Exploring Metacognitive Awareness of Reading Strategies among Undergraduates

This study explores how Malaysian ESL undergraduates are aware of their reading strategies and processes. This study draws on the framework established by Mokhtari and Reichard (2002) to explore how students view their use of global, problem-solving, and support reading strategies, as well as the relationship between these strategies. A quantitative method was employed, involving 146 participants who completed a self-report questionnaire. Studies show that students frequently use various reading strategies, particularly demonstrating a strong interest in predicting, rereading, and highlighting. The findings reveal significant positive relationships among all three types of strategies, indicating that students often use multiple strategies at the same time to enhance their understanding. The results highlight the importance of developing metacognitive awareness in ESL teaching and learning process.

Reading strategies, Metacognitive awareness

1. Jackson,S.L. (2015) Research methods and Statistics-A Critical Thinking Approach (5tH Edition) Boston, USA: Cengage Learning. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

2. Mokhtari, K., & Reichard, C. (2002). Assessing students’ metacognitive awareness of reading strategies. Journal of Educational Psychology, 94 (2), 249-259. Retrieved from https://citeseerx.ist.psu.edu/viewdoc/download?doi=10.1.1.456.5716&rep=rep1&type=pdf [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

3. Rahmat,N.H., Sakkanayok,K., Taib,S.A., Jenal,N., Adam, S., Abidin,N.S.Z., & Varma,S.B. (2022) Exploring Relationship between Reading Difficulties and Reading Strategies. International Journal of Academic Research in Business & Social Sciences, 12(9), 918—930. https://doi.org/10.6007/IJARBSS/v12-i9/14719 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

4. Awang, R., Hashim, H., & Ali, M. M. (2024). Reading strategy use among Malaysian undergraduates in academic English reading. Journal of Language and Literacy Studies, 16(1), 25–38. https://doi.org/10.17509/jlls.v16i1.XXXX [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

5. El Madani, A., Ibrahim, N., & Salleh, N. M. (2024). Metacognitive awareness and its impact on academic reading comprehension among ESL learners. Asian Journal of University Education, 20(2), 112–129. https://doi.org/10.24191/ajue.v20i2.XXXX [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

6. Khurram, B. (2023). Teaching reading strategies to ESL students: Effects on reading comprehension and engagement. English Language Teaching, 16(4), 56–65. https://doi.org/10.5539/elt.v16n4p56 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

7. Pervaiz, S., Nadeem, M., & Khan, I. (2022). Metacognitive reading strategies among Pakistani ESL secondary learners: An analysis of frequency and effectiveness. International Journal of Instruction, 15(1), 121–136. https://doi.org/10.29333/iji.2022.1518a [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

8. Zhang, L. J., & Wu, A. (2019). Chinese university students' use of metacognitive strategies and their English reading comprehension performance. System, 87, 102148. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.system.2019.102148 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

9. Anggia, H., & Habók, A. (2024). University students’ metacognitive awareness of reading strategies (MARS) in online reading and MARS’ role in their English reading comprehension. PLOS ONE, 19(11), e0313254. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0313254 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

10. Carrell, P. L., & Eisterhold, J. C. (1983). Schema theory and ESL reading pedagogy. TESOL Quarterly, 17(4), 553–573. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

11. Collins, A., Brown, J. S., & Newman, S. E. (1989). Cognitive apprenticeship: Teaching the craft of reading, writing, and mathematics. In L. B. Resnick (Ed.), Knowing, learning, and instruction: Essays in honor of Robert Glaser (pp. 453–494). Lawrence Erlbaum. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

12. Flavell, J. H. (1979). Metacognition and cognitive monitoring: A new area of cognitive–developmental inquiry. American Psychologist, 34(10), 906–911. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

13. Guthrie, J. T., Wigfield, A., Barbosa, P., Perencevich, K. C., Taboada, A., & Davis, M. H. et al. (2004). Increasing reading comprehension and engagement through concept-oriented reading instruction. Journal of Educational Psychology, 96(3), 403–423. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

14. Khartite, B. (2021). Implications of schema theory on teaching EFL and ESL reading comprehension: The role of pre-reading activities. International Journal of Linguistics and Translation Studies, 2(4), 75–90. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

15. Khellab, F., Demirel, Ö., & Mohammadzadeh, B. (2022). Effect of teaching metacognitive reading strategies on reading comprehension of engineering students. SAGE Open, 12, 1–12. https://doi.org/10.1177/21582440221138069 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

16. Khurram, B. A. (2023). The impact of metacognitive instruction on ESL university students’ awareness and use of reading strategies. SAGE Open, 13(2), 1–13. https://doi.org/10.1177/21582440231179695 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

17. Mokhtari, K., & Sheorey, R. (2002). Measuring ESL Students’ Awareness of Reading Strategies. Journal of Developmental Education, 25, 2-11. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

18. Alenezi, S. (2021). Investigating Saudi EFL students’ knowledge and beliefs related to English reading comprehension. Arab World English Journal, 12(1), 339–356. https://doi.org/10.24093/awej/vol12no1.23 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

19. Al-Mekhlafi, A. M. (2018). EFL Learners Metacognitive Awareness of reading Strategies. International Journal of Instruction, 11(2), 297–308. https://doi.org/10.12973/iji.2018.11220a [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

20. Aziz, A. a. A., Nordin, N. A., Yatim, A. I. A., Shaidin, S., Saad, N. H. M., & Rahmat, N. H. (2023). A Study of The Relationship between Metacognitive Reading Strategies among Undergraduates. International Journal of Academic Research in Business and Social Sciences, 13(6). https://doi.org/10.6007/ijarbss/v13-i6/17044 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

21. Banditvilai, C. (2020). The effectiveness of reading strategies on reading comprehension. International Journal of Social Science and Humanity, 46–50. https://doi.org/10.18178/ijssh.2020.v10.1012 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

22. Ekowijayanto, M., Astutik, Y., & Khomariyah, N. (2021). Understanding English Texts for Non-English students: Reading Habits and Reading Preferences in Az-Zainiyah Nurul Jadid. International Journal of English Education and Linguistics (IJoEEL), 3(1), 39–49. https://doi.org/10.33650/ijoeel.v3i1.2259 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

23. Gustanti, Y., & Ayu, M. (2021). THE CORRELATION BETWEEN COGNITIVE READING STRATEGIES AND STUDENTS’ ENGLISH PROFICIENCY TEST SCORE. Journal of English Language Teaching and Learning, 2(2), 95–100. https://doi.org/10.33365/jeltl.v2i2.1452 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

24. Habók, A., Oo, T. Z., & Magyar, A. (2024). The effect of reading strategy use on online reading comprehension. Heliyon, 10(2), e24281. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.heliyon.2024.e24281 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

25. Küçükoğlu, H. (2013). Improving reading skills through effective reading strategies. Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences, 70, 709–714. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2013.01.113 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

26. Louiza, C., & Fadhila, A. (2022). Metacognitive Awareness and Perceived Use of Reading Strategies in Academic Reading Comprehension: Case of Algerian EFL Students. El-Quari’e Journal of Literary, Critical and Linguistic Studies, 5(1), 750–763. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

27. Ngoc, D. T. B., & Nhung, V. T. (2022). METACOGNITIVE READING STRATEGIES USED BY ENGLISH-MAJORS AT a UNIVERSITY IN VIETNAM. VNU Journal of Foreign Studies, 38(5), 180–196. https://doi.org/10.25073/2525-2445/vnufs.4872 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

28. Nirwana, I., Mahmudah, K., & Pratama, A. (2025). Systematic review: How the Reading aloud strategy still used in the last five years. SALEE Study of Applied Linguistics and English Education, 6(1), 234–253. https://doi.org/10.35961/salee.v6i1.1638 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

29. Nisrina, N. (2023). Exploring reading strategies used by students based on metacognitive awareness. Ahmad Dahlan Journal of English Studies, 10(1). https://doi.org/10.26555/adjes.v10i1.273 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

30. Ondé, D., Jiménez, V., Alvarado, J. M., & Gràcia, M. (2022). Analysis of the structural validity of the reduced version of metacognitive awareness of reading strategies inventory. Frontiers in Psychology, 13. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2022.894327 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

31. Pahrizal, N., Vintoni, A., Sotlikova, R., & Ya’akub, H. Z. H. (2024). Metacognitive Reading Strategies and Their Impact on Comprehension: Insights from Rural EFL Learners. Indonesian Journal on Learning and Advanced Education (IJOLAE), 7(1), 18–36. https://doi.org/10.23917/ijolae.v7i1.23908 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

32. Shah, N. S. G. M., Ali, N. Z., & Ahmad, N. N. (2024). Analytical study of Awareness of Metacognitive Reading Strategies and Reading Comprehension among College Students. Voyage Journal of Educational Studies, 4(1), 34–46. https://doi.org/10.58622/vjes.v4i1.120 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

33. Suwarso, P. N., & Praseno, M. D. (2022). Developing an intensive reading material for EFL students: A final product. JOALL (Journal of Applied Linguistics and Literature), 7(1), 259–275. https://doi.org/10.33369/joall.v7i1.19735 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

• Evaluating the Impacts of Mind Mapping Strategy on Developing EFL Students’ Critical Reading Skills
• Significance of Reading Instructions for Language Improvement in Children with Down Syndrome
• Prenasalised Consonants in Liangmai
• Metadiscourse Matters: Definitions, Models, and Advantages for ESL/ EFL Writing
• Blank Minds and Stuck Voices: Understanding and Addressing Cognitive Anxiety in High-Stakes ESL Speaking Tests