Epistemic Injustice in Filipino Language Use and Social Inclusion among College of Education Students At BPSU–Balanga Campus

Language plays an important role in students' participation, learning, and sense of belonging in higher education. However, the dominance of English in academic settings may create challenges for students who prefer to express their ideas in Filipino. This study examined the relationship between epistemic injustice in Filipino language use and social inclusion among College of Education students at Bataan Peninsula State University (BPSU)–Balanga Campus. Specifically, it determined the extent of epistemic injustice, the level of social inclusion, the relationship between these variables, and the extent to which the dimensions of epistemic injustice predict social inclusion.
The study employed a quantitative descriptive-correlational research design. Data were collected from 189 College of Education students using a researcher-made questionnaire developed from relevant literature and theoretical frameworks. The instrument underwent four rounds of revisions and was independently validated by three experts to establish content validity before administration. The data were analyzed using weighted mean, Pearson Product-Moment Correlation Coefficient, and multiple linear regression analysis.
The findings revealed a low level of epistemic injustice (M = 2.47) and a high level of social inclusion (M = 3.20) among the respondents. No significant relationship was found between overall epistemic injustice and overall social inclusion (r = −0.098, p = .189). However, opportunities to use Filipino in academic discourse significantly predicted social inclusion (F = 4.310, p = .039, R² = .023). These findings suggest that while epistemic injustice is not a major determinant of students' overall social inclusion, providing greater opportunities to use Filipino in academic settings contributes to a more inclusive learning environment.
The study concludes that promoting inclusive language practices and recognizing both Filipino and English as valuable languages for academic communication can strengthen students' participation, sense of belonging, and overall social inclusion in higher education.

Epistemic Injustice, Filipino Language, Social Inclusion, Education Students, Language Equity

1. Ainscow, M. (2020). Promoting inclusion and equity in education: Lessons from international experiences. Nordic Journal of Studies in Educational Policy, 6(1), 7–16. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

2. Alaga, N. A. (2016). Motivation and attitude in learning English as a second language among Filipino students. International Journal of English Language Teaching, 4(5), 33–45. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

3. Bernardo, A. B. I. (2004). McKinley’s questionable bequest: Over 100 years of English in Philippine education. World Englishes, 23(1), 17–31. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

4. Bernardo, A. B. I. (2018). Language policy and practice in Philippine higher education: Challenges in the implementation of an English-dominated curriculum. Philippine Journal of Linguistics, 49, 23–45. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

5. Borlongan, A. M. (2011). Relocating Philippine English in Schneider’s dynamic model. Asian Englishes, 14(2), 5–35. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

6. Bourdieu, P. (1991). Language and Symbolic Power. Harvard University Press. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

7. Brooks, K., & Karathanos, K. (2009). Building on the cultural and linguistic capital of English learner (EL) students. Multicultural Education, 16(4), 47–51. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

8. Brown, P. G. (2014). The problem of English dominance in higher education globalization. International Student. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

9. Chen, X., & Du, Y. (2025). Language learning anxiety and classroom participation among university students. Journal of Language and Education, 11(2), 45–59. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

10. Creswell, J. W., & Creswell, J. D. (2018). Research Design: Qualitative, Quantitative, and Mixed Methods Approaches (5th ed.). SAGE Publications. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

11. Creswell, J. W. (2014). Educational Research: Planning, Conducting, and Evaluating Quantitative and Qualitative Research (4th ed.). Pearson. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

12. Commission on Higher Education. (2013). CHED Memorandum Order No. 20, series of 2013: General Education Curriculum. CHED. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

13. Council of the European Union. (2000). Presidency Conclusions: Lisbon European Council (March 23–24, 2000). [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

14. Department of Education. (2009). Department Order No. 74, s. 2009: Institutionalizing Mother Tongue-Based Multilingual Education (MTB-MLE). [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

15. DiPerna, J. C., & Elliott, S. N. (1999). Development and validation of the Academic Competence Evaluation Scales. Journal of Psychoeducational Assessment, 17(3), 207–225. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

16. Dotson, K. (2011). Tracking epistemic violence, tracking practices of silencing. Hypatia, 26(2), 236–257. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

17. Etikan, I., Musa, S. A., & Alkassim, R. S. (2016). Comparison of Convenience Sampling and Purposive Sampling. American Journal of Theoretical and Applied Statistics, 5(1), 1–4. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

18. ResearchGate. Comparison of Convenience Sampling and Purposive Sampling. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

19. Field, A. (2018). Discovering Statistics Using IBM SPSS Statistics (5th ed.). SAGE Publications. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

20. Foucault, M. (1980). Power/Knowledge: Selected Interviews and Other Writings, 1972–1977. Pantheon Books. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

21. Fricker, M. (2007). Epistemic Injustice: Power and the Ethics of Knowing. Oxford University Press. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

22. Gaite, C. R. G. (2025). Indigenous Filipino students’ challenges, coping strategies, and recommendations in higher education. Xavier University–Ateneo de Cagayan and Central Mindanao University. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

23. García, O., & Wei, L. (2014). Translanguaging: Language, Bilingualism and Education. Palgrave Macmillan. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

24. Hall, G., & Cook, G. (2012). Own-language use in language teaching and learning. Language Teaching, 45(3), 271–308. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

25. Jorolan-Quintero, G. (2018). Oral traditions: An aid to implementation of mother tongue-based multilingual education in the Philippines’ basic education programme. International Review of Education, 64(6), 803–824. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

26. Likert, R. (1932). A Technique for the Measurement of Attitudes. Archives of Psychology, 140, 1–55. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

27. Lippi-Green, R. (2012). English with an Accent: Language, Ideology and Discrimination in the United States (2nd ed.). Routledge. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

28. Macaro, E. (2018). English Medium Instruction. Oxford University Press. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

29. MacSwan, J. (2017). A multilingual perspective on translanguaging. American Educational Research Journal, 54(1), 167–201. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

30. Medina, J. (2013). The Epistemology of Resistance: Gender and Racial Oppression, Epistemic Injustice, and Resistant Imaginations. Oxford University Press. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

31. McCroskey, J. C., & Teven, J. J. (1999). Goodwill: A Reexamination of the Construct and Its Measurement. Communication Monographs, 66(1), 90–103. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

32. Mignolo, W. D. (2009). Epistemic disobedience, independent thought and decolonial freedom. Theory, Culture & Society, 26(7–8), 159–181. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

33. Nation, I. S. P. (2013). Learning Vocabulary in Another Language (2nd ed.). Cambridge University Press. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

34. Norton, B. (2013). Identity and Language Learning: Extending the Conversation (2nd ed.). Multilingual Matters. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

35. Phillipson, R. (1992). Linguistic Imperialism. Oxford University Press. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

36. Republic of the Philippines. (1987). The 1987 Constitution of the Republic of the Philippines. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

37. Santos, B. de S. (2014). Epistemologies of the South: Justice Against Epistemicide. Routledge. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

38. Schober, P., Boer, C., & Schwarte, L. A. (2018). Correlation coefficients: Appropriate use and interpretation. Anesthesia & Analgesia, 126(5), 1763–1768. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

39. Strayhorn, T. L. (2019). College Students' Sense of Belonging: A Key to Educational Success for All Students (2nd ed.). Routledge. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

40. Tupas, R. (2015). Inequalities of multilingualism: Challenges to mother tongue-based multilingual education. Language and Education, 29(2), 112–124. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

41. Tupas, R. (2015). Unequal Englishes: The Politics of Englishes Today. Palgrave Macmillan. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

42. UNESCO. (2017). A Guide for Ensuring Inclusion and Equity in Education. UNESCO Publishing. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

43. UNESCO Philippines. (2019). Inclusive Education and Multilingualism in the Philippines. UNESCO Philippines. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

44. UNESCO. (2019). World Report of Languages. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

45. UNESCO. (2021). Reimagining Our Futures Together: A New Social Contract for Education. UNESCO Publishing. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

46. University of Groningen. (n.d.). Common Language Hierarchy. In Multilingual Practices: Tackling Challenges and Creating Opportunities. FutureLearn. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

47. Vygotsky, L. S. (1978). Mind in Society: The Development of Higher Psychological Processes. Harvard University Press. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

48. Wandel, T. (2001). The power of discourse: Michel Foucault and critical theory. Cultural Values, 5(3), 368–382. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

49. Wasserstein, R. L., & Lazar, N. A. (2016). The ASA statement on p-values: Context, process, and purpose. The American Statistician, 70(2), 129–133. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

50. Wei, L. (2018). Translanguaging as a practical theory of language. Applied Linguistics, 39(1), 9–30. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

51. Wee, H. L., Karkkulainen, E. A., & Tateo, L. (2023). Experiences of epistemic injustice among minority language students aged 6–16 in the Nordics: A literature review. Education Sciences, 13(4), 367. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

52. Wertsch, J. V. (1985). Vygotsky and the Social Formation of Mind. Harvard University Press. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

53. World Bank. (2013). Inclusion Matters: The Foundation for Shared Prosperity. World Bank. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

• Assessment of the Role of Artificial Intelligence in Repositioning TVET for Economic Development in Nigeria
• Teachers’ Use of Assure Model Instructional Design on Learners’ Problem Solving Efficacy in Secondary Schools in Bungoma County, Kenya
• “E-Booksan Ang Kaalaman”: Development, Validation, and Utilization of Electronic Book in Academic Performance of Grade 9 Students in Social Studies
• Analyzing EFL University Students’ Academic Speaking Skills Through Self-Recorded Video Presentation
• Major Findings of The Study on Total Quality Management in Teachers’ Education Institutions (TEIs) In Assam – An Evaluative Study