Establishing A Local Norm of Assessment for Arm Strength Using One-Repetition Maximum Push-Up Test in Bukidnon, Philippines

Authors

Jasiel Bacsarpa

Lourdes College, Inc. Graduate School (Philippines)

Oliver Napila Gomez

Mindanao State University – Maigo College of Education, Science and Technology (Philippines)

Article Information

DOI: 10.47772/IJRISS.2026.1026EDU0316

Subject Category: Sports Science

Volume/Issue: 10/26 | Page No: 4025-4036

Publication Timeline

Submitted: 2026-05-18

Accepted: 2026-05-23

Published: 2026-06-12

Abstract

Standardized, population-specific norms enhance the reliability, validity, and fairness of fitness assessments by enabling accurate interpretation of test results across demographic groups. However, commonly used push-up test norms are largely repetition-based and generalized, limiting their applicability for adolescent populations with distinct developmental and contextual characteristics. This study aimed to establish normative standards for an estimated one-repetition maximum (1RM) push-up test using the Epley formula among high school students in Bukidnon and to determine whether estimated 1RM performance differs by age, gender, geographic location, and physical activity level. A cross-sectional descriptive–comparative design was employed, involving 998 public high school students (N = 998) who completed a standardized, cadence-controlled push-up protocol. Estimated 1RM push-up scores were derived using the Epley equation and analyzed using descriptive statistics and percentile cut-offs. Group differences were examined using appropriate comparative statistical tests for age, physical activity level, gender, and geographic location, with effect sizes reported. Results indicated significant differences in estimated 1RM push-up performance across age, gender, and geographic location, all with small effect sizes, while no significant differences were observed across physical activity levels. Based on percentile distributions, age-, gender-, and locale-specific strength norms were proposed, classifying performance into Poor, Fair, Good, Very Good, and Excellent categories. These findings support the use of estimated 1RM push-up norms as a safe and context-sensitive tool for assessing adolescent muscular strength and for informing school-based fitness evaluation practices. Future research is recommended to expand the norming process across broader populations, incorporate additional strength assessment methods for validation, and examine longitudinal changes in adolescent strength development.

Keywords

Estimated One-Repetition Maximum; Push-Up Test; Epley Formula; Normative Standards

Downloads

References

1. Ajisafe, O. L. (2019). Normative values and gender differences in physical fitness among adolescents. Journal of Physical Education and Sport, 19(4), 2301–2308. https://doi.org/10.7752/jpes.2019.04345 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

2. Alekseyev, E., Ivanov, D., & Petrov, A. (2020). Motor learning constraints and strength development in bodyweight resistance exercises. Journal of Strength and Conditioning Research, 34(9), 2525–2533. https://doi.org/10.1519/JSC.0000000000002813 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

3. Al-Nuaim, A. A., & Safi, A. A. (2022). Urbanization, lifestyle change, and physical activity patterns among adolescents. BMC Public Health, 22, Article 1467. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12889-022-13467-9 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

4. Artanayasa, I. (2023). Push-up counter (PUC) as an instrument of arm muscle strength: Validity and reliability. Journal Sport Area, 8(3), 350–359. https://doi.org/10.25299/sportarea.2023.vol8(3).13245 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

5. Artanayasa, I., Kusuma, K., & Ariawan, K. (2022). Need analysis of digital technology-based push up test: Instrument of arm muscle strength. Journal Sport Area, 7(3), 361–368. https://doi.org/10.25299/sportarea.2022.vol7(3).10641 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

6. Bartolomei, S., Grillone, G., Michele, R., & Cortesi, M. (2021). A comparison between male and female athletes in relative strength and power performances. Journal of Functional Morphology and Kinesiology, 6(1), Article 17. https://doi.org/10.3390/jfmk6010017 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

7. Baumgartner, T. A., Oh, S., Chung, H., & Hales, D. (2002). Objectivity, reliability, and validity for a revised push-up test protocol. Measurement in Physical Education and Exercise Science, 6(4), 225–242. https://doi.org/10.1207/S15327841MPEE0604_2 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

8. Baumgartner, T. A., Hales, D., Chung, H., Oh, S., & Wood, H. M. (2004). Revised push-up test norms for college students. Measurement in Physical Education and Exercise Science, 8(2), 83–87. https://doi.org/10.1207/s15327841mpee0802_3 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

9. Ben Mansour, G., Kacem, A., Ishak, M., Grélot, L., & Ftaiti, F. (2021). The effect of body composition on strength and power in male and female students. BMC Sports Science, Medicine and Rehabilitation, 13(1), Article 150. https://doi.org/10.1186/s13102-021-00376-z [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

10. Bennie, J., Faulkner, G., & Smith, J. (2021). The epidemiology of muscle-strengthening activity among adolescents from 28 European countries. Scandinavian Journal of Public Health, 50(2), 295–302. https://doi.org/10.1177/14034948211031392 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

11. Butulis, M., Fedor, B., & McGaver, R. (2023). Adolescent dance team fitness: Initial quantitative normative values. Journal of Dance Medicine & Science, 27(2), 66–73. https://doi.org/10.1177/1089313X231177159 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

12. Cheng, T. S., Brage, S., van Sluijs, E. M. F., & Ong, K. K. (2023). Pre-pubertal accelerometer-assessed physical activity and timing of puberty in British boys and girls: The Millennium Cohort Study. International Journal of Epidemiology, 52(5), 1316–1327. https://doi.org/10.1093/ije/dyad063 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

13. Coogan, S., Hansen-Honeycutt, J., Fauntroy, V., & Ambegaonkar, J. (2021). Upper-body strength endurance and power norms in healthy collegiate dancers: A 10-year prospective study. Journal of Strength and Conditioning Research, 35(6), 1599–1603. https://doi.org/10.1519/JSC.0000000000004016 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

14. Creswell, J. W., & Creswell, J. D. (2023). Research design: Qualitative, quantitative, and mixed methods approaches (6th ed.). SAGE Publications. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

15. Dhote, S., Eon, P., & Grosprêtre, S. (2024). A comparison of the plyometric performance of upper limbs between experienced and non-experienced athletes. Sports, 12(8), Article 217. https://doi.org/10.3390/sports12080217 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

16. Epley, B. (1985). Poundage chart for strength testing. National Strength and Conditioning Association Journal, 7(2), 86–90. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

17. Etikan, I., & Bala, K. (2017). Sampling and sampling methods. Biometrics & Biostatistics International Journal, 5(6), 215–217. https://doi.org/10.15406/bbij.2017.05.00149 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

18. García-Ramos, A., Haff, G. G., & Jiménez-Reyes, P. (2021). Strength assessment and injury risk in youth. Strength and Conditioning Journal, 43(1), 32–40. https://doi.org/10.1519/SSC.0000000000000604 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

19. García-Suárez, P., Pérez-Castilla, A., & Rojas, F. J. (2022). Validity of push-ups as an alternative upper-body strength test. Journal of Sports Sciences, 40(12), 1384–1392. https://doi.org/10.1080/02640414.2022.2042013 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

20. Gomez, O. N. (2025). The solution to the entrenched scoring mistake physical educators have been making in push-up test. International Journal of Research and Innovation in Social Science, 9(3s), 1241–1250. https://dx.doi.org/10.47772/IJRISS.2025.903SEDU0094 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

21. Grgić, J., Lazinica, B., & Schoenfeld, B. J. (2020). Test–retest reliability of the one-repetition maximum (1RM) strength assessment: A systematic review. Sports Medicine – Open, 6(1), Article 31. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40798-020-00260-z [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

22. Ismail, A. S., & Zainun, Z. (2023). Confidence level of college students’ learning activity at university. Scaffolding: Jurnal Pendidikan Islam Dan Multikulturalisme, 5(1), 536–551. https://doi.org/10.37680/scaffolding.v5i1.2703 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

23. Kihoon, L., Seo, T., & Kim, Y. (2020). Relationship between movement dysfunctions and sports injuries according to gender of youth soccer player. Journal of Exercise Rehabilitation, 16(5), 427–431. https://doi.org/10.12965/jer.2040650.325 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

24. Lenhard, A., Lenhard, W., Gary, S., & Segerer, R. (2021). Continuous norming: A new approach for the development of norms for psychological and educational tests. Frontiers in Psychology, 12, Article 662820. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2021.662820 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

25. Liao, T., Duhig, S., Du, G., Luo, B., & Wang, Y. (2021). The effect of a functional strength training intervention on movement quality and physical fitness in adolescents. Perceptual and Motor Skills, 129(1), 176–194. https://doi.org/10.1177/00315125211056865 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

26. Macarilla, C. T., Sautter, N. M., Robinson, Z. P., Juber, M. R., Hickmott, L. M., Cerminaro, R. M., Remmert, J. F., & Zourdos, M. C. (2022). Accuracy of predicting one-repetition maximum from submaximal velocity in the barbell back squat and bench press. Journal of Human Kinetics, 82, 201–212. https://doi.org/10.2478/hukin-2022-0046 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

27. Mascherini, G., Buglione, N., Ciani, V., Galanti, G., Giannelli, C., & Modesti, P. A. (2022). Florentine normative values for physical fitness in adolescents aged 14–15 years. Healthcare, 10(12), Article 2486. https://doi.org/10.3390/healthcare10122486 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

28. Mateo-Orcajada, A., Ponce-Ramírez, C., Abenza-Cano, L., & Vaquero-Cristóbal, R. (2024). Effects of 10 weeks of walking with mobile step-tracking apps on body composition, fitness, and psychological state in adolescents who are overweight and obese: Randomized controlled trial. Journal of Medical Internet Research, 26, e55243. https://doi.org/10.2196/55243 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

29. Ngcobo, S., Makhado, L., & Sehularo, L. (2023). HIV care profiling and delivery status in the mobile health clinics of Ethekwini district in KwaZulu Natal, South Africa: A descriptive evaluation study. Nursing Reports, 13(4), 1539–1552. https://doi.org/10.3390/nursrep13040129 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

30. Niessner, C., Utesch, T., Oriwol, D., Hanssen-Doose, A., Schmidt, S., Wöll, A., & Worth, A. (2020). Representative percentile curves of physical fitness from early childhood to early adulthood: The MoMo study. Frontiers in Public Health, 8, Article 458. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpubh.2020.00458 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

31. Nuzzo, J. L., & Pinto, M. D. (2025). Sex differences in upper- and lower-limb muscle strength in children and adolescents: A meta-analysis. European Journal of Sport Science, 25(5), Article e12282. https://doi.org/10.1002/ejsc.12282 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

32. O’Keeffe, B., Donnelly, A., & MacDonncha, C. (2020). Test–retest reliability of student-administered health-related fitness tests in school settings. Pediatric Exercise Science, 32(1), 48–57. https://doi.org/10.1123/pes.2019-0166 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

33. Pierce, K. C., Hornsby, W. G., & Stone, M. H. (2022). Weightlifting for children and adolescents: A narrative review. Sports Health, 14(1), 45–56. https://doi.org/10.1177/19417381211056094 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

34. Portela-Pino, I., Villaverde, M., & Juste, M. (2021). Environmental barriers as a determining factor of physical activity. Sustainability, 13(6), Article 3019. https://doi.org/10.3390/su13063019 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

35. Rubín, L., Mitáš, J., Vorlíček, M., Dygrýn, J., Hron, K., Tomkinson, G. R., & Gába, A. (2023). Normative-referenced values for health-related fitness among Czech youth: Physical fitness data from the study IPEN Adolescent Czech Republic. Central European Journal of Public Health, 31(4), 279–286. https://doi.org/10.21101/cejph.a7645 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

36. Santos, M., Thompson, M., Dinyer-McNeely, T., Torrence, T., Lockie, R., Orr, R., & Dawes, J. (2023). Differences and relationships between push-up and sit-up variations among male law enforcement cadets. Journal of Strength and Conditioning Research, 37(9), 1865–1869. https://doi.org/10.1519/JSC.0000000000004466 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

37. Santtila, M., Pihlainen, K., Vaara, J., Tokola, K., & Kyröläinen, H. (2020). Changes in physical fitness and anthropometrics differ between female and male recruits during the Finnish military service. BMJ Military Health, 168(5), 337–342. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmjmilitary-2020-001513 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

38. Tillaar, R., & Ball, N. (2020). Push-ups are able to predict the bench press 1RM and constitute an alternative for measuring maximum upper body strength based on load-velocity relationships. Journal of Human Kinetics, 73(1), 7–18. https://doi.org/10.2478/hukin-2019-0133 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

39. Vanhelst, J., Béghin, L., & Fardy, P. S. (2019). Physical fitness reference values for adolescents. Journal of Public Health, 41(3), e366–e373. https://doi.org/10.1093/pubmed/fdy193 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

40. Vodičar, J., Pori, P., & Šimenko, J. (2020). Relationship between body mass index and push-up performance. Kinesiology, 52(1), 45–52. https://doi.org/10.26582/k.52.1.6 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

41. Zhang, F., Bi, C., Yin, X., Chen, Q., Liu, Y., Li, Y., Sun, Y., Zhang, T., Yang, X., & Sun, J. (2021). Physical fitness reference standards for Chinese children and adolescents. Scientific Reports, 11(1), Article 4991. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-021-84634-7 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

Metrics

Views & Downloads

Similar Articles