Evaluating the Effect of Teaching Approaches on Student Performance in Primary Education: Evidence from Albania

This study investigates the relationship between teaching approaches and student performance in primary education, with a particular focus on language learning outcomes in Albania. The research is grounded in data derived from the National Assessment of Pupils’ Achievement, administered at the end of grade five. Given the increasing emphasis on improving educational quality, understanding the role of instructional practices in shaping student outcomes has become essential. A mixed-method research design was employed, combining quantitative statistical analysis with qualitative interpretation of teaching practices. The quantitative component involved descriptive statistics and comparative analysis of student achievement across different instructional approaches. The qualitative component focused on identifying patterns in pedagogical practices and their influence on learning outcomes. The findings indicate that student-centered teaching approaches, characterized by interaction, collaboration, and active engagement, are significantly associated with higher levels of student achievement. In contrast, teacher-centered approaches show lower effectiveness in developing language competencies. These results are consistent with established educational theories emphasizing active learning and social interaction. The study contributes to the existing body of knowledge by providing real evidence from a national educational context and offers practical recommendations for improving teaching practices. The findings are particularly relevant for educators, policymakers, and researchers seeking to enhance student performance in primary education.

Teaching approaches; student achievement

1. Hattie, J. (2009). Visible learning: A synthesis of over 800 meta-analyses relating to achievement. Routledge. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

2. Vygotsky, L. S. (1978). Mind in society: The development of higher psychological processes. Harvard University Press. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

3. Piaget, J. (1970). Science of education and the psychology of the child. Orion Press. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

4. Slavin, R. E. (2015). Cooperative learning in elementary schools. Education 3–13, 43(1), 5–14. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

5. OECD. (2019). PISA 2018 results: What students know and can do. OECD Publishing. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

6. Darling-Hammond, L. (2000). Teacher quality and student achievement. Education Policy Analysis Archives, 8(1), 1–44. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

7. Tomlinson, C. A. (2014). The differentiated classroom: Responding to the needs of all learners. ASCD. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

8. Bransford, J. D., Brown, A. L., & Cocking, R. R. (2000). How people learn: Brain, mind, experience, and school. National Academy Press. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

9. Biggs, J., & Tang, C. (2011). Teaching for quality learning at university. McGraw-Hill. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

10. Schunk, D. H. (2012). Learning theories: An educational perspective. Pearson. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

• Assessment of the Role of Artificial Intelligence in Repositioning TVET for Economic Development in Nigeria
• Teachers’ Use of Assure Model Instructional Design on Learners’ Problem Solving Efficacy in Secondary Schools in Bungoma County, Kenya
• “E-Booksan Ang Kaalaman”: Development, Validation, and Utilization of Electronic Book in Academic Performance of Grade 9 Students in Social Studies
• Analyzing EFL University Students’ Academic Speaking Skills Through Self-Recorded Video Presentation
• Major Findings of The Study on Total Quality Management in Teachers’ Education Institutions (TEIs) In Assam – An Evaluative Study