From Instinct to Intelligence: People Analytics as a Framework for Human-Centred HRM in Nigerian Manufacturing Organizations
Authors
Business Administration, University of Jos, Jos, Plateau (Nigeria)
Business Administration, University of Jos, Jos, Plateau (Nigeria)
Business Administration, University of Jos, Jos, Plateau (Nigeria)
Business Administration, University of Jos, Jos, Plateau (Nigeria)
Business Administration, University of Jos, Jos, Plateau (Nigeria)
Business Administration, University of Jos, Jos, Plateau (Nigeria)
Article Information
DOI: 10.47772/IJRISS.2026.100300556
Subject Category: Human Resource Management
Volume/Issue: 10/3 | Page No: 7660-7673
Publication Timeline
Submitted: 2026-03-26
Accepted: 2026-04-01
Published: 2026-04-17
Abstract
Purpose — Nigerian manufacturing HRM remains intuition-driven, applying uniform motivational strategies to an occupationally diverse workforce lacking data infrastructure. This article argues that people analytics applied to motivation and satisfaction data provides the methodological foundation for human-centred HRM consistent with Society 5.0's vision of technology serving individual flourishing.
Aims — The article maps motivation–satisfaction evidence onto the four-level people analytics maturity model, develops a phased implementation roadmap for Nigerian industrial contexts, and constructs an ethical risk matrix ensuring analytics serves worker flourishing rather than surveillance.
Design/methodology/approach — A cross-sectional survey of 144 employees across Lagos, Kano, and Port Harcourt employed validated instruments (Cronbach α = .76–.93), hierarchical regression, and moderation analysis (PROCESS macro), mapped as a proof-of-concept across descriptive, diagnostic, predictive, and prescriptive analytics levels. The study demonstrates how conventional survey methodology, when designed with occupational granularity, can populate each tier of the people analytics maturity model without requiring longitudinal or big-data infrastructure.
Findings — Mean job satisfaction was M = 3.14 (SD = 0.86), concealing substantial heterogeneity. Working conditions and recognition were primary drivers (β = .19; β = .15); 34.7% of workers were educationally underemployed (d = 0.58); technical staff (M = 3.42) reported markedly higher satisfaction than non-skilled workers (M = 3.02).
Keywords
people analytics, human-centred HRM, Nigerian manufacturing
Downloads
References
1. AIHR. (2025). People analytics: An essential guide for 2026. Academy to Innovate HR. Retrieved from https://www.aihr.com/blog/people-analytics/ [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
2. Belizón, M. J., Majarín, D., & Aguado, D. (2024). Human resources analytics in practice: A knowledge discovery process. European Management Review, 21(3), 659–677. https://doi.org/10.1111/emre.12605 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
3. Breque, M., De Nul, L., & Petridis, A. (2021). Industry 5.0: Towards a sustainable, human-centric and resilient European industry. European Commission, Directorate-General for Research and Innovation. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
4. Cooke, F. L., Dickmann, M., & Parry, E. (2022). Building sustainable societies through human-centred HRM: Emerging issues and research opportunities. International Journal of Human Resource Management, 33(1), 1–15. https://doi.org/10.1080/09585192.2021.2021732 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
5. Deloitte. (2026). 2026 Global Human Capital Trends. Deloitte Insights. Retrieved from https://www.deloitte.com/us/en/insights/topics/talent/human-capital-trends.html [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
6. Di Prima, V., Galati, F., & Maisano, D. A. (2024). Help me help you: How HR analytics forecasts foster organizational creativity. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 203, 123540. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techfore.2024.123540 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
7. Ellmer, M., & Reichel, A. (2021). Staying close to business: The role of epistemic alignment in rendering HR analytics outputs relevant to decision-makers. International Journal of Human Resource Management, 32(12), 2622–2642. https://doi.org/10.1080/09585192.2021.1886148 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
8. Gamberini, L., & Pluchino, P. (2024). Industry 5.0: A comprehensive insight into the future of work, social sustainability, sustainable development, and career. Australian Journal of Career Development, 33(1), 5–14. https://doi.org/10.1177/10384162241231118 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
9. Habtamu, Y., Mihret, D. G., & Yigzaw, E. (2025). The effect of human resource analytics on organizational performance: Insights from Ethiopia. Systems, 13(2), 134. https://doi.org/10.3390/systems13020134 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
10. Hackman, J. R., & Oldham, G. R. (1975). Development of the job diagnostic survey. Journal of Applied Psychology, 60(2), 159–170. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
11. Hayes, A. F. (2018). Introduction to mediation, moderation, and conditional process analysis (2nd ed.). Guilford Press. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
12. Herzberg, F., Mausner, B., & Snyderman, B. B. (1959). The motivation to work (2nd ed.). John Wiley & Sons. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
13. Johnson, J. W. (2000). A heuristic method for estimating the relative weight of predictor variables in multiple regression. Multivariate Behavioral Research, 35(1), 1–19. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
14. Maddikunta, P. K. R., Pham, Q. V., B, P., Deepa, N., Dev, K., Gadekallu, T. R., Ruby, R., & Liyanage, M. (2022). Industry 5.0: A survey on enabling technologies and potential applications. Journal of Industrial Information Integration, 26, 100257. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
15. McCartney, S., & Fu, N. (2022). Bridging the gap: Why, how and when HR analytics can impact organizational performance. Management Decision, 60(13), 25–47. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
16. National Bureau of Statistics. (2023). Labour force statistics: Unemployment and underemployment report Q2 2023. National Bureau of Statistics, Nigeria. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
17. Onuoha, U. C., & Idemudia, E. S. (2021). The influence of organizational culture on employee job satisfaction in selected Nigerian organizations. SA Journal of Human Resource Management, 19, a1423. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
18. Osibanjo, A. O., Adeniji, A. A., Falola, H. O., & Heirsmac, P. T. (2014). Compensation packages: A strategic tool for employees’ performance and retention. Leonardo Journal of Sciences, 25, 65–84. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
19. Smith, P. C., Kendall, L., & Hulin, C. L. (1969). The measurement of satisfaction in work and retirement: A strategy for the study of attitudes. Rand McNally. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
20. Weiss, D. J., Dawis, R. V., England, G. W., & Lofquist, L. H. (1967). Manual for the Minnesota Satisfaction Questionnaire. University of Minnesota, Industrial Relations Center. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
Metrics
Views & Downloads
Similar Articles
- Is Strike Relevant in the Modern Era? Evidence from Indian Manufacturing, IT/Ites, FMCG, Electronics and Emerging Sectors
- A Qualitative Exploration of Work-Life Balance Among Private Universities Lecturers in Klang Valley
- Leadership Styles and Employee Motivation: Examining the Impact on Job Satisfaction and Turnover
- Human Resource Management, Organizational Culture, and Good Governance Practices: A Structural Equation Model on Service Orientation among Government-Owned and Controlled Corporation in Davao Region
- Cost of Silence: Exploring the Impact of Organisational Silence on Employee Engagement