From Participation to Withdrawal: Cyberbullying and Social Media Engagement among Undergraduates in a Nigerian Private University
Authors
Communication and Language Arts, University of Ibadan, Oyo State (Nigeria)
Communication Arts, Bowen University, Iwo, Osun State (Nigeria)
Vivien Adedunbi Akin-Morakinyo
Mass Communication and Media Technology, Lead City University, Ibadan, Oyo State (Nigeria)
Mass Communication, Precious Cornerstone University, Ibadan, Oyo State (Nigeria)
Federal College of Agriculture, Ibadan, Oyo State (Nigeria)
Article Information
DOI: 10.47772/IJRISS.2026.1013COM0045
Subject Category: Social Media
Volume/Issue: 10/13 | Page No: 627-642
Publication Timeline
Submitted: 2026-09-02
Accepted: 2026-09-07
Published: 2026-09-21
Abstract
Background: Social media has become an indispensable platform for undergraduate communication, self-expression, and socialisation; however, it has simultaneously facilitated the emergence of cyberbullying as a significant threat to students’ digital well-being and social media engagement.
Objectives: This study investigated the perceived influence of cyberbullying on the social media engagement of undergraduates of Lead City University, Ibadan. Specifically, the study determined the current patterns of social media engagement, identified the common forms of cyberbullying experienced, examined the prevalence of cyberbullying, and examined self-reported behavioural responses to cyberbullying among the students.
Methods: This study employed a quantitative survey research design, with a questionnaire administered to 265 respondents selected across all nine faculties of Lead City University through stratified, purposive, and convenience sampling techniques.
Results: Findings revealed that WhatsApp (96.2%) and Instagram (78.5%) were the most frequently used platforms, with 45.7% of respondents spending three to four hours daily on social media. Cyberbullying victimisation had a prevalence of 70.2%, with harassment (70.6%) and trolling (63.4%) being the most common forms, predominantly occurring on WhatsApp. Respondents broadly reported that cyberbullying negatively influenced their social media engagement behaviours (grand mean = 3.80), with many indicating that they had withdrawn from online activity, restricted their accounts, or adopted more cautious posting practices following cyberbullying experiences.
Conclusion: Cyberbullying is perceived by undergraduates as a substantial inhibitor of healthy social media engagement in the Nigerian university context. Comprehensive anti-cyberbullying policies and digital literacy programmes should be implemented at the University and similar institutions.
Keywords
Cyberbullying, Digital harassment, Social media engagement, Undergraduates, Social media platforms
Downloads
References
1. Agatston, P., Kowalski, R., & Limber, S. (2022). Youth views on cyberbullying. In Cyberbullying prevention and response: Expert perspectives (pp. 57–71). Routledge. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
2. Alalwan, A. A. (2022). Social media and student engagement in education: A systematic review. Journal of Educational Technology, 11(2), 19–35. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
3. Al-Khaddam, H. K. (2023). Impact of social networks on interpersonal communication of the students, University College Irbid Girls: Facebook as a model. Cross-Cultural Communication, 9(5), 17–22. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
4. Avci, H., Raams, L., & Kretschmer, T. (2024). A systematic review of social media use and adolescent identity development. Adolescent Research Review. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40894-024-00251-1 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
5. Bandura, A. (1986). Social foundations of thought and action: A social cognitive theory. Prentice-Hall. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
6. Bargh, J. A., & McKenna, K. Y. A. (2004). The Internet and social life. Annual Review of Psychology, 55, 573–590. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
7. Bargh, J. A., McKenna, K. Y., & Fitzsimons, G. M. (2022). Can you see the real me? Activation and expression of the “true self” on the Internet. Journal of Social Issues, 58, 33–48. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
8. Barragan, N., Batista, A., Hall, D. L., & Silva, Y. N. (2024). Social identity, social media use, and mental health in adults: Investigating the mediating role of cyberbullying experiences and the moderating effects of gender and age. Psychology Research and Behaviour Management, 17, 4009–4020. https://doi.org/10.2147/PRBM.S466965 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
9. Baruah, T. D. (2022). Effectiveness of social media as a tool of communication and its potential for technology-enabled connections: A micro-level study. International Journal of Scientific and Research Publications, 2(5), 1–10. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
10. Baym, N. K., Zhang, Y. B., & Lin, M. C. (2004). Social interactions across media: Interpersonal communication on the internet, telephone, and face-to-face. New Media & Society, 8, 298–318. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
11. Beran, T., & Li, Q. (2007). The relationship between cyberbullying and school bullying. The Journal of Student Wellbeing, 1(2), 16–33. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
12. Beran, T., & Li, Q. (2005). Cyber-harassment: A study of a new method for an old behaviour. Journal of Educational Computing Research, 32(3), 265–277. https://doi.org/10.2190/8YQM-B04G-PU4E-8F0Y [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
13. Drussell, J. (2022). Social networking and interpersonal communication and conflict resolution skills among college freshmen. Master of Social Work Clinical Research Papers. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
14. http://sophia.stkate.edu/msw_papers/21 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
15. Fisher, B. W., Gardella, J. H., & Teurbe-Tolon, A. R. (2016). Peer cybervictimization among adolescents and the associated internalising and externalising problems: A meta-analysis. Journal of Youth and Adolescence, 45(9), 1727–1743. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10964-016-0541-z [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
16. Fredrick, S. S., Ettekal, I., Domoff, S. E., & Nickerson, A. (2025). Patterns of child and adolescent digital media use: Associations with school support, engagement, and cybervictimization. Psychology of Popular Media, 14(1), 54–65. https://doi.org/10.1037/ppm0000570 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
17. Geng, Z., Huang, H., Zhao, Z., & He, W. (2021). Peer victimisation and social anxiety: The mediating role of online disinhibition. Current Psychology, 41, 5412–5420. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12144-020-01058-4 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
18. Grigg, D. W. (2020). Cyber-aggression: Definition and concept of cyberbullying. Journal of Psychologists and Counsellors in Schools, 20(2), 143–156. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
19. Hampton, K., & Wellman, B. (2003). Long-distance community in the network society. American Behavioural Scientist, 45, 476–495. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
20. Howard, P. E. N., Rainie, L., & Jones, S. (2001). Days and nights on the Internet. American Behavioural Scientist, 45, 383–404. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
21. Joinson, A. N. (2008). Looking at, looking up or keeping up with people? Motives and use of Facebook. In Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (pp. 1027–1036). ACM Press. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
22. Kapoor, K. K., Tamilmani, K., Rana, N. P., Patil, P., Dwivedi, Y. K., & Nerur, S. (2018). Advances in social media research: A review of conceptual frameworks and theories. Information Systems Frontiers, 20(3), 531–558. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
23. Kowalski, R. M., & Limber, S. P. (2013). Psychological, physical, and academic correlates of cyberbullying and traditional bullying. Journal of Adolescent Health, 53(1), S13–S20. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
24. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jadohealth.2012.09.018 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
25. Kowalski, R. M., Giumetti, G. W., Schroeder, A. N., & Lattanner, M. R. (2014). Bullying in the digital age: A critical review and meta-analysis of cyberbullying research among youth. Psychological Bulletin, 140(4), 1073–1137. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0035618 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
26. Kowalski, R. M., Limber, S. P., & McCord, A. (2019). A developmental approach to cyberbullying: Prevalence and protective factors. Aggression and Violent Behaviour, 45, 20–32. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
27. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.avb.2018.02.009 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
28. Lampe, C., Ellison, N., & Steinfield, C. (2007). A familiar Face(book): Profile elements as signals in an online social network. Proceedings of the Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems. ACM Press. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
29. Lee, M. H. L., Kaur, M., Shaker, V., Yee, A., Sham, R., & Siau, C. S. (2023). Cyberbullying, social media addiction and associations with depression, anxiety, and stress among medical students in Malaysia. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 20(4), 3136. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
30. Lenhart, A., Purcell, K., Smith, A., & Zickuhr, K. (2010). Social media and mobile Internet use among teens and young adults. Pew Research Center. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
31. Li, Q. (2007). New bottle but old wine: A research of cyberbullying in schools. Computers in Human Behaviour, 23(4), 1777–1791. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2005.10.005 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
32. Marciano, L., Schulz, P. J., & Camerini, A.-L. (2020). Cyberbullying perpetration and victimisation in youth: A meta-analysis of longitudinal studies. Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication, 25(2), 163–181. https://doi.org/10.1093/jcmc/zmz031 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
33. Mayfield, A. S. (2018). Is blogging innovation journalism? Innovation Journalism, 5(2). http://www.innovationjournalism.org [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
34. Mitchell, K. J., Ybarra, M., & Finkelhor, D. (2007). The relative importance of online victimisation in understanding depression, delinquency, and substance use. Child Maltreatment, 12(4), 314–324. https://doi.org/10.1177/1077559507305996 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
35. Nesi, J., Choukas-Bradley, S., & Prinstein, M. J. (2018). Transformation of adolescent peer relations in the social media context: Part 2, application to peer group processes and future directions for research. Clinical Child and Family Psychology Review, 21(3), 295–319. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
36. Nunnally, J. C. (1978). Psychometric theory (2nd ed.). McGraw-Hill. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
37. Olowu, A., & Seri, O. T. (2023). Digital harassment and the Nigerian student: A communication perspective. University of Ibadan Press. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
38. Olweus, D. (2013). School bullying: Development and some important challenges. Annual Review of Clinical Psychology, 9, 751–780. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-clinpsy-050212-185516 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
39. Orben, A., Meier, A., Dalgleish, T., & Blakemore, S.-J. (2024). Mechanisms linking social media use to adolescent mental health vulnerability. Nature Reviews Psychology, 3(6), 407–423. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
40. Oyero, I. O. (2013). Social media use in Nigeria: Patterns, purposes, and effects. New Media & Society, 8, 298–318. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
41. Patchin, J. W., & Hinduja, S. (2022). Cyberbullying identification, prevention, and response. Cyberbullying Research Centre. https://cyberbullying.org [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
42. Patchin, J. W., & Hinduja, S. (2023). Summary of our cyberbullying research (2007–2023). Cyberbullying Research Centre. https://cyberbullying.org/summary-of-our-cyberbullying-research [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
43. Peprah, P., Oduro, M. S., Atta-Osei, G., et al. (2024). Problematic social media use mediates the effect of cyberbullying victimisation on psychosomatic complaints in adolescents. Scientific Reports, 14, 9773. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-024-59509-2 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
44. Privitera, C., & Campbell, M. A. (2009). Cyberbullying: The new face of workplace bullying? CyberPsychology & Behavior, 12(4), 395–400. https://doi.org/10.1089/cpb.2009.0025 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
45. Rasheed, M. I., Sarwar, S., & Lee, H. (2020). Examining word-of-mouth social media reviews effects on online purchase intention. Journal of Research in Interactive Marketing, 14(3), 341–361. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
46. Salari, N., Mohammadi, M., Hosseinian-Far, M., & Jalali, R. (2025). The global prevalence of cyberbullying among adolescents: A systematic review and meta-analysis. BMC Public Health, 25, 1–15. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
47. SEAHI Publications. (2025). Digital habits of Nigerian undergraduates: A national survey. SEAHI Media Research. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
48. Seitz, H. (2024). Cyberbullying on social media platforms: Platforms, forms, and gender differences. Youth & Society, 56(1), 12–34. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
49. Smith, P. K., del Barrio, C., & Tokunaga, R. S. (2013). Definitions of bullying and cyberbullying: How useful are the terms? In S. Bauman, D. Cross, & J. Walker (Eds.), Principles of cyberbullying research: Definitions, measures and methodology (pp. 26–40). Routledge. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
50. Smith, P. K., Mahdavi, J., Carvalho, M., Fisher, S., Russell, S., & Tippett, N. (2008). Cyberbullying: Its nature and impact in secondary school pupils. Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry, 49(4), 376–385. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
51. Subair, G. (2019). Social media as third space: Nigerian undergraduate communication practices. Journal of African Media Studies, 11(3), 325–339. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
52. Suler, J. (2004). The online disinhibition effect. CyberPsychology & Behaviour, 7(3), 321–326. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
53. Tabares, A. S., Lleras, M. A., & Luna, D. (2024). Cyberbullying and social media: A review of emerging evidence on digital victimisation. Computers in Human Behaviour Reports, 12, 100–118. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
54. Tayeh, A. (2023). Cyberbullying in Jordanian higher education institutions. International Journal of Emerging Technologies in Learning, 18(5), 143–156. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
55. Tayeh, A. (2025). Cyberbullying in UK higher education: Experiences and coping strategies of university students. Journal of Further and Higher Education, 49(2), 215–228. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
56. Valkenburg, P. M., Patti, M., & Meier, A. (2022). Social media and well-being: A synthesising review. Current Opinion in Psychology, 45, 101264. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
57. Waasdorp, T. E., & Bradshaw, C. P. (2011). Examining student responses to frequent bullying: A latent class approach. Journal of Educational Psychology, 103(2), 336–352. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
58. Willard, N. (2004). I can't see you, you can't see me: How the use of information and communication technologies can impact responsible behaviour (rev. ed.). Centre for Safe and Responsible Internet Use. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
59. Xia, L., Li, X., & Cao, Y. (2023). Problematic social media use and academic procrastination among undergraduates. Computers in Human Behaviour, 142, 107658. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
60. Ybarra, M. L., Mitchell, K. J., & Finkelhor, D. (2007). Internet prevention messages: Targeting the right online behaviours. Archives of Paediatrics & Adolescent Medicine, 161(2), 138–145. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
61. Zhou, Y., & Cheng, S. (2022). Social media use, peer relationships, and adolescent well-being: A meta-analytic review. Adolescent Research Review, 7(3), 315–332. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
Metrics
Views & Downloads
Similar Articles
- Social Media and Ghanaian Youth: A Systematic Review of Impacts and Implications
- Social Media Trends and Public Opinion Dynamics in Port Harcourt
- The Impact of Social Media Information in Checkmating Social Injustice and Bad Governance in Nigeria
- The Impact of Image-Based Brand Content on Moroccan Consumers Engagement on Social Media
- Qur’anic Character Model in Enhancing the Quality of Job Satisfaction among the Civil Servants