Financing Models and Startup Sustainability in Emerging African Economies: A Systematic Literature Review
Authors
University of Eastern Africa, Baraton (Kigali Kigali Rwanda)
University of Eastern Africa, Baraton (Kigali Kigali Rwanda)
Article Information
DOI: 10.47772/IJRISS.2026.100800335
Subject Category: Banking and Finance
Volume/Issue: 10/8 | Page No: 5112-5140
Publication Timeline
Submitted: 2026-08-19
Accepted: 2026-08-24
Published: 2026-09-04
Abstract
Background: Access to sustainable financing remains one of the most critical impediments to startup survival and growth across emerging African economies. Despite the strategic importance of startups to employment creation, innovation, and structural economic transformation across the continent, the scholarly literature remains fragmented regarding which financing models most effectively support long-term startup sustainability. The annual financing gap for micro, small, and medium enterprises in Sub-Saharan Africa is estimated to exceed USD 630 billion, and traditional bank lending has proven largely inaccessible to early-stage ventures owing to collateral requirements, information asymmetries, and underdeveloped credit infrastructure.
Objective: This systematic literature review (SLR) synthesizes empirical and theoretical evidence on four distinct financing models: (Hybrid Financing Models (pairing Debt and equity, Venture Capital and banking (VC/B) and equity crowdfunding (ECF) to evaluate their relative effectiveness in supporting startup survival, profitability, innovation, scalability, and long-term sustainability in African and comparable emerging-market contexts. The review further explores the conditions under which each model is most appropriate and identifies gaps warranting further primary research
Method: Following the PRISMA 2020 guidelines, a structured search was conducted across eight major academic databases: Scopus, Web of Science, Springer, Taylor & Francis, ScienceDirect, Emerald, Wiley Online Library, and Google Scholar. Studies published between 2017 and 2026 were screened using a pre-defined PICOS-based inclusion and exclusion framework. A total of 35 peer-reviewed studies were retained for thematic synthesis following title, abstract, and full text screening.
Results: No single financing model emerged as universally superior. Effectiveness is strongly moderated by startup lifecycle stage, institutional environment, and founder human capital. Venture capital demonstrates the strongest performance impact on profitability, innovation, and scalability, but is systemically distorted by homophily bias that disadvantages African-led startups. Bank financing provides the most stable platform for survival and sustainability in the consolidation phase but structurally excludes early-stage ventures. Hybrid models particularly DFI private co-investment structures and equity-for-guarantee instruments offer the most adaptable architecture for bridging financing gaps across startup lifecycle stages. Equity crowdfunding remains constrained by limited digital infrastructure, low investor sophistication, and the absence of enabling regulatory frameworks across most African markets.
Conclusion: The evidence supports a sequenced, lifecycle-sensitive financing approach: hybrid instruments in the early stage, transitioning to VC-backed configurations in the growth phase, and consolidating through bank financing at maturity. Realizing this pathway requires coordinated policy action to strengthen institutional quality and guarantee mechanisms, investor commitment to reducing bias and expanding co-investment mandates, and ecosystem-level integration of financial literacy support. The review’s central contribution is diagnostic as much as prescriptive: the field agrees on cause information asymmetry but is largely silent on combination, unable to explain how African entrepreneurs actually choose, combine and transition between financing models over a venture’s lifetime. Future research should prioritize longitudinal African cohort studies, sector-specific comparative analyses, and investigation of the behavioural determinants of financing model choice.
Keywords
Startup financing; entrepreneurial finance; funding models; financing constraints; startup sustainability; Sub-Saharan Africa
Downloads
References
1. Abor, J., & Quartey, P. (2010). Issues in SME development in Ghana and South Africa. International Research Journal of Finance and Economics, 39, 218–228. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
2. Adesanya, A., & Ifere, S. (2025). Entrepreneurship financing: A shift to crowdfunding as enabler of startup and business sustainability. UNILAG Journal of Business, 11(1), 1–11. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
3. Ahmad, N. S. M., & Atniesha, R. A. A. (2018). The pecking order theory (POT) and start-up financing of small and medium enterprises (SMEs): Insight into available literature in the Libyan context. Financial Markets, Institutions and Risks, 2(4), 5–12. https://doi.org/10.21272/fmir.2(4).5-12.2018 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
4. Al-Khazaleh, S., Badwan, N., Al-Smadi, R., Aldallaien, B., Darwazeh, R., & Abdallah-ou-Moussa, S. (2026). Access to finance, financial constraints and financial inclusion: a literature review and future directions for FinTech innovations. Research in Globalization, 100331. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
5. Arrieta-Paredes, M. P., van Klyton, A., Scott, J. M., Danowski, J., Duque, K., & Byombi Kamasa, V. (2026). Entrepreneurial finance, news media narratives, and productive entrepreneurship in Rwanda's entrepreneurial ecosystem: an entrepreneurial resourcefulness perspective. International Journal of Entrepreneurial Behavior & Research, 1–24. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
6. Ayyagari, M., Beck, T., & Demirguc-Kunt, A. (2007). Small and medium enterprises across the globe. Small Business Economics, 29(4), 415–434. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
7. Babich, V., Marinesi, S., & Tsoukalas, G. (2021). Does crowdfunding benefit entrepreneurs and venture capital investors? Manufacturing & Service Operations Management, 23(2), 508–524. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
8. Beck, T., Demirguc-Kunt, A., & Singer, D. (2013). Is small beautiful? Financial structure, size, and access to finance. World Development, 52, 19–33. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
9. Beck, T., & Levine, R. (2004). Stock markets, banks, and growth: Panel evidence. Journal of Banking and Finance, 28(3), 423–442. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
10. Bellavitis, C., Filatotchev, I., Kamuriwo, D. S., & Vanacker, T. (2017). Entrepreneurial finance: new frontiers of research and practice: Editorial for the special issue Embracing entrepreneurial funding innovations. Venture Capital, 19(1–2), 1–16. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
11. Berger, M., & Gottschalk, S. (2021). Financing and advising early stage startups: the effect of angel investor subsidies. ZEW-Centre for European Economic Research Discussion Paper (21-069). [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
12. Bonini, S., & Capizzi, V. (2019). The role of venture capital in the emerging entrepreneurial finance ecosystem: future threats and opportunities. Venture Capital, 21(2–3), 137–175. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
13. Brixiová, Z., Kangoye, T., & Yogo, T. U. (2020). Access to finance among small and medium-sized enterprises and job creation in Africa. Structural Change and Economic Dynamics, 55, 177–189. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
14. Burżacka, M. (2017). Building an optimal capital structure of start ups. Gospodarka w praktyce i teorii, 48(3). [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
15. Camilleri, M. A., & Bresciani, S. (2024). Crowdfunding small businesses and startups: a systematic review, an appraisal of theoretical insights and future research directions. European Journal of Innovation Management, 27(7), 2183–2209. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
16. . Celestin, M., & Vanitha, N. (2018). How to fund your startup: Innovative approaches for aspiring entrepreneurs. International Journal of Advanced Trends in Engineering and Technology (IJATET), 3(2), 43–49. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
17. Cole, R. A., & Sokolyk, T. (2018). Debt financing, survival, and growth of start-up firms. Journal of Corporate Finance, 50, 609–625. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
18. Colombo, G. D. C., Gomes, M. D. C., Eça, J. P. A., & Valle, M. R. D. (2023). Analysis of the capital structure of startups in light of the tradeoff and pecking order theories. REGEPE Entrepreneurship and Small Business Journal, 12(3), e2338. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
19. Correia, S., Sousa, M., & Brandão, E. (2024). What do we know about the choices of entrepreneurs before the equity crowdfunding campaign? Small Business Economics, 63(4), 1471–1501. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
20. Cumming, D., Meoli, M., & Vismara, S. (2021). Does equity crowdfunding democratize entrepreneurial finance? Small Business Economics, 56(2), 533–552. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
21. Davila, A., Foster, G., & Gupta, M. (2003). Venture capital financing and the growth of startup firms. Journal of Business Venturing, 18(6), 689–708. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
22. Dekker, D., Galeano-Duque, V., & Christopoulos, D. (2026). Effects of venture debt on early- and late-stage funding of tech startups in tech ecosystems. International Review of Economics & Finance, 108, 105196. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
23. Derdabi, A., & Dvouletý, O. (2025). Funding sustainable entrepreneurship: a hybrid systematic literature review and bibliometric analysis. Nankai Business Review International, 16(2), 359–380. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
24. Drover, W., Busenitz, L., Matusik, S., Townsend, D., Anglin, A., & Dushnitsky, G. (2017). A review and road map of entrepreneurial equity financing research: Venture capital, corporate venture capital, angel investment, crowdfunding, and accelerators. Journal of Management, 43(6), 1820–1853. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
25. Eldridge, D., Nisar, T. M., & Torchia, M. (2021). What impact does equity crowdfunding have on SME innovation and growth? An empirical study. Small Business Economics, 56(1), 105–120. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
26. Ermawati, Y. (2024). Entrepreneurial finance strategies for startup success. Advances in Economics & Financial Studies, 2(2), 67–75. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
27. Esho, E., & Verhoef, G. (2018). The funding gap and the financing of small and medium businesses: An integrated literature review and an agenda. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
28. Fowowe, B. (2017). Access to finance and firm performance: Evidence from African countries. Review of Development Finance, 7(1), 6–17. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
29. Fred-Sawo, C. I., & Onuoha, B. C. Startup financing models and their effectiveness: A comparative study of crowdfunding and traditional loans in early-stage enterprises. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
30. Golder, U., & Barua, S. (2025). The dynamic linkage between fintech venture capital funding, bank credit flows, and equity market movement: evidence from a global perspective. Financial Innovation, 11(1), 120. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
31. Hoque, M. M. (2024). Crowdfunding for innovation: a comprehensive empirical review. Future Business Journal, 10(1), 102. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
32. Idi, K. I. A., & Germinah, C. T. E. (2022). Venture capital financing as a driver for entrepreneurship development in Africa: A literature review and future research agenda. IJEBD (International Journal of Entrepreneurship and Business Development), 5(6), 1183–1198. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
33. Igwe, P. A., Emeordi, R., & Nkanta, I. (2024). Entrepreneurial financing of small and medium enterprises. Reference Module in Social Sciences. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
34. Ismaila, B. (2023). The state of crowdfunding in Africa and its potential impact: a literature review. International Journal of Research in Business & Social Science, 12(5). [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
35. Junge, L. B., Laursen, I. C., & Nielsen, K. R. (2022). Choosing crowdfunding: why do entrepreneurs choose to engage in crowdfunding? Technovation, 111, 102385. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
36. Kabengele, C., & Hahn, R. (2025). Venture capital funding in Africa: a mixed-methods study of evolving ecosystems and financial discrimination. Journal of International Business Studies, 56(6), 777–794. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
37. Kato, A. (2021). A literature review of venture capital financing and growth of SMEs in emerging economies and an agenda for future research. Academy of Entrepreneurship Journal, 27(1), 1–17. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
38. Kato, A. I. (2024). Building resilience and sustainability in small businesses enterprises through sustainable venture capital investment in sub-Saharan Africa. Cogent Economics & Finance, 12(1), 2399760. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
39. Klein, M., Neitzert, F., Hartmann-Wendels, T., & Kraus, S. (2019). Start-up financing in the digital age: A systematic review and comparison of new forms of financing. The Journal of Entrepreneurial Finance (JEF), 21(2), 46–98. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
40. Krishna, K., & Bhasin, S. (2025). Financing green startups in developing markets: A systematic review of structural and perceptual gaps. International Journal of Financial Management and Economics, 8(2), 88–94. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
41. Kukurba, M. (2018). Crowdfunding as a form of funding for businesses in the culturally-changing global economy: a literature review. Journal of Intercultural Management. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
42. Lerner, J. (2009). Boulevard of broken dreams: Why public efforts to boost entrepreneurship and venture capital have failed — and what to do about it. Princeton University Press. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
43. Lödar-Miculeac, R., Ulrich, K., Hernández, J., & Eastwood, N. (2026). Attracting business angels to finance entrepreneurial ventures: successful ways for startups to raise funds. International Entrepreneurship and Management Journal, 22(2), 82. \ [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
44. Marpaung, N., Eriza, F., Manurung, R. P., Fauzan, A. L., & Sitorus, G. M. (2026). Hybrid funding innovation based on debt and equity collaboration for MSME funding in North Sumatera. Journal of Management Analytical and Solution (JoMAS), 6(1), 6–16. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
45. Mazzocchini, F. J., & Lucarelli, C. (2023). Success or failure in equity crowdfunding? A systematic literature review and research perspectives. Management Research Review, 46(6), 790–831. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
46. Megersa, K. (2020). Improving SMEs' access to finance through capital markets and innovative financing instruments: some evidence from developing countries. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
47. Mitra, D. (2012). The role of crowdfunding in entrepreneurial finance. Delhi Business Review, 13(2), 67. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
48. Myers, S. C., & Majluf, N. S. (1984). Corporate financing and investment decisions when firms have information that investors do not have. Journal of Financial Economics, 13(2), 187–221. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
49. Quartey, P., Turkson, E., Abor, J., & Iddrisu, A. (2017). Financing the growth of SMEs in Africa: What are the contraints to SME financing within ECOWAS? Review of Development Finance, 7(1), 18–28. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
50. Rao, P., Kumar, S., Chavan, M., & Lim, W. M. (2023). A systematic literature review on SME financing: Trends and future directions. Journal of Small Business Management, 61(3), 1247–1277. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
51. Ribeiro, C., & Serrasqueiro, Z. (2026). Debt financing in entrepreneurship: a systematic literature review. Journal of Small Business and Enterprise Development, 1–20. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
52. Romero Alvarez, Y. P., Salas-Navarro, K., Martínez, L. B., & Zamora-Musa, R. (2026). Financing innovation in SMEs: a systematic review of financing channels. International Journal of Innovation Science, 18(2), 524–563. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
53. Sanga, B., & Aziakpono, M. (2023). FinTech and SMEs financing: A systematic literature review and bibliometric analysis. Digital Business, 3(2), 100067. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
54. Sukachova, S., Vytrykhovskyi, Y., Korneev, V., Gaponiuk, M., & Borodenko, T. (2025). Innovative startup financing models: Venture capital and crowdfunding. International Journal of Economics and Financial Issues, 15(4), 427–433. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
55. Svetek, M. (2022). Signaling in the context of early-stage equity financing: review and directions. Venture Capital, 24(1), 71–104. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
56. Taglialatela, J., & Mina, A. (2024). Innovation, asymmetric information and the capital structure of new firms. Economics of Innovation and New Technology, 33(7), 955–978. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
57. TSUSHI, N., & Yoshiaki, N. O. S. E. (2025). The "shelf life" of patent signals: Empirical research on startup financing in Japan. Finance Research Open, 100063. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
58. Tuffa, W. A., Hunegnaw, F. B., & Habtewold, T. M. (2025). Comparative analysis of innovation financing mechanisms for tech startups: Evidence from Ethiopia, Kenya, and Uganda. Journal of Risk and Financial Management, 19(1), 1. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
59. Tykvova, T. (2018). Venture capital and private equity financing: An overview of recent literature and an agenda for future research. Journal of Business Economics, 88(3–4), 325–362. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
60. Virgen, M. (2026). Financing sources for venture capital: How startups secure financing. Available at SSRN 6530098. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
61. Wardiman, J., Wardi, Y., Marwan, M., & Nofriansyah, N. (2024). Exploring debt financing option for SME's: A systematic literature review. Journal of Management: Small and Medium Enterprises (SMEs), 17(3), 1321–1337. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
62. Winton, A., & Yerramilli, V. (2008). Entrepreneurial finance: Banks versus venture capital. Journal of Financial Economics, 88(1), 51–79. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
63. Wright, F. (2017). How do entrepreneurs obtain financing? An evaluation of available options and how they fit into the current entrepreneurial ecosystem. Journal of Business & Finance Librarianship, 22(3–4), 190–200. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
Metrics
Views & Downloads
Similar Articles
- A Study on Customer Awareness on Green Banking Intiatives
- International Financial Reporting Standards and Earnings Management: A Global Research Landscape Analysis
- Analysis of Financial Performance and Operational Efficiency of State Bank of India Using the CAMEL Framework
- Roles and Performance of India Post Payment Bank (IPPB) With Special References to Shivamogga District
- Enhancing Transactional Security in U.S. Banking Systems by Implementing OTP-Based Two-Factor Authentication to Mitigate Debit and Credit Card Fraud