Examining Higher-Order Thinking Skills among Art Students: A Demographic Perspective

This study examines the level of higher-order thinking skills (HOTS) among art students in higher education. HOTS, including analyzing, evaluating, and creating, are essential for fostering creativity and critical thinking in art education. However, limited empirical research has explored HOTS development among art students. This study investigates the level of HOTS among art students and examines differences based on gender, socioeconomic status (SES), and year of study. A quantitative research design was employed, involving 325 undergraduate art students from Dali University and Yunnan Arts University in China. A HOTS test adapted from the Synthesis Evaluation Analysis (SEA) test was used to measure analyzing (C4), evaluating (C5), and creating (C6). The findings indicate that the overall level of HOTS among art students remains relatively low, with no significant difference based on gender and SES. However, significant difference was found based on the year of study. These findings provide insights into students’ cognitive development and highlight the need for instructional strategies that promote HOTS in art education.

Higher-order thinking skills, Bloom’s Revised Taxonomy

1. Albarracín-Vivo, D., Encabo-Fernández, E., Jerez-Martínez, I., & Hernández-Delgado, L. (2024). Gender Differences and Critical Thinking: A Study on the Written Compositions of Primary Education Students. Societies, 14(7), 118. https://doi.org/10.3390/soc14070118 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

2. Anderson, L. W., Krathwohl, D. R., Airasian, P. W., Cruikshank, K. A., Mayer, R. E., Pintrich, P. R., Raths, J., & Wittrock, M. C. (2001). A revision of Bloom’s taxonomy of educational objectives. A Taxonomy for Learning, Teaching and Assessing. Longman, New York. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

3. Boman, B., & Wiberg, M. (2024). Cognitive ability, gender, and well being in school contexts: longitudinal evidence from Sweden. Frontiers in Psychology, 15, 1396682. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2024.1396682 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

4. Chen, J. J., Jiang, T. N., & Liu, M. F. (2021). Family socioeconomic status and learning engagement in Chinese adolescents: The multiple mediating roles of resilience and future orientation. Frontiers in Psychology, 12, 714346. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

5. Chen, W., Liu, Y., & Zhao, M. (2024). Co-creation and innovation in art and design education: A collaborative learning perspective. Arts Education Policy Review, 125(1), 12–25. https://doi.org/10.1080/10632913.2024.2367852 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

6. Cui, S., & Fan, Q. (2026). Teacher support, peer support, and art creativity: The mediating roles of learning interest and self-efficacy. Frontiers in Psychology, 17, 1763658. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2026.1763658 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

7. Duan, R., Sun, Q., & Tong, X. (2025). Non linear development in statistical learning of visual orthographic regularities. npj Science of Learning, 10, 6. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41539-025-00298-2 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

8. Gomez, M. J. (2025). The impact of inquiry-based learning in science education: A systematic review of student engagement and achievement. Journal of Education, Learning, and Management, 2(2), 353-363. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

9. Gordon, S. J., Bolwell, C. F., Raney, J. L., & Zepke, N. (2022). Transforming a didactic lecture into a student-centered active learning exercise—teaching equine diarrhea to fourth-year veterinary students. Education Sciences, 12(2), 68. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

10. Hair, J. F., Black, W. C., Babin, B. J., & Anderson, R. E. (2019). Multivariate data analysis (8th ed.). Cengage. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

11. Jackson, D. (2024). The relationship between student employment, employability-building activities and graduate outcomes. Journal of Further and Higher Education, 48(1), 14–30. https://doi.org/10.1080/0309877X.2023.2253426 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

12. Janse van Rensburg, J., & Rauscher, W. (2022). Strategies for fostering critical thinking dispositions in the technology classroom. International Journal of Technology and Design Education, 32(4), 2151-2171. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

13. Karakuş, I. (2024). University students’ cognitive flexibility and critical thinking dispositions: examining the effects of grade level and gender in higher education contexts. Frontiers in Psychology, 15, Article 1420272. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2024.1420272 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

14. Kwangmuang, P., Jarutkamolpong, S., Sangboonraung, W., & Daungtod, S. (2021). The development of learning innovation to enhance higher order thinking skills for students in Thailand junior high schools. Heliyon, 7(6). [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

15. Langensee, L., Rumetshofer, T., & Martensson, J. (2024). Interplay of socioeconomic status, cognition, and school performance in the ABCD sample. npj Science of Learning, 9, Article 33. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41539-024-00233-x [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

16. Leonido, L., Pereira, A., Mendes, L., Rodrigues, J. B., & Morgado, E. M. G. (2023). Art education: Two decades of creation, evaluation and application of an interdisciplinary method of artistic literacy. Education Sciences, 13(6), 589. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

17. Liu, N. (2024). University calligraphy teaching: Aesthetic expansion and innovation of teaching models. Education Research, 7(5), 66–70. https://www.educ-res.com/index.php/er/article/view/6086/5744 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

18. Lukaka, D. (2023). Art education and its impact on creativity and critical thinking skills: A review literature. International Journal of Arts and Humanities, 1(1), 31-39. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

19. Maras, K., & Shand, B. (2023). Critical and Creative Thinking as a Form of Making in Art Education. Studies in Art Education, 64(1), 23–39. https://doi.org/10.1080/00393541.2022.2154523 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

20. Nakano, T. C., Oliveira, K. S., & Zaia, P. (2021). Gender differences in creativity: A systematic literature review. Psicologia: Teoria e Pesquisa, 37, e372116. https://doi.org/10.1590/0102-3772e372116 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

21. Ning, X., Luo, X., & Guo, S. (2024). Researching into Chinese university students’ mental health in the post-pandemic era – Problems and causes. Frontiers in Psychology, 15, 1393603. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2024.1393603 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

22. OECD. (2025). Seven questions about creativity and creative thinking: What do PISA 2022 data tell us? OECD Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1787/0aa52128-en [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

23. Pan, D. (2019). Cultivation of innovation and entrepreneurship ability of college students based on deep learning. Journal of Hunan First Normal College, 19(1), 80–83. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

24. Pang, C., Li, W., Zhou, Y., Gao, T., & Han, S. (2023). Are women more empathetic than men? Questionnaire and EEG estimations of sex/gender differences in empathic ability. Social Cognitive and Affective Neuroscience, 18(1), nsad008. https://doi.org/10.1093/scan/nsad008 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

25. Peng, R. (2025). Enhancing creativity in music education through VR: Development of convergent and divergent thinking. Interactive Learning Environments, 33(8), 4874–4888. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

26. Qiao, K., Xu, R., Liu, B., Chen, X., & Gu, P. (2022). The differences in learning motivation of college freshmen in Northwest China. Frontiers in Psychology, 13. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2022.997137 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

27. Ragab, A., Kaid, A., & Sayed, A. K. (2024). Enhancing higher order thinking skills (hots) in education: Strategies and outcomes. TOFEDU: The Future of Education Journal, 3(5), 1488-1499. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

28. Renzulli, J. S. (2021). Assessment for learning: The missing element for identifying high potential in low income and minority groups. Gifted Education International, 37(2), 199-208. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

29. Sangiorgio, A. (2020). A manifesto for creative interactions in music education. Andrea Sangiorgio und Wolfgang Mastnak (Hg.): Creative Interactions. Dynamic Processes in Group Music Activities. München: Hochschule für Musik und Theater München, 7–22. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

30. Shubina, I., Kwiatek, P., & Kulakli, A. (2021). The relationships between critical thinking and creativity among university students in contemporary education: Empirical analysis of gender differences. The New Educational Review, 65, 87–98. https://doi.org/10.15804/tner.2021.65.3.07 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

31. Siregar, T. (2025). Balancing Higher-and Lower-Order Thinking Skills: An Analysis of Lecturers' Pedagogical Practices in Higher Education. Available at SSRN 5590290. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

32. Song, H., & Xue, H. (2022). The impact of extracurricular tutoring time investment on academic performance of secondary school students: An empirical analysis based on PISA2015 data of four provincial administrative regions in China. Science Insights Education Frontiers, 11(2), 1551–1565. https://doi.org/10.15354/sief.22.or052 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

33. Tan, C. Y., Gao, L., Hong, X., & Song, Q. (2023). Socioeconomic status and students’ science self efficacy. British Educational Research Journal, 49(4), 782–832. https://doi.org/10.1002/berj.3869 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

34. Urban, K., Urban, M., & Jelińska, M. (2021). Metacognitively aware university students exhibit higher creativity and motivation to learn. Thinking Skills and Creativity, 42, 100956. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tsc.2021.100956 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

35. Vasil, M., Weiss, L., & Powell, B. (2019). Popular music pedagogies: An approach to teaching 21st-century skills. Journal of Music Teacher Education, 28(3), 85–95. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

36. Wang, C., Zhang, X., & Pan, Y. (2023). Enhancing Sustainable Arts Education: Comparative Analysis of Creative Process Measurement Techniques. Sustainability, 15(11), 9078. https://doi.org/10.3390/su15119078 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

37. Wang, J., Lim, X. J., & Ng, S. I. (2024). Why can’t I get a job? Exploring the drivers of perceived employability among fine art graduates. Current Psychology, 43(4), 3002-3020. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

38. Wang, L., & Jiang, N. (2022). Managing students’ creativity in music education–the mediating role of frustration tolerance and moderating role of emotion regulation. Frontiers in Psychology, 13, 843531. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

39. Wanti, M., Wesselink, R., Biemans, H., & De Brok, P. (2022). Determining factors of access and equity in higher education: A systematic review. Equity in Education & Society, 1(2), 279–296. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

40. Xia, J. (2024). Cultivation of creative thinking ability in the reform of art education in colleges and universities. Development Pedagogy, 5(11), 139–142. https://doi.org/10.12184/wspfzjyxWSP2634-793836.20240511 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

41. Yao, Y. (2023). Problems and countermeasures analysis of art education development in colleges and universities . In Guangdong Teachers' Continuing Education Society (Ed.), Proceedings of the Sixth Teaching Seminar of Guangdong Teachers' Continuing Education Society (IV) (p. 5). Nanchang Institute of Technology, Jiangxi, China. https://doi.org/10.26914/c.cnkihy.2023.006010 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

42. Yunnan Provincial Bureau of Statistics. (2024). Yunnan statistical yearbook 2024. China Statistics Press. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

43. Zeng, J., Yan, H., & Zhang, H. (2025). How Classroom Curiosity Affects College Students’ Creativity? Education Sciences, 15(9), 1101. https://doi.org/10.3390/educsci15091101 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

44. Zhang, T. (2023). Research on art and design education to promote the development of higher-order thinking ability in the context of the intelligent era. Textile Report, 42(6), 108–110. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

45. Zhao, L., & Lin, X. (2022). Metacognitive strategies and creative learning in higher education. Educational Psychology Review, 34(3), 1257–1281. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10648-021-09641-3 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

46. Zhong, S., Yuan, G., Gu, Y., & Liu, C. (2025). The influence of childhood socioeconomic status on academic engagement among adolescents: The mediating role of internalization of learning motivation and learning burnout. Frontiers in Psychology, 16, Article 1641804. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2025.1641804 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

47. Zohar, A., & Ben-Ari, G. (2022). Teachers’ knowledge and professional development for metacognitive instruction in the context of higher order thinking. Metacognition and Learning, 17(3), 855–895. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

• Assessment of the Role of Artificial Intelligence in Repositioning TVET for Economic Development in Nigeria
• Teachers’ Use of Assure Model Instructional Design on Learners’ Problem Solving Efficacy in Secondary Schools in Bungoma County, Kenya
• “E-Booksan Ang Kaalaman”: Development, Validation, and Utilization of Electronic Book in Academic Performance of Grade 9 Students in Social Studies
• Analyzing EFL University Students’ Academic Speaking Skills Through Self-Recorded Video Presentation
• Major Findings of The Study on Total Quality Management in Teachers’ Education Institutions (TEIs) In Assam – An Evaluative Study