I., & Montales, C. L. B. (2025). Use of SAM in developing instructional numeracy materials. American Journal of Education and Technology. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

3. Artigas, A. R. (2023). Effectiveness of math learning resource package to the numeracy skills of kindergarten pupils. International Journal of Advanced Multidisciplinary Studies,3(2).https://www.ijams-bbp.net/archive/vol-3-issue-2- february/effectiveness-of-math-learning-resource-package-to-the-numeracy-skills- of-kindergarten-pupils/ [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

4. Artigas, A. R. (2025). Effectiveness of math learning resource package to the numeracy skills of kindergarten pupils. International Journal of Advanced Multidisciplinary Studies. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

5. Babbie, E. (2021). The practice of social research (15th ed.). Cengage Learning. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

6. Bennett, R. E. (2011). Formative assessment: A critical review. Assessment in Education: Principles, Policy & Practice. Retrieved from Springer. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

7. Boadu, K., & Boateng, S. (2024). Enhancing students’ achievement in mathematics education in the 21st century through technology integration. Eurasia Journal of Mathematics, Science and Technology Education, 20(2), em2356. https://doi.org/10.29333/ejmste/15622 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

8. Bote, J. L. (2023). Effectiveness of learning resource package in improving the numeracy performance of Grade I learners in blended learning. International Journal of Advanced Multidisciplinary Studies. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

9. Carbonneau, K. J., Marley, S. C., & Selig, J. P. (2013). A meta-analysis of the efficacy of teaching mathematics with concrete manipulatives. Journal of Educational Psychology, 105(2), 380–400. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0031084 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

10. Causing, R. A., Araquil, A. G., Baldove, L. K. G. O., & Toreno, R. H. (2024). Enhancing numeracy skills for learners at the margin utilizing concrete manipulatives: A community-based participatory action research. International Journal of Research and Scientific Innovation. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

11. Causing, R. A., Araquil, A. G., Baldove, L. K. G. O., & Toreno, R. H. (2024). Enhancing numeracy skills for learners at the margin utilizing concrete manipulatives: A community-based participatory action research. International Journal of Research and Scientific Innovation. https://doi.org/10.51244/IJRSI.2024.1107085 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

12. Cevikbas, M., Kaiser, G., & König, J. (2025). International comparative research in mathematics education: A systematic scoping review. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 118(1), 1–24. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11858-025-01700-4 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

13. Chang, H. (2023). The relationship between early literacy and numeracy development: Evidence from longitudinal data. Early Childhood Research Quarterly, 64, 1–12. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecresq.2022.02.001 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

14. Dela Cruz, C. B., Santos, M. K. A., & Valdez, P. R. (2023). Diagnostic assessment of fraction concepts among primary grade pupils. Asian Journal of Education and Social Studies, 41(4), 55–64. https://doi.org/10.9734/ajess/2023/v41i4902 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

15. Department of Education. (2018). DepEd Order No. 14, s. 2018: Implementing Guidelines on the Enhanced Basic Education Act of 2013 (RA 10533) – ELLN Program. https://www.deped.gov.ph/2018/07/23/deped-order-no-14-s-2018/ [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

16. Department of Education. (2019). Policy guidelines on the K to 12 basic education program. DepEd Order No. 21, s. 2019. https://www.deped.gov.ph [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

17. Department of Education. (2023). PISA 2022 Philippine national report. https://www.deped.gov.ph [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

18. Department of Education. (2024). Division memorandum on the administration of the Rapid Mathematics Assessment (RMA) for Grades 1–3 (Division Memorandum No. , s. 2024). DepEd. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

19. Department of Education. (2024, August 20). DepEd Memorandum DM-CT-2024-284: Administration of Rapid Mathematics Assessment (RMA) and Comprehensive Literacy Assessment (CRLA) for Grades 1 to 3 (SY 2024–2025). https://www.deped.gov.ph/2024/08/20/memorandum-dm-ct-2024-284/ [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

20. Department of Education. (2024, August 20). Memorandum DM-CT-2024-284: Administration of Rapid Mathematics Assessment (RMA) and Comprehensive Literacy Assessment (CRLA) for Grades 1 to 3 (SY 2024–2025). https://www.deped.gov.ph/2024/08/20/memorandum-dm-ct-2024-284/ [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

21. Djekourmane, O., Li, Y., & Leung, F. K. S. (2025). Parental involvement, mathematics self-efficacy, and student achievement: Evidence from PISA 2022 Southeast Asia. Frontiers in Psychology, 16, 1594131. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2025.1594131 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

22. Dulay, L. G. H. (2025). Improving numeracy skills using the RMA approach: A study of Grade 2 pupils at Binuan Elementary School. Asian Journal of Education and Social Studies, 51(7), 651–658. https://doi.org/10.9734/ajess/2025/v51i72155 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

23. Duncan, G. J., Dowsett, C. J., Claessens, A., Magnuson, K., Huston, A. C., Klebanov, P., Pagani, L. S., Feinstein, L., Engel, M., Brooks-Gunn, J., Sexton, H., Duckworth, K., & Japel, C. (2007). School readiness and later achievement. Developmental Psychology, 43(6), 1428–1446. https://doi.org/10.1037/0012-1649.43.6.1428 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

24. Filiz, T., & Güneş, G. (2023). A systematic review of instructional interventions applied to primary school students with mathematics learning difficulties. International Journal of Education and Literacy Studies, 11(4), 281–296. https://doi.org/10.7575/aiac.ijels.v.11n.4p.281 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

25. Fox, J. P., Glas, C. A. W., & Engelhard, G. (2025). Explaining cross-national differences in mathematics achievement using large-scale assessment data. International Journal of Educational Research, 121, 102210. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijer.2024.102210 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

26. Garcia, M. L., Mendoza, A. P., & Reyes, J. P. (2022). Development and validation of mathematics learning materials for early grade learners. Asian Journal of Education and Social Studies, 40(4), 52–65. https://doi.org/10.9734/ajess/2022/v40i2976 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

27. Garcia, M. L., Mendoza, A. P., & Reyes, J. P. (2022). Development and validation of instructional materials for early mathematics learning. Asian Journal of Education and Social Studies, 40(2), 60–72. https://doi.org/10.9734/ajess/2022/v40i2892 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

28. Gomez-Talal, R., Martínez-Abad, F., & Rodríguez-Conde, M. J. (2025). Interpreting global inequalities in mathematics achievement: An explainable machine learning approach. Educational Measurement: Issues and Practice. Advance online publication. https://doi.org/10.1111/emip.12590 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

29. Hassan, N. A., Rahman, N. A., & Karim, F. A. (2022). Developing conceptual understanding of multiplication among primary school pupils through visual and concrete representations. International Journal of Instruction, 15(4), 955–970. https://doi.org/10.29333/iji.2022.15452a [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

30. Hattie, J., & Yates, G. (2023). Visible learning and the science of how we learn (2nd ed.). Routledge. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

31. Jordan, N. C., Kaplan, D., Ramineni, C., & Locuniak, M. N. (2009). Early math matters: Kindergarten number competence and later mathematics outcomes. Developmental Psychology, 45(3), 850–867. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0014939 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

32. Kleemans, T., Segers, E., & Verhoeven, L. (2022). Home numeracy and early numeracy skills: A meta-analysis. Educational Research Review, 35, 100421. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.edurev.2022.100421 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

33. Koellner, R., Sims, D., & Fletcher-Wood, H. (2025). Teacher professional development and student mathematics achievement: A meta-analysis of the effects and moderators. Education Sciences, 15(9), 1177. https://doi.org/10.3390/educsci15091177 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

34. König, J., Blömeke, S., & Jentsch, A. (2021). The links between pedagogical competence, instructional quality, and mathematics achievement in the lower secondary classroom. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 107, 189–212. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10649-020-10021-0 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

35. LeFevre, J.-A., Fast, L., Skwarchuk, S.-L., & Penner-Wright, S. (2021). Mathematics language and early numeracy development: A longitudinal analysis. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 208, 105–128. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jecp.2021.105128 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

36. Levin, K. A. (2021). Study design III: Quasi-experimental designs. Evidence-Based Dentistry, 22(3), 74–76. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41432-021-0165-8 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

37. Lim, S. K., Chua, P. L., & Tan, H. Y. (2023). Self directed learning materials and numeracy development among young learners. Journal of Educational Research and Practice, 13(3), 95–108. https://doi.org/10.5590/JERAP.2023.13.3.08 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

38. Lim, S. K., Chua, P. L., & Wong, H. L. (2023). Mathematics learning materials and number sense development among young learners. Journal of Educational Research and Practice, 13(2), 97–110. https://doi.org/10.5590/JERAP.2023.13.2.08 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

39. Lopez, J. D., Rivera, P. S., & Salazar, K. M. (2023). Diagnostic assessment of foundational arithmetic skills among early grade learners. Asian Journal of Education and Social Studies, 40(3), 61–72. https://doi.org/10.9734/ajess/2023/v40i3897 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

40. Lopez, J. R., Herrera, M. D., & Ramos, C. S. (2023). Diagnostic evaluation of basic mathematical operations among early grade learners. Asian Journal of Education and Social Studies, 43(1), 44–55. https://doi.org/10.9734/ajess/2023/v43i1913 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

41. Lopez-Pedersen, A., Mononen, R., Aunio, P., Scherer, R., & Melby-Lervåg, M. (2022). Improving numeracy skills in first graders with low performance in early numeracy: A randomized controlled trial. Remedial and Special Education, 44(2), 126–136. https://doi.org/10.1177/07419325221102537 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

42. MDPI Study (2023). Teaching and learning mathematics in primary education: The role of ICT — A systematic review. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

43. MDPI. (2025). Improving mathematics performance through after-school interventions: A gender-based analysis of low-achieving students. Education Sciences, 15(12), 1587. https://doi.org/10.3390/educsci15121587 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

44. Mahmud, M., Ahmed, S., & Sultana, N. (2025). Early mathematics education in low- resource settings: A systematic review of challenges and interventions. International Journal of Educational Development, 91, 102–123. ttps://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijedudev.2024.102123 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

45. Menacho, I., Aragón, E., Arrigoni, F., Mera, C., Canto, M. C., & Navarro, J. I. (2024). Establishing benchmarks for assessing early mathematical competence in children. Frontiers in Education, 9, Article 1384422.https://doi.org/10.3389/feduc.2024.1384422 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

46. Mercado, P. S., Salazar, K. M., & Dizon, R. L. (2023). Diagnostic assessment of foundational mathematics skills among early grade learners. Asian Journal of Education and Social Studies, 41(2), 67–78. https://doi.org/10.9734/ajess/2023/v41i2889 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

47. Mohamad, N. A., Mahmud, S. Z., & Nordin, M. F. (2022). Early mathematical cognition and number discrimination skills among lower primary pupils. International Journal of Instruction, 15(4), 1027–1042. https://doi.org/10.29333/iji.2022.15455a [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

48. National School Boards Association (2025). Research: Defining high-quality instructional materials for math. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

49. Nguyen, P. A., Tran, Q. H., & Le, M. C. (2023). Visual numeracy learning and early number recognition among elementary pupils. Journal of Educational Research and Practice, 13(2), 97–109. https://doi.org/10.5590/JERAP.2023.13.2.07 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

50. Nguyen, T. H., Dang, Q. T., & Pham, L. M. (2023). Understanding elementary students’ difficulties in learning division concepts. Journal of Educational Research and Practice, 13(3), 145–157. https://doi.org/10.5590/JERAP.2023.13.3.11 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

51. Nguyen, T. H., Hoang, P. L., & Pham, M. T. (2023). Understanding fraction learning difficulties among elementary school students. Journal of Educational Research and Practice, 13(2), 120–131. https://doi.org/10.5590/JERAP.2023.13.2.09 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

52. Paas, F., Renkl, A., & Sweller, J. (2003). Cognitive load theory and instructional design: Recent developments. Educational Psychologist, 38(1), 1–4. https://doi.org/10.1207/S15326985EP38011 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

53. Philippine Information Agency. (2025, June 14). DepEd-NIR eyes literacy, numeracy enhancement among students. https://pia.gov.ph/news/deped-nir-eyes-literacy- numeracy-enhancement-among-students/ [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

54. Philippine News Agency. (2024, October 15). DepEd-5 recovery program improves students’ literacy, numeracy skills. ttps://www.pna.gov.ph/index.php/articles/1235614 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

55. Piaget, J. (1970). Science of education and the psychology of the child (W. Mays, Trans.). Orion Press. (Original work published 1952) [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

56. Rahayu, N. K. A., & Suarjana, I. M. (2024). Virtual manipulatives: A pathway to enhancing numeracy skills in inclusive classrooms. International Journal of Elementary Education, 8(3), 503–510. https://doi.org/10.23887/ijee.v8i3.89805 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

57. Rahim, N. A., Yusoff, N. M., & Salleh, S. M. (2022). Conceptual understanding of division among lower primary learners through contextual learning strategies. International Journal of Instruction, 15(3), 843–858. https://doi.org/10.29333/iji.2022.15347a [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

58. Rahmadona, P., Aziz, N. A., & Wahyuni, S. W. (2025). Innovative pedagogy: Improving early childhood numeracy skills using manipulative media. International Journal of Pedagogy, 3(2), 78–86. https://doi.org/10.31849/x7n9fe86 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

59. Rahman, N. A., Yusof, N. M., & Karim, F. A. (2022). Conceptual and procedural understanding of basic arithmetic among lower primary pupils. International Journal of Instruction, 15(2), 1001–1016. https://doi.org/10.29333/iji.2022.15254a [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

60. Rahman, S. N. A., Mohd Noor, A. F., & Zulkifli, N. H. (2023). Enhancing number recognition through interactive mathematics activities in early primary classrooms. International Journal of Instruction, 16(3), 211–2h ttps://doi.org/10.29333/iji.2023.16312a [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

61. Ramirez, J. P., Santos, R. L., & Cruz, M. J. (2024). Effectiveness of numeracy interventions in early mathematics learning. International Journal of Learning, Teaching and Educational Research, 23(3), 118–132. https://doi.org/10.26803/ijlter.23.3.6 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

62. Ramirez, J. P., Santos, R. L., & Cruz, M. J. (2024). Instructional material usability and learner engagement in early mathematics. International Journal of Learning, Teaching and Educational Research, 23(4), 140–154. https://doi.org/10.26803/ijlter.23.4.9 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

63. Ramirez, J. P., Santos, R. L., & Torres, P. A. (2024). Effectiveness of structured numeracy materials in early mathematics learning. International Journal of Learning, Teaching and Educational Research, 23(4), 140–154. https://doi.org/10.26803/ijlter.23.4.10 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

64. Ramos, A. P., Villanueva, M. A. D., & Bautista, L. M. S. (2024). Foundational numeracy skills of young learners: Evidence from diagnostic mathematics assessment. International Journal of Learning, Teaching and Educational Research, 23(1), 214– [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

65. 229. https://doi.org/10.26803/ijlter.23.1.11 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

66. Ramos, J. P., Villanueva, M. R., & Bautista, L. M. (2022). Early numeracy and geometric thinking skills among young learners. Asian Journal of Education and Social Studies, 41(3), 52–63. https://doi.org/10.9734/ajess/2022/v41i3921 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

67. Rivera, J. P., Gonzales, A. L., & Bautista, M. R. (2024). Early numeracy competencies of primary learners: Evidence from baseline mathematics assessments. International Journal of Learning, Teaching and Educational Research, 23(5), 134–149. https://doi.org/10.26803/ijlter.23.5.7 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

68. Rubio, F. J., Kim, S., & Choi, K. (2025). Unlocking mathematics success: Global lessons on student achievement, teacher satisfaction, and school environment. International Electronic Journal of Mathematics Education, 20(1), em1590. https://www.iejme.com [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

69. Sakaria, D., Maat, S. M., & Matore, M. E. (2023). Factors influencing mathematics teachers’ pedagogical content knowledge: A systematic review. Pegem Journal of Education and Instruction, 13(2), 1–14. https://doi.org/10.47750/pegegog.13.02.01 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

70. Salminen, J., Hietajärvi, L., & Lehtinen, E. (2021). Early numeracy and later mathematics achievement: A longitudinal study of Finnish children. Learning and Instruction, 74, 101–118. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.learninstruc.2021.101–118 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

71. Santos, L. M., Rivera, J. P., & Gutierrez, A. D. (2024). Diagnostic assessment of early numeracy skills among primary learners. International Journal of Learning, Teaching and Educational Research, 23(2), 120–134. https://doi.org/10.26803/ijlter.23.2.7 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

72. Santos, M. K. A., Mendoza, A. L. P., & Castillo, R. B. (2022). Diagnostic assessment of early numeracy skills among primary grade learners. Asian Journal of Basic Education, 6(1), 27–39. https://doi.org/10.20448/ajbe.v6i1.4123 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

73. Santos, R. L., Villanueva, A. P., & Perez, C. M. (2023). Diagnostic evaluation of early numeracy skills among elementary school learners. Asian Journal of Education and Social Studies, 39(4), 48–58. https://doi.org/10.9734/ajess/2023/v39i4871 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

74. Senate of the Philippines. (2024, August 29). Eight-week long learning recovery plan to begin this school year, to focus on math, reading, science – DepEd. https://web.senate.gov.ph/press_release/2024/0829_edcom1.asp [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

75. Senate of the Philippines. (2024, September 25). Gatchalian urges DepEd: Make learning recovery programscohesive. https://web.senate.gov.ph/press_release/2024/0925_gatchalian1.asp [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

76. Shin, D., & Shim, J. (2021). Students’ perceived mathematics teacher competence: Longitudinal associations with learning outcomes and choice of college major. Education Sciences, 11(1), 18. https://doi.org/10.3390/educsci11010018 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

77. Svane, P., Willemsen, M., Bleses, D., Krøjgaard, P., Verner, M., & Nielsen, H. S. (2023). A systematic literature review of math interventions across educational settings from early childhood education to high school. Frontiers in Education, 8(1), 1–23. https://doi.org/10.3389/feduc.2023.1229849 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

78. Svane, R. P., Willemsen, M. M., Bleses, D., Krøjgaard, P., Verner, M., & Nielsen, H. S. (2023). A systematic literature review of math interventions across educational settings from early childhood education to high school. Frontiers in Education, 8, Article 1229849. https://doi.org/10.3389/feduc.2023.1229849 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

79. Sweller, J. (1994). Cognitive load theory, learning difficulty, and instructional design. Learning and Instruction, 4(4), 295–31 https://doi.org/10.1016/S0959- 4752(94)90003-5 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

80. Sweller, J., Ayres, P., & Kalyuga, S. (2011). Cognitive load theory. Springer. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

81. Tagalog, C. E., & Oco, R. M. (2025). Learning manipulatives and pupils’ mathematical skills. International Journal of Multidisciplinary Research and Analysis, 8(5). https://doi.org/10.47191/ijmra/v8-i05-08 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

82. Tan, C. K., Lim, S. Y., & Chua, P. L. (2023). Visual learning approaches and early mathematics achievement among young learners. International Journal of Instruction, 16(2), 905–920. https://doi.org/10.29333/iji.2023.16249a [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

83. Tan, C. K., Lim, S. Y., & Wong, H. L. (2023). Typography and visual learning effectiveness in mathematics instruction. International Journal of Instruction, 16(2), 915–928. https://doi.org/10.29333/iji.2023.16251a [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

84. Tan, C. K., Lim, S. Y., & Wong, H. L. (2024). Development of geometric thinking skills among early primary students through pattern-based instruction. Asian Journal of Education and Social Studies, 43(2), 72–83. https://doi.org/10.9734/ajess/2024/v43i2950 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

85. Tan, C. K., Wong, H. L., & Chua, P. L. (2023). Instructional design quality and mathematics learning engagement among primary students. International Journal of Instruction, 16(2), 910–924. https://doi.org/10.29333/iji.2023.16250a [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

86. U.S. Campbell Collaboration. (2021). Targeted school-based interventions for improving reading and mathematics for students with or at risk of academic difficulties in Grades K-6: A systematic review. Campbell Systematic Reviews. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

87. UNESCO. (2021). Reimagining our futures together: A new social contract for education. United Nations Educational, Scientific and Cultural Organization. https://www.unesco.org [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

88. Von Glasersfeld, E. (1995). A constructivist approach to teaching. In L. P. Steffe & J. Gale (Eds.), Constructivism in education (pp. 3–15). Lawrence Erlbaum Associates. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

89. Vygotsky, L. S. (1978). Mind in society: The development of higher psychological processes. Harvard University Press. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

90. Yang, X., & Kaiser, G. (2022). The impact of mathematics teachers’ professional competence on instructional quality and students’ mathematics learning outcomes. Current Opinion in Behavioral Sciences, 48, 101225.https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cobeha.2022.101225 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

• Interplay of Students’ Emotional Intelligence and Attitude toward Mathematics on Performance in Grade 10 Algebra
• Numerical Simulation of Fitzhugh-Nagumo Dynamics Using a Finite Difference-Based Method of Lines
• Fixed Point Theorem in Controlled Metric Spaces
• Usage of Moving Average to Heart Rate, Blood Pressure and Blood Sugar
• Exploring Algebraic Topology and Homotopy Theory: Methods, Empirical Data, and Numerical Examples