Fluency in Second Language Learning: A Conceptual Review of Proficiency and Language Anxiety

Fluency has become an important focus in second language (L2) acquisition research because it is a strong indicator of oral proficiency. Alongside complexity and accuracy, fluency is widely used to assess communicative competence, with features such as speech rate, pausing, and self-repair serving as reliable measures. Previous studies consistently highlight fluency as a key predictor of proficiency, yet emotional factors, particularly foreign language anxiety, it can disrupt speech by increasing hesitation and slowing delivery. This conceptual paper reviews recent studies published between 2019 and 2025 to explore the role of fluency in L2 learning. It specifically aims to (1) present an overview of fluency in L2 learning, (2) examine fluency as a predictor of oral proficiency, and (3) analyze its relationship with language anxiety. The review emphasizes the multidimensional nature of fluency and calls for further research into how anxiety influences both objective performance and perceived fluency.

Fluency; Second Language Acquisition; Oral Proficiency; Foreign Language Anxiety; Communicative Competence; Perceived Fluency

1. Ashriyyah, A. N., & Indah, R. N. (2024). Linguistic and paralinguistic features of speech anxiety of high school students. Wanastra: Jurnal Bahasa dan Sastra, 16(2), 46–57. https://doi.org/10.31294/wanastra.v16i2.22564 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

2. Bosker, H. R., Pinget, A. F., Quené, H., Sanders, T., & De Jong, N. H. (2013). What makes speech sound fluent? The contributions of pauses, speed and repairs. Language Testing, 30(2), 159–175. https://doi.org/10.1177/0265532212455394 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

3. Bosker, H. R., Pinget, A. F., Quené, H., Sanders, T., & De Jong, N. H. (2013). What makes speech sound fluent? The contributions of pauses, speed and repairs. Language Testing, 30(2), 159–175. https://doi.org/10.1177/0265532212455394 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

4. Broughton, G., Brumfit, C., Flavell, R., Hill, P., & Pincas, A. (2003). Teaching English as a foreign language. Routledge. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

5. Campione, E., & Véronis, J. (2002). A large-scale multilingual study of silent pause duration. Proceedings of Speech Prosody 2002, 1–4. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

6. Chen, Z. (2025). What shapes communicative adequacy in second language speaking performance? The contributions of complexity, accuracy, fluency, and pronunciation. Vigo International Journal of Applied Linguistics, 22. https://doi.org/10.35869/vial.v0i22.4882 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

7. Cucchiarini, C., Strik, H., & Boves, L. (2000). Quantitative assessment of second language learners’ fluency by means of automatic speech recognition technology. The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 107(2), 989–999. https://doi.org/10.1121/1.428279 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

8. Cucchiarini, C., Strik, H., & Boves, L. (2002). Quantitative assessment of second language learners’ fluency: Comparisons between read and spontaneous speech. The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 111(6), 2862–2873. https://doi.org/10.1121/1.1471894 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

9. De Jong, N. H. (2016). Fluency in second language assessment. In D. Tsagari & J. Banerjee (Eds.), Handbook of second language assessment (pp. 203–218). De Gruyter. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

10. De Jong, N. H., & Bosker, H. R. (2013). Choosing a threshold for silent pauses to measure second language fluency. In R. Eklund (Ed.), Proceedings of disfluency in spontaneous speech (pp. 17–20). Royal Institute of Technology (KTH). [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

11. De Jong, N. H., Steinel, M. P., & Florijn, A. (2012). The effect of task complexity on functional adequacy, fluency and lexical diversity in speaking performances of native and non-native speakers. In A. Housen, I. Vedder, & F. Kuiken (Eds.), Dimensions of L2 performance and proficiency: Complexity, accuracy and fluency in SLA (pp. 121–142). John Benjamins Publishing Company. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

12. De Jong, N. H., Steinel, M. P., Florijn, A. F., Schoonen, R., & Hulstijn, J. H. (2013). Linguistic skills and speaking fluency in a second language. Applied Psycholinguistics, 34(5), 893–916. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0142716412000522 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

13. Derwing, T. M., Rossiter, M. J., Munro, M. J., & Thomson, R. I. (2004). Second language fluency: Judgments on different tasks. Language Learning, 54(4), 655–679. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9922.2004.00282.x [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

14. Di Silvio, F., Donovan, A., & Diao, W. (2016). The development of L2 fluency during study abroad: A cross-language study. The Modern Language Journal, 100(3), 610–624. https://doi.org/10.1111/modl.12343 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

15. Fillmore, C. J. (1979). On fluency. In C. J. Fillmore, D. Kempler, & W. S.-Y. Wang (Eds.), Individual differences in language ability and language behavior (pp. 85–102). Academic Press. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

16. Foster, P. (2020). Oral fluency in a second language: A research agenda for the next ten years. Language Teaching, 53(4), 446–461. https://doi.org/10.1017/S026144482000018X [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

17. Freed, B. (2000). Is fluency, like beauty, in the eyes (and ears) of the beholder? In H. Riggenbach (Ed.), Perspectives on fluency (pp. 243–265). University of Michigan Press. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

18. Freed, B. F., Segalowitz, N., & Dewey, D. P. (2004). Context of learning and second language fluency in French: Comparing regular classroom, study abroad, and intensive domestic immersion programs. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 26(2), 275–301. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0272263104262061 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

19. Green, D. W. (1998). Mental control of the bilingual lexico-semantic system. Bilingualism: Language and Cognition, 1(2), 67–81. https://doi.org/10.1017/S1366728998000133 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

20. Grosjean, F. (2013). Bilingual and monolingual language modes. In C. A. Chapelle (Ed.), The encyclopedia of applied linguistics (pp. 1–9). Blackwell Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1002/9781405198431.wbeal0090 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

21. Hanzawa, K. (2024). Development of second language speech fluency in foreign language classrooms: A longitudinal study. Language Teaching Research, 28(3), 816–838. https://doi.org/10.1177/13621688211008693 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

22. Heldner, M., & Edlund, J. (2010). Pauses, gaps and overlaps in conversations. Journal of Phonetics, 38(4), 555–568. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.wocn.2010.08.002 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

23. Iwashita, N., Brown, A., McNamara, T., & O’Hagan, S. (2008). Assessed levels of second language speaking proficiency: How distinct? Applied Linguistics, 29(1), 24–49. https://doi.org/10.1093/applin/amm026 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

24. Kallio, H., Kautonen, M., & Kuronen, M. (2023). Prosody and fluency of Finland Swedish as a second language: Investigating global parameters for automated speaking assessment. Speech Communication, 148, 66–80. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.specom.2023.02.003 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

25. Kallio, H., Šimko, J., Huhta, A., Karhila, R., Vainio, M., Lindroos, E., Hildén, R., & Kurimo, M. (2017). Towards the phonetic basis of spoken second language assessment: Temporal features as indicators of perceived proficiency level. In M. Kuronen, P. Lintunen, & T. Nieminen (Eds.), AFinLA-e: Soveltavan kielitieteen tutkimuksia, 10 (pp. 193–213). [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

26. Kang, O., & Johnson, D. (2018). The roles of suprasegmental features in predicting English oral proficiency with an automated system. Language Assessment Quarterly, 15(2), 150–168. https://doi.org/10.1080/15434303.2017.1421956 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

27. Koizumi, R., & In’nami, Y. (2024). Predicting functional adequacy from complexity, accuracy, and fluency of second-language picture-prompted speaking. System, 120, 103208. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.system.2023.103208 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

28. Kormos, J. (2006). Speech production and second language acquisition. Lawrence Erlbaum Associates. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

29. Kormos, J., & Dénes, M. (2004). Exploring measures and perceptions of fluency in the speech of second language learners. System, 32(2), 145–164. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.system.2004.01.001 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

30. Lahmann, C., Steinkrauss, R., & Schmid, M. S. (2017). Speed, breakdown, and repair: An investigation of fluency in long-term second-language speakers of English. International Journal of Bilingualism, 21(2), 228–242. https://doi.org/10.1177/1367006915613162 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

31. Lennon, P. (1990). Investigating fluency in EFL: A quantitative approach. Language Learning, 40(3), 387–417. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-1770.1990.tb00207.x [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

32. Lintunen, P., Mutta, M., & Peltonen, P. (2020). Defining fluency in L2 learning and use. In P. Lintunen, M. Mutta, & P. Peltonen (Eds.), Fluency in L2 learning and use (pp. 1–15). Multilingual Matters. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

33. Luoma, S. (2004). Assessing speaking. Cambridge University Press. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

34. Mora, J. C., Mora‐Plaza, I., & Bermejo Miranda, G. (2024). Speaking anxiety and task complexity effects on second language speech. International Journal of Applied Linguistics, 34(1), 292–315. https://doi.org/10.1111/ijal.12494 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

35. Nation, I. S. P. (2014). Developing fluency. In T. Muller, J. Adamson, P. S. Brown, & S. Herder (Eds.), Exploring EFL fluency in Asia (pp. 11–25). Palgrave Macmillan. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

36. Préfontaine, Y., & Kormos, J. (2015). The relationship between task difficulty and second language fluency in French: A mixed methods approach. The Modern Language Journal, 99(1), 96–112. https://doi.org/10.1111/modl.12190 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

37. Qurbi, E. (2024). Temporal measurements for second language speaking fluency. East European Journal of Psycholinguistics, 11(2). https://doi.org/10.29038/eejpl.2024.11.2.qur [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

38. Rehbein, J. (1987). On fluency in second language speech. In H. W. Dechert & M. Raupach (Eds.), Psycholinguistic models of production (pp. 97–105). Ablex Publishing Corporation. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

39. Révész, A., Ekiert, M., & Torgersen, E. N. (2016). The effects of complexity, accuracy, and fluency on communicative adequacy in oral task performance. Applied Linguistics, 37(6), 828–848. https://doi.org/10.1093/applin/amu069 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

40. Rohloff, T., Frank, M., & Peters, J. (2025). On the relationship between language dominance and fluency in bilingual speakers of Low and High German. International Journal of Bilingualism. Advance online publication. https://doi.org/10.1177/13670069251353090 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

41. Rood, M. M. S. J., & de Jong, N. H. (2023). A mixed-methods study on the effects of manipulated speaking anxiety on L2 utterance and L2 cognitive fluency. Journal of the European Second Language Association, 7(1), 60–74. https://doi.org/10.22599/jesla.96 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

42. Segalowitz, N. (2010). Cognitive bases of second language fluency. Routledge. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

43. Skehan, P. (2003). Task-based instruction. Language Teaching, 36(1), 1–14. https://doi.org/10.1017/S026144480200188X [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

44. Skehan, P. (2009). Modelling second language performance: Integrating complexity, accuracy, fluency, and lexis. Applied Linguistics, 30(4), 510–532. https://doi.org/10.1093/applin/amp047 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

45. Stockdale, D. A. (2009). Comparing perception of oral fluency to objective measures in the EFL classroom (Unpublished master’s thesis). University of Birmingham. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

46. Stokes, J. D. (2025). The impact of foreign language anxiety on the utterance fluency of international students in the UK: Does the presence of an audience matter? Theory and Practice of Second Language Acquisition. Advance online publication. https://doi.org/10.31261/TAPSLA.16033 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

47. Suzuki, S., & Kormos, J. (2020). Linguistic dimensions of comprehensibility and perceived fluency: An investigation of complexity, accuracy, and fluency in second language argumentative speech. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 42(1), 143–167. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0272263119000421 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

48. Suzuki, S., & Kormos, J. (2025). L2 fluency across tasks: Disentangling demands on conceptualisation and formulation in speech production. International Review of Applied Linguistics in Language Teaching. Advance online publication. https://doi.org/10.1515/iral-2024-0185 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

49. Szánthó, Z. (2021). Foreign language anxiety and filled pauses in spontaneous L2 speech. Proceedings of the 3rd International Symposium on Applied Phonetics (ISAPh 2021), 67–70. https://doi.org/10.21437/ISAPh.2021-12 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

50. Szyszka, M., & Lintunen, P. (2023). Zooming into the L2 speech fluency markers of anxious and non-anxious advanced L2 learners – An extreme case sampling report. Research in Language, 21(4), 357–376. https://doi.org/10.18778/1731-7533.21.4.02 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

51. Szyszka, M., Peltonen, P., & Lintunen, P. (2024). Unravelling the relationship between language anxiety and foreign language speech fluency in a monologue production. Journal of Multilingual and Multicultural Development. Advance online publication. https://doi.org/10.1080/01434632.2024.2387149 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

52. Tavakoli, P., & Skehan, P. (2005). Strategic planning, task structure and performance testing. In R. Ellis (Ed.), Planning and task performance in a second language (pp. 239–273). John Benjamins Publishing Company. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

53. Tavakoli, P., & Wright, C. (2020). Second language speech fluency: From research to practice. Cambridge University Press. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

54. Tavakoli, P., Nakatsuhara, F., & Hunter, A. (2020). Aspects of fluency across assessed levels of speaking proficiency. The Modern Language Journal, 104(1), 169–191. https://doi.org/10.1111/modl.12620 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

55. Tavakoli, P., Nakatsuhara, F., & Hunter, A.-M. (2020). Aspects of fluency across assessed levels of speaking proficiency. The Modern Language Journal, 104(1), 169–191. https://doi.org/10.1111/modl.12590 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

56. Tennessee Department of Education. (2009). Fluency resource packet: Assessment of speech – Determination of speech impairment – Fluency. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

57. Towell, R., Hawkins, R., & Bazergui, N. (1996). The development of fluency in advanced learners of French. Applied Linguistics, 17(1), 84–119. https://doi.org/10.1093/applin/17.1.84 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

58. Winaryo, S., & Gusdian, R. I. (2021). Measuring English language education department students’ speaking fluency level. Wanastra: Jurnal Bahasa dan Sastra, 13(1), 13–18. https://doi.org/10.31294/w.v13i1.9812 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

59. Zuniga, M., & Simard, D. (2022). Exploring the intricate relationship between foreign language anxiety, attention and self-repairs during L2 speech production. System, 105, 102732. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.system.2022.102732 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

• Methane Emissions from Municipal Solid Waste - Case Study in Cai Rang District, Can Tho City, Vietnam
• Youth Activism, Intentional Integration of Policies to Raise Awareness on Climate Change Action among the Youth
• Breathing Spaces: Environmental & User Experience in Dhanmondi and Zigatola Multistoried Apartments, Dhaka, Bangladesh
• Effects of Solid Waste Disposal on Soil Quality in Makurdi Metropolis, Benue State, Nigeria
• Environmental Impact of Artisanal and Small-Scale Gold Mining in Borgu Local Government Area