Enhancing Students’ Ethical Reasoning Through High-Impact Educational Practices: Evidence from an Ethics and Civilization Course

Ethics education in higher education is fundamental to developing students’ ethical reasoning, social responsibility, and civic awareness, particularly within multicultural societies. This study examined the effectiveness of High-Impact Educational Practices (HIEPs) in enhancing students’ ethical reasoning in an Ethics and Civilization course. A quantitative cross-sectional survey design was employed involving 66 undergraduate students enrolled in the Appreciation of Ethics and Civilization course at a Malaysian public university. Data were collected using a structured questionnaire grounded in established theories of high-impact pedagogy and ethical reasoning. Descriptive statistics, reliability analysis, and Pearson correlation analysis were conducted. The findings revealed high levels of student engagement with HIEPs (M = 4.12, SD = 0.51) and ethical reasoning (M = 4.08, SD = 0.56). A positive and statistically significant relationship was observed between engagement in HIEPs and ethical reasoning (r = .58, p < .01). These results indicate that student-centred pedagogical approaches, including collaborative learning, discussion-based activities, and authentic assessment, are associated with meaningful improvements in ethical reasoning. From a research and pedagogical perspective, the findings provide empirical support for the systematic integration of High-Impact Educational Practices into ethics curricula and highlight the role of high-impact instructional design in strengthening ethical learning outcomes within multicultural higher education contexts.

Ethical reasoning; High-Impact Educational Practices

1. Ashford-Rowe, K., Herrington, J., & Brown, C. (2014). Establishing the critical elements that determine authentic assessment. Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education, 39(2), 205–222. https://doi.org/10.1080/02602938.2013.819566 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

2. Boud, D., & Falchikov, N. (2006). Aligning assessment with long-term learning. Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education, 31(4), 399–413. https://doi.org/10.1080/02602930600679050 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

3. Brownell, J. E., & Swaner, L. E. (2010). Five high-impact practices: Research on learning outcomes, completion, and quality. Association of American Colleges and Universities. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

4. de Moraes Abrahão, V., Vaquero-Diego, M., & Currás Móstoles, R. (2024). University social responsibility: The role of teachers. Journal of Innovation & Knowledge, 9(1), Article 100464. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jik.2024.100464 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

5. Johnson, D. W., & Johnson, R. T. (2009). An educational psychology success story: Social interdependence theory and cooperative learning. Educational Researcher, 38(5), 365–379. https://doi.org/10.3102/0013189X09339057 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

6. Kuh, G. D. (2008). High-impact educational practices: What they are, who has access to them, and why they matter. Association of American Colleges and Universities. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

7. Kuh, G. D., O’Donnell, K., & Reed, S. (2013). Ensuring quality and taking high-impact practices to scale. Association of American Colleges and Universities. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

8. Martini, M., Cavenago, D., & Carminati, M. (2025). Can business ethics courses be effective? A quasi-experimental mixed-methods study of a cooperative-learning approach in higher education. Journal of Business Ethics, 202, 439–458. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-023-05528-6 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

9. Mohd Zahid, E. S., Ahmad, N. A., Abdul Halim, I., & Ab Lateh, A. T. (2022). Students’ perception of appreciation of ethics and civilization course at Universiti Teknologi MARA, Penang Branch. International Journal of Academic Research in Progressive Education and Development, 11(2), 877–889. https://doi.org/10.6007/IJARPED/v11-i2/13447 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

10. Narvaez, D. (2002). Does reading moral stories build character? Educational Psychology Review, 14(2), 155–171. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1014674621501 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

11. Nazri Muslim. (2020). Islam dan Melayu dalam Perlembagaan: Tiang seri hubungan etnik di Malaysia (2nd ed.). Penerbit Universiti Kebangsaan Malaysia. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

12. Rajanthran, S. K., Wider, W., Wong, L. S., Chan, C. K., & Maidin, S. S. (2023). Utilisation of high-impact educational practices to engage undergraduates: A preliminary case study. Journal of Curriculum and Teaching, 12(1), 35–45. https://doi.org/10.5430/jct.v12n1p35 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

13. Rest, J. R., Narvaez, D., Bebeau, M. J., & Thoma, S. J. (1999). Postconventional moral thinking: A neo-Kohlbergian approach. Lawrence Erlbaum Associates. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

14. Shamsul Amri Baharuddin. (2008). Many ethnicities, many cultures, one nation: The Malaysian experience. Penerbit Universiti Kebangsaan Malaysia. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

15. Soh, N. S. M. (2024). High-impact educational practices in higher education institutions: A thematic review. Universiti Teknologi MARA. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

16. Tavani, F. M., Manzoni, C., Castiglioni, C., & Sala, R. (2024). The effects of e-learning using educational multimedia on ethical decision-making and professionalism of nursing students. BMC Nursing, 23, Article 45. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12912-024-01361-7 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

17. Thoma, S. J., & Dong, Y. (2014). The defining issues test of moral judgment development. Behavioral Development Bulletin, 19(3), 55–61. https://doi.org/10.1037/h0100582 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

18. VanWyngaarden, K., Pelton, J. A., Martínez Oquendo, P., & Moore, C. (2024). High-impact teaching practices in higher education: Understanding barriers, concerns, and obstacles to adoption. Trends in Higher Education, 3(1), 105–121. https://doi.org/10.3390/higheredu3010006 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

19. Wiese, L. J., Patil, I., Schiff, D. S., & Magana, A. J. (2025). AI ethics education: A systematic literature review. Computers and Education: Artificial Intelligence, 6, 100405. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.caeai.2024.100405 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

• Administrative Support as a Predictor of Teacher Retention and Organizational Commitment: A Case Study of Junior High Teachers
• No Place for Play-Ful Learning in Higher Education: An Interdisciplinary Critical Evaluation (2015–2025)
• Unmasking Colonial Legacies in Zambian Education: A Philosophical and Historical Critique of the Secondary School Curriculum
• Improving Students' Collaboration and Communication Skills through Project-Based Digital Learning in Plantation and Herbal
• Public Primary School Teacher Preparedness on CBC Adoption in Township Ward, Garissa County, Kenya