Evaluating Clearance Delays and their Impact on Supply Chain Efficiency: A Study on Chattogram Port

This study investigates the clearance delays at Chattogram Port and their implications for supply chain efficiency in Bangladesh, adopting a qualitative research approach supported by case study evidence. As the country’s principal maritime gateway, Chattogram Port handles over 90% of containerized trade, yet clearance inefficiencies undermine both cost competitiveness and operational reliability. Primary data was collected through structured surveys with 10 respondents, including customs officials, C&F agents, and importers, to capture stakeholder experiences and perceptions regarding clearance processes. Thematic analysis revealed four dominant issues: manual documentation (cited by 80% of respondents), understaffing at customs and port authorities (70%), inadequate terminal infrastructure such as shortage of scanners and equipment (60%), and inefficient customs procedures including excessive physical inspections (50%). Respondents emphasized that these problems collectively prolong clearance times, disrupt production schedules, raise logistics costs, and reduce supply chain reliability—particularly for time-sensitive sectors like garments and pharmaceuticals. To enrich the qualitative findings, secondary evidence from the Time Release Study (TRS) 2022 was integrated as a case reference, which reported an Average Release Time (ART) of 11 days 6 hours. Stakeholder insights confirmed that these delays significantly disrupt lead times, increase logistics costs, and reduce reliability across industries such as garments and pharmaceuticals. The findings also reveal the effectiveness of Pre-Arrival Processing (PAP), which reduced clearance duration by an average of 43%. The study highlights the potential benefits of digitization, Pre-Arrival Processing (PAP), workforce capacity building, and infrastructure investment to mitigate these bottlenecks. By combining qualitative insights with case-based secondary data, the research underscores that clearance delays at Chattogram Port are not isolated technical problems but systemic challenges rooted in processes, institutions, and capacity gaps. The study concludes that coordinated investment in infrastructure, digital customs, workforce training, and PAP adoption is essential. These reforms will cut delays, boost supply chain performance, and strengthen Bangladesh’s global trade competitiveness.

Time Release Study (TRS) 2022, Average Release Time (ART), Pre-Arrival Processing

1. Ahmed, S., & Mahmud, K. (2019). Port inefficiencies and logistics costs: A case of Chattogram Port. Journal of Transport Economics, 15(3), 45-60. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

2. Alavi-Borazjani, S. A., Bengue, A. A., Chkoniya, V., & Shafique, M. N. (2025). An Overview of Critical Success Factors for Digital Shipping Corridors: A Roadmap for Maritime Logistics Modernization. Sustainability, 17(12), 5537. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

3. Bashar, M., & Amin, M. (2022). Public-private partnerships in port infrastructure: Lessons from developing countries. International Journal of Maritime Economics, 24(2), 112-128. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

4. Chittagong Port Authority. (2022). Annual report 2022. Chittagong. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

5. Chowdhury, A. R., Hasan, M. K., & Rahman, M. M. (2020). Challenges in handling perishable goods at Chattogram Port: An empirical study. Asian Journal of Logistics Management, 8(1), 33-47. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

6. Du Plessis, F., Goedhals-Gerber, L. L., & van Eeden, J. (2023). Forecasting fruit export damages and enhancing food safety through risk management. Sustainability, 15(21), 15216. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

7. Ghate, P. S. (2025). Optimizing ocean gateways: an empirical study of port privatization and its effects on the performance of the Indian major ports. Maritime Economics & Logistics, 1-19. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

8. Gonçalves, M., & Teixeira, L. (2025). Decision support system for port terminals: Design and development of a business intelligence tool. Procedia Computer Science, 253, 2438-2447. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

9. Islam, M. A., Rahman, M. S., & Karim, M. R. (2021). Impact of port congestion on supply chain efficiency: Evidence from Bangladesh. Journal of Supply Chain Management, 45(4), 78-95. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

10. Kabir, R. A., & Helal, K. (2021). Congestion at Chittagong Seaport: Causes and consequences. International Journal of Social Sciences and Economic Review, 3(3), 13-21. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

11. Karim, S. M. N. (2024). Turnaround Time of Container Vessels at Chattogram Port: Review and Assessment. BIMRAD Journal, 5(1), 85-128. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

12. Koray, M., Kaya, E., & Keskin, M. H. (2025). Determining Logistical Strategies to Mitigate Supply Chain Disruptions in Maritime Shipping for a Resilient and Sustainable Global [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

13. Economy. Sustainability, 17(12), 5261. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

14. Lu, C., Zhang, J., & Zhang, Y. (2016). Application of blockchain and AI in port logistics: A case of Shanghai Port. Journal of Shipping and Trade, 1(1), 1-15. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

15. Meersman, H., Van de Voorde, E., & Vanelslander, T. (2012). Port congestion and implications to maritime logistics. In Maritime logistics: Contemporary issues (pp. 49-68). Emerald Group Publishing Limited. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

16. Notteboom, T. (2006). The time factor in liner shipping services. Maritime Economics and Logistics, 8(1), 1939. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

17. Notteboom, T. (2006). The time factor in liner shipping services. Maritime Economics and Logistics, 8(1), 1939. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

18. Rahman, T., & Hossain, M. (2020). Challenges and opportunities in port operations: A case study of Chattogram Port. Journal of Maritime Research, 12(2), 45-60. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

19. Sukanta, S., MD, A. S., Anis, M. T., Mohammad, S. I., & Wang, X. (2020). Port efficiency and supply chain: Implication for Bangladesh. International journal of engineering, 10(6), 21-34. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

20. Tsou, M. C. (2025). A machine learning-based model for predicting high deficiency risk ships in port state control: A case study of the port of singapore. Journal of marine science and engineering, 13(8), 1485. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

21. World Bank. (2022). Logistics performance index 2022. World Bank Group. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

• The Impact of Ownership Structure on Dividend Payout Policy of Listed Plantation Companies in Sri Lanka
• Urban Sustainability in North-East India: A Study through the lens of NER-SDG index
• Performance Assessment of Predictive Forecasting Techniques for Enhancing Hospital Supply Chain Efficiency in Healthcare Logistics
• The Fractured Self in Julian Barnes' Postmodern Fiction: Identity Crisis and Deflation in Metroland and the Sense of an Ending
• Impact of Flood on the Employment, Labour Productivity and Migration of Agricultural Labour in North Bihar