Exploring the Relationship Between Self-Efficacy, Digital Competence, and AI Dependence among Senior College Students in a Private University in Cebu, Philippines

The rapid integration of artificial intelligence (AI) in higher education has introduced new learning opportunities while raising concerns about students’ potential overreliance on AI tools. Although prior studies have examined self-efficacy and digital competence independently, limited research has explored their relationship with AI dependence among senior college students in private higher education institutions in developing contexts. This study addresses this gap by investigating the relationship between self-efficacy, digital competence, and AI dependence among senior college students in a private university in Cebu, Philippines, during the academic year 2024–2025. A total of 320 students from the College of Teacher Education participated in the study by responding to adapted survey instruments measuring self-efficacy, digital competence, and AI dependence. Descriptive statistics and Pearson Product Moment Correlation Coefficient (PPMCC) were employed to analyze the data. Results revealed that the respondents demonstrated high levels of self-efficacy and digital competence, indicating strong confidence in performing academic tasks and effective utilization of digital technologies. Furthermore, a significant positive relationship was found between self-efficacy and digital competence, suggesting that students with higher confidence tend to exhibit stronger digital skills. However, no significant relationship was observed between self-efficacy and AI dependence, indicating that the use of AI tools does not necessarily reduce students’ perceived academic capability. These findings contribute to the growing discourse on AI in education and inform the development of a guidance and counseling enhancement plan to promote responsible AI use.

Guidance and Counseling, Self-efficacy, Digital competence

1. Ary, D., Jacobs, L. C., Irvine, C. K. S., & Walker, D. (2018). Introduction to research in education (10th ed.). Cengage Learning. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

2. Bandura, A. (1997). Self-efficacy: The exercise of control. W. H. Freeman. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

3. Blomgren, C. (2023). Copyright literacy and open license attribution as scholarly practice. Digital Culture & Education, 14(4), 129-148. https://www.digitalcultureandeducation.com/volume-14-4 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

4. Bloomfield, J., & Fisher, M. J. (2019). Quantitative research design. Journal of the Australasian Rehabilitation Nurses Association, 22(2), 27-30. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

5. Bratti, M., Fiore, S. & Mendola, M. (2020). The impact of family size and sibling structure on the great Mexico–USA migration. Journal of Population Economics 33, 483–529. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00148-019-00754-5 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

6. Busboom, J. B., & Boulus-Rødje, N. (2023). Planning for hybrid cooperation: A design-driven exploration. Proceedings of the 21st European Conference on Computer-Supported Cooperative Work (ECSCW 2023 Exploratory Papers and Notes). European Society for Socially Embedded Technologies (EUSSET). https://doi.org/10.48340/ecscw2023_ep02 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

7. Coe, R., Waring, M., Hedges, L. V., & Ashley, L. D. (Eds.). (2021). Research methods and methodologies in education. Sage. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

8. Dergaa, I., Chamari, K., Zmijewski, P., & Saad, H. B. (2023). From human writing to artificial intelligence generated text: Examining the prospects and potential threats of chatgpt in academic writing. Biology of Sport, 40(2), 615–622. https://doi.org/10.5114/biolsport.2023.125623 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

9. Esteve, A., Pohl, M., Becca, F., Fang, H., Galeano, J., Garcia-Roman, J., Reher, D., Trias-Prats, R. & Turu, A. (2024). A global perspective on household size and composition, 1970–2020. Genus 80(2). https://doi.org/10.1186/s41118-024-00211-6 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

10. Fukuya, Y., Fujiwara, T., Isumi, A., Doi, S., & Ochi, M. (2021). Association of birth order with mental health problems, self-esteem, resilience, and happiness among children: Results from A-CHILD study. Frontiers in Psychiatry, 12:638088. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyt.2021.638088 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

11. George, B., & Wooden, O. (2023). Managing the strategic transformation of higher education through artificial intelligence. Administrative Sciences, 13(9), 196, 1-20. https://doi.org/10.3390/admsci13090196 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

12. Havari, E., & Savegnago, M. (2022). The intergenerational effects of birth order on education. Journal of Population Economics, 35, 349–377. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00148-020-00810-5 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

13. Holmes, W., Bialik, M., & Fadel, C. (2019). Artificial intelligence in education: Promises and implications for teaching and learning. Center for Curriculum Redesign. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

14. Hopcan, S., Türkmen, G., & Polat, E. (2024). Exploring the Artificial Intelligence Anxiety and Machine Learning Attitudes of Teacher Candidates. Education and Information Technologies, 29(6), 7281-7301, https://doi.org/10.1007/s10639-023-12086-9https://doi.org/10.3390/computers12050100 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

15. Kapania, S., Siy, O., Clapper, G., SP, A. M., & Sambasivan, N. (2022). "Because AI is 100% right and safe": User attitudes and sources of AI authority in India. In CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (CHI ’22), April 29-May 5, 2022, New Orleans, LA, USA. ACM. https://dl.acm.org/doi/pdf/10.1145/3491102.3517533 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

16. Koyuncuoglu, D. (2022). Analysis of digital and technological competencies of university students. International Journal of Education in Mathematics, Science, and Technology (IJEMST), 10(4), 971-988. https://doi.org/10.46328/ijemst.2583 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

17. Krauss, S., Orth, U., & Robins, R. W. (2020). Family environment and self-esteem development: A longitudinal study from age 10 to 16. Journal of personality and social psychology, 119(2), 457. https://psycnet.apa.org/manuscript/2019-55801-001.pdf [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

18. Kristensen, S.M., Larsen, T.M.B., Urke, H.B. & Danielsen, A.G. (2023). Academic Stress, Academic Self-efficacy, and Psychological Distress: A Moderated Mediation of Within-person Effects. Journal of Youth and Adolescence, 52, 1512–1529. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10964-023-01770-1 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

19. Li, J., & Huang, J.-S. (2020). Dimensions of artificial intelligence anxiety based on the integrated fear acquisition theory. Technology in Society, 63(101410), 1-10. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techsoc.2020.101410 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

20. Limeri, L.B., Carter, N.T., Choe, J., Harper, H.G., Martin, H.R., Benton, A., & Dolan, E.L. (2020). Growing a growth mindset: characterizing how and why undergraduate students’ mindsets change. International Journal of STEM Education, 7(35). https://doi.org/10.1186/s40594-020-00227-2 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

21. López-Meneses, E., Sirignano, F. M., Vázquez-Cano, E., & Ramírez-Hurtado, J. M. (2020). University students’ digital competence in three areas: Digital content creation, communication, and information literacy. Education Sciences, 10(9), 232. https://doi.org/10.3390/educsci10090232 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

22. Mabaso, M., Mlangeni, L., Makola, L., Oladimeji, O., Naidoo, I., Naidoo, Y., & Simbayi, L. (2021). Factors associated with age-disparate sexual partnerships among males and females in South Africa: a multinomial analysis of the 2012 national population-based household survey data. Emerging themes in epidemiology, 18, 1-13. https://link.springer.com/article/10.1186/s12982-021-00093-5 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

23. Mhlongo, S., Mbatha, K., Ramatsetse, B., & Dlamini, R. (2023). Challenges, opportunities, and prospects of adopting and using smart digital technologies in learning environments: An iterative review. Heliyon, 9(6),1-20. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.heliyon.2023.e16348 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

24. Moreira-Choez J.S., Gomez Barzola, K.E., Lamus de Rodríguez, T.M., Sabando-García, A.R., Cruz Mendoza, J.C., & Cedeño Barcia, L.A. (2024). Assessment of digital competencies in higher education faculty: a multimodal approach within the framework of artificial intelligence. Frontiers in Education, 9, 1-11. https://doi.org/10.3389/feduc.2024.1425487 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

25. Morrison, K., Iqbal, S. T., & Horvitz, E. (2024). AI-powered reminders for collaborative tasks: experiences and futures. ACM Journals, Proceedings of the ACM on Human-Computer Interaction, 8(210), 1-20. https://doi.org/10.1145/3653701 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

26. Peiffer, H., Schmidt, I., Ellwart, T., & Ulfert, A.-S. (2020). Digital Competences in the Workplace: Theory, Terminology, and Training. In E. Wuttke, J. Seifried, & H. Niegemann (Eds.), Vocational Education and Training in the Age of Digitization: Challenges and Opportunities, 157-181. Verlag Barbara Budrich. https://doi.org/10.2307/j.ctv18dvv1c.11 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

27. Remler, D. K., & Van Ryzin, G. G. (2021). Research methods in practice: Strategies for description and causation. Sage Publications [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

28. Rock, L.Y., Tajudeen, F.P. & Chung, Y.W. (2024). Usage and impact of the internet-of-things-based smart home technology: a quality-of-life perspective. Universal Access in the Information Society, 23, 345–364. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10209-022-00937-0 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

29. Runge, I., Lazarides, R., Rubach, C., Richter, D., & Scheiter, K. (2023). Teacher-reported instructional quality in the context of technology-enhanced teaching: The role of teachers’ digital competence-related beliefs in empowering learners. Computers and Education, 198, 1-13. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2023.104761 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

30. Sabordino, E.B., Ardina, G.T., Empedrado, I.R.A., & Baguio, A.J.P. (2024). Assessing Future Teachers’ Readiness in an AI-Driven Classroom. International Journal of Current Research, 16(5), 28129 – 28133. https://doi.org/10.24941/ijcr.47119.05.2024 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

31. Saltos-Rivas, R., Novoa-Hernández, P., & Serrano Rodríguez, R. (2022). How reliable and valid are the evaluations of digital competence in higher education: A systematic mapping study. SAGE Journals. 1-14. https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/pdf/10.1177/21582440211068492 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

32. Savickas, M. L., & Porfeli, E. J. (2012). Career adapt-abilities scale: Construction, reliability, and measurement equivalence across 13 countries. Journal of Vocational Behavior, 80(3), 661–673. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jvb.2012.01.011 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

33. Seeram, E. (2019). An overview of correlational research. Radiologic technology, 91(2), 176-179. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

34. Taguchi, N. (2018). Description and explanation of pragmatic development: Quantitative, qualitative, and mixed methods research. System, 75, 23-32. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

35. Tejedor, S., Cervi, L., Pérez-Escoda, A., & Tusa, F. (2020). Smartphone usage among students during COVID-19 pandemic in Spain, Italy, and Ecuador. In F. J. García-Peñalvo & A. García-Holgado (Eds.), TEEM'20: Eighth International Conference on Technological Ecosystems for Enhancing Multiculturality. New York: Association for Computing Machinery (ACM), 571-576. https://doi.org/10.1145/3434780.3436587 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

36. Tzafilkou, K., Perifanou, M., & Economides, A. A. (2022). Development and validation of students’ digital competence scale (SDiCoS). International Journal of Educational Technology in Higher Education, 19(30). https://doi.org/10.1186/s41239-022-00330-0 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

37. Ulfert-Blank, A.-S., and Schmidt, I. (2022). Assessing digital self-efficacy: Review and scale development. Computers and Education, 191, 2-23. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2022.104626 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

38. UNESCO. (2021). Recommendation on the ethics of artificial intelligence. UNESCO Publishing. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

39. https://unesdoc.unesco.org/ark:/48223/pf0000381137 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

40. Vuorikari, R., Kluzer, S. and Punie, Y. (2022). DigComp 2.2: The Digital Competence Framework for Citizens - With new examples of knowledge, skills and attitudes, EUR 31006 EN, Publications Office of the European Union, Luxembourg, 2022, ISBN 978-92-76-48883-5, doi:10.2760/490274, JRC128415.https://publications.jrc.ec.europa.eu/repository/bitstream/JRC128415/JRC128415_01.pdf [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

41. Zhang, S., Zhao, X., Zhou, T., & Kim, J. H. (2024). Do you have AI dependency? The roles of academic self-efficacy, academic stress, and performance expectations on problematic AI usage behavior. International Journal of Educational Technology in Higher Education, 21(34), 1-14. https://doi.org/10.1186/s41239-024-00467-0 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

42. Zhao, Y., Sánchez Gómez, M.C., Pinto Llorente, A.M., & Zhao, L. (2021). Digital competence in higher education: Students’ perception and personal factors. Sustainability, 13(12184), 1-17. https://doi.org/10.3390/ su132112184 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

• The Influence of Career Outcome Expectations and Career Interests on Career Readiness among Secondary School Students in Johor, Malaysia
• Gender and the Outcomes of Forgiveness Education: A Quasi-Experimental Analysis of Anger and Depression Among Ghanaian Adolescents
• Empowering Students: The Role of Rational Emotive Behavior Therapy in Overcoming Exam-Related Depression