Examining Online Group Interactions Through the Lens of Social Cognitive Theory

The expansion of online learning has made virtual group work integral to higher education, yet communication gaps, uneven participation, cognitive uncertainty, and limited instructional support continue to affect collaborative effectiveness. Grounded in Bandura’s Social Cognitive Theory, this study examined how environmental, personal, and behavioral factors interact to shape students’ online group experiences. Environmental factors were represented by teaching presence, personal factors by cognitive presence, and behavioral factors by social presence. A quantitative survey was conducted with a convenience sample of 286 university students from various faculties and levels. Data were collected using a 23-item, five-point Likert-scale questionnaire comprising eight items on teaching presence, seven on cognitive presence, and eight on social presence. The instrument demonstrated internal consistency, with a Cronbach’s alpha of .850. Descriptive findings showed that students perceived teaching presence positively, particularly when instructors provided clear examples, suitable materials, structured templates, and explanations. Although some students experienced confusion at the beginning of online discussions, cognitive engagement improved as they exchanged information, connected ideas, and applied new understanding. Social presence supported collaboration by enabling students to express opinions, share ideas, and participate confidently. Pearson correlation analysis revealed significant moderate positive relationships between environmental and personal factors (r = .408, p < .001), personal and behavioral factors (r = .394, p < .001), and behavioral and environmental factors (r = .438, p < .001). These findings support Social Cognitive Theory’s reciprocal determinism and highlight the importance of structured guidance, scaffolded activities, peer feedback, and psychologically supportive environments in strengthening online collaborative learning.

Online Group Work, Social Cognitive Theory, Teaching Presence, Cognitive Engagement

1. Aderibigbe,S.A. (2021) Can Online Discussions Facilitate deep learning for students in General Education? Heliyon, Vol 7(3) , pp 1-6. Retrieved from https://doi.org/10.1016/j.heliyon.2021.e06414 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

2. Bandura, A. (2012). Social cognitive theory. In P. A. M. Van Lange, A. W. Kruglanski, & E. T. Higgins (Eds.), Handbook of theories of social psychology (pp. 349–373). Sage Publications Ltd. https://doi.org/10.4135/9781446249215.n18 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

3. Jackson,S.L. (2015) Research methods and Statistics-A Critical Thinking Approach (5tH Edition) Boston, USA:: Cengage Learning. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

4. Rahmat, N.H. (2020) Conflict Resolutions in Class Discussions. International Journal of Education, 12(3), 49-66. https://doi.org/10.5296/ije.v12i3.16914 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

5. Ahola, S., Malmberg, J., & Järvenoja, H. (2023). Investigating the relation of higher education students’ situational self-efficacy beliefs to participation in group level regulation of learning during a collaborative task. Cogent Education, 10(1). https://doi.org/10.1080/2331186x.2022.2164241 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

6. Alqurashi, E. (2016). Self-Efficacy In Online Learning Environments: A Literature Review. Contemporary Issues in Education Research (CIER), 9(1), 45. https://doi.org/10.19030/cier.v9i1.9549 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

7. Antoci, A., Sabatini, F., & Sodini, M. (2012). See you on Facebook! A framework for analyzing the role of computer-mediated interaction in the evolution of social capital. The Journal of Socio-Economics, 41(5), 541. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.socec.2012.04.024 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

8. Ashford, R. L. (2014). Being Nontraditional and Learning Online: Assessing the Psychosocial Learning Environments, Self-Efficacy, and Affective Outcomes among College Student Groups [Doctoral dissertation, University of Southern Mississippi]. ProQuest. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

9. Bakhtiar, A., Webster, E. A., & Hadwin, A. F. (2017). Regulation and socio-emotional interactions in a positive and a negative group climate. Metacognition and Learning, 13(1), 57. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11409-017-9178-x [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

10. Bandura, A. (1986). Social foundations of thought and action: A social cognitive theory. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

11. Bandura, A. (2001). Social cognitive theory: An agentic perspective. Annual Review of Psychology, 52, 1–26. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.psych.52.1.1 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

12. Barberà, E., Virgili, M. E. T., & Guasch, T. (2011). Cognitive attainment in online learning environments: Matching cognitive and technological presence. Interactive Learning Environments, 20(5), 467. https://doi.org/10.1080/10494820.2010.531026 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

13. Bernsmann, S., & Croll, J. (2013). Lowering the threshold to libraries with social media. Library Review, 62, 53. https://doi.org/10.1108/00242531311328168 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

14. Byars‐Winston, A., Estrada, Y., Howard, C. J., Davis, D., & Zalapa, J. (2010). Influence of social cognitive and ethnic variables on academic goals of underrepresented students in science and engineering: A multiple-groups analysis. Journal of Counseling Psychology, 57(2), 205. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0018608 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

15. Cherian, J., & Jacob, J. (2013). Impact of Self Efficacy on Motivation and Performance of Employees. International Journal of Business and Management, 8(14). https://doi.org/10.5539/ijbm.v8n14p80 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

16. Chounta, I. (2019). Collaborative Learning and Patterns of Practice. In Encyclopedia of Education and Information Technologies, 1. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-60013-0_83-1 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

17. Ding, L. (2018). Applying gamifications to asynchronous online discussions: A mixed methods study. Computers in Human Behavior, 91, 1. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2018.09.022 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

18. Donelan, H., & Kear, K. (2023). Online group projects in higher education: Persistent challenges and implications for practice. Journal of Computing in Higher Education, 36(2), 435. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12528-023-09360-7 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

19. Engel, D., Woolley, A. W., Jing, L. X., Chabris, C. F., & Malone, T. W. (2014). Reading the Mind in the Eyes or Reading between the Lines? PLoS ONE, 9(12). https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0115212 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

20. Freire, C., Ferradás, M. del M., Regueiro, B., Rodríguez, S., Valle, A., & Núñez, J. C. (2020). Coping Strategies and Self-Efficacy in University Students: A Person-Centered Approach. Frontiers in Psychology, 11. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2020.00841 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

21. Gaad, A. L. V. (2022). The Effects of Online Collaborative Learning (OCL) on Student Achievement and Engagement. IAFOR Journal of Education, 10(3), 31. https://doi.org/10.22492/ije.10.3.02 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

22. Gibson, C. B., & Earley, P. C. (2007). Collective Cognition in Action: Accumulation, Interaction, Examination, and Accommodation in the Development and Operation of Group Efficacy Beliefs in the Workplace. Academy of Management Review, 32(2), 438. https://doi.org/10.5465/amr.2007.24351397 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

23. Goldstone, R. L., Roberts, M. E., & Gureckis, T. M. (2008). Emergent Processes in Group Behavior. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 17(1), 10. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-8721.2008.00539.x [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

24. Greenhow, C., & Galvin, S. (2020). Teaching with social media: Evidence-based strategies for making remote higher education less remote. Information and Learning Sciences, 121, 513. https://doi.org/10.1108/ils-04-2020-0138 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

25. Hamzah, S. R., Musa, S. N. S., & Mohamad, N. (2022). The mediating effect of self-efficacy on career aspiration and organizational support with subjective career success among Malaysian women managers. Frontiers in Sociology, 7. https://doi.org/10.3389/fsoc.2022.802090 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

26. Hartelt, T., & Martens, H. (2024). Self-regulatory and metacognitive instruction regarding student conceptions: Influence on students’ self-efficacy and cognitive load. Frontiers in Psychology, 15. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2024.1450947 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

27. Hartford, T. (2005). Facilitation and Assessment of Group Work using Web-based Tools. Bioscience Education, 5(1), 1. https://doi.org/10.3108/beej.2005.05000006 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

28. Herrera, C., Torres‐Vallejos, J., & Martínez-Líbano, J. (2022). Psychometric properties of the Collective Efficacy Scale Short-Form in Chilean teachers. Frontiers in Psychology, 13. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2022.935578 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

29. Hew, K. F., & Cheung, W. (2003). Models to evaluate online learning communities of asynchronous discussion forums. Australasian Journal of Educational Technology, 19(2). https://doi.org/10.14742/ajet.1714 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

30. Hoddinott, P., Allan, K., Avenell, A., & Britten, J. (2010). Group interventions to improve health outcomes: A framework for their design and delivery. BMC Public Health, 10(1). https://doi.org/10.1186/1471-2458-10-800 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

31. Hodges, L. C. (2018). Contemporary Issues in Group Learning in Undergraduate Science Classrooms: A Perspective from Student Engagement. CBE—Life Sciences Education, 17(2). https://doi.org/10.1187/cbe.17-11-0239 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

32. Horwitz, F. M., Bravington, D., & Silvis, U. (2006). The promise of virtual teams: Identifying key factors in effectiveness and failure. Journal of European Industrial Training, 30(6), 472. https://doi.org/10.1108/03090590610688843 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

33. Ilie, V. (2023). The Impact of Technology on Collaborative Learning. European Proceedings of Educational Sciences, 5, 126. https://doi.org/10.15405/epes.23045.13 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

34. Joksimovíc, S., Poquet, O., Kovanović, V., Dowell, N., Mills, C., Gasević, D., Dawson, S., Graesser, A. C., & Brooks, C. (2017). How Do We Model Learning at Scale? A Systematic Review of Research on MOOCs. Review of Educational Research, 88(1), 43–86. https://doi.org/10.3102/0034654317740335 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

35. Karagkounis, C., Manomenidis, G., Platis, C., Minasidou, E., & Bellali, T. (2020). The Impact of Self-Efficacy and Work Engagement on Healthcare Professionals’ Proactive Behavior. Health, 12(4), 305–318. https://doi.org/10.4236/health.2020.124025 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

36. Kudusheva, N., Amanova, I., Abisheva, E., Sabirova, Z., & Beisenova, Z. (2022). The development of individual self-efficiency among university students. Cypriot Journal of Educational Sciences, 17(2), 615–622. https://doi.org/10.18844/cjes.v17i2.6857 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

37. Kundu, A. (2020). Toward a framework for strengthening participants’ self-efficacy in online education. AAOU Journal, 15(3), 351–365. https://doi.org/10.1108/aaouj-06-2020-0039 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

38. Kwon, K., Liu, Y.-H., & Johnson, L. P. (2014). Group regulation and social-emotional interactions observed in computer supported collaborative learning: Comparison between good vs. poor collaborators. Computers & Education, 78, 185–200. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2014.06.004 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

39. Labrague, L. J. (2024). Examining the influence of social support and resilience on academic self-efficacy and learning outcomes in pre-licensure student nurses. Journal of Professional Nursing, 55, 119–126. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.profnurs.2024.09.012 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

40. Lent, R. W., Brown, S. D., & Hackett, G. (1994). Toward a unifying social cognitive theory of career and academic interest, choice, and performance. Journal of Vocational Behavior, 45(1), 79–122. https://doi.org/10.1006/jvbe.1994.1027 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

41. Mayer, R. E. (2006). The Cambridge handbook of multimedia learning. Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511816819 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

42. McKay, J., & Sridharan, B. (2023). Student perceptions of collaborative group work (CGW) in higher education. Studies in Higher Education, 49(2), 221–234. https://doi.org/10.1080/03075079.2023.2227677 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

43. Pajares, F. (1996). Self-efficacy beliefs in academic settings. Review of Educational Research, 66(4), 543–578. https://doi.org/10.3102/00346543066004543 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

44. Pajares, F. (2003). Self-efficacy beliefs, motivation, and achievement in writing: A review of the literature. Reading & Writing Quarterly, 19(2), 139–158. https://doi.org/10.1080/10573560308222 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

45. Pang, C., Lau, J., Seah, C., Cheong, L., & Low, A. (2018). Socially Challenged Collaborative Learning of Secondary School Students in Singapore. Education Sciences, 8(1), 24. https://doi.org/10.3390/educsci8010024 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

46. Pekkala, K., & van Zoonen, W. (2021). Work-related social media use: The mediating role of social media communication self-efficacy. European Management Journal, 40(1), 67–78. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.emj.2021.03.004 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

47. Pennington, D. (2008). Cross-disciplinary collaboration and learning. Ecology and Society, 13(2), 8. https://doi.org/10.5751/ES-02520-130208 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

48. Peterson, A. T., Beymer, P. N., & Putnam, R. T. (2018). Synchronous and asynchronous discussions: Effects on cooperation, belonging, and affect. Online Learning, 22(4), 7–20. https://doi.org/10.24059/olj.v22i4.1517 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

49. Schneider, S., Beege, M., Nebel, S., Schnaubert, L., & Rey, G. D. (2021). The Cognitive-Affective-Social Theory of Learning in Digital Environments (CASTLE). Educational Psychology Review, 34, 1–27. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10648-021-09626-5 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

50. Shakarami, A., Khajehei, H., & Hajhashemi, K. (2013). Digital self-efficacy and language learning enhancement in an online setting. SSRN Electronic Journal. https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.2637404 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

51. Sitinjak, N. V., Yakub, E., Mardes, S., & Muna, Z. (2023). Enhancing student self-confidence through cognitive restructuring: A high school group guidance approach. Jurnal Psikologi Terapan (JPT), 6(1), 64–74. https://doi.org/10.29103/jpt.v6i1.11384 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

52. Sudrajat, D. A., Mailani, F., Ibrahim, M., & Kumala, T. F. (2022). The effect of emotional intelligence training on self-efficacy in nursing students. KnE Life Sciences. https://doi.org/10.18502/kls.v7i2.10328 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

53. Wang, H., Hall, N. C., & Rahimi, S. (2015). Self-efficacy and causal attributions in teachers: Effects on burnout, job satisfaction, illness, and quitting intentions. Teaching and Teacher Education, 47, 120–130. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tate.2014.12.005 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

54. Wang, M., Jiang, L., & Luo, H. (2023). Dyads or quads? Impact of group size and learning context on collaborative learning. Frontiers in Psychology, 14. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2023.1168208 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

55. Wang, S., & Wu, P. (2008). The role of feedback and self-efficacy on web-based learning: The social cognitive perspective. Computers & Education, 51(4), 1589–1598. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2008.03.004 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

56. Woods, R. H., & Baker, J. D. (2005). The pedagogy of social development in online learning. In H. H. Adelsberger, B. Collis, & J. M. Pawlowski (Eds.), Handbook on Information Technologies for Education and Training (pp. 593–611). Springer. https://doi.org/10.4018/978-1-59140-555-9.ch224 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

57. Yoon, P., & Leem, J. (2021). The influence of social presence in online classes using virtual conferencing: Relationships between group cohesion, group efficacy, and academic performance. Sustainability, 13(4), 1988. https://doi.org/10.3390/su13041988 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

58. Zhang, Y., & Li, Z. (2021). The cultivation of self-efficacy in college English learning. Advances in Social Science, Education and Humanities Research. https://doi.org/10.2991/assehr.k.211122.088 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

• Assessment of the Role of Artificial Intelligence in Repositioning TVET for Economic Development in Nigeria
• Teachers’ Use of Assure Model Instructional Design on Learners’ Problem Solving Efficacy in Secondary Schools in Bungoma County, Kenya
• “E-Booksan Ang Kaalaman”: Development, Validation, and Utilization of Electronic Book in Academic Performance of Grade 9 Students in Social Studies
• Analyzing EFL University Students’ Academic Speaking Skills Through Self-Recorded Video Presentation
• Major Findings of The Study on Total Quality Management in Teachers’ Education Institutions (TEIs) In Assam – An Evaluative Study