Factors Affecting Programming Skill Development among Third Year Computer Engineering Students: A Survey Based Study

This study focuses on what shapes programming growth among third-year Computer Engineering learners at Bulacan State University. Psychological traits, classroom structure, personal study routines, alongside AI tool usage and shape skill acquisition patterns observed in these individuals. A numeric method guides this study. The surveys reach 60 selected participants via purposeful selection techniques. Information flows from responses marked on a 4-point Likert scale questionnaire, later analysed using weighted mean, standard deviation, and Pearson correlation. Results show those who believe more strongly in themselves tend to perform better in coding coursework. Despite a positive view of classroom support, learners show hesitation during difficult tasks. When mistakes occur in programming work, discomfort tends to follow. Because understanding code becomes harder, some turn to artificial intelligence systems too frequently. As time passes, personal analytical growth slows under such dependency. Without frequent engagement beyond scheduled lessons, ability to locate faults weakens. Skill advancement depends strongly on individual initiative paired with repeated exercise. Progress requires sustained effort done without guidance from instructors. The study concludes that consistent, self-directed study habits and hands-on practice are critical for skill development. Recommendations include increasing out-of-class coding practice, conducting live skill assessments for future research, and expanding study samples to include other IT-related fields.

programming skill development, self-confidence

1. Bhandari, P. (2023, June 22). What is quantitative research? | Definition, uses & methods. Scribbr. https://www.scribbr.com/methodology/quantitative-research/ [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

2. Bringula, R. P., Aviles, A. D., Batalla, M. Y. C., Borebor, M. T. F., Uy, M. a. D., & Diego, B. E. S. (2017). Factors affecting failing the programming skill examination of computing students. International Journal of Modern Education and Computer Science, 9(5), 1–8. https://doi.org/10.5815/ijmecs.2017.05.01 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

3. Dwiantoro, B., Sujana, Y., & Hatta, P. (2025). The role of artificial intelligence in programming education and its impact on the learning process. Indonesian Journal of Informatics Education, 9(1). https://doi.org/10.20961/ijie.v9i1.103884 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

4. Farooq, U., & Anwar, S. (2024). Students motivation to learn programming: A systematic review. In Proceedings of the IEEE Frontiers in Education Conference. https://doi.org/10.1109/FIE61694.2024.10893105 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

5. Gurer, M. D., & Tokumaci, S. (2020). Factors affecting engineering students’ achievement in computer programming. International Journal of Computer Science Education in Schools, 3(4), 23–34. https://doi.org/10.21585/ijcses.v3i4.74 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

6. Harimurti, R., Ekohariadi, E., Munoto, M., B, I. G. P. A., & Winanti, E. T. (2019). Analysis of programming skills concept in developing problem solving skills. Jurnal Pendidikan Teknologi Dan Kejuruan, 25(1), 43–51. https://doi.org/10.21831/jptk.v25i1.22638 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

7. Kuo, Y., & Kuo, Y. (2025). Learning programming: exploring the relationships of self-efficacy, computational thinking, and learning performance among minority students. Frontiers in Education, 10. https://doi.org/10.3389/feduc.2025.1623415 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

8. Luxton-Reilly, A., Simon, N., Albluwi, I., Becker, B. A., Giannakos, M., Kumar, A. N., Ott, L., Paterson, J., Scott, M. J., Sheard, J., & Szabo, C. (2018). Introductory programming: a systematic literature review. Proceedings Companion of the 23rd Annual ACM Conference on Innovation and Technology in Computer Science Education (ACM ITiCSE 2018 Companion)., 55–106. https://doi.org/10.1145/3293881.3295779 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

9. Misa. (2025, July 2). Significance of Quantitative Research : 9 Essential insights. Researchmate.net. https://researchmate.net/quantitative-research/ [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

10. Sitompul, S. S., Kustono, D., Suhartadi, S., & Setyaningsih, R. M. (2017). The relationship of the learning of tourism marketing, hard skills, soft skills and working quality of the graduates of Tourism Academy in Medan. International Journal of Social Sciences and Educational Studies, 3(4). https://doi.org/10.23918/ijsses.v3i4p124 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

11. Sweller, J. (1988b). Cognitive load during problem solving: Effects on learning. Cognitive Science, 12(2), 257–285. https://doi.org/10.1207/s15516709cog1202_4 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

12. Watson, M. (2024, October 11). Job prospects for programmers in the Philippines. Full Scale. https://fullscale.io/blog/job-prospects-for-programmers-in-the-philippines/ [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

• An Adaptive Joint Filtering Approach to Wireless Relay Network for Transmission Rate Maximization
• IoT-Integrated Mercury Substance Detection System for Cosmetic Product Safety
• Design and Implementation of Solar PV-Based Railway Microgrid for Linke Hofmann Busch Coaches
• Cost Control Techniques on Civil Engineering Projects in Oyo State, Nigeria
• Strength and Predictive Modeling of Corn Cob Ash Blended Concrete Using Multi-Output Artificial Neural Network Approach