From Repression to Restoration? Police and Civil Society Roles in Agrarian Restorative Justice in Central Kalimantan

47 agrarian disputes were recorded in Kotawaringin Timur alone between 2020–2024, yet the district police responded not with arrests, but with Huma Hapakat (House of Agreement), a culturally grounded dialogue mechanism a response that inverts the historically repressive role attributed to Indonesian security forces in land conflicts. While existing literature documents police mediation in urban settings, their role as institutional mediators in structural agrarian disputes involving corporate actors and indigenous communities remains empirically unexamined. This study addresses that gap by examining how POLRI and civil society organizations operationalize restorative justice in oil palm plasma disputes in Kotawaringin Timur District, Central Kalimantan. Using Moustakas's transcendental phenomenology, this study draws on in-depth interviews with police officers, civil society representatives, and affected community members in Kecamatan Cempaga and Kota Besi. Findings reveal that POLRI has developed Huma Hapakat, a culturally adapted restorative mechanism integrating Dayak deliberative traditions with a graduated green-yellow-red intervention zone system. Yet its effectiveness is fundamentally undermined by a single critical asymmetry: while community members and police officers engaged consistently, the company the party whose compliance is essential repeatedly absented itself from mediation forums without consequence. Village cooperative representatives further reported that sustained advocacy over multiple years had eroded member commitment, and that targeted payments to individual members had fractured internal solidarity a dynamic that exposes how restorative processes can be systematically hollowed out by the more powerful party. The study concludes that restorative justice in agrarian contexts requires not only cultural legitimacy but also coercive institutional backing proposing "embedded restoration," in which restorative processes are anchored within enforceable regulatory frameworks such as conditioning concession renewal on demonstrated mediation compliance as a theoretical response to this paradox.

agrarian conflict; civil society organizations

1. Baihaky, M., & Isnawati. (2024) Restorative Justice: Pemaknaan, Problematika, dan Penerapan yang Seyogianya. UNES Journal of Swara Justisia, 8(1), 45–62. DOI: https://doi.org/10.31933/4mqgaj17 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

2. Bayley, D. H. (1994). Police for the future. Oxford University Press. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

3. Bayley, D. H. (2006). Changing the guard: Developing democratic police abroad. Oxford University Press. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

4. Braithwaite, J. (2002). Restorative justice and responsive regulation. Oxford University Press. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

5. Sihite, G. M., Malik, I., KY, I. G. S., & Widodo, P. (2023). Peran Organisasi Masyarakat Sipil/Civil Society Organization (Cso) Dalam Menyelesaikan Konflik Agraria Di Indonesia. NUSANTARA: Jurnal Ilmu Pengetahuan Sosial, 10(11), 5232-5244. DOI: https://doi.org/10.31604/jips.v10i11.2023.5232-5244 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

6. Clark, P. (2010). The Gacaca courts, post-genocide justice and reconciliation in Rwanda. Cambridge University Press. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

7. Fahmi, R. (2023). Rekonstruksi regulasi sengketa lahan pertanahan Indonesia berbasis keadilan Pancasila [Doctoral dissertation, unpublished]. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

8. Abdul, I. (2023). Merancang kelapa sawit sebagai komoditi unggulan nasional [Doctoral dissertation, unpublished]. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

9. Muhammad Riyan Hidayah. (2025). Dampak Perkebunan Kelapa Sawit terhadap Lingkungan:Menyeimbangkan Risiko Ekologis dengan Keuntungan Ekonomi. Globe: Publikasi Ilmu Teknik, Teknologi Kebumian, Ilmu Perkapalan, 3(1), 90–94. https://doi.org/10.61132/globe.v3i1.763 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

10. Gavrielides, T. (Ed.). (2019). Routledge international handbook of restorative justice. Routledge. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

11. Goldstein, H. (1990). Problem-oriented policing. McGraw-Hill. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

12. Johnstone, G., & Van Ness, D. W. (2007). Handbook of restorative justice. Willan Publishing. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

13. Karjono, A., Malau, P., & Ciptono, C. (2024). Penerapan Keadilan Restoratif dalam Hukum Pidana Berbasis Kearifan Lokal. Jurnal Usm Law Review, 7(2), 1035-1050. DOI: https://doi.org/10.26623/julr.v7i2.9571 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

14. Khoirudin, M. Z., Erawati, D., & Syamsuri, S. (2021). Resolusi Konflik Masyarakat Kalimantan Tengah Dengan Perusahaan Perkebunan Kelapa Sawit (Analisis Teori Hegemoni). Proceedings of Palangka Raya International and National Conference on Islamic Studies (PINCIS), 1(1), 19–32. https://eproceedings.iainpalangkaraya.ac.id/index.php/PICIS/article/view/485 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

15. KLHK. (2021). Laporan konflik kawasan hutan. Kementerian Lingkungan Hidup dan Kehutanan. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

16. KLHK. (2022). Laporan konflik kawasan hutan. Kementerian Lingkungan Hidup dan Kehutanan. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

17. Komnas HAM. (2023). Laporan insiden Desa Bangkal, Kabupaten Seruyan. Komisi Nasional Hak Asasi Manusia. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

18. Lederach, J. P. (2014). The little book of conflict transformation. Good Books. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

19. Manning, P. K. (2010). Democratic policing in a changing world. Paradigm Publishers. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

20. Meilantara, H., Adi, B. T. S., Sukmana, O., & Salviana, V. (2024). Participatory Social Action in the Mediation Process of Oil Palm Land Conflict in Central Kalimantan, Indonesia. International Journal of Research in Engineering, Science and Management, 7(5), 51-59. https://journal.ijresm.com/index.php/ijresm/article/view/3029 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

21. Meilantara, H., Adi, B. T. S., Sukmana, O., & Soedarwo, V. S. D. (2024b). Peran Lembaga Kepolisian dalam Menjaga Ketertiban dan Keamanan Masyarakat di Kebun Sawit, Kalimantan Tengah. Madaniya, 5(3), 1173-1180. https://doi.org/10.53696/27214834.904 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

22. Mikroj, M., & Djumhur, A. (2023). Restoratif justice sebagai perwujudan keadilan dalam perspektif teori kemaslahatan (Maqashid Al-Syari'ah). Tahkim, 19(2), 239–253. DOI: https://doi.org/10.33477/thk.v19i2.5164 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

23. Moustakas, C. (1994). Phenomenological research methods. Sage Publications. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

24. Nashir, M. A., Zafira, A., & Maharani, N. (2024). Urgensi pembentukan undang-undang restorative justice dalam rangka reformasi keadilan dan kepastian hukum di Indonesia. Sapientia et Virtus, 9(1), 344–357. https://doi.org/10.37477/sev.v8i1 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

25. Ostrom, E. (1990). Governing the commons: The evolution of institutions for collective action. Cambridge University Press. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

26. Priono, B. (2023). Konflik pertanahan atas tanah aset Badan Usaha Milik Negara (BUMN) yang dikuasai oleh masyarakat [Disertasi, Universitas Hasanuddin]. Repositori Institusi Universitas Hasanuddin. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

27. Rahardjo, S. (2002). Polisi sipil dalam perubahan sosial di Indonesia. Penerbit Buku Kompas. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

28. Save Our Borneo. (2017). Konflik agraria di Kalimantan Tengah. https://saveourborneo.org/konflik-agraria-di-kalimantan-tengah/ [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

29. Susan, N. (2009). Sosiologi konflik dan isu-isu konflik kontemporer. Kencana Prenada Media Group. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

30. Umbreit, M. S., & Armour, M. P. (2011). Restorative justice dialogue: An essential guide for research and practice. Springer. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

31. Van Ness, D. W., & Strong, K. H. (2015). Restoring justice: An introduction to restorative justice (5th ed.). Routledge. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

32. Wicaksono, S., Bagas, B., & Reyhansyah, A. (2024). Penyelesaian Sengketa dan Konflik Pertanahan di Indonesia: Kajian Politik Hukum: Resolution of Land Disputes and Conflicts in Indonesia: A Study of Legal Politics. Dialogia Iuridica, 16(1), 068–095. https://doi.org/10.28932/di.v16i1.9993 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

33. Ashibly, & Pratama, P. T. (2024). Implementasi proses mediasi antara PT. AAIMD dan koperasi petani dalam penyelesaian sengketa terhadap petani plasma di Kabupaten Bengkulu Utara. Jurnal Jendela Hukum dan Keadilan, 10(1), 9–17. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

34. Zehr, H. (2002). The little book of restorative justice. Good Books. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

• Conflict of Law in the Safeguarding of Malaysian Intangible Cultural Heritage: A Way Forward
• Alternative Dispute Resolution in India: A Brief Overview Justice Delayed is Justice Denied. - William E. Gladstone
• The Role of Museums in Safeguarding Cultural Heritage Rights: Balancing Access and Repatriation
• An Evaluation of the Universal Declaration of Human Rights' Significance and Application in Nigeria
• The Role of International Law in Shaping National Immigration Policies.