Exploring User Intentions to Embrace Mobile Technology in Halal Auditing

Authors

Zuhra Junaida Mohamad Husny Hamid

Department of Urban and Regional Planning, University technology Malaysia (Malaysia)

Mohd Iskandar Illyas Tan

Azman Hashim International Business School, University technology Malaysia (Malaysia)

Nur Aaina Athira Hamdan

Faculty of Applied Sciences and Technology, University Tun Hussein Onn Malaysia (Malaysia)

Article Information

DOI: 10.47772/IJRISS.2025.91100120

Subject Category: Education

Volume/Issue: 9/11 | Page No: 1516-1522

Publication Timeline

Submitted: 2025-11-10

Accepted: 2025-11-20

Published: 2025-12-02

Abstract

Halal certification remains a critical benchmark in affirming product credibility for Muslim consumers. Traditional manual auditing procedures, however, often prove inefficient and time-consuming. The integration of digital tools into auditing processes, although promising, has seen limited traction in the halal sector. This study applies the Unified Theory of Acceptance and Use of Technology (UTAUT) to analyze determinants of mobile application adoption among halal auditors in Malaysia. The analysis involved 552 mobile app users engaged in halal certification tasks. Findings highlight that constructs such as performance expectancy, effort expectancy, social influence, and facilitating conditions—alongside factors like self-efficacy and attitudes toward technology—positively correlate with the intent to utilize halal auditing applications.

Keywords

Mobile auditing, halal compliance, UTAUT, adoption behavior, digital transformation

Downloads

References

1. Ab Talib, M. S., Ai Chin, T., & Fischer, J. (2017). Linking Halal food certification and business performance. British Food Journal, 119(7), 1606–1618. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

2. Ahmad, N. A., Nordin, N., & Sulaiman, M. Z. M. (2019). Contemporary Management and Science Issues in the Halal Industry. Springer. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

3. Cronbach, L. J. (1951). Coefficient alpha and the internal structure of tests. Psychometrika, 16(3), 297–334. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

4. Fadzil, N. S. M. (2022). The Study on The Effectiveness Of Quikhalal Among The Halal Auditors. Universiti Teknologi Mara. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

5. George, D., & Mallery, P. (2003). SPSS for Windows Step by Step: A Simple Guide and Reference. Allyn & Bacon. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

6. Guetterman, T. C. (2019). Basics of statistics for primary care research. Family Medicine and Community Health, 7(2). [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

7. Irfan, A., & Iskandar, M. (2017). Implementation of Halal Auditing Using Progressive Web Application. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

8. JAKIM. (2020). Manual Prosedur Pensijilan Halal Malaysia (Domestik) 2020. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

9. Kamaruddin, R., Iberahim, H., & Shabudin, A. (2012). Halal compliance critical control point (HCCCP) analysis of processed food. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

10. Mohd Sulaiman, M. Z. et al. (2018). Issues of Halal Inspection from Demand and Supply Perspectives. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

11. Nowlan, W. (2013). UTM researchers invent mobile app for halal certification. HalalFocus.net. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

12. Schober, P., Boer, C., & Schwarte, L. A. (2018). Correlation coefficients: Appropriate use and interpretation. Anesthesia & Analgesia, 126(5), 1763–1768. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

13. Šumak, B., & Šorgo, A. (2016). The Acceptance and Use of Interactive Whiteboards among Teachers: Differences in UTAUT Determinants between Pre- and In-Service Teachers. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

14. Taylor, S., & Todd, P. A. (1995). Understanding Information Technology Usage: A Test of Competing Models. Information Systems Research, 6(2), 144–176. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

15. Venkatesh, V., Morris, M. G., Davis, G. B., & Davis, F. D. (2003). User Acceptance of Information Technology: Toward a Unified View. MIS Quarterly, 27(3), 425–478. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

16. Williams, K., Shaw, R., & Turner, D. (2019). Adoption of mobile banking apps: The role of attitudes, ease of use, and perceived security. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

17. Zhao, Y., Ni, Q., & Zhou, R. (2021). What factors influence the mobile health service adoption? A meta-analysis and the moderating role of age. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

Metrics

Views & Downloads

Similar Articles