Exploring Total Physical Response (TPR) for Vocabulary Teaching in Primary Education: Evidence from Teachers in Hanoi, Vietnam

This study examines the pedagogical value and practical implementation of Total Physical Response (TPR) in primary-level English vocabulary instruction by integrating theoretical perspectives with empirical evidence from a mixed-methods investigation of teachers’ perceptions. Drawing on foundational work on TPR and recent research on embodied learning and teacher cognition, the study adopts a concurrent mixed-methods design in which quantitative and qualitative data were collected from 15 primary school English teachers in Hanoi, Vietnam. Questionnaire results indicate consistently high ratings across domains, including perceived instructional benefits, teacher confidence, classroom dynamics, implementation challenges, and professional development needs, suggesting that TPR is viewed as both highly effective and operationally demanding. Qualitative findings further elaborate these patterns by identifying three key themes: the role of TPR in reducing learner anxiety and enabling low-pressure participation, its contribution to sustaining engagement and attention through structured movement, and the practical constraints associated with classroom management, space, time, and limited professional training. The integration of findings supports a context-sensitive interpretation of TPR as a high-value yet resource-intensive approach whose effectiveness depends on instructional design and implementation conditions. Based on these insights, the study proposes a structured TPR lesson sequence that progresses from comprehension to production and highlights the importance of aligning assessment practices with embodied learning processes. While the findings are limited by their reliance on teacher self-report data within a single context, they offer pedagogically grounded implications for primary language teaching and identify directions for future research, including the need for classroom observation and direct measures of learner outcomes.

Total Physical Response (TPR); vocabulary instruction; primary education

1. Asher, J. J. (1965). The strategy of the total physical response: An application to learning Russian. IRAL: International Review of Applied Linguistics in Language Teaching, 3(4), 291. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

2. Asher, J. J. (1966). The Learning Strategy of the Total Physical Response: A Review. The modern language journal, 50(2), 79-84. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

3. Asher, J. J., & Price, B. S. (1967). The learning strategy of the total physical response: Some age differences. Child Development, 38(4), 1219–1227. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

4. Borg, S. (2003). Teacher cognition in language teaching: A review of research on what language teachers think, know, believe, and do. Language Teaching, 36(2), 81–109. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

5. Creswell, J. W., & Clark, V. L. P. (2017). Designing and conducting mixed methods research. Sage publications. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

6. İnciman Çelik, T., Çay, T., & Kanadlı, S. (2021). The effect of total physical response method on vocabulary learning/teaching: A mixed research synthesis. English Language Teaching, 14(12), 154–170. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

7. Jusslin, S., Korpinen, K., Lilja, N., Martin, R., Lehtinen-Schnabel, J., & Anttila, E. (2022). Embodied learning and teaching approaches in language education: A mixed studies review. Educational Research Review, 37, 100480. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

8. Nguyen, T. C., Le, T. K. D., & Le, Q. T. (2021). Impacts of total physical response on young learners’ vocabulary ability. VNU Journal of Science: Education Research, 37(4), 101–112. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

9. Nguyen, T. Q., & Nguyen, T. Q. (2024). Applying total physical response to improve primary students’ vocabulary retention. Hong Duc University Journal of Science, E6. https://hdujs.edu.vn/index.php/hdujs/article/view/400 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

10. Oppici, L., Mathias, B., & colleagues. (2023). Benefits of enacting and observing gestures on foreign language vocabulary learning: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Behavioral Sciences, 13(11), 920. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

11. Liu, X. (2021). The Corpus-Assisted Approach to TPR. In Cognitive Processing Routes in Consecutive Interpreting: A Corpus-assisted Approach (pp. 39-57). Singapore: Springer Singapore. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

12. Sumarni, B., Bhatta, D. D., & Kho, S. F. C. (2022). The use of total physical response in teaching vocabulary integrated with meaningful classroom interaction. Journal of Language and Literature Studies, 2(1), 23-32. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

13. Xie, R. (2021). The Effectiveness of Total Physical Response (TPR) on Teaching English to Young Learners. Journal of Language Teaching & Research, 12(2). [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

• The Impact of Ownership Structure on Dividend Payout Policy of Listed Plantation Companies in Sri Lanka
• Urban Sustainability in North-East India: A Study through the lens of NER-SDG index
• Performance Assessment of Predictive Forecasting Techniques for Enhancing Hospital Supply Chain Efficiency in Healthcare Logistics
• The Fractured Self in Julian Barnes' Postmodern Fiction: Identity Crisis and Deflation in Metroland and the Sense of an Ending
• Impact of Flood on the Employment, Labour Productivity and Migration of Agricultural Labour in North Bihar