Enhancing Urban Mobility: A Methodology for Multi-Dimensional Evaluation of Bus Service Quality in Kuala Lumpur Using the Go KL City Bus Network

Authors

Ts. Dr. Shuhairy Bin Norhisham

Institute of Energy Infrastructure, Universiti Tenaga Nasional | Department of Civil Engineering College of Engineering, Universiti Tenaga Nasional (Malaysia)

Fakrul Irfan Mohd Haron

Department of Civil Engineering College of Engineering, Universiti Tenaga Nasional (Malaysia)

Muhammad Fadhulullah Abu Bakar

Institute of Energy Infrastructure, Universiti Tenaga Nasional | Department of Civil Engineering College of Engineering, Universiti Tenaga Nasional (Malaysia)

Article Information

DOI: 10.47772/IJRISS.2026.100601091

Subject Category: Engineering & Technology

Volume/Issue: 10/6 | Page No: 15559-15568

Publication Timeline

Submitted: 2026-06-24

Accepted: 2026-06-29

Published: 2026-07-13

Abstract

Urban public transportation plays a critical role in ensuring sustainable mobility, social equity, and economic productivity in rapidly developing cities. Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia, faces growing transportation challenges, particularly due to increasing private vehicle ownership and traffic congestion. This study evaluates the Quality of Service (QoS) of the Go KL City Bus system using three key performance indicators: on-time performance, service frequency, and passenger load factor. A field-based observational methodology was employed to collect real-time operational data from selected routes within the central business district. This study aims to evaluate the operational performance of the Go KL City Bus system by focusing on three main objectives to assess the on-time performance of selected bus routes, to analyse service frequency and headway consistency and to evaluate passenger load factor and capacity utilisation. Findings highlight significant variability in service reliability, frequency consistency, and passenger demand across routes. The results indicate that while the Go KL initiative improves accessibility and promotes sustainable transport, operational inefficiencies still influence user satisfaction and system effectiveness. The study contributes to the growing body of research on urban transport performance and provides strategic recommendations to enhance service delivery and support modal shift from private vehicles to public transport in Kuala Lumpur. The Go KL City Bus system demonstrates potential as a sustainable urban transport solution. However, operational inefficiencies in punctuality, frequency consistency, and passenger distribution limit its effectiveness.

Keywords

Public transport, Quality of Service (QoS), Bus performance, Kuala Lumpur, Sustainable mobility, Go KL City Bus

Downloads

References

1. Abu Bakar, M. F., Norhisham, S., Saad, N. M., et al. (2023). The impact of on-time performance towards quality of urban bus services. Planning Malaysia, 21(25). [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

2. Anil Minhans, S., Shahid, S., & Hassan, S. A. (2022). Assessment of bus service quality using passengers’ perceptions. Jurnal Teknologi. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

3. Azlan, N. N. I. M., Norhisham, S., et al. (2022). Analysing on-time performance of public bus service. Lecture Notes in Civil Engineering. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

4. Azmi, N. A., & Harun, N. A. (2020). Passenger satisfaction in bus services. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

5. Eboli, L., & Mazzulla, G. (2008). Measuring service quality in public transport. Transportation Planning & Technology. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

6. Ery Sugito, D. B. M., & Roosli, R. (2022). Impact of traffic congestion on bus performance. Progress in Energy and Environment. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

7. Fazeera Zul’ Azman, N. A., et al. (2022). Quality performance of Rapid Bus operation. Journal of Administrative Science. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

8. Haziman, Z., et al. (2023). Evaluation of AVL systems for city buses. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

9. Mani, K. (2022). Passenger satisfaction in BRT systems. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

10. Ngah, A. H., et al. (2020). Service quality factors in public transport. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

11. Transportation Research Board. (1999). Transit Capacity and Quality of Service Manual. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

12. Ubaidillah, N. Z., et al. (2022). Bus service quality and user satisfaction. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

13. Zainol, N. N., et al. (2018). Public transport accessibility in Malaysia. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

Metrics

Views & Downloads

Similar Articles