Exploring Peer Scaffolding Strategies through Discourse Analysis in Senior High School

This qualitative study explored peer scaffolding strategies among senior high school students during collaborative group work through discourse analysis. Conducted at Kiburiao National High School in Bukidnon, Philippines, the research examined how learners used language to support one another cognitively, socially, and linguistically in authentic classroom interactions. Data were gathered through classroom observations, audio-recorded group discussions, and semi-structured interviews with students and teachers. The analysis revealed nine interrelated themes organized under three focal areas. Under peer scaffolding strategies, students employed clarification and simplification, role assignment, and active engagement to sustain collaborative dialogue. Under the influence of learning and participation, peer interaction enhanced motivation and engagement, improved understanding and communication skills, and fostered ownership of learning. Under peer scaffolding challenges, students encountered task imbalance, emotional barriers, and communication breakdowns that sometimes hindered group cohesion.
Findings demonstratedthat peer scaffolding is a dynamic, socially situated process that enhances comprehension, confidence, and collective responsibility among learners. Despite recurring challenges, the discourse of collaboration reflected empathy, adaptability, and shared problem-solving. The study concludes that structured, supportive group work can transform classroom interaction into a space for mutual learning and linguistic growth. It recommends that teachers intentionally design collaborative tasks that ensure equitable participation, cultivate emotional safety, and strengthen communicative competence to maximize the potential of peer scaffolding in multilingual classrooms.

peer scaffolding, discourse analysis

1. Alzubi, A. A., Nazim, M., & Ahamad, J. (2024). Examining the effect of a collaborative learning intervention on EFL students’ English learning and social interaction. Journal of Pedagogical Research, 8(2), 26-46. https://doi.org/10.33902/JPR.202425541 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

2. Azir, I. D. A. (2019). Applying peer scaffolding to enhance the EFL vocational students’ speaking skills. Ethical Lingua: Journal of Language Teaching and Literature, 6(2), 149–157. https://doi.org/10.30605/25409190.v6.149-157 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

3. Bozkurt, Buse & Aydin, Selami. (2023). The Impact of Collaborative Learning on Speaking Anxiety Among Foreign Language Learners in Online and Face-to-Face Environments. International Journal of Virtual and Personal Learning Environments, DOI:10.4018/IJVPLE.316973 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

4. Casinto, C. D. (2023). Scaffolded peer feedback and second language writing proficiency: Implications for inclusive ESL teaching practice. Teaching English as a Second or Foreign Language (TESL-EJ), 26(4), 1-37. https://doi.org/10.55593/ej.26104a8 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

5. Chen, M. H., & Ye, S. X. (2022). Extending repair in peer interaction: A conversation-for-learning study. Frontiers in Psychology, 13, 926842. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2022.926842 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

6. Donato, R. (1994). Collective scaffolding in second language learning. In J. P. Lantolf & G. Appel (Eds.), Vygotskian approaches to second language research (pp. 33–56). Ablex. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

7. Gee, J. P. (2014). An introduction to discourse analysis: Theory and method (4th ed.). Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315819679 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

8. Gillies, R. M. (2016). Cooperative learning: Review of research and practice. Australian Journal of Teacher Education, 41(3), 39–54. https://doi.org/10.14221/ajte.2016v41n3.3 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

9. Gonda, D., Tirpáková, A., Pavlovičová, G., & Ďuriš, V. (2024). The role of a team psychological safety feeling in teamwork in the classroom. Heliyon, 10(18), e37618. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.heliyon.2024.e37618 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

10. Hussaini, M. (2024). The impact of cooperative learning on students’ academic achievement and social behavior. International Journal of Academic Research in Education and Review, 12(3), 45–56. https://doi.org/10.5897/IJARER2024.0794 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

11. Jin, T., Jiang, Y., Gu, M. M., & Chen, J. (2022). “Their encouragement makes me feel more confident”: Exploring peer effects on learner engagement in collaborative reading of academic texts. Journal of English for Academic Purposes, 60, Article 101177. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jeap.2022.101177 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

12. Johnson, D. W., & Johnson, R. T. (2009). An educational psychology success story: Social interdependence theory and cooperative learning. Educational Researcher, 38(5), 365–379. https://doi.org/10.3102/0013189X09339057 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

13. Lu, H. S., & Smiles, R. (2022). The role of collaborative learning in the online education. International Journal of Economics, Business and Management Research, 6(6), 125-137. https://doi.org/10.51505/IJEBMR.2022.6608 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

14. Manuel, K. C. (2025). Scaffolding strategies and student self-efficacy in inclusive high school classrooms. Philippine Journal of Educational Research, 19(1), 58–74. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

15. Masinading, M. R., & Gaylo, R. (2022). Collaborative learning practices and participation challenges in public senior high schools. Asia Pacific Journal of Multidisciplinary Research, 10(4), 120–131. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

16. Mercer, N. (2000). Words and minds: How we use language to think together. Routledge. DOI:10.1016/S0346-251X(02)00044-1 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

17. Naeem, F., Nasir, M., & Ahmad, S. (2023). Thematic analysis in qualitative research: A six-phase approach. International Journal of Qualitative Methods, 22, 16094069231187654. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.glmedi.2025.100198 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

18. Quinn, K. N., Kelley, M. M., McGill, K. L., Smith, E. M., Whipps, Z., & Holmes, N. G. (2020, May 15). Group roles in unstructured labs show inequitable gender divide [Preprint]. arXiv. https://arxiv.org/abs/2005.07670 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

19. Roy, K. (2024). Effectiveness of peer teaching in enhancing academic performance, engagement, and social-emotional outcomes among high school students: A quasi-experimental study. https://doi.org/10.13140/RG.2.2.28650.32965 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

20. Salarvand, H., Mousavi, M., & Rahimi, M. (2023). Communication and cooperation challenges in the online classroom in the COVID-19 era: a qualitative study DOI:10.1186/s12909-023-04189-1 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

21. Saunders, W. M. (1989). Collaborative writing tasks and peer interaction. International Journal of Educational Research, 13(1), 101-112. https://doi.org/10.1016/0883-0355(89)90019-0 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

22. Smit, J., & van Eerde, H. (2011). A teacher’s learning process in dual design research: Learning to scaffold language in a multilingual mathematics classroom. ZDM – The International Journal on Mathematics Education, 43(6), 889–900. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11858-011-0350-5 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

23. Soekarno, M., & Ting, S. H. (2020). Fluency and communication strategy use in group interactions for occupational purposes. Journal of English Language Teaching Innovations and Materials (JELTIM), 2(2), 63-84. http://dx.doi.org/10.26418/jeltim.v2i2.41363 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

24. Swain, M., Brooks, L., & Tocalli-Beller, A. (2002). Peer–peer dialogue as a means of second language learning. Annual Review of Applied Linguistics, 22, 171–185. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

25. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0267190502000090 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

26. T’Sas, J., & De Maeyer, S. (2025). Exploratory talk and cognitive engagement in collaborative learning contexts. Learning, Culture and Social Interaction, 48, 101892. DOI:10.59302/cj4khk48 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

27. Usop, J. L. (2024). Socio-cultural, educational, and psychological barriers in ESL learning: A qualitative study of senior high school students. Randwick International of Education and Linguistics Science Journal, 5(3), 1004–1010. https://doi.org/10.47175/rielsj.v5i3.1031. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

28. Van Ryzin, M. J., & Roseth, C. J. (2019). Effects of cooperative learning on peer relations, empathy, and bullying in middle school. Aggressive Behavior, 45(6), 643-651. https://doi.org/10.1002/ab.21858 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

29. Veniati, V., Setyaningsih, E., & Drajati, N. A. (2023). Demystifying conflict in collaborative writing: University EFL students case study. AL-ISLAH: Jurnal Pendidikan, 15(4). https://doi.org/10.35445/alishlah.v15i4.3741 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

30. Vygotsky, L. S. (1978). Mind in society: The development of higher psychological processes. Harvard University Press. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

31. Wang, M. T., & Eccles, J. S. (2023). Adolescent Behavioral, Emotional, and Cognitive Engagement Trajectories in School and Their Differential Relations to Educational Success. Journal of Research on Adolescence, 22, 31-39. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1532-7795.2011.00753.x [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

32. Wilson, K. A., Brickman, P., & Brame, C. J. (2018). Group work and collaborative learning: Best practices. Life Sciences Education, 17(1), fe1. https://doi.org/10.1187/cbe.17-12-0258 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

33. Wood, D., Bruner, J. S., & Ross, G. (1976). The role of tutoring in problem solving. Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry, 17(2), 89–100. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1469-7610.1976.tb00381.x [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

34. Zambrano, J., Kirschner, F., Sweller, J., & Kirschner, P. A. (2019). Effects of group experience and information distribution on collaborative learning. Instructional Science, 47(5), 531–550. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

35. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11251-019-09495-0 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

36. Zhou, T., & Colomer, J. (2024). Cooperative learning promoting cultural diversity and individual accountability: A systematic review. Education Sciences, 14(6), 567. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

37. https://doi.org/10.3390/educsci14060567 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

• Assessment of the Role of Artificial Intelligence in Repositioning TVET for Economic Development in Nigeria
• Teachers’ Use of Assure Model Instructional Design on Learners’ Problem Solving Efficacy in Secondary Schools in Bungoma County, Kenya
• “E-Booksan Ang Kaalaman”: Development, Validation, and Utilization of Electronic Book in Academic Performance of Grade 9 Students in Social Studies
• Analyzing EFL University Students’ Academic Speaking Skills Through Self-Recorded Video Presentation
• Major Findings of The Study on Total Quality Management in Teachers’ Education Institutions (TEIs) In Assam – An Evaluative Study