Evaluating the Comparative Effectiveness of Performance-Based Financing and Direct Facility Funding in Improving Maternal and Child Health Service Utilization in Nigeria.

Nigeria continues to face one of the highest maternal mortality burdens globally, a situation that is closely linked to the low utilization of essential maternal and child health services. To address this challenge, the Nigeria State Health Investment Project (NSHIP) introduced two innovative financing mechanisms Performance-Based Financing (PBF) and Decentralized Facility Financing (DFF) aimed at improving the performance of primary healthcare facilities. This study compared the effectiveness of these financing approaches in enhancing service utilization while accounting for the selection bias commonly associated with non-experimental research designs. The study adopted a retrospective quantitative approach and analyzed data from 216 Primary Health Care (PHC) facilities located in Adamawa, Nasarawa, and Ondo States between 2022 and 2025. Propensity Score Matching (PSM) was used to create comparable groups of facilities based on important characteristics such as staffing levels and bed capacity. Thereafter, Analysis of Covariance (ANCOVA) and Welch’s ANOVA were employed to examine differences in service utilization across key maternal and child health indicators, including Outpatient Department (OPD) attendance, Antenatal Care (ANC) visits, Skilled Deliveries, Family Planning (FP) uptake, and Complete Vaccination Coverage (CVC). The results revealed that facilities operating under the PBF model consistently recorded higher utilization rates than those supported through DFF in several critical service areas. Specifically, PBF facilities achieved significantly better outcomes in OPD attendance (Mean Difference = 3,276; p < .01; Partial Eta Squared = 0.19), Skilled Deliveries (Mean Difference = 322; p < .001; Partial Eta Squared = 0.34), and Family Planning uptake (Mean Difference = 1,180; p < .001; Partial Eta Squared = 0.36). These findings indicate that PBF had a substantial positive influence on services that require active provider engagement and community mobilization. In contrast, no statistically significant difference was found between PBF and DFF in Complete Vaccination Coverage (p = .70), suggesting that both financing approaches were equally effective in supporting routine immunization services. The study concludes that PBF offers a clear advantage for demand-driven maternal and reproductive health services, whereas DFF provides comparable results for supply-driven programmes such as routine immunization. These findings highlight the importance of adopting a differentiated financing strategy within Nigeria’s primary healthcare system. Rather than relying on a single financing model, policymakers should consider a hybrid approach that combines the strengths of both PBF and DFF to maximize health outcomes while ensuring efficient use of available resources. However, as this study focused solely on service volumes, future research is recommended to evaluate the impact of these financing models on clinical quality of care, maternal mortality outcomes, and cost-effectiveness across broader geographic settings.

Performance-Based Financing, Decentralized Facility Financing, Maternal Health, Child Health, Primary Healthcare, Service Utilization

1. Adeyi, O. (2016). Health system in Nigeria: From underperformance to measured optimism. Health System Reform, 2(4), 285–289. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

2. Akachi, Y., Kruk, M. E., & Reich, M. R. (2012). Effect of payment for performance on maternal and child health services. The Lancet, 380(9845), 1057. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

3. Amnesty International. (2021). Nigeria: Deadly apathy – Uncovering the tragedy of maternal health. Amnesty International. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

4. Anselmi, L., Lagarde, M., & Hanson, K. (2018). Health service availability and health outcomes: A spatial econometric analysis. Health & Place, 49, 81–89. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

5. Basinga, P., Gertler, P. J., Binagwaho, A., Soucat, A. L. B., Sturdy, J., & Vermeersch, C. M. J. (2011). Effect on maternal and child health services in Rwanda of payment to primary health-care providers for performance: An impact evaluation. The Lancet, 377(9775), 1421–1428. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

6. Bonfrer, I., Soeters, R., Van de Poel, E., Basenya, O., Longin, G., & Van de Looij, F. (2014). The effects of performance-based financing on the use and quality of health care in Burundi: An impact evaluation. The Lancet, 384(9946), 206–207. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

7. Brockerhoff, M., & Hewett, P. (2000). Inequality of child mortality among ethnic groups in sub-Saharan Africa. Bulletin of the World Health Organization, 78(1), 30–41. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

8. Das, J., Hammer, J., & Leonard, K. (2008). The quality of medical advice in low-income countries. The Journal of Economic Perspectives, 22(2), 93–114. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

9. Dziejkan, D. M., Okolo, A., & Chikaeze, I. (2019). Performance-based financing and health outcomes: Evidence from Nigeria. Global Journal of Health Science, 11(12), 1–10. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

10. Eichler, R. (2006). Can “pay for performance” increase utilization by the poor and improve the quality of health services? Center for Global Development. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

11. Federal Ministry of Health. (2013). Nigeria State Health Investment Project (NSHIP) performance-based financing (PBF) manual. FMOH. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

12. Gertler, P. J., & Vermeersch, C. M. (2012). Using performance incentives to improve health outcomes. Policy Research Working Paper No. 6100. World Bank. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

13. Gopinathan, N., Kowalski, M., & Lagarde, M. (2016). Payment for performance: The Dar es Salaam urban health system, Tanzania. Health Policy and Planning, 31(7), 877–887. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

14. Grittner, A. M. (2013). Results-based financing: Evidence from performance-based financing in the health sector. German Development Institute. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

15. Huillery, E., & Seban, J. (2014). Performance-based financing in the health sector in the Democratic Republic of Congo: An impact evaluation. Agence Française de Développement. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

16. Irving, D. (2018). Maternal health in Nigeria: A review of policy frameworks and implementation gaps. African Journal of Reproductive Health, 22(3), 29–38. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

17. Kruk, M. E., Kujawski, S. A., Mbaruku, G., Ramsey, K., Moyo, W., & Freedman, L. P. (2009). Women's perceptions of the quality of antenatal care services in the United Republic of Tanzania. Bulletin of the World Health Organization, 87(12), 944–951. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

18. Lu, C., Chin, M. T., Lewandowski, J. L., et al. (2014). Towards universal health coverage: An evaluation of Rwanda mutuelles in its first eight years. PLOS ONE, 9(2), e84297. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

19. Meessen, B., Soucat, A., & Sekabaraga, C. (2011). Performance-based financing: Just a donor fad or a catalyst towards comprehensive health-care reform? Bulletin of the World Health Organization, 89(2), 153–156. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

20. Musgrove, P. (2011). Financial and other rewards for good performance or results: A short glossary. World Bank. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

21. National Population Commission (NPC) [Nigeria] & ICF. (2019). Nigeria Demographic and Health Survey 2018. NPC and ICF. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

22. Ng, M., Fleming, T., Robinson, M., et al. (2014). Global, regional, and national prevalence of overweight and obesity in children and adults during 1980–2013: A systematic analysis for the Global Burden of Disease Study 2013. The Lancet, 384(9945), 766–781. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

23. Onwujekwe, O., Uzochukwu, B., Eze, S., Obikeze, E., Okoli, C., & Ochonma, O. (2018). Improving equity in malaria treatment by involving community health workers in outcome-based financing. Health Policy and Planning, 33(5), 596–605. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

24. Renmans, D., Holvoet, N., Orach, C. G., & Criel, B. (2016). Opening the ‘black box’ of performance-based financing in low and lower middle income countries: A review of the literature. Health Policy and Planning, 31(9), 1297–1309. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

25. Rosenbaum, P. R., & Rubin, D. B. (1983). The central role of the propensity score in observational studies for causal effects. Biometrika, 70(1), 41–55. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

26. Salkind, N. J. (2010). Encyclopedia of research design (Vol. 1). Sage. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

27. Sato, K., & Belel, A. (2021). Effect of performance-based financing on health. International Health, 13(2), 122–129. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

28. Soeters, R., Peerenboom, P. B., Mushagalusa, P., & Kimanuka, C. (2011). Performance-based financing experiment improved health care in the Democratic Republic of Congo. Health Affairs, 30(8), 1518–1527. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

29. Stekelenburg, J., Jager, B. E., Kinsman, J., Scherpbier, R. W., & Wolffers, I. (2004). Health care seeking behaviour and utilisation of traditional healers in Kalabo, Zambia. Health Policy, 71(2), 227–236. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

30. Witter, S., Toonen, J., Meessen, B., Kagubare, J., Fritsche, G., & Vaughan, K. (2013). Performance-based financing as a health system reform: Mapping the key dimensions for monitoring and evaluation. BMC Health Services Research, 13, 367. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

31. World Health Organization. (2019). Trends in maternal mortality 2000 to 2022. WHO. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

• Assessment of the Role of Artificial Intelligence in Repositioning TVET for Economic Development in Nigeria
• Teachers’ Use of Assure Model Instructional Design on Learners’ Problem Solving Efficacy in Secondary Schools in Bungoma County, Kenya
• “E-Booksan Ang Kaalaman”: Development, Validation, and Utilization of Electronic Book in Academic Performance of Grade 9 Students in Social Studies
• Analyzing EFL University Students’ Academic Speaking Skills Through Self-Recorded Video Presentation
• Major Findings of The Study on Total Quality Management in Teachers’ Education Institutions (TEIs) In Assam – An Evaluative Study