Exploring Theory of Planned Behavior (TPB) Constructs As Predictors of Teachers’ Intention to Implement Inclusive Education: A Phenomenological Study

Inclusive education in the Philippines continues to face systemic barriers despite the enactment of Republic Act 11650, the Inclusive Education Act of 2022. This phenomenological study examined the lived experiences of fifteen purposively selected junior high school teachers to explore how constructs of the Theory of Planned Behavior (TPB)—attitudes, subjective norms, and perceived behavioral control—shape their intention to implement inclusive practices. Semi-structured interviews and thematic analysis revealed that teachers generally hold positive attitudes toward inclusive education, grounded in moral responsibility and the observed benefits of diverse learners thriving together. Subjective norms, particularly peer collaboration and administrative encouragement, emerged as powerful motivators, while perceived behavioral control was influenced by access to training, resources, and institutional support. Teachers’ motivation and practical experiences further reinforced their commitment, though persistent challenges such as large class sizes, limited materials, and inconsistent systemic backing constrained implementation. Motivation and practical experience, though not core TPB constructs, can be situated within perceived behavioral control and emerging extensions of TPB that integrate affective readiness. Findings highlight that while individual beliefs and intentions are crucial, sustainable inclusive education requires enabling conditions and institutional structures that empower teachers to act on their convictions. The study contributes to both theory and practice by extending TPB to account for experiential and emotional dimensions of teaching, situating intention within complex educational realities, though these remain exploratory and require further empirical triangulation. It underscores the need for responsive policies, professional development, and collaborative school cultures to bridge the gap between inclusive education policy and classroom practice. Ultimately, this research supports global and national efforts toward achieving Sustainable Development Goal 4 by advocating for equitable, learner-centered environments that uphold the rights and potentials of all students.

Inclusive Education, Theory of Planned Behavior, Teacher attitudes, Subjective Norms, Perceived Behavioral Control

1. Ahrbeck, B., & Felder, M. (2020). Inclusive education in Germany: Challenges and contradictions. Education Sciences, 10(12), 358. https://doi.org/10.3390/educsci10120358 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

2. Ainscow, M. (2020). Promoting inclusion and equity in education: Lessons from international experiences. Nordic Journal of Studies in Educational Policy, 6(1), 7–16. https://doi.org/10.1080/20020317.2020.1729587 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

3. Ajzen, I. (1991). The theory of planned behavior. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 50(2),179–211. https://doi.org/10.1016/0749-5978(91)90020-T [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

4. Ajzen, I. (2011). The theory of planned behaviour: Reactions and reflections. Psychology & Health, 26(9), 1113–1127. https://doi.org/10.1080/08870446.2011.613995 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

5. Ajzen, I. (2020). The theory of planned behavior: Frequently asked questions. Human Behavior and Emerging Technologies, 2(4), 314–324. https://doi.org/10.1002/hbe2.195 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

6. Alcosero, A., Carcueva, H., Abasolo, M. C., Arranchado, W. M., & Cabanilla, A. (2023). Preparedness of regular teachers in the implementation of inclusive education in the Philippines: A meta-synthesis. International Journal of Research in Engineering and Science, 11(3), 259–266. https://doi.org/10.13140/RG.2.2.17249.79205 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

7. Avramidis, E., & Norwich, B. (2002). Teachers’ attitudes towards integration. European Journal of Special Needs Education, 17(2), 129–147. https://doi.org/10.1080/08856250210129056 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

8. Bandura, A. (1986). Social foundations of thought and action: A social cognitive theory. Prentice-Hall. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

9. Bartholomew, T. T., Joy, E. E., Kang, E., & Brown, J. (2021). A choir or cacophony? Sample sizes and quality of conveying participants’ voices in phenomenological research. Methodological Innovations, 14(3), 1 14. https://doi.org/10.1177/20597991211040063 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

10. Bernardo, A. B. I., & Mendoza, R. C. (2020). Barriers to inclusive education in the Philippines: Teachers’ perspectives on resources and workload. Asia Pacific Education Review, 21(4), 543–556. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12564-020-09645-7 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

11. Braun, V., & Clarke, V. (2006). Using thematic analysis in psychology. Qualitative Research in Psychology, 13(2), 77–101. https://doi.org/10.1191/1478088706qp063oa [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

12. Braun, V., & Clarke, V. (2019). Reflecting on reflexive thematic analysis. Qualitative Research in Sport, 1Exercise and Health, 11(4), 589–597. https://doi.org/10.1080/2159676X.2019.1628806 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

13. Chambers, D., & Forlin, C. (2021). An historical review from exclusion to inclusion in Western Australia across the past five decades: What have we learnt? Education Sciences, 11(3), 119. https://doi.org/10.3390/educsci11030119 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

14. Creswell, J. W. (2013). Qualitative inquiry and research design: Choosing among five approaches (3rd ed.). SAGE Publications. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

15. Creswell, J. W., & Creswell, J. D. (2018). Research design: Qualitative, quantitative, and mixed methods approaches (5th ed.). SAGE Publications. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

16. Felső, E., & Fehérvári, A. (2024). Peer power in practice: A systematic literature review of peer programs for inclusive schools. Education Sciences, 14(1), 154. https://doi.org/10.3390/educsci14010154 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

17. Florian, L., & Black-Hawkins, K. (2011). Exploring inclusive pedagogy. British Educational Research Journal, 37(5), 813–828. https://doi.org/10.1080/01411926.2010.501096 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

18. Gülsün, İ., Malinen, O., Yada, A., & Savolainen, H. (2025). Applying the theory of planned behaviour to examine teachers’ intentions to teach in inclusive classrooms and their inclusive practices. British Educational Research Journal. Advance online publication. https://doi.org/10.1002/berj.70023 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

19. Harris, A. (2013). Distributed leadership: Friend or foe? Educational Management Administration & Leadership, 41(5), 545–554. https://doi.org/10.1177/1741143213497635 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

20. Kupers, E., de Boer, A., Bakker, A., de Jong, F., & Minnaert, A. (2024). Explaining teachers’ behavioural intentions towards differentiated instruction for inclusion: Using the theory of planned behavior and the self-determination theory. European Journal of Special Needs Education, 39(4), 638–647. https://doi.org/10.1080/08856257.2023.2263717 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

21. Lagura, D. G., & Salapa, A. C. (2024). Implementation and challenges of inclusive education in public secondary schools: A systematic literature review. Journal of Novel Research and Innovative Development, 2(12), a502–a507. https://tijer.org/JNRID/papers/JNRID2412042.pdf [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

22. Lo, M. C., Jugan, M. B., Delos Reyes, N. R. T., Pepito, J. C., Capuno, R. G., Pinili, L. C., Cabigon, A. F. P., & Sitoy, R. E. (2024). Attitudes of elementary teachers towards inclusive education of learners with special education needs in a public school. World Journal on Education and Humanities Research,23. 4(4), 171–183. https://doi.org/10.30068/wjher.4.4.171183 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

23. Lopes, J. O., Galinha de Sá, F., Magão, M. T., Oliveira, J. P., Silva-Pereira, P., & Klinke, M. E. (2025). Characteristics of the phenomenological interview in healthcare research: A scoping review and practical guidance. International Journal of Qualitative Methods, https://doi.org/10.1177/16094069251381018 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

24. Mendoza, M., & Heymann, J. (2024). Implementation of inclusive education: A systematic review of studies of inclusive education interventions in low- and lower-middle-income countries. International Journal of Disability, Development and Education, 71(3), 299–316. https://doi.org/10.1080/1034912X.2022.2095359 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

25. Miña, A. A. (2024). The lived experiences of special education teachers in teaching inclusive education. Psychology and Education: A Multidisciplinary Journal, 21(10), 1072–1090. https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.12731335 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

26. Morse, J. M. (2015). Critical analysis of strategies for determining rigor in qualitative inquiry. Qualitative Health Research, 25(9), 1212–1222. https://doi.org/10.1177/1049732315588501 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

27. Nguyen, D., Harris, A., & Ng, D. (2020). A review of distributed leadership theory: Confucian and non Confucian perspectives. Educational Management Administration & Leadership, 48(5), 925–944. https://doi.org/10.1177/1741143219836683 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

28. Nowell, L. S., Norris, J. M., White, D. E., & Moules, N. J. (2017). Thematic analysis: Striving to meet the trustworthiness criteria. International Journal of Qualitative Methods, 16(1), 1–13. https://doi.org/10.1177/1609406917733847 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

29. Saiz-González, P., de la Fuente-González, S., Sierra-Díaz, J., & Uría-Valle, P. (2025). Inclusive education and physical education in Spain: A qualitative analysis of teachers’ perspectives. Education Sciences, 15(1), 108. https://doi.org/10.3390/educsci15010108 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

30. Schwab, S., & Alnahdi, G. H. (2023). Does the same teacher’s attitude fit all students? Uncovering student specific variance of teachers’ attitudes towards all of their students. International Journal of Inclusive Education. Advance online publication. https://doi.org/10.108 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

31. Shani, M., & Koss, C. (2022). Institutional barriers to inclusive education: Teachers’ confidence and motivation under constraint. Curriculum and Teaching, 37(1), 31–54. https://doi.org/10.1080/0726416X.2022.1341593 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

32. Sharma, U., & Loreman, T. (2014). Teacher attitudes, training, and inclusive education: Cross-national perspectives. International Journal of Inclusive Education, 18(7), 711–726. https://doi.org/10.1080/13603116.2013.786757 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

• A Comparative Study of Adjustment Level, Parental Income and Academic Achievement of Adolescent Girls
• Increase in STIs among Adolescents in Masvingo District
• A Correlation between SDG 4 (Quality Education) and Emotional Disposition of Teacher Educators in Hyderabad District
• Ear Piercing Behaviour and Self-Esteem among Male University Students in Nigeria
• A Study of Religiosity and Psychological Well-Being