IJRISS Logo

From Design Fit to Capability Fit: Reconsidering the Viability of Organizational Design

Authors

Linda Blignaut

Academia, Higher Colleges of Technology (Sharjah, United Arab Emirates)

Ahmed Faisal Ahmed Ali Alyassi

Student, Higher Colleges of Technology (Sharjah, United Arab Emirates)

Article Information

DOI: 10.47772/IJRISS.2026.100800578

Subject Category: Education

Volume/Issue: 10/8 | Page No: 8669-8689

Publication Timeline

Submitted: 2026-08-27

Accepted: 2026-09-01

Published: 2026-09-12

Abstract

Organizational design research has developed sophisticated accounts of fit among strategy, environment, structure, information, knowledge, and related organizational conditions. A design that appears appropriate for its context may nevertheless prove difficult to operate when the capabilities it assumes are not sufficiently available. This article examines that capability correspondence problem through a structured integrative literature review. Eleven Scopus search formulations were executed, nine of which returned 948 raw records across organizational design, capability, human capital, fit, formal and informal organization, implementation, decentralization, and organizational change. Following deduplication, staged screening, detailed eligibility assessment, full text verification, and qualitative appraisal of study type and methodological transparency, 52 sources formed the analytical evidence set. The appraisal differentiated quantitative, qualitative, mixed, modeling, theoretical, and review evidence. Prior research establishes reciprocal relationships between design and capability, several forms of capability alignment, and divergence between formal arrangements and realized organizational functioning. Less integrated is the question of whether available organizational capabilities correspond with those required for a selected design to operate according to its intended logic. The article formalizes design required capability and develops capability fit as correspondence between required and available organizational capability across strength, scale, and organizational location. It distinguishes capability fit from implementation capability and explains how lower fit can increase reliance on escalation, informal expertise, retained central support, and other compensatory adaptations. The resulting Capability Fit Model extends organizational fit reasoning from design appropriateness toward design operability and proposes that effectiveness depends partly on whether organizations can provide the capabilities their intended arrangements require.

Keywords

organizational design, organizational capability, organizational fit, human capital, capability fit

Downloads

PDF JATS XML

References

1. Adobor, H., & Kudonoo, E. C. (2025). Antifragility and organizations: An organizational design perspective. Leadership & Organization Development Journal, 46(2), 351–375. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

2. https://doi.org/10.1108/LODJ-03-2024-0185 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

3. Arshi, T., & Burns, P. (2019). Designing an organization for innovation in emerging economies: The mediating role of readiness for innovation. Organizations and Markets in Emerging Economies, 10(1), 31–56. https://doi.org/10.15388/omee.2019.10.00002 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

4. Baporikar, N., & Randa, I. O. (2020). Organizational design for performance management in state-owned enterprises. International Journal of Service Science, Management, Engineering, and Technology, 11(4), 1–25. https://doi.org/10.4018/IJSSMET.2020100101 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

5. Beer, M., Voelpel, S. C., Leibod, M., & Tekie, E. B. (2005). Strategic management as organizational learning: Developing fit and alignment through a disciplined process. Long Range Planning, 38(5), 445–465. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lrp.2005.04.008 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

6. Belloc, F., Burdin, G., & Landini, F. (2023). Corporate hierarchies and workplace voice. Journal of Institutional Economics, 19(6), 729–746. https://doi.org/10.1017/S1744137423000206 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

7. Bendickson, J. S., Chandler, T. D., James, B. E., & Taylor, E. C. (2023). Sourcing human capital for organizational effectiveness: Sourcing strategy, determinants, and alignment. International Journal of Human Resource Management, 34(5), 987–1014. https://doi.org/10.1080/09585192.2021.2016888 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

8. Benelli, F. (2026). Governing AI diffusion in open innovation ecosystems: Decision architecture under authority–information misalignment. Journal of Open Innovation: Technology, Market, and Complexity, 12(3), Article 100804. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.joitmc.2026.100804 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

9. Bocken, N. M. P., & Geradts, T. H. J. (2020). Barriers and drivers to sustainable business model innovation: Organization design and dynamic capabilities. Long Range Planning, 53(4), Article 101950. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lrp.2019.101950 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

10. Bounfour, A., Etienne, J. M., Cheng, X., & Nonnis, A. (2022). How do firms use cloud computing to transform their organization? Evidence from a global survey. Digital Transformation and Society, 1(1), 29–47. https://doi.org/10.1108/DTS-05-2022-0014 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

11. Bourrier, M. (2005). The contribution of organizational design to safety. European Management Journal, 23(1), 98–104. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.emj.2004.12.014 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

12. Bredillet, C., Tywoniak, S., & Tootoonchy, M. (2018). Why and how do project management offices change? A structural analysis approach. International Journal of Project Management, 36(5), 744–761. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

13. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijproman.2018.04.001 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

14. Butler, J. C., & Grahovac, J. (2012). Learning, imitation, and the use of knowledge: A comparison of markets, hierarchies, and teams. Organization Science, 23(5), 1249–1263. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

15. https://doi.org/10.1287/orsc.1120.0747 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

16. Ceci, F., & Masini, A. (2013). Specialised capabilities in integrated solutions: The role of fit. International Journal of Business and Systems Research, 7(4), 395–411. https://doi.org/10.1504/IJBSR.2013.056705 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

17. Chen-Florea, A. L. Q., Granberg, M., Hofstad, H., & Vedeld, T. (2026). Network organizational capabilities for scaling co-created sustainability solutions: The Nordic countries as a testbed. Environmental Innovation and Societal Transitions, 61, Article 101167. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

18. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eist.2026.101167 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

19. Cheng, J. L. C., & Love, E. G. (2022). Designing chief innovation officer positions: A strategic contingency framework. Journal of Organization Design, 11(4), 115–128. https://doi.org/10.1007/s41469-022-00126-6 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

20. Christie, A., & Tippmann, E. (2026). Why middle managers deviate from strategy and how to make the most of it. Organizational Dynamics, 55(3), Article 101254. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.orgdyn.2026.101254 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

21. Coffay, M., & Bocken, N. (2023). Sustainable by design: An organizational design tool for sustainable business model innovation. Journal of Cleaner Production, 427, Article 139294. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2023.139294 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

22. Colombo, M. G., & Grilli, L. (2013). The creation of a middle-management level by entrepreneurial ventures: Testing economic theories of organizational design. Journal of Economics and Management Strategy, 22(2), 390–422. https://doi.org/10.1111/jems.12010 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

23. Colombo, M. G., Rossi-Lamastra, C., & Matassini, B. (2016). The organizational design of high-tech entrepreneurial ventures. Foundations and Trends in Entrepreneurship, 11(6), 427–523. https://doi.org/10.1561/0300000053 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

24. Constant, F., & Johnsen, T. (2025). Purchasing contribution to innovation exploration: Awareness, motivations and capabilities. International Journal of Operations and Production Management, 45(2), 493–516. https://doi.org/10.1108/IJOPM-10-2023-0849 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

25. Curado, C. (2006). Organisational learning and organisational design. Learning Organization, 13(1), 25–48. https://doi.org/10.1108/09696470610639112 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

26. Dassanayake, H. C., Nagalingam, S., & Xing, K. (2025). Organizational capabilities to embed sustainability: Case study on apparel manufacturing in Sri Lanka. International Studies of Management & Organization. https://doi.org/10.1080/00208825.2025.2531639 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

27. Gahan, P., Theilacker, M., Adamovic, M., Choi, D., Harley, B., Healy, J., & Olsen, J. E. (2021). Between fit and flexibility? The benefits of high-performance work practices and leadership capability for innovation outcomes. Human Resource Management Journal, 31(2), 414–437. https://doi.org/10.1111/1748-8583.12316 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

28. Greasley, A., & Wang, Y. (2016). Building the hybrid organisation through ERP and enterprise social software. Computers in Industry, 82, 69–81. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compind.2016.05.007 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

29. Gulati, R., & Puranam, P. (2009). Renewal through reorganization: The value of inconsistencies between formal and informal organization. Organization Science, 20(2), 422–440. https://doi.org/10.1287/orsc.1090.0421 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

30. Hansen, E. G., Wicki, S., & Schaltegger, S. (2019). Structural ambidexterity, transition processes, and integration trade-offs: A longitudinal study of failed exploration. R&D Management, 49(4), 484–508. https://doi.org/10.1111/radm.12339 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

31. Hellström, T., Kemlin, P., & Malmquist, U. (2000). Knowledge and competence management at Ericsson: Decentralization and organizational fit. Journal of Knowledge Management, 4(2), 99–110. https://doi.org/10.1108/13673270010336594 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

32. Herremans, I. M., Isaac, R. G., Kline, T. J. B., & Nazari, J. A. (2011). Intellectual capital and uncertainty of knowledge: Control by design of the management system. Journal of Business Ethics, 98(4), 627–640. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-010-0642-7 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

33. Keers, B. B. M., van Fenema, P. C., & Zijm, H. (2017). Understanding organizational change for alliancing. Journal of Organizational Change Management, 30(5), 823–838. https://doi.org/10.1108/JOCM-09-2016-0170 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

34. Keum, D. D., & See, K. E. (2017). The influence of hierarchy on idea generation and selection in the innovation process. Organization Science, 28(4), 653–669. https://doi.org/10.1287/orsc.2017.1142 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

35. Kim, S., & Anand, J. J. (2018). Knowledge complexity and the performance of inter-unit knowledge replication structures. Strategic Management Journal, 39(7), 1959–1989. https://doi.org/10.1002/smj.2899 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

36. Levina, N., & Ross, J. W. (2003). From the vendor's perspective: Exploring the value proposition in information technology outsourcing. MIS Quarterly: Management Information Systems, 27(3), 331–364. https://doi.org/10.2307/30036537 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

37. Levinthal, D. A., & Wu, B. (2025). Resource redeployment and the pursuit of the new best use: Economic logic and organizational challenges. Strategy Science, 10(1), 32–47. https://doi.org/10.1287/stsc.2022.0105 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

38. Lynch, S. E., & Mors, M. L. (2019). Strategy implementation and organizational change: How formal reorganization affects professional networks. Long Range Planning, 52(2), 255–270. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lrp.2018.02.003 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

39. Mahesh, K., & Suresh, J. K. (2009). Knowledge criteria for organization design. Journal of Knowledge Management, 13(4), 41–51. https://doi.org/10.1108/13673270910971815 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

40. Maragno, G., Tangi, L., Gastaldi, L., & Benedetti, M. (2023). AI as an organizational agent to nurture: Effectively introducing chatbots in public entities. Public Management Review, 25(11), 2135–2165. https://doi.org/10.1080/14719037.2022.2063935 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

41. Pawar, K. S., Beltagui, A., & Riedel, J. C. K. H. (2009). The PSO triangle: Designing product, service and organisation to create value. International Journal of Operations and Production Management, 29(5), 468–493. https://doi.org/10.1108/01443570910953595 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

42. Perez-Valls, M., Cespedes-Lorente, J., & Moreno-Garcia, J. (2016). Green practices and organizational design as sources of strategic flexibility and performance. Business Strategy and the Environment, 25(8), 529–544. https://doi.org/10.1002/bse.1881 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

43. Prasad, A., Green, P., & Heales, J. (2013). Beyond normal competencies: Understanding organisation designs to develop and sustain IT-related capabilities. Australasian Journal of Information Systems, 18(1), Article 8. https://doi.org/10.3127/ajis.v18i1.767 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

44. Raisch, S. (2008). Balanced structures: Designing organizations for profitable growth. Long Range Planning, 41(5), 483–508. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lrp.2008.06.004 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

45. Richter, P. C., & Brühl, R. (2020). Ahead of the game: Antecedents for the success of shared service centers. European Management Journal, 38(3), 477–488. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.emj.2019.10.006 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

46. Roh, J., Turkulainen, V., Whipple, J. M., & Swink, M. (2017). Organizational design change in multinational supply chain organizations. International Journal of Logistics Management, 28(4), 1078–1098. https://doi.org/10.1108/IJLM-06-2016-0146 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

47. Sartor, M., Orzes, G., Nassimbeni, G., Jia, F., & Lamming, R. (2015). International purchasing offices in China: Roles and resource/capability requirements. International Journal of Operations and Production Management, 35(8), 1125–1157. https://doi.org/10.1108/IJOPM-09-2013-0440 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

48. Sherif, K., Tsado, L., Zheng, W., & Airhia, B. (2013). An exploratory study of organization architecture and the balance between exploration and exploitation of knowledge. VINE, 43(4), 442–461. https://doi.org/10.1108/VINE-04-2012-0006 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

49. Snyder, H. (2019). Literature review as a research methodology: An overview and guidelines. Journal of Business Research, 104, 333–339. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2019.07.039 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

50. Storbacka, K. (2012). Strategic account management programs: Alignment of design elements and management practices. Journal of Business & Industrial Marketing, 27(4), 259–274. https://doi.org/10.1108/08858621211221643 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

51. Tamirat, S., & Amentie, C. (2023). Advances in knowledge-based dynamic capabilities: A systematic review of foundations and determinants in recent literature. Cogent Business and Management, 10(3), Article 2257866. https://doi.org/10.1080/23311975.2023.2257866 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

52. Torraco, R. J. (2005). Writing integrative literature reviews: Guidelines and examples. Human Resource Development Review, 4(3), 356–367. https://doi.org/10.1177/1534484305278283 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

53. Torraco, R. J. (2016). Writing integrative literature reviews: Using the past and present to explore the future. Human Resource Development Review, 15(4), 404–428. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

54. https://doi.org/10.1177/1534484316671606 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

55. Trez, G., & Luce, F. B. (2012). Organizational structure and specialized marketing capabilities in SMEs. Marketing Intelligence and Planning, 30(2), 143–164. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

56. https://doi.org/10.1108/02634501211211957 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

57. Victer, R. S. (2020). Connectivity knowledge and the degree of structural formalization: A contribution to a contingency theory of organizational capability. Journal of Organization Design, 9(1), Article 7. https://doi.org/10.1186/s41469-020-0068-3 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

58. Witschel, D., Döhla, A., Kaiser, M., Voigt, K. I., & Pfletschinger, T. (2019). Riding on the wave of digitization: Insights how and under what settings dynamic capabilities facilitate digital-driven business model change. Journal of Business Economics, 89(8–9), 1023–1095. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11573-019-00950-5 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

59. Wu, L., Lou, B., & Hitt, L. (2019). Data analytics supports decentralized innovation. Management Science, 65(10), 4863–4877. https://doi.org/10.1287/mnsc.2019.3344 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

60. Wu, Y. (2015). Organizational structure and product choice in knowledge-intensive firms. Management Science, 61(8), 1830–1848. https://doi.org/10.1287/mnsc.2014.2080 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

61. Xu, C., Ruanggoon, J., & Thavorn, J. (2026). Total quality management and organizational performance in the manufacturing industry: Integrating contingency theory and the resource-based view. Cogent Business and Management, 13(1), Article 2635755. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

62. https://doi.org/10.1080/23311975.2026.2635755 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

Metrics

Views & Downloads

Similar Articles