From Algorithmic Accuracy to Organisational Value: A Systematic Overview of Artificial Intelligence-Enabled Defect Detection in Facilities Management

Authors

Ahmad Shahsyafie Muhamad

Department of Real Estate, Faculty of Built Environment and Surveying, Universiti Teknologi Malaysia (Malaysia)

Mat Naim Abdullah@Asmoni

Department of Real Estate, Faculty of Built Environment and Surveying, Universiti Teknologi Malaysia (Malaysia)

Ahmad Sha’rainon Md Shaarani

Department of Real Estate, Faculty of Built Environment and Surveying, Universiti Teknologi Malaysia (Malaysia)

Norshaliza Kamaruddin

Faculty of Artificial Intelligence, Universiti Teknologi Malaysia (Malaysia)

Article Information

DOI: 10.47772/IJRISS.2026.100700430

Subject Category: Social science

Volume/Issue: 10/7 | Page No: 6304-6319

Publication Timeline

Submitted: 2026-07-22

Accepted: 2026-07-28

Published: 2026-08-04

Abstract

Artificial intelligence (AI) has become an important enabler of defect detection, fault diagnosis and predictive maintenance in Facilities Management (FM). Despite rapid technological advancements, existing studies predominantly emphasise algorithmic accuracy while giving comparatively less attention to the organisational, operational and managerial conditions required to translate AI predictions into sustainable FM value. This paper aims to provide a systematic overview of AI-enabled defect detection in FM and to develop an integrative Technology–Process–Management (TPM) perspective for understanding how AI capabilities are transformed into organisational value. The study adopts a systematic overview methodology based on a previously completed systematic literature review covering publications from January 2019 to March 2025. The source review identified 94 eligible studies through a transparent PRISMA-based review process. Evidence was synthesised using a structured narrative approach by categorising findings into three analytical dimensions: Technology, Process and Management. The review identifies five major AI technology families, namely conventional machine learning, deep learning, computer vision, semantic and language-enabled methods, and digital twins. The findings demonstrate that high predictive accuracy alone is insufficient to ensure successful implementation in FM. Instead, AI effectiveness depends on data quality, interoperability, workflow integration, governance, organisational readiness, operator participation and lifecycle economic considerations. Based on these findings, the paper proposes a Technology–Process–Management (TPM) framework that conceptualises the relationships between implementation readiness, operational mechanisms and multi-level organisational outcomes. The review also outlines future research priorities, including prospective multi-site validation, human–AI collaboration, interoperability, lifecycle economic evaluation and implementation-oriented reporting. The findings suggest that AI-enabled defect detection should be viewed as a socio-technical transformation rather than solely a technological innovation. For FM practitioners, successful AI adoption requires aligning technological capability with organisational processes, governance structures and maintenance decision-making to achieve sustainable operational value.

Keywords

Artificial intelligence; Facilities management; Defect detection

Downloads

References

1. Almobarek, M., Mendibil, K., & Alrashdan, A. (2023). Predictive maintenance 4.0 for chilled water system at commercial buildings: A methodological framework. Buildings, 13(2), 497. https://doi.org/10.3390/buildings13020497 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

2. Bouabdallaoui, Y., Lafhaj, Z., Yim, P., Ducoulombier, L., & Bennadji, B. (2021). Predictive maintenance in building facilities: A machine learning-based approach. Sensors, 21(4), 1044. https://doi.org/10.3390/s21041044 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

3. Cao, Y., Kamaruzzaman, S. N., & Aziz, N. M. (2022). Building information modeling (BIM) capabilities in the operation and maintenance phase of green buildings: A systematic review. Buildings, 12(6), 830. https://doi.org/10.3390/buildings12060830 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

4. Chen, Z., O’Neill, Z., Wen, J., Pradhan, O., Yang, T., Lu, X., Lin, G., Miyata, S., Lee, S., Shen, C., Chiosa, R., Piscitelli, M. S., Capozzoli, A., Hengel, F., Kührer, A., Pritoni, M., Liu, W., Clauß, J., Chen, Y., & Herr, T. (2023). A review of data-driven fault detection and diagnostics for building HVAC systems. Applied Energy, 339, 121030. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apenergy.2023.121030 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

5. Coupry, C., Noblecourt, S., Richard, P., Baudry, D., & Bigaud, D. (2021). BIM-based digital twin and XR devices to improve maintenance procedures in smart buildings: A literature review. Applied Sciences, 11(15), 6810. https://doi.org/10.3390/app11156810 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

6. Frank, S., Lin, G., Jin, X., Singla, R., Farthing, A., & Granderson, J. (2019). A performance evaluation framework for building fault detection and diagnosis algorithms. Energy and Buildings, 192, 84–92. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enbuild.2019.03.024 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

7. Ghansah, F. (2024). Digital twins for smart building at the facility management stage: A systematic review of enablers, applications, and challenges. Smart and Sustainable Built Environment, 14(4), 1194–1229. https://doi.org/10.1108/SASBE-10-2023-0298 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

8. Gunay, B., Markus, A., Parsaei, A., Darwazeh, D., Bursill, J., & Pellerin, L. (2025). A critical review of field implementation of data-driven operation and maintenance technologies to reduce building energy use and greenhouse-gas emissions. Energy and Buildings, 346, 116087. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enbuild.2025.116087 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

9. Hodavand, F., Ramaji, I. J., & Sadeghi, N. (2023). Digital twin for fault detection and diagnosis of building operations: A systematic review. Buildings, 13(6), 1426. https://doi.org/10.3390/buildings13061426 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

10. Jahangir, M. F., Schultz, C. P. L., & Kamari, A. (2024). A review of drivers and barriers of digital twin adoption in building project development processes. Journal of Information Technology in Construction, 29, 141–178. https://doi.org/10.36680/j.itcon.2024.008 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

11. Lawal, O. O., Nawari, N. O., & Lawal, O. (2025). AI-enabled cognitive predictive maintenance of urban assets using city information modeling—Systematic review. Buildings, 15(5), 690. https://doi.org/10.3390/buildings15050690 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

12. Lee, J. Y., Irisboev, I. O., & Ryu, Y.-S. (2021). Literature review on digitalization in facilities management and facilities management performance measurement: Contribution of Industry 4.0 in the global era. Sustainability, 13(23), 13432. https://doi.org/10.3390/su132313432 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

13. Li, G., Chen, L., Fan, C., Li, T., Xu, C., & Fang, X. (2023). Interpretation and explanation of convolutional neural network-based fault diagnosis model at the feature-level for building energy systems. Energy and Buildings, 295, 113326. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enbuild.2023.113326 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

14. Lin, G., Kramer, H., & Granderson, J. (2020). Building fault detection and diagnostics: Achieved savings, and methods to evaluate algorithm performance. Building and Environment, 168, 106505. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.buildenv.2019.106505 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

15. Liu, J., Zhang, Q., Li, X., Li, G., Liu, Z., Xie, Y., Li, K., & Liu, B. (2021). Transfer learning-based strategies for fault diagnosis in building energy systems. Energy and Buildings, 250, 111256. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enbuild.2021.111256 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

16. Marocco, M., & Garofolo, I. (2021). Integrating disruptive technologies with facilities management: A literature review and future research directions. Automation in Construction, 131, 103917. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.autcon.2021.103917 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

17. Naji, K. K., Gunduz, M., & Al-Qahtani, A. (2024). Unveiling digital transformation: Analyzing building facility management’s preparedness for transformation using structural equation modeling. Buildings, 14(9), 2794. https://doi.org/10.3390/buildings14092794 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

18. Page, M. J., McKenzie, J. E., Bossuyt, P. M., Boutron, I., Hoffmann, T. C., Mulrow, C. D., Shamseer, L., Tetzlaff, J. M., Akl, E. A., Brennan, S. E., Chou, R., Glanville, J., Grimshaw, J. M., Hróbjartsson, A., Lalu, M. M., Li, T., Loder, E. W., Mayo-Wilson, E., McDonald, S., McGuinness, L. A., Stewart, L. A., Thomas, J., Tricco, A. C., Welch, V. A., Whiting, P., & Moher, D. (2021). The PRISMA 2020 statement: An updated guideline for reporting systematic reviews. BMJ, 372, n71. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.n71 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

19. Paneru, S., & Jeelani, I. (2021). Computer vision applications in construction: Current state, opportunities and challenges. Automation in Construction, 132, 103940. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.autcon.2021.103940 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

20. Pascual, L.-L. (2022). A systematic review of the extent to which BIM is integrated into operation and maintenance. Sustainability, 14(14), 8692. https://doi.org/10.3390/su14148692 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

21. Sampaio, R. P., Costa, A. A., & Flores-Colen, I. (2022). A systematic review of artificial intelligence applied to facility management in the building information modeling context and future research directions. Buildings, 12(11), 1939. https://doi.org/10.3390/buildings12111939 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

22. Shi, Z., & O’Brien, W. (2019). Development and implementation of automated fault detection and diagnostics for building systems: A review. Automation in Construction, 104, 215–229. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.autcon.2019.04.002 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

23. Shuhaimi, A. M., Mohamed Yusof, L., & Rahman, R. A. (2024). Drivers, capabilities, and challenges for adopting digital twin in facility management: A profound qualitative investigation. Planning Malaysia, 22(32), 589–606. https://doi.org/10.21837/pm.v22i32.1528 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

24. Wong, J. K. W., Ge, J., & He, S. X. (2018). Digitisation in facilities management: A literature review and future research directions. Automation in Construction, 92, 312–326. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.autcon.2018.04.006 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

25. Zhao, Y., Li, T., Zhang, X., & Zhang, C. (2019). Artificial intelligence-based fault detection and diagnosis methods for building energy systems: Advantages, challenges and the future. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, 109, 85–101. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rser.2019.04.021 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

Metrics

Views & Downloads

Similar Articles