Evaluation of Building Structural Strength: Insights from Licensed Civil Engineers
Authors
Student, Dapa National High School, Dapa Surigao del Norte (Philippines)
Student, Dapa National High School, Dapa Surigao del Norte (Philippines)
Student, Dapa National High School, Dapa Surigao del Norte (Philippines)
Student, Dapa National High School, Dapa Surigao del Norte (Philippines)
Student, Dapa National High School, Dapa Surigao del Norte (Philippines)
Student, Dapa National High School, Dapa Surigao del Norte (Philippines)
Student, Dapa National High School, Dapa Surigao del Norte (Philippines)
Teacher, Dapa National High School, Dapa, Surigao del Norte (Philippines)
Article Information
DOI: 10.47772/IJRISS.2026.100601078
Subject Category: Engineering
Volume/Issue: 10/6 | Page No: 15297-15303
Publication Timeline
Submitted: 2026-06-20
Accepted: 2026-06-25
Published: 2026-07-11
Abstract
This study examined the factors affecting the structural strength of buildings and the challenges encountered by licensed civil engineers in evaluating structural integrity on Siargao Island, Surigao del Norte. Specifically, it investigated foundation design and soil conditions, quality of construction materials, structural design and load-bearing capacity, workmanship, and compliance with building codes and safety standards. A descriptive-comparative design was used involving forty (40) licensed civil engineers in DPWH Siargao Island. Data were gathered using a researcher-made questionnaire and analyzed using weighted mean, standard deviation, t-test, and ANOVA to determine levels of influence and group differences across profile variables.
Findings showed that all factors had a very high influence on structural strength, with soil conditions ranked highest (M = 3.81, SD = 0.48), followed by materials (M = 3.78, SD = 0.42), load-bearing capacity (M = 3.78, SD = 0.42), workmanship (M = 3.77, SD = 0.43), and building codes (M = 3.69, SD = 0.50). Key challenges included material degradation, hidden defects, and incomplete documentation. Inferential results indicated significant differences in selected variables, particularly load-bearing capacity when grouped according to sex (F = 5.153, p = .028) and years of experience (F = 4.825, p = .012), while no significant differences were observed in most other comparisons. Overall, load-bearing capacity consistently showed statistically significant variation across key professional profiles, underscoring its central role in structural safety assessment and engineering decision-making. The study underscores the need for comprehensive engineering assessment, strict adherence to standards, and improved documentation practices, leading to the development of policy guidelines aimed at enhancing structural performance and sustainability in the locality.
Keywords
Structural strength, licensed civil engineers, construction materials, building codes
Downloads
References
1. Afolabi, O. S. (2020). Load-Bearing Capacity Analysis and Optimization of Beams, Slabs, and Columns. Communication In Physical Sciences, 6(2), 941-952. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
2. Association of Structural Engineers of the Philippines. (2015). National Structural Code of the Philippines (7th ed.). ASEP. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
3. Department of Public Works and Highways. (2015). National Building Code of the Philippines and its implementing rules and regulations (IRR). DPWH. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
4. Faqih, F., & Zayed, T. (2021). Defect-based building condition assessment. Building and Environment, 191, 107575. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
5. Hussain, S., Xuetong, W., & Hussain, T. (2020). Impact of skilled and unskilled labor on project performance using structural equation modeling approach. Sage Open, 10(1), 2158244020914590. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
6. Ming, X., Huang, J. C., & Li, Z. (2022). Materials-oriented integrated design and construction of structures in civil engineering—A review. Frontiers of Structural and Civil Engineering, 16(1), 24-44. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
7. Otake, Y., & Honjo, Y. (2022). Challenges in geotechnical design revealed by reliability assessment: Review and future perspectives. Soils and Foundations, 62(3), 101129. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
8. Su, J., Xia, Y., & Weng, S. (2020). Review on field monitoring of high‐rise structures. Structural Control and Health Monitoring, 27(12), e2629. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
9. United Nations. (2015). Transforming our world: The 2030 Agenda for Sustainable Development. United Nations. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
10. United Nations. (n.d.). Sustainable Development Goal 9: Industry, innovation and infrastructure. United Nations. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
11. United Nations. (n.d.). Sustainable Development Goal 11: Sustainable cities and communities. United Nations. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
Metrics
Views & Downloads
Similar Articles
- An Adaptive Joint Filtering Approach to Wireless Relay Network for Transmission Rate Maximization
- IoT-Integrated Mercury Substance Detection System for Cosmetic Product Safety
- Design and Implementation of Solar PV-Based Railway Microgrid for Linke Hofmann Busch Coaches
- Cost Control Techniques on Civil Engineering Projects in Oyo State, Nigeria
- Strength and Predictive Modeling of Corn Cob Ash Blended Concrete Using Multi-Output Artificial Neural Network Approach