Factory Closure Challenges for Human Resource Intervention in Closure Management Process and Employee Anxiety

Authors

Mirasukma Razak

Institute of Technology Management and Entrepreneurship, Universiti Teknikal Malaysia Melaka, 76100 Durian Tunggal, Melaka (Malaysia)

Al Amin Mohamed Sultan

Faculty of Industrial and Manufacturing Technology and Engineering, Universiti Teknikal Malaysia Melaka, 76100 Durian Tunggal, Melaka (Malaysia)

Wan Hasrulnizzam Wan Mahmood

Faculty of Industrial and Manufacturing Technology and Engineering, Universiti Teknikal Malaysia Melaka, 76100 Durian Tunggal, Melaka (Malaysia)

Abdurrahman Faris Indriya Himawan

School of Economics and Business, Telkom University, Terusan Buahbatu, Bandung 40257 (Indonesia)

Article Information

DOI: 10.47772/IJRISS.2026.100600129

Subject Category: Management

Volume/Issue: 10/6 | Page No: 1731-1744

Publication Timeline

Submitted: 2026-05-24

Accepted: 2026-05-29

Published: 2026-06-18

Abstract

This paper explores the factory closure management process and its impact on employee anxiety in a foreign-based manufacturing firm that had been operating for more than 30 years. The closure significantly affected operational employees, many of whom had spent their entire careers within the company. Most employees possessed only a single working experience and had achieved promotions through internal career advancement without formal educational qualifications. Consequently, they faced considerable challenges in securing new employment opportunities after the factory closure. The main objective of this study is to examine the perspectives of 200 respondents regarding the effectiveness of the closure management process implemented by the human resource management team, as well as the level of employee anxiety experienced during the transition period. The research adopted a two-phase mixed-method approach. The first phase involved quantitative data collection through questionnaire surveys using a five-point Likert scale to evaluate employee perceptions of closure management practices and anxiety levels. The second phase employed qualitative analysis through engagement with selected government agencies to assess whether the company’s closure management process aligned with recommended best practices for employee welfare and industrial transition management. The findings indicate that most respondents considered the closure management practices acceptable and consistent with government guidelines related to employee welfare. Furthermore, the study found no strong correlation between the closure management process and employee anxiety. Most employees demonstrated an understanding of the company’s decision and appeared mentally prepared for the closure despite the unfavourable circumstances. In conclusion, the study provides practical insights and best practices for manufacturing firms managing employee separation and organizational closure processes.

Keywords

Factory Closure; Human Resource, Closure Management Process, Employee Anxiety

Downloads

References

1. Adams, J., 2024. Exploring flexible interview techniques in organizational research. Qualitative Research Review, 19(1), pp. 45–59. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

2. Agrawal, A., et al. (2026). Organizational healing: Development and validation of a scale for workplace recovery after crises. Acta Psychologica. https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0001691825013964. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

3. Armstrong, M. and Taylor, S. (2023) Armstrong’s Handbook of Human Resource Management Practice. 16th edn. London. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

4. Bennett-Alexander, D. D., and Hartman, L. P., 2021. Employment law for business, 10th ed., New York: McGraw-Hill Education. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

5. Brewster, C., and Brookes, M., 2022. Sustainable Development Goals and New Approaches to HRM: Why HRM Specialists Will Not Reach the Sustainable Development Goals and Why It Matters. German Journal of Human Resource Management, 38(2), pp. 183–201. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

6. Castleberry, A., and Nolen, A., 2024. Analyzing qualitative data using thematic analysis. American Journal of Pharmaceutical Education, 88(1), pp. 134–140. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

7. Creswell, J. W., & Creswell, J. D. (2018). Research design: Qualitative, quantitative, and mixed methods approach (5th ed.). [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

8. Gohar, B., Adhikari, S., and Meraj, S., 2022. Coping strategies and stress during organizational change. Journal of Mental Health in the Workplace, 6(1), pp. 55–72. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

9. Griep, Y., Vantilborgh, T., & Jones, S. K. (2025). Sustainable HRM practices and employee well-being during organisational restructuring. Human Resource Management Review, 35(1), 100912. https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0090261624000871. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

10. Griep, Y., Vantilborgh, T., & Jones, S. K. (2025). Sustainable human resource management: The good, the bad and the paradoxical. Organizational Dynamics, 54(1), 101063. https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0090261624000871?utm.com. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

11. Irving, T., Lee, S., and Smith, B., 2022. Lessons from automotive sector closures in Australia. Journal of Industrial Relations, 64(2), pp. 189–205. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

12. Johnson, R. D., Carlson, K. D., and Kavanagh, M. J., 2020. Human Resource Information Systems: Basics, Applications, and Future Directions, 5th ed. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

13. Lotich, P., 2023. 9 Duties of a Human Resource Assistant. [online] Available at: https://thethrivingsmallbusiness.com/what-does-a-human-resource-assistant-do [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

14. McGrath, R., Wilson, T., & Green, A. (2024). Human resource interventions during organisational transitions: Employee adjustment and workforce resilience. https://www.sciencedirect.com/org/science/article/pii/S0048348624000062. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

15. Pandey, A., Maheshwari, M., & Malik, N. (2025). A systematic literature review on employee well-being: Mapping multi-level antecedents, moderators, mediators and future research agenda. Acta Psychologica, 250, 105080. https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0001691825003932?utm.com. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

16. Sabri, A., and Saraih, U., 2021. Human resource management practices and innovation work behaviour. International Journal of Business & Technology, 11(2), pp. 13–28. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

17. Williams, D. R., Hauret, L., Martin, L., and Omrani, N., 2020. How do HRM practices improve employee satisfaction Economic and Industrial Democracy, 43(2), pp. 972-996. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

Metrics

Views & Downloads

Similar Articles