Exploring Affective Engagement with Automated and Peer Feedback in L2 Writing: Evidence from Chinese Undergraduates

Feedback is increasingly perceived as an interactive process instead of a one-way transmission of information. In this context, affective engagement, or how students respond emotionally to feedback, has become a critical factor shaping the effectiveness of feedback. While automated writing evaluation (AWE) feedback and peer feedback are widely used in university English writing classrooms, limited research has examined students’ emotional experiences and attitudinal responses across different feedback types. Using a qualitative case study design, this study investigates the affective engagement of four undergraduate English majors completing a writing task involving AWE feedback and peer feedback in a Chinese university writing course. Drawing on students’ drafts, feedback comments, reflective journals, and retrospective interview data, this study explores students’ emotional experiences and attitudinal stances toward both types of feedback. The findings indicate that AWE feedback elicits a combination of trust and mild anxiety, whereas peer feedback generates greater emotional variability. Learner beliefs, as well as feedback accuracy and features, significantly shape students’ affective engagement. The findings highlight affective engagement as a key psychological mechanism in feedback processing and suggest that effective feedback practices should attend not only to informational quality but also to learners’ emotional responses.

Affective engagement; AWE feedback; Peer feedback; L2 writing

1. Bharuthram, S., & van Heerden, M. (2023). The affective effect: Exploring undergraduate students’ emotions in giving and receiving peer feedback. Innovations in Education and Teaching International, 60(3), 379-389. https://doi.org/10.1186/s41239-024-00455-4 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

2. Chen, H., & Hu, G. (2025). Investigating relationships among students’ affective, behavioral and cognitive engagement with peer feedback on EFL writing. Studies in Educational Evaluation, 84, 101430. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.stueduc.2024.101430 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

3. Chen, J., & Huang, K. (2025). ‘It is useful, but we feel confused and frustrated’: exploring learner engagement with AWE feedback in collaborative academic writing. Computer Assisted Language Learning, 1-32. https://doi.org/10.1080/09588221.2025.2508805 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

4. Chen, W., Liu, D., & Lin, C. (2023). Collaborative peer feedback in L2 writing: Affective, behavioral, cognitive, and social engagement. Frontiers in Psychology, 14, 1078141. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2023.1078141 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

5. Cheng, X., Liu, Y., & Wang, C. (2023). Understanding student engagement with teacher and peer feedback in L2 writing. System, 119, 103176. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.system.2023.103176 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

6. Ellis, R. (2010). Epilogue: A framework for investigating oral and written corrective feedback. Studies in second language acquisition, 32(2), 335-349. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0272263109990544 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

7. Ene, E., & Yao, J. (2021). How Does That Make You Feel: Students’ Affective Engagement with Feedback. Language Teaching Research Quarterly, 25, 66-83. https://doi.org/10.32038/ltrq.2021.25.04 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

8. Fan, N., & Ma, Y. (2022). The Effects of Automated Writing Evaluation (AWE) Feedback on Students’ English Writing Quality: A Systematic Literature Review. Language Teaching Research Quarterly, 28, 53-73. https://doi.org/10.32038/ltrq.2022.28.03 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

9. Fan, Y., & Xu, J. (2020). Exploring student engagement with peer feedback on L2 writing. Journal of Second Language Writing, 50, 100775. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jslw.2020.100775 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

10. Fu, Q. K., Zou, D., Xie, H., & Cheng, G. (2024). A review of AWE feedback: Types, learning outcomes, and implications. Computer Assisted Language Learning, 37(1-2), 179-221. https://doi.org/10.1080/09588221.2022.2033787 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

11. Han, Y. (2017). Mediating and being mediated: Learner beliefs and learner engagement with written corrective feedback. System, 69, 133-142. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.system.2017.07.003 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

12. Han, Y., & Gao, X. (2021). Research on learner engagement with written (corrective) feedback: Insights and issues. In J. Philp & R. E. Papi (Eds.), Student engagement in the language classroom (pp. 56-74). Multilingual Matters. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

13. Han, Y., & Xu, Y. (2021). Student feedback literacy and engagement with feedback: A case study of Chinese undergraduate students. Teaching in Higher Education, 26(2), 181-196. https://doi.org/10.1080/13562517.2019.1648410 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

14. Hu, G., & Lam, S. T. E. (2010). Issues of cultural appropriateness and pedagogical efficacy: Exploring peer review in a second language writing class. Instructional science, 38(4), 371-394. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11251-008-9086-1 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

15. Jin, X., Jiang, Q., Xiong, W., Feng, Y., & Zhao, W. (2024). Effects of student engagement in peer feedback on writing performance in higher education. Interactive Learning Environments, 32(1), 128-143. https://doi.org/10.1080/10494820.2022.2081209 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

16. Li, M., & Reynolds, B. L. (2023). Academic emotions in giving genre-based peer feedback: an emotional intelligence perspective. Applied Linguistics Review, 14(4), 993-1026. https://doi.org/10.1515/applirev-2020-0134 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

17. Liu, S., & Yu, G. (2022). L2 learners’ engagement with automated feedback: An eye-tracking study. Language Learning & Technology, 26(2), 78-105. https://doi.org/10.64152/10125/73480 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

18. Mao, Z., & Lee, I. (2024). Student engagement with written feedback: Critical issues and way forward. RELC Journal, 55(3), 810-818. https://doi.org/10.1177/00336882221150811 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

19. Qian, J., & Li, D. (2025). Toward a better understanding of student engagement with peer feedback: A longitudinal study. International Review of Applied Linguistics in Language Teaching, 63(1), 709-734. https://doi.org/10.1515/iral-2023-0108 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

20. Ranalli, J. (2021). L2 student engagement with automated feedback on writing: Potential for learning and issues of trust. Journal of Second Language Writing, 52, 100816. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jslw.2021.100816 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

21. Saeli, H., & Cheng, A. (2019). Student writers’ affective engagement with grammar-centred written corrective feedback: The impact of (mis) aligned practices and perceptions. Canadian Journal of Applied Linguistics, 22(2), 109-132. https://doi.org/10.7202/1065058ar [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

22. Shi, Y. (2021). Exploring learner engagement with multiple sources of feedback on L2 writing across genres. Frontiers in Psychology, 12, 758867. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2021.758867 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

23. Tian, L., & Zhou, Y. (2020). Learner engagement with automated feedback, peer feedback and teacher feedback in an online EFL writing context. System, 91, 102247. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.system.2020.102247 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

24. Wang, Y., Cao, Y., Gong, S., Wang, Z., Li, N., & Ai, L. (2022). Interaction and learning engagement in online learning: The mediating roles of online learning self-efficacy and academic emotions. Learning and Individual Differences, 94, 102128. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lindif.2022.102128 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

25. Wei, Y., & Liu, D. (2024). Incorporating peer feedback in academic writing: a systematic review of benefits and challenges. Frontiers in Psychology, 15, 1506725. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2024.1506725 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

26. Wu, Y., & Schunn, C. D. (2023). Passive, active, and constructive engagement with peer feedback: A revised model of learning from peer feedback. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 73, 102160. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cedpsych.2023.102160 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

27. Xu, J., & Zhang, S. (2025). Understanding the dynamics of EFL learner affective engagement with receiving peer feedback: A case study from the sociocultural perspective. Learning and Individual Differences, 120, 102662. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lindif.2025.102662 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

28. Xue, S., Yang, Y., Du, J., & Liu, F. (2023). Multi-layered e-feedback anxiety: An action research study among Chinese learners using peer feedback activities in an academic writing course. Frontiers in Psychology, 14, 1062517. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2023.1062517 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

29. Yamazaki, J. S., & Hiver, P. (2024). Learners’ behavioral engagement and performance on linguistically difficult L2 reading tasks: The effects of effort feedback, self-efficacy, and attributions. Language Teaching Research, 4(2), 1-10. https://doi.org/10.1177/13621688241304871 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

30. Zhai, N., & Ma, X. (2022). Automated writing evaluation (AWE) feedback: A systematic investigation of college students’ acceptance. Computer Assisted Language Learning, 35(9), 2817-2842. https://doi.org/10.1080/09588221.2021.1897019 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

31. Zhang, Z. (2022). Promoting student engagement with feedback: insights from collaborative pedagogy and teacher feedback. Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education, 47(4), 540-555. https://doi.org/10.1080/02602938.2021.1933900 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

32. Zhang, Y., & Gao, Y. (2024). Exploring the dynamics of student engagement with receiving peer feedback in L2 writing. Assessing Writing, 60, 100842. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.asw.2024.100842 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

33. Zhang, Z. V., & Hyland, K. (2018). Student engagement with teacher and automated feedback on L2 writing. Assessing Writing, 36, 90-102. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.asw.2018.02.004 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

34. Zhang, Z. V., & Hyland, K. (2022). Fostering student engagement with feedback: An integrated approach. Assessing Writing, 51, 100586. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.asw.2021.100586 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

35. Zhu, X., Yao, Y., & Lu, Q. (2024). The relationships between the growth mindset, writing feedback literacy, and feedback engagement of undergraduate students in L1 Chinese writing learning. Studies in Educational Evaluation, 80, 101320. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.stueduc.2023.101320 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

• Assessment of the Role of Artificial Intelligence in Repositioning TVET for Economic Development in Nigeria
• Teachers’ Use of Assure Model Instructional Design on Learners’ Problem Solving Efficacy in Secondary Schools in Bungoma County, Kenya
• “E-Booksan Ang Kaalaman”: Development, Validation, and Utilization of Electronic Book in Academic Performance of Grade 9 Students in Social Studies
• Analyzing EFL University Students’ Academic Speaking Skills Through Self-Recorded Video Presentation
• Major Findings of The Study on Total Quality Management in Teachers’ Education Institutions (TEIs) In Assam – An Evaluative Study