Exploring Teachers’ Perspectives on Work Environment Factors That Enhance the School Workplace

Authors

Edellita A. Dela Cruz

Graduate Studies, De La Salle Araneta University (Philippines)

Socorro E. Aguja

Graduate Studies, De La Salle Araneta University (Philippines)

Maricar S. Prudente

Science Education Department, De La Salle University (Philippines)

Article Information

DOI: 10.47772/IJRISS.2026.1026EDU0258

Subject Category: Educational Management

Volume/Issue: 10/26 | Page No: 3270-3279

Publication Timeline

Submitted: 2026-05-01

Accepted: 2026-05-06

Published: 2026-05-22

Abstract

The study aimed to investigate the perceptions of teachers of the workplace environment program in a private basic education school in Valenzuela City, employing a mixed- methods sequential explanatory design that included both qualitative and quantitative approaches. The concentrated-on teachers’ workloads, support, relationships between and among school personnel, teacher roles, and the implementation of work changes. It was found that there was a significant improvement in the workplace environment condition of the teachers after the implementation of the PROTEC school workplace development program. It was observed from the results of the study that the highest improvement fell in change management, followed by role and relationship factors. However, there is still room for continuous improvement on support and workload factors in the workplace environment condition of teachers. It stressed the need for schools to support teachers in lesson delivery through diverse strategies and resources to foster academic success. It highlighted the importance of fair compensation for educators facing teaching overload and those covering absent colleagues, advocating for remuneration policies that recognize these extra responsibilities. Moreover, the researcher concluded that there was a significant difference in the perceptions of the respondents on a workplace environment condition before, during, and after the implementation of the PROTEC school workplace environment development program. The findings of the study served as a basis for proposing an action plan that intends to improve the management of a school workplace environment program for policy creation and integration that are beneficial to teachers’ well-being, fulfillment, and effectiveness, leading to the delivery for high-quality education.

Keywords

School Workplace; School Workplace Development Program; Teachers’ Perspectives

Downloads

References

1. Bahrain, S., et al. (2023). Effective communication in educational organizations. [Publisher details needed]. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

2. Baluyos, G. R., Rivera, H. L., & Baluyos, E. L. (2019). Teachers’ job satisfaction and work performance. Open Journal of Social Sciences, 7(8), 206–221. https://doi.org/10.4236/jss.2019.78015 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

3. Billingsley, B., Bettini, E., & Jones, N. (2020). Supporting special education teacher retention. Teaching Exceptional Children, 52(6), 345–356. https://doi.org/10.1177/0040059920918613 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

4. Bhandari, P. (2024). Ethical considerations in research. Scribbr. https://www.scribbr.com [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

5. Charner-Laird, M., Szczesiul, S., & Linsky, S. (2017). Teachers’ experiences with leadership and school culture. Educational Administration Quarterly, 53(5), 720–758. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

6. Collie, R. J., Shapka, J. D., & Perry, N. E. (2012). School climate and teacher well-being. Educational Psychology, 32(6), 641–657. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

7. Conley, S., & You, S. (2017). Key influences on teacher performance and satisfaction. Educational Administration Quarterly, 53(5), 732–765. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

8. Corbin, J., et al. (2019). Collaboration in education: Enhancing teacher development. Journal of Educational Change, 20(2), 145–167. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

9. Creswell, J. W. (2014). Research design: Qualitative, quantitative, and mixed methods approaches (4th ed.). SAGE Publications. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

10. Creswell, J. W., & Plano Clark, V. L. (2018). Designing and conducting mixed methods research (3rd ed.). SAGE Publications. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

11. David, C. C., Albert, J. R. G., & Vizmanos, J. F. V. (2019). Pressures on public school teachers in the Philippines. Philippine Institute for Development Studies. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

12. Day, C., & Qing, G. (2009). Teacher emotions: Well-being and effectiveness. Teachers and Teaching, 15(1), 15–31. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

13. Deming, W. E. (2000). Out of the crisis. MIT Press.Hascher, T., Waber, J., & Stecher, L. (2021). Teacher well-being: A systematic review. Educational Research Review, 34, 100411. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

14. Hutchins, H. M. (2024). Feedback and teacher development. Human Resource Development Review. [Details needed] [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

15. Jardí, A., et al. (2022). Teacher collaboration and school improvement. School Effectiveness and School Improvement, 33(2), 1–20. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

16. Jomuad, P. D., et al. (2021). Teachers’ workload and stress. International Journal of Educational Research and Innovation, 15, 200–213. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

17. Masoom, M. R. (2021). Workplace environment and teacher effectiveness. Journal of Education and Practice, 12(5), 45–53. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

18. Palm, K., et al. (2024). Technology integration in educational environments. Computers & Education. [Details needed] [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

19. Rai, P. (2018). Collaboration in teaching and learning. International Journal of Education and Development, 8(1), 12–20. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

20. Rechsteiner, K., et al. (2022). Professional collaboration among teachers. Teaching and Teacher Education, 108, 103–120. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

21. Tarraya, H. (2023). Teacher workload and well-being in the Philippines. Asia Pacific Education Review. [Details needed] [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

22. Venkatesh, V., Morris, M. G., Davis, G. B., & Davis, F. D. (2003). User acceptance of information technology: Toward a unified view. MIS Quarterly, 27(3), 425–478. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

23. Ventista, O. M., & Brown, C. (2023). Teacher workload and burnout. Educational Review, 75(3), 456–472. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

24. Wilson, A., et al. (2020). The role of feedback in teacher performance. Teaching and Teacher Education, 92, 103–118. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

Metrics

Views & Downloads

Similar Articles