From Redistribution to Empowerment: Institutional Pathways of Zakat and Waqf-Related Social Finance for Inclusive Development in Malaysia and Türkiye
Authors
Department of Moral Studies, Civics and Character Building, Faculty of Human Sciences, Sultan Idris Education University (Malaysia)
Faculty of Theology, Sakarya University, Sakarya (Malaysia)
Faculty of Human Sciences, Sultan Idris Education University (Malaysia)
Marshelayanti Binti Mohamed Razali
Department of Moral Studies, Civics and Character Building, Faculty of Human Sciences, Sultan Idris Education University (Malaysia)
Faculty of Theology, Gaziantep Islamic Science and Technology University, Türkiye (Malaysia)
Article Information
DOI: 10.47772/IJRISS.2026.100800945
Subject Category: Economic
Volume/Issue: 10/8 | Page No: 13796-13814
Publication Timeline
Submitted: 2026-08-30
Accepted: 2026-09-13
Published: 2026-09-21
Abstract
Islamic social finance is increasingly presented as a mechanism through which faith-based redistribution can support poverty reduction, social protection and sustainable development. This article undertakes a structured comparative institutional analysis of Zakat and Waqf-related social finance in Malaysia and Türkiye using publicly available administrative data, audited or official financial reports, legal documents and institutional reporting. The comparative unit is the institution or reporting jurisdiction rather than a harmonised national beneficiary population; indicators are therefore interpreted within their source context and are not treated as like-for-like country performance measures. In Malaysia, MAIWP Zakat collection rose from RM1.031 billion in 2023 to RM1.134 billion in 2024, while distribution increased from RM1.019 billion to RM1.220 billion. In Selangor, collection increased from RM1.07 billion in 2022 to RM1.31 billion in 2025, with distribution rising from RM1.05 billion to RM1.33 billion. In Türkiye, VGM reported 6,180 entities in the statutory category of “new foundations” in 2024 and extensive foundation-sector welfare outputs in 2025, while TDV reported TL2.152 billion in voluntary Zakat from 259,273 donations in 2025, reaching approximately 2.16 million people. The evidence base is asymmetric: Malaysian public reporting is more detailed for Zakat and includes emerging self-reliance indicators, whereas Turkish evidence is more dispersed and relies heavily on foundation-level outputs and voluntary Zakat reporting. VGM foundation statistics are not treated as equivalent to counts of Islamic Waqf, and Waqf-specific empirical evidence is more limited than Zakat evidence, particularly for Türkiye. Because the design is descriptive and lacks beneficiary-level longitudinal or counterfactual data, the study does not infer causal developmental effects. Instead, it proposes a resource–output–outcome–impact framework for evaluating how far institutional reporting can move from documenting redistribution toward assessing sustained socioeconomic inclusion.
Keywords
Islamic social finance; Zakat; Waqf-related social finance; foundations; beneficiary empowerment
Downloads
References
1. Dirie, K. A., Alam, M. M., & Maamor, S. (2024). Islamic social finance for achieving sustainable development goals: A systematic literature review and future research agenda. International Journal of Ethics and Systems, 40(4), 676–698. https://doi.org/10.1108/IJOES-12-2022-0317 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
2. İhya İlim Hizmet ve Yardımlaşma Vakfı. (n.d.). Vakıf senedi [Foundation deed]. https://www.ihyavakfi.org.tr/vakif-senedi/ [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
3. Kamaruddin, M. I. H., & Hanefah, M. M. (2021). An empirical investigation on Waqf governance practices in Waqf institutions in Malaysia. Journal of Financial Reporting and Accounting, 19(3), 455–473. https://doi.org/10.1108/JFRA-03-2020-0055 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
4. Lembaga Zakat Selangor. (2024). Annual report 2023. https://laporanlzs.zakatselangor.com.my/en/laporan-2023/ [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
5. Lembaga Zakat Selangor. (2025). Annual report 2024. https://laporanlzs.zakatselangor.com.my/en/lzs-2024/ [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
6. Lembaga Zakat Selangor. (2026). Integrated report 2025. https://laporanlzs.zakatselangor.com.my/lzs-report-2025/ [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
7. Majlis Agama Islam Wilayah Persekutuan. (2025). Annual report 2024. https://www.maiwp.gov.my/assets/PDF/publication/laporantahunan/laporan2024.pdf [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
8. Mat Daud, M. S., & Wahid, H. (2025). Assessing the role of Zakat institutions in the socio-economic sustainability of the poor and destitute in Malaysia. International Journal of Sociology and Social Policy, 45(11–12), 1121–1136. https://doi.org/10.1108/IJSSP-01-2025-0036 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
9. Muhamat, A. A., Jaafar, N., Rosly, H. E., & Abdul Manan, H. (2013). An appraisal on the business success of entrepreneurial Asnaf: An empirical study on the state Zakat organization (the Selangor Zakat Board or Lembaga Zakat Selangor) in Malaysia. Journal of Financial Reporting and Accounting, 11(1), 51–63. https://doi.org/10.1108/JFRA-03-2013-0012 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
10. Öztürk, D., & Özdemir, Ş. (2025). Türkiye’de Zekâtın kurumsallaşması için bir öneri: Zekât Gözetim Merkezi. İslam Hukuku Araştırmaları Dergisi, 45, 373–403. https://doi.org/10.59777/ihad.1634148 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
11. Serdaroğlu, Ü. S. (2025). Osmanlı Devleti’nde kamu yararının kurumsallaşması: Süleymaniye Vakfiyesi üzerinden bir kurum tarihi incelemesi [Institutionalisation of public benefit in the Ottoman Empire: An institutional history study on the Süleymaniye Waqfiyye]. Sosyal Siyaset Konferansları Dergisi, 88, 205–239. https://doi.org/10.26650/jspc.2025.88.1679795 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
12. Terzi, G., & Bilen, M. (2020). Türkiye’de Zekâtın kurumsallaşması ve Diyanet personelinin bakış açısı hakkında bir araştırma (Kocaeli örneği). Sakarya Üniversitesi İlahiyat Fakültesi Dergisi, 22(41), 81–114. https://doi.org/10.17335/sakaifd.689221 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
13. Tok, E., Yesuf, A. J., & Mohamed, A. (2022). Sustainable Development Goals and Islamic social finance: From policy divide to policy coherence and convergence. Sustainability, 14(11), 6875. https://doi.org/10.3390/su14116875 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
14. Türkiye Cumhuriyeti Vakıflar Genel Müdürlüğü. (n.d.-a). Foundation statistics: New foundations. https://www.vgm.gov.tr/vakif-islemleri/vakif-istatistikleri/yeni-vakiflar [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
15. Türkiye Cumhuriyeti Vakıflar Genel Müdürlüğü. (n.d.-b). The regulations for foundations. https://www.vgm.gov.tr/about-us/about-us/the-regulation-for-foundations [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
16. Türkiye Cumhuriyeti Vakıflar Genel Müdürlüğü. (2025a). 2024 activity report. https://cdn.vgm.gov.tr/genelicerik/genelicerik_216_260519/2024-faaliyet-raporu.pdf [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
17. Türkiye Cumhuriyeti Vakıflar Genel Müdürlüğü. (2025b). Vakıf geleneğimiz 2025’te de hayatlara dokundu [Our Waqf tradition touched lives once again in 2025]. https://www.vgm.gov.tr/haberler/vakif-gelenegimiz-2025te-de-hayatlara-dokundu [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
18. Türkiye Diyanet Vakfı. (n.d.). Zekât [Zakat]. https://tdv.org/tr-TR/zekat/ [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
19. Türkiye Diyanet Vakfı. (2025a). 1 million 254 thousand 457 people donated to TDV in 2024. https://tdv.org/en-EN/1-million-254-thousand-457-people-donated-to-tdv-in-2024/ [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
20. Türkiye Diyanet Vakfı. (2025b). Türkiye Diyanet Foundation reaches over 50 million needy people in 149 countries in its 50th year. https://tdv.org/en-EN/turkiye-diyanet-foundation-reaches-over-50-million-needy-people-in-149-countries-in-its-50th-year/ [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
21. Türkiye Diyanet Vakfı. (2026). A total of 50,773,000 people in need were reached in Türkiye and 149 countries. https://tdv.org/en-EN/a-total-of-50773000-people-in-need-were-reached-in-turkiye-and-149-countries/ [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
22. Widiastuti, T., Ningsih, S., Prasetyo, A., Mawardi, I., Herianingrum, S., Robani, A., Al Mustofa, M. U., & Hady, A. F. (2022). Developing an integrated model of Islamic social finance: Toward an effective governance framework. Heliyon, 8(9),1-10. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.heliyon.2022.e10383 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
Metrics
Views & Downloads
Similar Articles
- The Relationship Between Technological Progress and Human Capital Development: Regional Comparison in China
- Appraising the Vulnerability of the Female Gender and the Disruption of Social Protection in the Light of Sdgs 1 and 4: Issues in African Literature
- Microfinance and Women’s Empowerment in Rural Bangladesh: Progress and Challenges
- The Impact of Economic Growth, Global Peace Index, and Inflation on International Immigration to Indonesia
- Domestic Natural Gas Supply in Nigeria: A Critical Review of Policy, Infrastructure, and System-Level Constraints