Evaluation of the Occupational Safety and Health (OSH) Implementation Program in Public Secondary Schools in Valenzuela City: Basis for a School Continuity Plan

This study evaluates the implementation of the Occupational Safety and Health (OSH) program in public secondary schools in Valenzuela City during the 2025–2026 school year. Anchored on the CIPP (Context–Input–Process–Product) Model, it aims to examine the alignment between national policy mandates and localized school practices as a basis for developing a School Continuity Plan (SCP). A quantitative descriptive–correlational–predictive design was employed, with data collected from 100 school personnel—including School Heads, SDRRMC Coordinators, School Clinicians, and Teachers—using a standardized OSH monitoring checklist.
Findings indicate that OSH implementation across occupational safety, occupational health, and industrial hygiene is at a high level. A significant difference in perception was observed based on respondents’ position, with School Heads reporting higher ratings than SDRRMC Coordinators. However, no significant differences were found when grouped according to length of service, school size, and budget, suggesting consistent implementation across school contexts. Regression analysis further revealed that profile variables do not significantly predict OSH implementation, accounting for only 5.7% of the variance, implying the influence of organizational factors such as leadership and safety culture. A weak but significant relationship was noted between OSH training and industrial hygiene practices.
The study concludes that while OSH practices are generally well-implemented, they remain largely compliance-driven. The proposed School Continuity Plan emphasizes institutionalized certification, digital monitoring systems, and dedicated funding to enhance sustainability and resilience in school operations.

Occupational Safety and Health (OSH)

1. Alhassan, R. K., Nketiah-Amponsah, E., & Arhinful, D. K. (2016). Effects of occupational safety and health policies on workplace safety in developing contexts. Safety and Health at Work, 7(2), 107–115. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.shaw.2015.10.001 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

2. Aluko, O. O., Adebayo, A. E., & Oladipo, O. M. (2020). Occupational health and safety practices in educational institutions: A developing country perspective. Journal of Safety Research, 74, 1–8. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jsr.2020.04.003 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

3. Babbie, E. (2021). The practice of social research (15th ed.). Cengage Learning. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

4. Bautista, J. R., & Salazar, R. M. (2022). Post-pandemic readiness and occupational safety compliance in educational institutions. International Journal of Educational Development, 89, 102521. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijedudev.2022.102521 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

5. Bautista, R. (2016). Occupational safety practices in Philippine schools: A reactive or proactive approach? Philippine Journal of Education and Human Development Studies, 12(2), 45–58. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

6. Bloomfield, J., & Fisher, M. J. (2019). Quantitative research design in health and education studies. Nurse Researcher, 26(2), 32–38. https://doi.org/10.7748/nr.2019.e1625 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

7. Brown, G. D., Kapp, E. A., & Pretorius, L. (2021). Sustainability of occupational safety and health systems in developing countries. Safety Science, 138, 105226. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ssci.2021.105226 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

8. Civil Service Commission, Department of Health, & Department of Labor and Employment. (2020). Joint Memorandum Circular No. 1, s. 2020: OSH standards for government offices. Quezon City, Philippines. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

9. Creswell, J. W. (2014). Research design: Qualitative, quantitative, and mixed methods approaches (4th ed.). SAGE Publications. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

10. Cruz, J. M., Reyes, P. A., & Santos, R. L. (2022). School funding (MOOE) and safety compliance in public schools. Philippine Journal of Public Administration, 66(1), 55–78. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

11. Dela Cruz, A. P., & Navarro, M. J. (2022). Fire safety preparedness and hazard assessment in Philippine public schools. Disaster Prevention and Management, 31(4), 512–525. https://doi.org/10.1108/DPM-06-2021-0189 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

12. Department of Education. (2015). DepEd Order No. 37, s. 2015: The Comprehensive DRRM in Basic Education Framework. Department of Education. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

13. Department of Education. (2020). DepEd Order No. 14, s. 2020: Interim guidelines for COVID-19 prevention and control in schools. Department of Education. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

14. European Agency for Safety and Health at Work. (2013). Occupational safety and health in schools: A whole-school approach. EU-OSHA. https://osha.europa.eu [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

15. Fernandez, L. (2021). Pandemic preparedness and school safety in Philippine public schools. International Journal of Educational Safety and Risk Reduction, 9(1), 15–27. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

16. Garcia, R. T., & Santos, D. L. (2022). Bridging the gap between safety awareness and implementation in schools. Safety Science, 150, 105706. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ssci.2022.105706 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

17. International Labour Organization. (2018). Safety and health in education sector: Policy brief. ILO Publications. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

18. Kim, H. S., & Lee, J. Y. (2021). Safety culture development in Korean educational institutions. Journal of Safety Research, 78, 112–120. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jsr.2021.04.004 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

19. Kim, S. H., & Park, Y. J. (2022). Collaborative governance in school safety systems. International Journal of Disaster Risk Reduction, 68, 102692. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijdrr.2022.102692 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

20. Lopez, M. A., & Cruz, A. P. (2022). Teacher engagement and occupational safety outcomes in schools. Asia Pacific Education Review, 23(3), 389–401. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12564-022-09734-5 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

21. Mendoza, P. R., & Lagrimas, J. C. (2022). Compliance with safety protocols in public educational institutions. Educational Policy Analysis Archives, 30, 1–18. https://doi.org/10.14507/epaa.30.6582 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

22. Nketia, K. A., Mensah, E., & Boateng, S. (2022). Occupational safety compliance in public institutions: Evidence from developing countries. Safety and Health at Work, 13(3), 305–312. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.shaw.2022.02.004 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

23. Pineda, E. C., Poja, A. L., & Macaranas, J. M. (2023). Status and challenges on the implementation of OSH program in public schools and schools division offices in CAMANAVA in the resumption of on-site delivery learning. Unpublished research manuscript. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

24. Pratama, R., & Sari, D. (2021). Teacher participation in occupational safety programs in Indonesia. Journal of Educational Administration, 59(5), 612–628. https://doi.org/10.1108/JEA-03-2020-0061 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

25. Rahman, A., & Hussain, F. (2023). Integrated versus compliance-driven occupational safety systems. Safety Science, 158, 105992. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ssci.2022.105992 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

26. Republic Act No. 10121. (2010). Philippine Disaster Risk Reduction and Management Act of 2010. Official Gazette of the Philippines. https://www.officialgazette.gov.ph [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

27. Republic Act No. 11058. (2018). An Act strengthening compliance with occupational safety and health standards and providing penalties for violations thereof. Official Gazette of the Philippines. https://www.officialgazette.gov.ph [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

28. Reyes, J. A., & Alcantara, P. S. (2023). Competing priorities in education: Safety vs academic demands. International Journal of Educational Management, 37(4), 812–826. https://doi.org/10.1108/IJEM-06-2022-0267 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

29. Salanguit, J., Santillan, R., & Gregorio, P. (2024). Barriers to OSH implementation in Philippine schools during post-pandemic reopening. Asian Journal of Educational Research and Policy, 15(3), 112–129. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

30. Santos, L. M. (2023). Paper compliance in occupational safety systems in schools. Journal of Workplace Learning, 35(2), 145–158. https://doi.org/10.1108/JWL-05-2022-0061 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

31. Serrano, M. (2018). Infrastructure and safety gaps in Metro Manila schools: An OSH perspective. Journal of Philippine Public Administration, 62(1), 87–104. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

32. Smith, A. R., & Taylor, B. J. (2022). Resource constraints and safety neglect in underfunded schools. Safety Science, 146, 105538. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ssci.2021.105538 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

33. Soleh, A., Rahman, M., & Putra, H. (2023). Occupational safety and health management systems in educational settings. Journal of Safety Research, 85, 230–240. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jsr.2023.01.008 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

34. Stufflebeam, D. L. (2003). The CIPP model for evaluation. In T. Kellaghan & D. L. Stufflebeam (Eds.), International handbook of educational evaluation (pp. 31–62). Kluwer Academic Publishers. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

35. Turner, J. R., Lim, S. Y., & Wong, K. H. (2021). Monitoring and evaluation of school safety systems in Southeast Asia. International Journal of Disaster Risk Reduction, 58, 102184. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijdrr.2021.102184 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

36. Turner, S., & Baker, J. (2019). Embedding OSH in school management: Lessons from international case studies. Journal of Safety and Education Management, 7(2), 34–50. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

37. UNICEF. (2021). Framework for reopening schools: Ensuring safety, health, and learning continuity. UNICEF. https://www.unicef.org [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

38. United Nations Office for Disaster Risk Reduction. (2015). Sendai framework for disaster risk reduction 2015–2030. https://www.undrr.org [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

39. United Nations Office for Disaster Risk Reduction. (2022). Comprehensive School Safety Framework 2022–2030. UNDRR. https://www.undrr.org [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

40. Villanueva, R. M. (2022). Health protocol implementation challenges in public schools. Journal of Public Health Policy, 43(4), 612–624. https://doi.org/10.1057/s41271-022-00356-4 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

41. World Health Organization. (2021). Laboratory safety in educational institutions: Guidance for safe practices. WHO. https://www.who.int [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

42. Zhou, X., & Fang, Y. (2023). Organizational commitment and occupational safety effectiveness. Safety Science, 160, 106035. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ssci.2022.106035 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

• Migrant Health in Morocco: Between Law and Reality
• CaknaMinda: An Educator-Centred Mobile App for Early Screening of Mental Health and Schizophrenia Risks
• Health System and Nursing Strategies for Enhancing Male Participation in Family Planning: Evidence from Tema General Hospital, Ghana.
• From Īśvara-Praṇidhāna to Parā-Bhakti: Convergent Paths of Aṣṭāṅga Yoga and Bhakti Yoga
• Evidence-Based Psycho-Oncological Interventions: A Multimodal Approach to Supportive Care