From Recovery to Controversy: Institutional Failure and the Politics of Asset Disposal in Post-Jammeh Gambia (2017–2026).

Yahya Jammeh's twenty-two-year authoritarian rule in The Gambia came to an end in 2016 with a political transition that was hailed as a new era of accountability and the rule of law. The Janneh Commission of Inquiry (2017–2019), which documented widespread state capture, embezzlement, and illicit asset accumulation and recommended thorough forfeiture and recovery, was essential to this promise. Most of these suggestions were accepted in the government's 2019 White Paper. However, the question of what truly happened to the forfeited assets is still unsettlingly unclear almost ten years after Jammeh's departure. This paper offers the first thorough empirical analysis of the post-Commission asset recovery process, drawing from the 2019 White Paper and the 324-page Final Report of a Special Select Committee of The Gambia's National Assembly (March 2026). It contends that a deep-rooted administrative pathology that persisted through the political shift and methodically undermined each step of the forfeiture and disposal process was the primary cause of the failure of asset recovery rather than a failure of the law. The evidence shows that the promise of accountability has been largely unfulfilled due to an implementation gap caused by a number of factors, including disjointed custodial arrangements, flawed valuation and sales procedures, systematic violations of public finance law, catastrophic record-keeping failures, and lax parliamentary oversight. In order to explain how institutional culture, not just legal frameworks, can sustain impunity and mismanagement even after political transition, the paper develops the concept of "administrative pathology" and provides practical suggestions for bolstering asset recovery mechanisms in fragile democracies.

Janneh Commission, transitional justice

1. Andrews, M. (2013). The limits of institutional reform in development: Changing rules for realistic solutions. Cambridge University Press. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

2. Bracking, S. (2009). Political economies of corruption beyond liberalism: An interpretive view of Zimbabwe. Singapore Journal of Tropical Geography, 30(1), 35-51. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

3. Carranza, R. (2008). Plunder and pain: Should transitional justice engage with corruption and economic crimes? International Journal of Transitional Justice, 2(3), 310-330. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

4. Crozier, M. (1964). The bureaucratic phenomenon. University of Chicago Press. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

5. Fukuyama, F. (2013). What is governance? Governance, 26(3), 347-368. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

6. Government of The Gambia. (2019). White Paper on the Report of the Commission of Inquiry into the Financial Activities of Public Bodies, Enterprises and Offices as Regards Their Dealings with Former President Yahya Jammeh and Connected Matters. Banjul: Government Printer. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

7. Hayner, P. B. (2011). Unspeakable truths: Transitional justice and the challenge of truth commissions (2nd ed.). Routledge. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

8. Hellman, J. S., Jones, G., & Kaufmann, D. (2000). Seize the state, seize the day: State capture, corruption, and influence in transition. World Bank Policy Research Working Paper No. 2444. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

9. Khan, M. H. (2006). Determinants of corruption in developing countries: The limits of conventional economic analysis. In S. Rose-Ackerman (Ed.), International handbook on the economics of corruption (pp. 216-244). Edward Elgar. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

10. National Assembly of The Gambia. (2026). Final Report of the Special Select Committee on the Inquiry into the Sale and Disposal of Assets Identified by the Commission of Inquiry into the Financial Activities of Public Bodies, Enterprises & Offices as Regards Their Dealings with Former President Yahya Jammeh and Connected Matters. Banjul: National Assembly. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

11. Pelizzo, R., & Stapenhurst, R. (2008). Public expenditure accountability in Africa: Progress, lessons, and challenges. World Bank. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

12. Selznick, P. (1949). TVA and the grass roots: A study in the sociology of formal organization. University of California Press. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

13. Sikkink, K. (2011). The justice cascade: How human rights prosecutions are changing world politics. W.W. Norton. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

14. Teitel, R. G. (2000). Transitional justice. Oxford University Press. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

15. UN Security Council. (2004). The rule of law and transitional justice in conflict and post-conflict societies: Report of the Secretary-General. S/2004/616. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

16. Wiebelhaus-Brahm, E. (2010). Truth commissions and transitional societies: The impact on human rights and democracy. Routledge. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

17. Wilson, J. Q. (1989). Bureaucracy: What government agencies do and why they do it. Basic Books. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

• Conflict of Law in the Safeguarding of Malaysian Intangible Cultural Heritage: A Way Forward
• Alternative Dispute Resolution in India: A Brief Overview Justice Delayed is Justice Denied. - William E. Gladstone
• The Role of Museums in Safeguarding Cultural Heritage Rights: Balancing Access and Repatriation
• An Evaluation of the Universal Declaration of Human Rights' Significance and Application in Nigeria
• The Role of International Law in Shaping National Immigration Policies.