Examining the Role of Silat as Malay Intangible Cultural Heritage in Shaping Practitioners’ Self-Identity

Silat is often understood as a traditional Malay martial art associated with self-defence, physical movement and cultural performance. However, the findings of this study demonstrate that Silat functions far beyond combat practice. It operates as a holistic system of self-identity formation, personality development, moral education, emotional regulation, spiritual consciousness and cultural continuity. Based on qualitative findings from individual interviews and focus group interviews with experienced Silat practitioners, instructors and former students, this article examines how Silat contributes to the cultivation of self-identity among practitioners. Thematic analysis reveals that discipline and self-control form the strongest foundation of Silat practice. These qualities support the development of confidence, courage, humility, ethical conduct, emotional maturity, leadership and social responsibility. The findings also show that Silat strengthens Malay cultural identity by connecting practitioners to heritage, family lineage, historical memory, spiritual values and community belonging. Verbatim quotations from participants indicate that Silat is not merely inherited as a cultural practice but actively embodied through training, ritual, teacher-student relationships and everyday conduct. This article argues that Silat should be recognised as a living form of intangible cultural heritage that develops disciplined, confident, morally responsible, emotionally resilient, spiritually aware and culturally grounded individuals.
Keywords: Silat; self-identity; intangible cultural heritage; Malay heritage; discipline; personality development.

CULTURE AND HERITAGE

1. Al-Attas, S. M. N. (1980). The concept of education in Islam: A framework for an Islamic philosophy of education. Muslim Youth Movement of Malaysia. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

2. Bourdieu, P. (1977). Outline of a theory of practice. Cambridge University Press. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

3. Braun, V., & Clarke, V. (2006). Using thematic analysis in psychology. Qualitative Research in Psychology, 3(2), 77–101. https://doi.org/10.1191/1478088706qp063oa [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

4. Deci, E. L., & Ryan, R. M. (2000). The “what” and “why” of goal pursuits: Human needs and the self-determination of behavior. Psychological Inquiry, 11(4), 227–268. https://doi.org/10.1207/S15327965PLI1104_01 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

5. Erikson, E. H. (1968). Identity: Youth and crisis. W. W. Norton. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

6. Hasmah Md. Ali. (2013). Seni Silat Cekak Malaysia pembina jati diri masyarakat Melayu. International Journal of Creative Future and Heritage (TENIAT), 1(2). https://doi.org/10.47252/teniat.v1i2.121 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

7. Lakes, K. D., & Hoyt, W. T. (2004). Promoting self-regulation through school-based martial arts training. Journal of Applied Developmental Psychology, 25(3), 283–302. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.appdev.2004.04.002 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

8. Lickona, T. (1991). Educating for character: How our schools can teach respect and responsibility. Bantam Books. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

9. Mohamad Nizam Mohamed Shapie, Mohd Shahiid Elias, Sarimah Ismail, & Norlizah Abdul Hamid. (2015). Kurikulum Seni Silat Malaysia serta sumbangannya kepada warisan dan tamadun Melayu. In ICOMHAC2015 e-Proceedings (pp. 381–398). UiTM Cawangan Kedah-INSPIN. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

10. Mohd Anis Md Nor. (Ed.). (2016). The fighting art of pencak silat and its music: From Southeast Asian village to global movement. Brill. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

11. Moore, B., Dudley, D., & Woodcock, S. (2024). Martial arts, combat sports, and mental health in adults: A systematic review. Psychology of Sport and Exercise, 70, Article 102556. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.psychsport.2023.102556 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

12. Muhammad Fairus Hussain, Mustaffa Halabi Azahari, & Khairun Nisa Mustaffa. (2025). The significance of Silat as intangible heritage among Malaysian youth: A review. International Journal of Research and Innovation in Social Science, 9(10). https://doi.org/10.47772/IJRISS.2025.910000200 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

13. Tajfel, H., & Turner, J. C. (1979). An integrative theory of intergroup conflict. In W. G. Austin & S. Worchel (Eds.), The social psychology of intergroup relations (pp. 33–47). Brooks/Cole. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

14. UNESCO. (2003). Convention for the safeguarding of the intangible cultural heritage. UNESCO. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

15. UNESCO. (2019). Silat. UNESCO Intangible Cultural Heritage. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

16. Vertonghen, J., & Theeboom, M. (2010). The social-psychological outcomes of martial arts practice among youth: A review. Journal of Sports Science and Medicine, 9(4), 528–537. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

17. Vygotsky, L. S. (1978). Mind in society: The development of higher psychological processes. Harvard University Press. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

• Assessment of the Role of Artificial Intelligence in Repositioning TVET for Economic Development in Nigeria
• Teachers’ Use of Assure Model Instructional Design on Learners’ Problem Solving Efficacy in Secondary Schools in Bungoma County, Kenya
• “E-Booksan Ang Kaalaman”: Development, Validation, and Utilization of Electronic Book in Academic Performance of Grade 9 Students in Social Studies
• Analyzing EFL University Students’ Academic Speaking Skills Through Self-Recorded Video Presentation
• Major Findings of The Study on Total Quality Management in Teachers’ Education Institutions (TEIs) In Assam – An Evaluative Study