Factors Influencing Intention to Purchase Counterfeit Products in The Online Market Among Generation Y in Sarawak

The rapid growth of e-commerce and digital marketplaces has significantly increased consumers' exposure to counterfeit products, particularly among younger consumers who frequently engage in online shopping activities. Despite continuous efforts by brand owners and regulatory authorities to combat counterfeit trade, the demand for counterfeit products remains prevalent. Therefore, this study examines the factors influencing the intention to purchase counterfeit products in the online market among Generation Y consumers in Sarawak. Drawing upon the Theory of Planned Behaviour (TPB), this study investigates the influence of attitude, subjective norms, perceived behavioural control, brand consciousness, and price on consumers' purchase intention. A quantitative research approach was adopted, and data were collected from 384 Generation Y consumers in Sarawak using a structured questionnaire distributed through online platforms. The data were analysed using Structural Equation Modelling (SEM) with AMOS to evaluate both the measurement and structural models. The findings reveal that attitude, subjective norms, perceived behavioural control, and price have significant positive effects on purchase intention towards counterfeit products. Among these factors, price emerged as the strongest predictor, indicating that affordability and economic considerations are the primary motivations for purchasing counterfeit products online. In contrast, brand consciousness was found to have a significant negative influence on purchase intention, suggesting that consumers who place greater importance on brand authenticity, prestige, and reputation are less likely to purchase counterfeit products. The study contributes to the existing literature by extending the application of the Theory of Planned Behaviour in the context of online counterfeit product consumption and by incorporating brand consciousness and price as additional explanatory factors. The findings provide valuable insights for policymakers, brand owners, and e-commerce platform operators in developing effective strategies to reduce counterfeit product consumption and promote awareness of the risks associated with purchasing counterfeit goods in online marketplaces.

counterfeit products, purchase intention, generation y, attitudes, subjective norms, perceived behavioral control, brand consciousness, price

1. Abdul-Rahim, R., Bohari, S. A., Aman, A., & Awang, Z. (2022). Benefit–risk perceptions of fintech adoption for sustainability from bank consumers’ perspective: The moderating role of fear of COVID-19. Sustainability (Switzerland), 14(14). https://doi.org/10.3390/su14148357 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

2. Ajzen, I., & Madden, T. J. (1986). Prediction of goal-directed behavior: Attitudes, intentions, and perceived behavioral control. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 22(5). https://doi.org/10.1016/0022-1031(86)90045-4 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

3. Albers-Miller, N. D. (1999). Consumer misbehavior: Why people buy illicit goods. Journal of Consumer Marketing, 16(3), 273–287 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

4. Anderson, J. C., & Gerbing, D. W. (1988). Structural equation modeling in practice: A review and recommended two-step approach. Psychological Bulletin, 103(3), 411–423 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

5. Ang, S. H., Cheng, P. S., Lim, E. A. C., & Tambyah, S. K. (2001). Spot the difference: Consumer responses towards counterfeits. Journal of Consumer Marketing, 18(3), 219–235 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

6. Armitage, C. J., & Conner, M. (2001). Efficacy of the theory of planned behaviour: A meta‐analytic review. British Journal of Social Psychology, 40(4), 471–499 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

7. Awang, Z. (2015). SEM made simple: A gentle approach to learning Structural Equation Modeling. In MPWS Rich Resources (Vol. 1, Issue 3). [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

8. Bhatia, V. (2018). Examining consumers’ attitude towards purchase of counterfeit fashion products. Journal of Indian Business Research, 10(2). https://doi.org/10.1108/JIBR-10-2017-0177 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

9. Bian, X., Wang, K. Y., Smith, A., & Yannopoulou, N. (2016). New insights into unethical counterfeit consumption. Journal of Business Research, 69(10). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2016.02.038 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

10. Chang, M. K. (1998). Predicting unethical behavior: A comparison of the theory of reasoned action and the theory of planned behavior. In Journal of Business Ethics (Vol. 17, Issue 16). https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1005721401993 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

11. Chiu, W., & Leng, H. K. (2016). Consumers’ intention to purchase counterfeit sporting goods in Singapore and Taiwan. Asia Pacific Journal of Marketing and Logistics, 28(1). https://doi.org/10.1108/APJML-02-2015-0031 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

12. Cordell, V. V., Wongtada, N., & Kieschnick, R. L. (1996). Counterfeit purchase intentions: Role of lawfulness attitudes and product traits as determinants. Journal of Business Research, 35(1), 41–53. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

13. De Matos, C. A., Ituassu, C. T., & Rossi, C. A. V. (2007). Consumer attitudes toward counterfeits: A review and extension. Journal of Consumer Marketing, 24(1), 36–47. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

14. Eisend, M. (2019). Morality Effects and Consumer Responses to Counterfeit and Pirated Products: A Meta-analysis. Journal of Business Ethics, 154(2). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-016-3406-1 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

15. Fernandez, P. R. (2009). Impact of branding on Gen Y's choice of clothing. Journal of the South East Asia Research Centre for Communications and Humanities. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

16. Fornell, C., & Larcker, D. F. (1981). Evaluating structural equation models with unobservable variables and measurement error. Journal of Marketing Research, 18(1), 39–50. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

17. Grossman, G. M., & Shapiro, C. (1988). Foreign counterfeiting of status goods. Quarterly Journal of Economics, 103(1), 79–100. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

18. Harun, A., Mahmud, M., Othman, B., Ali, R., & Ismael, D. (2020). Understanding experienced consumers towards repeat purchase of counterfeit products: The mediating effect of attitude. Management Science Letters, 10(1), 13–28. https://doi.org/10.5267/j.msl.2019.8.019 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

19. Huang, J. H., Lee, B. C. Y., & Ho, S. H. (2004). Consumer attitude toward gray market goods. International Marketing Review. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

20. Islam, T., & Hussain, M. (2022). How consumer uncertainty intervenes country of origin image and consumer purchase intention? The moderating role of brand image. International Journal of Emerging Markets. https://doi.org/10.1108/IJOEM-08-2021-1194 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

21. Jiang, L., & Shan, J. (2016). Counterfeits or Shanzhai? The role of face and brand consciousness in luxury copycat consumption. Psychological Reports, 119(1). https://doi.org/10.1177/0033294116659316 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

22. Jiang, Y., Miao, M., Jalees, T., & Zaman, S. I. (2019). Analysis of the moral mechanism to purchase counterfeit luxury goods: evidence from China. Asia Pacific Journal of Marketing and Logistics, 31(3). https://doi.org/10.1108/APJML-05-2018-0190 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

23. Kasuma, J., Noor, N. M., Abdurahman, A. Z. A., Sawangchai, A., & Jemari, M. A. (2020). The influence of information susceptibility and normative susceptibility on counterfeit manufacturing products purchase intention. International Journal of Supply Chain Management, 9(2) [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

24. Landry, C. (1998). The Creative City: A Toolkit for Urban Innovators. Earthscan. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

25. Margherio, L. (1998). The emerging digital economy. U.S. Department of Commerce. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

26. Ng, J., Chok Huat, G., & Seng Teck, T. (2021 Ng, J., Goh, C. H., & Tan, S. T. (2021). A critical study on the factors influencing consumers' intention to purchase counterfeit products in Penang, Malaysia. Annals of the Romanian Society for Cell Biology, 25, 18084–18101. http://annalsofrscb.ro [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

27. Nordin, N. (2009). A study on consumers' attitude towards counterfeit products in Malaysia. Asian Social Science, 5(2), 8–14. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

28. Paul, P. (2001). Getting inside Gen Y. American Demographics, 23(9), 42–49. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

29. Penz, E., & Stöttinger, B. (2005). Forget the "real" thing—Take the copy! An explanatory model for the volitional purchase of counterfeit products. Advances in Consumer Research, 32, 568–575. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

30. Peterson, R. A., Balasubramanian, S., & Bronnenberg, B. J. (1997). Exploring the implications of the Internet for consumer marketing. Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, 25(4), 329–346. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

31. Phau, I., & Teah, M. (2009). Devil wears (counterfeit) Prada: A study of antecedents and outcomes of attitudes towards counterfeits of luxury brands. Journal of Consumer Marketing, 26(1), 15–27. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

32. Quoquab, F., Pahlevan, S., Mohammad, J., & Thurasamy, R. (2017). Factors affecting consumers’ intention to purchase counterfeit product: Empirical study in the Malaysian market. Asia Pacific Journal of Marketing and Logistics, 29(4). https://doi.org/10.1108/APJML-09-2016-0169 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

33. Rathnayake, C. V. (2011). An empirical investigation of fashion consciousness of young fashion consumers in Sri Lanka. Young Consumers, 12(2), 121–132. https://doi.org/10.1108/17473611111141588 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

34. San, L. Y., Omar, A., & Thurasamy, R. (2015). Online purchase: A study of generation Y in Malaysia. International Journal of Business and Management, 10(6), 298–308. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

35. Soh, C. Q. Y., Rezaei, S., & Gu, M. L. (2017). Factors affecting consumers' intention to purchase counterfeit product. Asia Pacific Journal of Marketing and Logistics, 29(4), 837–853. https://doi.org/10.1108/APJML-09-2016-0169 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

36. Stravinskiene, J., Dovaliene, A., & Ambrazeviciute, R. (2013). Factors influencing intention to buy counterfeit luxury goods. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

37. Suki, N. M. (2006). Consumer environmental concern and green product purchase in Malaysia. International Journal of Management Studies. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

38. Ting, M. S., Goh, Y. N., & Isa, S. M. (2016). Determining consumer purchase intentions toward counterfeit luxury goods in Malaysia. Asia Pacific Management Review, 21(4). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apmrv.2016.07.003 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

39. Tseng, W. Y., Chiu, W., & Leng, H. K. (2021). A comparative study of consumers’ intention to purchase counterfeit outdoor products in Taiwan and Hong Kong. Journal of Asian Business and Economic Studies, 28(3). https://doi.org/10.1108/JABES-02-2020-0011 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

40. Twenge, J. M., & Campbell, S. M. (2008). Generational differences in psychological traits and their impact on the workplace. Journal of Managerial Psychology. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

41. Usmani, S., & Ejaz, A. (2020). Consumer Buying Attitudes towards Counterfeit and Green Products: Application of Social Comparison Theory and Materialism. South Asian Journal of Management Sciences, 14(1). https://doi.org/10.21621/sajms.2020141.05 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

42. Utz, S., Kerkhof, P., & van den Bos, J. (2009). Consumers rule: How consumer reviews influence perceived trustworthiness of online stores. Electronic Commerce Research and Applications. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

43. Vinerean, S. (2014). The effects of social media marketing on online consumer behavior. International Journal of Business and Management. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

44. Wee, C. H., Tan, S. J., & Cheok, K. H. (1995). Non-price determinants of intention to purchase counterfeit goods. International Marketing Review, 12(6), 19–46. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

45. Wu, H. (2023). Drivers of Attitudes Toward Online Purchase Intention Among Residents of Taiyuan in China. AU-GSB e-Journal, 16(1), 28–37. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

46. Williams, K. C., & Page, R. A. (2011). Marketing to the generations. Journal of Behavioral Studies in Business, 3, 1–17. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

• Assessment of the Role of Artificial Intelligence in Repositioning TVET for Economic Development in Nigeria
• Teachers’ Use of Assure Model Instructional Design on Learners’ Problem Solving Efficacy in Secondary Schools in Bungoma County, Kenya
• “E-Booksan Ang Kaalaman”: Development, Validation, and Utilization of Electronic Book in Academic Performance of Grade 9 Students in Social Studies
• Analyzing EFL University Students’ Academic Speaking Skills Through Self-Recorded Video Presentation
• Major Findings of The Study on Total Quality Management in Teachers’ Education Institutions (TEIs) In Assam – An Evaluative Study