Evaluating The Effectiveness of Moncast: A Comprehensive Assessment of School Performance

This quantitative-descriptive study aimed to evaluate the effectiveness of Monkayo College of Arts, Sciences and Technology (MonCAST) as a higher education institution in delivering quality education and fostering continuous improvement. Anchored on Talcott Parsons’ Goal Attainment Theory (1960), the study examined how clearly defined institutional goals translate into concrete outcomes for faculty and students. Specifically, it assessed MonCAST’s effectiveness in terms of clear school mission, high expectations for success, instructional leadership, opportunity to learn and time on task, safe and orderly environment, positive home-school relations, and frequent monitoring of student progress. A survey was conducted among 69 faculty members selected through stratified random sampling to ensure fair representation. Results revealed that MonCAST achieved a "Very High" effectiveness level in most areas, particularly in its clear mission, strong instructional leadership, and high academic expectations. Opportunities for learning, student safety, and monitoring of progress were also highly rated, supporting a strong academic and supportive school culture. However, home-school relations received a "High" rating, suggesting the need for further strengthening of parental engagement and community connections. The study concludes that MonCAST demonstrates a solid foundation for excellence but should continue enhancing stakeholder partnerships and support systems. It recommends continuous curriculum improvement, faculty development, active student participation, and expanded community involvement to sustain progress. Future researchers are encouraged to explore additional effectiveness dimensions, such as graduate outcomes and student satisfaction, to further guide institutional development.

Institutional Effectiveness, Goal Attainment Theory

1. Bush, T., & Glover, D. (2019). School leadership and management in the 21st century: The importance of school effectiveness research. Educational Management Administration & Leadership, 47(5), 711–726. https://doi.org/10.1177/1741143219836682 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

2. Commission on Higher Education (CHED). (2021). Policies and standards for quality assurance in Philippine higher education. Retrieved from https://ched.gov.ph [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

3. Creswell, J. W., & Creswell, J. D. (2022). Research design: Qualitative, quantitative, and mixed methods approaches (6th ed.). SAGE Publications. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11135-023-01798-2 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

4. Creswell, J. W., & Creswell, J. D. (2022). Research design: Qualitative, quantitative, and mixed methods approaches (6th ed.). SAGE Publications. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11135-023-01798-2 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

5. Gupta, V., & Sharma, V. (2021). Organizational effectiveness: A goal attainment perspective. Journal of Management and Strategy, 12(2), 15–23. https://doi.org/10.5430/jms.v12n2p15 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

6. Juriševič, M., & Strmčnik, F. (2020). Impact of external school evaluation on school effectiveness in European countries. European Journal of Education Research, 9(3), 1195–1208. https://doi.org/10.12973/eu-jer.9.3.1195 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

7. Liu, Z., & Pontius Jr, R. G. (2021). The Total Operating Characteristic from Stratified Random Sampling with an Application to Flood Mapping. Remote Sensing, 13(19), 3922. https://doi.org/10.3390/rs13193922 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

8. Mertler, C. A. (2020). Action research: Improving schools and empowering educators (6th ed.). SAGE Publications. https://doi.org/10.33524/cjar.v22i2.601 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

9. Mertler, C. A. (2021). Action research: Improving schools and empowering educators (6th ed.). SAGE Publications. https://doi.org/10.33524/cjar.v22i2.601 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

10. MonCAST Research and Publication Report. (2023). Monkayo College of Arts, Sciences, and Technology: Milestones and achievements. Monkayo College of Arts, Sciences, and Technology. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

11. Santos, M. R., & Flores, J. B. (2022). Performance evaluation in Philippine higher education institutions: Implications for policy and practice. Asia Pacific Journal of Multidisciplinary Research, 10(2), 45–54. https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.6789012 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

12. Van der Bijl, H., & Taylor, N. (2021). Quality assurance and institutional effectiveness in higher education: A global perspective. International Journal of Educational Development, 85, 102457. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijedudev.2021.102457 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

• Assessment of the Role of Artificial Intelligence in Repositioning TVET for Economic Development in Nigeria
• Teachers’ Use of Assure Model Instructional Design on Learners’ Problem Solving Efficacy in Secondary Schools in Bungoma County, Kenya
• “E-Booksan Ang Kaalaman”: Development, Validation, and Utilization of Electronic Book in Academic Performance of Grade 9 Students in Social Studies
• Analyzing EFL University Students’ Academic Speaking Skills Through Self-Recorded Video Presentation
• Major Findings of The Study on Total Quality Management in Teachers’ Education Institutions (TEIs) In Assam – An Evaluative Study