From External Pressure to Internal Responsibility: Motivational Change among Men Participating in Domestic Violence Counselling Programmes in Albania

Authors

Dr. Fatjon Taipi

Office for Men and Boys (ZDB), Shkoder (Albania)

Article Information

DOI: 10.47772/IJRISS.2026.100601281

Subject Category: Psychology

Volume/Issue: 10/6 | Page No: 18685-18694

Publication Timeline

Submitted: 2026-06-06

Accepted: 2026-06-11

Published: 2026-07-17

Abstract

Motivation is a central mechanism in behavioural change processes within domestic violence perpetrator interventions. Many men initially enter counselling programmes because of external pressures, including court mandates, probation requirements, police referral, family pressure, or child protection involvement. However, sustainable change requires a gradual movement from compliance with external demands toward personal responsibility, autonomous motivation, and commitment to non-violent behaviour. Despite the expansion of perpetrator programmes across Europe, limited empirical research has examined motivational change among participants in the Western Balkan context. This study examines motivational pathways among men participating in structured domestic violence counselling programmes implemented by the Office for Men and Boys (ZDB) in Northern Albania during 2025. Drawing on Self-Determination Theory, the Transtheoretical Model of Change, and motivational interviewing principles, the study explores how participant motivation evolves during counselling. A descriptive longitudinal design was applied using monitoring data from 78 men enrolled in ZDB programmes. Data were collected through the Work With Perpetrators European Network (WWP EN) Impact Monitoring Toolkit across programme phases, with particular attention to referral pathways, reasons for participation,and reasons for remaining engaged. Findings show that mandatory institutional referrals represented 79.59% of recorded referral pathways, while voluntary referrals represented 20.41%. At programme entry, external motivations predominated, accounting for 56.00% of reported reasons for participation, compared with 30.00% internal motivation and 14.00% combined motivation. By the middle phase of the programme, internal motivation increased to 47.06%, while external motivation decreased to 35.29%. Participants increasingly reported personal goals such as stopping abusive behaviour, improving family relationships, becoming better fathers, taking responsibility for harm, and developing healthier communication skills. The study suggests that perpetrator counselling can support a progressive transition from externally regulated attendance to internal responsibility for change. This motivational transition may represent an important process mechanism linking programme participation with engagement, retention, and behavioural transformation. The findings highlight the need to integrate motivational approaches into perpetrator programmes while maintaining strong referral and monitoring systems.

Keywords

motivation, behaviour change, domestic violence, perpetrators, counselling programmes, Self-Determination Theory

Downloads

References

1. Ajdukovic, D., & Pauncz, A. (2015). How to start a perpetrator programme? Issues and dilemmas of the start-up process. Work With Perpetrators European Network. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

2. Akoensi, T. D., Koehler, J. A., Loesel, F., & Humphreys, D. K. (2013). Domestic violence perpetrator programs in Europe, Part II: A systematic review of the state of evidence. International Journal of Offender Therapy and Comparative Criminology, 57(10), 1206-1225. https://doi.org/10.1177/0306624X12468110 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

3. Deci, E. L., & Ryan, R. M. (2000). The what and why of goal pursuits: Human needs and the self-determination of behavior. Psychological Inquiry, 11(4), 227-268. https://doi.org/10.1207/S15327965PLI1104_01 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

4. Gondolf, E. W. (2012). The future of batterer programs: Reassessing evidence-based practice. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

5. Northeastern University Press. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

6. Heise, L. L. (1998). Violence against women: An integrated, ecological framework. Violence Against Women, 4(3), 262-290. https://doi.org/10.1177/1077801298004003002 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

7. Hester, M., Lilley, S.-J., O'Prey, L., & Budde, J. (2014). Overview and analysis of research studies evaluating European perpetrator programmes. IMPACT Project. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

8. Jones, C. (2015). Implementing the IMPACT Toolkit (Part II). Work With Perpetrators European Network. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

9. Kelly, L., & Westmarland, N. (2015). Domestic violence perpetrator programmes: Steps towards change. Project Mirabal final report. London Metropolitan University. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

10. Miller, W. R., & Rollnick, S. (2013). Motivational interviewing: Helping people change (3rd ed.). Guilford Press. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

11. Murphy, C. M., & Eckhardt, C. I. (2005). Treating the abusive partner: An individualized cognitive-behavioral approach. Guilford Press [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

13. Prochaska, J. O., & DiClemente, C. C. (1983). Stages and processes of self-change in smoking: Toward an integrative model of change. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 51(3), 390-395. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-006X.51.3.390 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

14. Respect. (2017). The Respect standard for work with perpetrators of domestic abuse. Respect. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

15. Ryan, R. M., & Deci, E. L. (2020). Intrinsic and extrinsic motivation from a self-determination theory perspective: Definitions, theory, practices, and future directions. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 61, Article 101860. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cedpsych.2020.101860 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

16. Work With Perpetrators European Network. (2017). An update on implementing the Impact Toolkit: Working Paper 3. WWP EN [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

17. World Health Organization. (2021). Violence against women prevalence estimates, 2018: Global, regional and national prevalence estimates for intimate partner violence against women and global and regional prevalence estimates for non-partner sexual violence against women. World Health Organization [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

Metrics

Views & Downloads

Similar Articles