From Idea to Customer: How Idea Time, Idea Support, and Employee Empowerment Shape Customer Experience in a Service Organisation

Organisations increasingly rely on climate for innovation to differentiate themselves through customer experience, yet little is known about which specific climate dimensions matter most for how customers are served. This paper examines the relationship between three closely linked dimensions of climate for innovation — idea time, idea support, and employee autonomy and empowerment — and customer experience. A qualitative single case study design was adopted, focusing on a major telecommunications organisation in Egypt. Thirty-five semi-structured interviews were conducted with employees across commercial and non-commercial functional units, and data were analysed thematically. The findings show that idea support, the extent to which new ideas and initiatives are encouraged and taken forward, was the dimension most consistently linked to superior customer experience, cited by the large majority of employees interviewed. Idea time, the amount of time available to think and elaborate on new ideas, showed a more divided pattern: employees in customer-facing and innovation-related units reported sufficient time to explore new ideas, while employees under sales and delivery pressure reported almost none, weakening their contribution to customer-facing innovation. Autonomy and empowerment were found to foster a sense of ownership that made employees more willing to exert discretionary effort for customers, although the degree of empowerment depended heavily on individual line managers rather than being uniformly institutionalised. Across all three dimensions, benefits were concentrated in commercial and customer-facing units, while human resources, internal communications, and enterprise units reported comparatively weaker climates. The paper argues that idea time, idea support, and empowerment operate as interdependent enablers of customer-facing innovation rather than independent levers, and that organisations seeking to improve customer experience need to institutionalise all three consistently across functions rather than concentrating them in revenue-generating teams.

idea time, idea support, autonomy, employee empowerment

1. Abstein, A., & Spieth, P. (2014). Exploring HRM meta-features that foster employees' innovative work behaviour in times of increasing work-life conflict. Creativity and Innovation Management, 23(2), 211-225. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

2. Amabile, T., Conti, R., Coon, H., Lazenby, J., & Herron, M. (1996). Assessing the work environment for creativity. The Academy of Management Journal, 39(5), 1154-1184. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

3. Amabile, T. (1997). Motivating creativity in organizations: On doing what you love and loving what you do. California Management Review, 40(1), 39-58. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

4. Bowen, D. E., & Lawler, E. E. (1992). The empowerment of service workers: What, why, how, and when. Sloan Management Review, 33(Spring), 31-39. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

5. Campbell, J. L., Quincy, C., Osserman, J., & Pedersen, O. K. (2013). Coding in-depth semistructured interviews. Sociological Methods & Research, 42(3), 294-320. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

6. Constantinou, C. S., Georgiou, M., & Perdikogianni, M. (2017). A comparative method for themes saturation (CoMeTS) in qualitative interviews. Qualitative Research. https://doi.org/10.1177/1468794116686650 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

7. Creswell, J. W. (1998). Qualitative inquiry and research design: Choosing among five traditions. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

8. De Spiegelaere, S., Van Gyes, G., De Witte, H., Niesen, W., & Van Hootegem, G. (2014). On the relation of job insecurity, job autonomy, innovative work behaviour and the mediating effect of work engagement. Creativity and Innovation Management, 23(3), 318-330. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

9. Ekvall, G. (1996). Organizational climate for creativity and innovation. European Journal of Work and Organizational Psychology, 5(1), 105-123. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

10. Ekvall, G., Arvonen, J., & Waldenstrom-Lindblad, I. (1983). Creative organizational climate: Construction and validation of a measuring instrument (Report No. 2). Stockholm, Sweden: FArådet - The Swedish Council for Management and Work Life Issues. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

11. Gagné, M., & Deci, E. L. (2005). Self-determination theory and work motivation. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 26(4), 331-362. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

12. Gómez, C., & Rosen, B. (2001). The leader-member exchange as a link between managerial trust and employee empowerment. Group & Organization Management, 26(1), 53-69. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

13. Hammond, M. M., Neff, N. L., Farr, J. L., Schwall, A. R., & Zhao, X. (2011). Predictors of individual-level innovation at work: A meta-analysis. Psychology of Aesthetics, Creativity, and the Arts, 5(1), 90-105. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

14. Hennessey, B. A., & Amabile, T. M. (2010). Creativity. Annual Review of Psychology, 61, 569-598. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

15. Isaksen, S. G. (2007). The situational outlook questionnaire: Assessing the context for change. Psychological Reports, 100(2), 455-466. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

16. Isaksen, S. G., & Ekvall, G. (2010). Managing for innovation: The two faces of tension in creative climates. Creativity and Innovation Management, 19(2), 73-88. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

17. Isaksen, S. G., Lauer, K. J., & Ekvall, G. (1999). Situational outlook questionnaire: A measure of the climate for creativity. Psychological Reports, 85(2), 665-674. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

18. Luoh, H.-F., Tsaur, S.-H., & Tang, Y.-Y. (2014). Empowering employees: Job standardization and innovative behavior. International Journal of Contemporary Hospitality Management, 26(7), 1100-1117. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

19. Marshall, B., Cardon, P., Poddar, A., & Fontenot, R. (2013). Does sample size matter in qualitative research? A review of qualitative interviews in IS research. Journal of Computer Information Systems, 54(1), 11-22. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

20. Martins, E. C., & Terblanche, F. (2003). Building organisational culture that stimulates creativity and innovation. European Journal of Innovation Management, 6(1), 64-74. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

21. McLean, L. D. (2005). Organizational culture's influence on creativity and innovation: A review of the literature and implications for human resource development. Advances in Developing Human Resources, 7(2), 226-246. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

22. Meyer, C., & Schwager, A. (2007). Understanding customer experience. Harvard Business Review, 85(2), 116-126. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

23. Miles, M. B., & Huberman, A. M. (1994). Qualitative data analysis: An expanded sourcebook. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

24. Ohly, S., Sonnentag, S., & Pluntke, F. (2006). Routinization, work characteristics and their relationships with creative and proactive behaviors. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 27(3), 257-279. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

25. Oldham, G. R., & Cummings, A. (1996). Employee creativity: Personal and contextual factors at work. The Academy of Management Journal, 39(3), 607-634. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

26. Patterson, M. G., West, M. A., Shackleton, V. J., Dawson, J. F., Lawthom, R., Maitlis, S., Robinson, D. L., & Wallace, A. M. (2005). Validating the organizational climate measure: Links to managerial practices, productivity and innovation. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 26(4), 379-408. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

27. Rafiq, M., & Ahmed, P. K. (1998). A customer-oriented framework for empowering service employees. Journal of Services Marketing, 12(5), 379-396. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

28. Rubin, H. J., & Rubin, I. S. (2012). Qualitative interviewing: The art of hearing data (3rd ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

29. Saldaña, J. (2012). The coding manual for qualitative researchers. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

30. Shalley, C. E., & Gilson, L. L. (2004). What leaders need to know: A review of social and contextual factors that can foster or hinder creativity. The Leadership Quarterly, 15(1), 33-53. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

31. Shalley, C. E., Zhou, J., & Oldham, G. R. (2004). The effects of personal and contextual characteristics on creativity: Where should we go from here? Journal of Management, 30(6), 933-958. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

32. Sok, P., & O'Cass, A. (2015). Achieving service quality through service innovation exploration-exploitation: The critical role of employee empowerment and slack resources. Journal of Services Marketing, 29(2), 137-149. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

33. Spreitzer, G. M. (1995). Psychological empowerment in the workplace: Dimensions, measurement, and validation. Academy of Management Journal, 38(5), 1442-1465. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

34. Verhoef, P. C., Lemon, K. N., Parasuraman, A., Roggeveen, A., Tsiros, M., & Schlesinger, L. A. (2009). Customer experience creation: Determinants, dynamics and management strategies. Journal of Retailing, 85(1), 31-41. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

35. Yin, R. K. (2014). Case study research: Design and methods (5th ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

• The Indirect Effect of Liquidity and Activity on Company Value with Profitability as an Intervening Variable
• Effect of Financial Skills, Knowledge, and Attitude on The Financial Behaviour of Clergy
• A Decade of Review: Trends in Budget Execution and Financial Performance of Development Projects in Tanzania (2014/15-2023/24)
• The Influence of Pre-Project Planning on the Budget Absorption Rate of Public Funded Infrastructure Projects in Kenya a Comparative Case Study of Narok, Migori, and Kisii County Government Projects
• Assessment of Factors Influencing Digital Transformation in Hotels’ Facility Management in Abuja Metropolis, Nigeria