Examining The Sustainability Implications of Global LNG Trade Through A PESTLE Analysis of Political, Economic, Social, Technological, Legal, and Environmental Drivers
Authors
Federal University Otuoke, Nigeria (Nigeria)
Sustainable Maritime Operations, Plymouth University (Nigeria)
Article Information
DOI: 10.47772/IJRISS.2026.10200620
Subject Category: Sustainability
Volume/Issue: 10/2 | Page No: 8727-8733
Publication Timeline
Submitted: 2026-03-01
Accepted: 2026-03-06
Published: 2026-03-23
Abstract
Sustainable maritime transport is a growing concern for the International Marine Organization (IMO) as it seeks to align with the Sustainable Development Agenda of 2030. LNG energy is still within the fossil fuel family; however, it is a better energy source than fossil fuel resources like coal or oil. Consequently, since the use of LNG for energy sources is projected to continue substituting other fossil fuels and play a role in the reduction of carbon emissions, sustainable shipping and LNG trade are critical to address. This paper is a qualitative study that adopts a PESTLE analysis of global LNG Trade and the implications on sustainability. To examine how to achieve a sustainable balance, on how LNG shipping and trade activities operate to meet the present demand for LNG without compromising the sustainable state of future generations. The study reveals that global LNG trade operates within a multifaceted web of forces, each carrying significant implications for sustainable shipping and trade across generations. Geopolitical tensions continue to disrupt trade routes, while market volatility, social equity concerns, and mounting environmental pressures collectively challenge the industry's sustainability trajectory. Nevertheless, accelerating technological innovation signals a growing industry commitment to decarbonization.
Keywords
Global LNG Trade, SDG, LNG supply chain
Downloads
References
1. Buse, C.G. et al. (2019) 'Locating community impacts of unconventional natural gas across the supply chain: A scoping review,' The Extractive Industries and Society, 6(2), pp. 620–629. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
2. Botão, R.P., De Medeiros Costa, H.K. and Santos, E.M.D. (2023) 'Global Gas and LNG Markets: demand, supply dynamics, and implications for the future,' Energies, 16(13), p. 5223. https://doi.org/10.3390/en16135223. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
3. Cabezas-Basurko, O., Mesbahi, E. and Moloney, S.R. (2008) 'Methodology for sustainability analysis of ships,' Ships and Offshore Structures, 3(1), pp. 1–11. https://doi.org/10.1080/17445300701673841. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
4. Cutright, A. and Palti-Guzman, L. (2023) Fragile Equilibrium: LNG Trade Dynamics and Market Risks, International Energy Forum. International Energy Forum and SynMax. https://www.ief.org/focus/ief-reports/fragile-equilibrium-lng-trade-dynamics-and-market-risks. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
5. GECF (2024) GECF Monthly Gas Market Report – October 2024, GECF. https://www.gecf.org/insights/monthly-gas-market-report.aspx?p=1&s=. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
6. GTT (2024) GTT NEXT1 system. https://gtt.fr/technologies/gtt-next1. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
7. IMO (2013) World Maritime Day a Concept of a Sustainable Maritime Transportation system, sustainabledevelopment.un.org. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
8. Michail, N.A. and Melas, K.D. (2022) 'Geopolitical risk and the LNG-LPG trade,' Peace Economics Peace Science and Public Policy, 28(3), pp. 243–265. https://doi.org/10.1515/peps-2022-0007. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
9. Morris, A. (2025, June). Future of LNG: Global strategy and supply outlook: PwC. PwC. Retrieved March 12, 2026, from https://www.pwc.com/us/en/industries/energy-utilities-resources/library/future-of-lng.html [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
10. Ouki, M. (2024) 'Market and regulatory headwinds build for MENA gas exporters to Europe,' Oxford Institute for Energy Studies Or [Preprint]. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
11. Pike, K. (2024) Marine and maritime sustainability [TLP]. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
12. Seafarers Happiness Index (2024) Seafarers Happiness Index Quarter 3 2024. Seafarers Happiness Index. https://www.seafarershappinessindex.org/ (Accessed: November 12, 2024) [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
13. Stern, J. (2022) 'Greenhouse Gas Emissions from LNG Trade: from carbon neutral to GHG-verified,' Oxford Institute for Energy Studies [Preprint]. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
14. UNCTAD (2023) Review of Maritime Transport 2023. Towards a green and just transition https://unctad.org/publication/review-maritime-transport-2023. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
15. UNCTAD (2024) Review of Maritime Transport 2024. Navigating Maritime Chokepoints https://unctad.org/publication/review-maritime-transport-2024. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
16. Vazi, B. and Bridle, R. (2024) A Balancing Act: Considerations for the expansion of liquefied natural gas projects in Nigeria, www.iisd.org. International Institute for Sustainable Development. https://www.iisd.org (Accessed: November 5, 2024). [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
17. Wang, K., Zhao, S., & Wang, Z. (2025). Global liquefied natural gas market development and future outlook. Natural Gas Industry B, 12(5), 636–646. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ngib.2025.10.001 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
18. Wärtsilä (2024) Hybrid-electric propulsion for large LNG carriers. https://www.wartsila.com/marine/products/ship-electrification-solutions/hybrid-electric-lng-carrier. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
19. Wood, D.A. and Leather, D.T.B. (2024) 'Australian LNG sector: struggling to achieve commercial and environmental sustainability or community satisfaction,' in Elsevier eBooks, pp. 125–161. https://doi.org/10.1016/b978-0-443-13420-3.00009-3. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
20. Xiao, G. et al. (2024) 'Sustainable Maritime Transport: A review of intelligent shipping technology and green port construction applications,' Journal of Marine Science and Engineering, 12(10), p. 1728. https://doi.org/10.3390/jmse12101728. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
21. Yafimava, K. et al. (2024) 'EU sanctions on Russian LNG: choices and consequences,' Oxford Institute for Energy Studies [Preprint]. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
Metrics
Views & Downloads
Similar Articles
- Eco-Microcredit and Rural Transformation: The Mediating Role of Sustainable Farming Practices and the Moderating Effect of Financial Literacy on Household Sustainability
- Comparative Analysis of Traditional and Innovative Methods for Rare Earth Element Extraction
- Global Trends in Sustainability Reporting: A Malaysian Evidence
- Blockchain for Transparency: Tracking Zero-Waste Practices Across the Fashion Value Chain in Bangladesh
- Entrepreneurship and the Path to Globalizing Jamdani Weaving: Tradition, Innovation, and Sustainable Digital Practices