Exploring the Influence of Social Cognitive Theory on Academic Writing and ChatGPT

This study explores the influence of Social Cognitive Theory on academic writing and ChatGPT usage among university learners. Specifically, it examines the relationships among environmental, personal, and behavioural factors in academic writing. A quantitative survey was conducted involving 256 respondents from various academic disciplines. The instrument measured environmental factors through ChatGPT usage, critical thinking, academic achievement, and student engagement; personal factors through metacognitive and cognitive writing strategies; and behavioural factors through effort regulation, social, and affective strategies. The findings revealed a significant difference in writing components across gender but no significant difference across disciplines. Learners perceived ChatGPT positively, particularly for translation, idea generation, research support, and engagement. Correlation analysis further showed significant positive relationships among environmental, personal, and behavioural factors. The findings support Social Cognitive Theory by demonstrating that academic writing in AI-supported environments is shaped by the reciprocal interaction between learners’ writing strategies, behaviours, and environmental support.

Social Cognitive Theory, ChatGPT, writing strategies, artificial intelligence, ESL learners

1. Adam, K., & Chowdhury, M. (2024). From Prompt to Paper: A Case Analysis of AI and Academic Writing. Proceedings of the International Conference of the Learning Sciences, 2241-2242. https://doi.org/10.22318/icls2024.268898 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

2. Afzal, M., Arshad, N., & Shaheen, A. (2025). ChatGPT and the future of academic writing: Enhancing productivity and creativity. Journal of Engineering and Computational Intelligence Review, 3(1), 1-11. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

3. Ahmad, N., Alias, F.A., Hamat, M., & Mohamed, S.A. (2024). Reliability Analysis: Application of Cronbach’s Alpha in Research Instruments. SIG: e-Learning@CS, 114-119. https://appspenang.uitm.edu.my/sigcs/ [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

4. Alfarraj, Y. F., & Wardat, Y. (2024). Exploring the Impact of ChatGPT on Scientific [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

5. Research: Assessing Strengths, Weaknesses, Opportunities, and Threats. Education as [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

6. Change, 28(1), 1-27. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

7. Asad, M. M., Shahzad, S., Shah, S. H. A., Sherwani, F., & Almusharraf, N. M. (2024). ChatGPT as artificial intelligence-based generative multimedia for English writing pedagogy: challenges and opportunities from an educator’s perspective. The International Journal of Information and Learning Technology, 41(5), 490-506. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

8. Bandura, A. (2012). Social cognitive theory. In P. A. M. Van Lange, A. W. Kruglanski, & E. T. Higgins (Eds.), Handbook of theories of social psychology (pp. 349–373). Sage Publications Ltd. https://doi.org/10.4135/9781446249215.n18 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

9. Bouwer, R., & Van der Veen, C. (2024). Write, talk and rewrite: The effectiveness of a dialogic writing intervention in upper elementary education. Reading and Writing, 37, 1435–1456. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

10. Chen, L. (2025). Unlocking the beat: how AI tools drive music students' motivation, engagement, creativity and learning success. European Journal of Education, 60(1), e12823. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

11. Doe, J., Smith, A. B., & Johnson, C. (2022). The impact of AI language models on undergraduate writing. Journal of Educational Technology, 12(3), 45-60. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

12. Durgungoz, A., & Kharrufa, A. (2026). “ChatGPT is like a study buddy, a teacher and sometimes just a friend”: a longitudinal exploration of students’ interactions, perception and acceptance. Interactive Learning Environments, 34(2), 758-777. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

13. Farhi, F., Jeljeli, R., Aburezeq, I., Dweikat, F. F., Al-shami, S. A., & Slamene, R. (2023). Analysing the students' views, concerns, and perceived ethics about chat GPT usage. Computers and Education: Artificial Intelligence, 5, 100180. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.caeai.2023.100180 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

14. Gultom, A. M., Ashadi, A., Fatnalaila, F., Azizah, S. N., & Rosyidah, D. M. (2024). The use of chat GPT for academic writing in higher education. Formosa Journal of Sustainable Research, 3(8), 1713-1730. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

15. Guna, S., Kande, F., & Halum, Y. S. (2025). Lexical and Structural Challenges in Indonesian EFL Learners' Narrative Writing. Lensa: Kajian Kebahasaan, Kesusastraan, dan Budaya, 15(2), 280-299. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

16. He, L. (2024) The Application of SPSS Correlation Analysis in the Study if Precision Teaching of English in Universities. Applied Mathematics and Nonlinear Science, 9(1), 1-13. http://dx.doi.org/10.2478/amns-2024-1371 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

17. Holland, A., & Ciachir, C. (2025). A qualitative study of students’ lived experience and perceptions of using ChatGPT: immediacy, equity and integrity. Interactive Learning Environments, 33(1), 483–494. https://doi.org/10.1080/10494820.2024.2350655 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

18. Huallpa, J. J., Flores Arocutipa, J. P., Panduro, W. D., Huete, L. C., Flores Limo, F. A., Herrera, E. E., Alba Callacna, R. A., Ariza Flores, V. A., Medina Romero, M. Á., Quispe, I. M., & Hernández Hernández, F. A. (2023). Exploring the ethical considerations of using ChatGPT in university education. Periodicals of Engineering and Natural Sciences, 11(4), 105–115. https://doi.org/10.21533/pen.v11i4.3770 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

19. Jarrah, A. M., Wardat, Y., & Fidalgo, P. (2023). Using ChatGPT in academic writing is (not) a form of plagiarism: What does the literature say? Online Journal of Communication and Media Technologies, 13(4). https://doi.org/10.30935/ojcmt/13572 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

20. Jo, H. (2023). Understanding AI tool engagement: A study of ChatGPT usage and word-of-mouth among university students and office workers. Telematics and Informatics, 85, 102067. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

21. Jusun, K. D., & Yunus, M. (2017). The effectiveness of using sentence makers in improving writing performance among pupils in Lubok Antu rural schools. In International Conference on Education (ICE2) 2018: Education and innovation in science in the digital era (pp. 469–475). https://core.ac.uk/download/pdf/267023579.pdf [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

22. Khairuddin, Z., Rahmat, N. H., Noor, M. M., & Khairuddin, Z. (2021) The Use of Rhetorical Strategies in Argumentative Essays. Pertanika Journal of Social Sciences & Humanities, 29(S3), 263-285). https://doi.org/10.47836/pjssh.29.S3.14 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

23. Mahapatra, S. (2024). Impact of ChatGPT on ESL students’ academic writing skills: A mixed methods intervention study. Smart Learning Environments, 11(9), 1–23. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40561-024-00295-9 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

24. Malik, M. A., Amjad, A. I., Aslam, S., & Fakhrou, A. (2024). Global insights: ChatGPT’s [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

25. influence on academic and research writing, creativity, and plagiarism policies. Frontiers [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

26. in Research Metrics and Analytics, 9. https://doi.org/10.3389/frma.2024.1486832 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

27. Na, H., Staudt Willet, K. B., Shi, H., Hur, J., He, D., & Kim, C. (2025). Initial discussions of ChatGPT in education-related subreddits. Journal of Research on Technology in Education, 57(5), 953-971. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

28. Perkins, M. (2023). Academic Integrity considerations of AI Large Language Models in the post-pandemic era: ChatGPT and beyond. Journal of University Teaching and Learning [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

29. Practice, 20(2). https://doi.org/10.53761/1.20.02.07 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

30. Peter, J. & Singaravelu, G. (2020). Problems in writing in english among high school learners. AEGAEUM Journal, 8(9), 1502-1515. https://www.researchgate.net/profile/GovindarajanSingaravelu/publication/351048985 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

31. Playfoot, D., Quigley, M., & Thomas, A. G. (2024). Hey ChatGPT, give me a title for a paper about degree apathy and student use of AI for assignment writing. The Internet and Higher Education, 62, 100950. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

32. Rahmat, N. H. (2021). An Investigative Study of Cognitive and Metacognitive Paraphrasing Strategies in ESL Writing. International Journal of Academic Research in Business & Social Sciences, 11(3), 76-87. http://dx.doi.org/10.6007/IJARBSS/v11-i3/8919 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

33. Raoofi, S. Miri, A., Gharibi, J. & Malaki, B. (2017). Assessing and Validating a Writing Strategy Scale for Undergraduate Students. Journal of Language Teaching and Research, Vol 8(3), pp 624-633. Retrieved from http://www.academypublication.com/issues2/jltr/vol08/03/23.pdf [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

34. Shah, M. A. (2024). Meaning and Statistical Analysis of T-Tests in SPSS. Journal of Saidu Medical College, 14(1), 64-65. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

35. Smith, C., & Johnson, D. (2021). Exploring the use of AI chatbots in academic writing support services. International Journal of Writing Support, 8(2), 120-138. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

36. Tiwari, C. K., Bhat, M., Khan, S. T., Subramaniam, R., & Khan, M. A. I. (2024). What drives students toward ChatGPT? An investigation of the factors influencing adoption and usage of ChatGPT. Interactive Technology and Smart Education, 21(3), 333-355. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

37. Tlili, A., Shehata, B., Adarkwah, M. A., Bozkurt, A., Hickey, D. T., Huang, R., & Agyemang, B. (2023). What if the devil is my guardian angel: ChatGPT as a case study of using chatbots in education. Smart learning environments, 10(1), 15. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

38. Vetter, T.R. (2017). Descriptive Statistics: Reporting the Answers to the 5 Basic Questions of Who, What, Why, When , Where, and a Sixth, so What? Anesth Analg, 12595), 1797-1802. https://doi.org/10.1213/ane.0000000000002471 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

39. Wise, B., Emerson, L., Van Luyn, A., Dyson, B., Bjork, C., & Thomas, S. E. (2024). A scholarly dialogue: Writing scholarship, authorship, academic integrity and the challenges of AI. Higher Education Research & Development, 43(3), 578-590. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

40. Yilmaz, H., Maxutov, S., Baitekov, A., & Balta, N. (2023). Student attitudes towards Chat GPT: A technology acceptance model survey. International Educational Review, 1(1), 57-83. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

41. Youssef, E., Medhat, M., Abdellatif, S., & Al Malek, M. (2024). Examining the effect of ChatGPT usage on students’ academic learning and achievement: A survey-based study in Ajman,UAE. Computers and Education: Artificial Intelligence, 7(Dec 2024), 100316. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.caeai.2024.100316 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

42. Ziegenfuss, J. Y., Casey A. E., Jennifer M. D., Meghan M. J., Thomas E. K, and Marna, C. (2021). Impact of Demographic Survey Questions on Response Rate and Measurement: A Randomized Experiment. Survey Practice 14 (1), https://doi.org/10.29115/SP-2021-0010 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

• Assessment of the Role of Artificial Intelligence in Repositioning TVET for Economic Development in Nigeria
• Teachers’ Use of Assure Model Instructional Design on Learners’ Problem Solving Efficacy in Secondary Schools in Bungoma County, Kenya
• “E-Booksan Ang Kaalaman”: Development, Validation, and Utilization of Electronic Book in Academic Performance of Grade 9 Students in Social Studies
• Analyzing EFL University Students’ Academic Speaking Skills Through Self-Recorded Video Presentation
• Major Findings of The Study on Total Quality Management in Teachers’ Education Institutions (TEIs) In Assam – An Evaluative Study