Environment, Social, and Governance Compliance Challenges Affecting Sustainable Urbanisation in Malaysian Real Estate Development

Authors

Vincent Leow Chee Ho

Department of Real Estate, Faculty of Built Environment and Surveying, Universiti Teknologi Malaysia, 81310 UTM Johor Bahru (Malaysia)

Lim Jian Yi

Department of Real Estate, Faculty of Built Environment and Surveying, Universiti Teknologi Malaysia, 81310 UTM Johor Bahru (Malaysia)

Prof. Madya Ts Gs Sr Dr. Noorsidi Aizuddin bin Mat Noor

Centre of Real Estate Studies, Mass Appraisal, Housing and Planning Research Group, Department of Real Estate, Faculty of Built Environment and Surveying, Universiti Teknologi Malaysia, 81310 UTM Johor Bahru, Johor (Malaysia)

Prof. Madya Dr. Rohaya Binti Abdul Jalil

Department of Real Estate, Faculty of Built Environment and Surveying, Universiti Teknologi Malaysia, 81310 UTM Johor Bahru (Malaysia)

Article Information

DOI: 10.47772/IJRISS.2026.10230009

Subject Category: Real Estate

Volume/Issue: 10/23 | Page No: 100-115

Publication Timeline

Submitted: 2026-05-06

Accepted: 2026-05-12

Published: 2026-05-28

Abstract

In the era of Malaysia's urbanisation agenda, the real estate sector is being put to the test to provide a balance between economic development and sustainability. Developers in the field of sustainable urbanisation can face opportunities and challenges related to Environmental, Social and Governance (ESG) compliance. This study will explore the challenges related to the ESG compliance of sustainable urbanisation in Malaysia’s real estate development. Firstly, it pinpoint issues relating to ESG through a series of pilot surveys and content analysis which is then broken down into eight sections: Environmental Impact (EI), Workplace Dynamics (WD), Infrastructure Development (ID), Urban Development (UD), Housing Finance (HF), Regulatory Compliance (RC), Tenure Legalities (TL) and Administrative Hurdles (AH). The second goal is to apply descriptive statistics and the Relative Importance Index (RII) method to assess and rank the ESG compliance challenges based on the perception of the respondents. The results show that the most important constraints on sustainable urbanisation are unrelenting bureaucracies and vague procedures (AH1), building plan approvals and permits (UD3), flooding (EI6), onerous regulatory frameworks (RC2) and worker shortages (WD7). Based on the study, several sub-challenges were found. However, the sub-challenges which are workplace democracy (WD1), equal employment opportunity (WD4), inadequate mortgage market (HF1), etc are not influential in the Malaysian context. The study also contributes to ESG and sustainable urbanisation literatures by proposing an integrated conceptual framework of how the environmental, social, governance, institutional and urban development barriers can be aligned in the real estate industry in Malaysia. The results offer practical guidance for developers, urban planners and policy makers in designing a more effective implementation of ESG and a more environmentally sustainable, socially inclusive and economically viable development in urban areas in Malaysia.

Keywords

ESG compliance, sustainable urbanisation, real estate development, urban governance, Malaysia

Downloads

References

1. Ab Razak, N. H., Aris, A. Z., Ramli, M. F., Looi, L. J., & Juahir, H. (2018). Temporal flood incidence forecasting for Segamat River (Malaysia) using autoregressive integrated moving average modelling. Journal of Flood Risk Management, 11, S794–S804. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

2. Albert, I., Shakantu, W., & Ibrahim, S. (2021). The effect of poor materials management in the construction industry: A case study of Abuja, Nigeria. Acta Structilia, 28(1), 142–167. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

3. Ali, S., Niaz, H., Ahmad, S., & Khan, S. (2025). Investigating how rapid urbanisation contributes to climate change and the social challenges cities face in mitigating its effects. Review of Applied Management and Social Sciences, 8(1), 1–16. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

4. Arubayi, D. (2021). Documenting the everyday hidden resistances of ride-hailing platform drivers to algorithmic management in Lagos, Nigeria. South Atlantic Quarterly, 120(4), 823-838. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

5. https://doi.org/10.1215/00382876-9443378 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

6. Athallah, M. F., & Fitri, N. N. (2025). Optimizing ESG-based TOD implementation to foster inclusive and sustainable economic growth. Arthatama: Journal of Business Management and Accounting, 9(1), 93-106. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

7. Bai, L., Wang, J., Ma, X., & Lu, H. (2018). Air pollution forecasts: An overview. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 15(4), 780. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

8. Bamfo-Agyei, E., Thwala, D. W., & Aigbavboa, C. (2023). Optimisation of labour intensive productivity for construction projects in Ghana. Acta Structilia, 30(1), 122-154. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

9. Chan, N. W., Ghani, A. A., Samat, N., Hasan, N. N. N., & Tan, M. L. (2019, August). Integrating structural and non-structural flood management measures for greater effectiveness in flood loss reduction in the Kelantan River basin, Malaysia. In AWAM International Conference on Civil Engineering (pp. 1151–1162). Springer International Publishing. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

10. Doling, J. (1999). Housing policies and the little tigers: How do they compare with other industrialized countries? Housing Studies, 14(2), 229–250. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

11. Donkor-Hyiaman, K. A., & Owusu-Manu, D. (2016). Another look at housing finance in Africa: The anatomy of pension asset-backed housing financing. International Journal of Housing Markets and Analysis, 9(1), 20–46. https://doi.org/10.1108/IJHMA-11-2014-0048 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

12. Dube, E., Mtapui, O., & Matunhu, J. (2018). Managing flood disasters on the built environment in the rural communities of Zimbabwe: Lessons learned. Jamba: Journal of Disaster Risk Studies, 10(1), a542. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

13. Eichholtz, P. (2021). The total return and risk to residential real estate. Review of Financial Studies, 34(8), 3608–3646. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

14. Foo, L. H. R., & Wong, C. (2014). Planning for housing development in Malaysia: Developers’ response to the regulatory policy framework. International Planning Studies, 19(2), 192–209. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

15. Gustavsson, T. K., Hallin, A., & Dobers, P. (2023). Stakeholder involvement in distributed projects: A performative approach to large scale urban sustainable development projects and the case of Stockholm Royal Seaport. Construction Management and Economics. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

16. https://doi.org/10.1080/01446193.2023.2232893 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

17. Ho, V. L. C., Yi, L. J., Noor, N. A. B. M., & Jalil, R. B. A. (2024). Assessing the listed property companies readiness towards environmental social governance implementation in Malaysia. International Journal of Research and Innovation in Social Science, 8(7), 2514-2524. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

18. Hong, J., Kang, H., Jung, S., Sung, S., Hong, T., Park, H. S., & Lee, D. E. (2020). An empirical analysis of environmental pollutants on building construction sites for determining the real-time monitoring indices. Building and Environment, 170, 106636. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

19. Huang, L., Krigsvoll, G., Johansen, F., Liu, Y., & Zhang, X. (2018). Carbon emissions of the global construction sector. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, 81, 1906–1916. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

20. Karki, T. K. (2020). Flood resilience in Malaysian cities: A case study of two towns in Johor state. International Journal of Disaster Resilience in the Built Environment, 11(3), 329–342. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

21. Lyytimaki, J., Vikstrom, S., & Furman, E. (2019). Voluntary participation for sustainability transition: experiences from the Commitment to Sustainable Development 2050. International Journal of Sustainable Development & World Ecology, 26(1), 25–36. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

22. Mahamid, I. (2013). Contractors’ perspective toward factors affecting labour productivity in building construction. Engineering, Construction and Architectural Management, 20(5), 446–460. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

23. Marzukhi, M. A., Jaafar, A., & Leh, O. L. H. (2019). The effectiveness of building plan approval: Case study of Subang Jaya Municipal Council, Selangor. In MATEC Web of Conferences (Vol. 266, p. 06005). EDP Sciences. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

24. Mohamed, H. H. (2025). Integrating sustainability in project management in Egypt: Barriers, challenges, and strategies. World Journal of Advanced Research and Reviews, 25(1), 1968–1983. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

25. Nwanekezie, O. F., & Nwanguma, R. W. (2020). Examination of the challenges and impact of building plan approval procedure on real estate development in Uyo, Nigeria. Architecture Research, 10(1), 15-20. https://doi.org/10.5923/j.arch.20201001.02 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

26. Olusola, F. A., & Oluwaseyi, A. A. (2011). An appraisal of risks associated with contractor’s cash flow and their impact on project delivery in Nigeria. Proceedings of RICS Construction & Property Conference (pp. 1601–1611). Manchester, England. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

27. Othman, A. (2014). A conceptual model for overcoming the challenges of mega construction projects in developing countries. African Journal of Engineering Research, 2(4), 73–84. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

28. Panas, A., & Pantouvakis, J. P. (2010). Evaluating research methodology in construction. The Built & Human Environment Review, 3(1). [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

29. Rashid Abdul Aziz, A., Shiew Yi, H., & Jaafar, M. (2006). Competitive resources of private housing developers: The Malaysian perspective. Journal of Engineering, Design and Technology, 4(1), 71–80. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

30. Saad, M. S. H., Ali, M. I., Razi, P. Z., Ramli, N. I., & Jaya, R. P. (2024). Exploring the factors and impacts of flash flood vulnerability in various areas of Malaysia: A content analysis. Disaster in Civil Engineering and Architecture, 1(1), 55–82. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

31. Samsuri, N., Abu Bakar, R., & Unjah, T. (2018). Flash flood impact in Kuala Lumpur: Approach review and way forward. International Journal of the Malay World and Civilisation, 6(1), 69–76. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

32. Simpeh, F., Mavangwa, G. M., & Wentzel, L. (2022). Strategies to overcome barriers to public facilities management. Property Management. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

33. Umeh, O. L., & Adilieme, C. M. (2020). Inflation-hedging capabilities of commercial real estate investments in metropolitan Lagos. The Lagos Journal of Environmental Sciences, 10(1), 40–47. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

34. Valkonen, A. (2021). Examining sources of land tenure (in) security: A focus on authority relations, state politics, social dynamics and belonging. Land Use Policy, 101, 105191. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

35. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.landusepol.2020.105191 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

36. Van der Waldt, G. (2024). Towards a conceptual framework for the social dimensions of sustainable development. African Journal of Governance and Development, 13(2), 113-134. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

37. Wang, J., & Rakha, H. A. (2017). Fuel consumption model for heavy duty diesel trucks: Model development and testing. Transportation Research Part D: Transport and Environment, 55, 127–141. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

38. Wechie, O., & Kakulu, I. (2020). Applying land management tools in the sustainability of property development and environmental protection. American Journal of Humanities and Social Sciences Research, 4(11), 282 –292. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

39. Wong, P. S., & Maric, D. (2016). Causes of disputes in construction planning permit applications. Journal of Legal Affairs and Dispute Resolution in Engineering and Construction, 8(4), 04516006. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

40. Wong, W. P., & Tang, C. F. (2018). The major determinants of logistic performance in a global perspective: Evidence from panel data analysis. International Journal of Logistics Research and Applications, 21(4), 431-443. https://doi.org/10.1080/13675567.2018.1438377 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

41. Wysocki, O., Deka, L., & Elizondo, D. (2019). Heavy-duty vehicle fuel consumption modelling using artificial neural networks. In Proceedings of the 25th International Conference on Automation and Computing (ICAC) (pp. 1–6), Lancaster, UK. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

42. Xiang, Y., Li, Z., Chen, M. Y., & Jiang, X. M. (2011). Research on calculation software of fuel consumption for heavy trucks. In Proceedings of the 3rd International Conference on Measuring Technology and Mechatronics Automation (Vol. 2, pp. 1121–1124). Shanghai, China. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

43. Yaakup, A., Johar, F., Sulaiman, S., Hassan, R., & Ibrahim, A. R. (2003). GIS and development control system for a local authority in Malaysia. Habitat International, 27(4), 683–696. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

Metrics

Views & Downloads

Similar Articles