From Transcripts to Competencies: A Digital CLER Framework for Malaysian Graduates

The growing demand for a skills-based economy in Malaysia has highlighted the limitations of traditional academic record-keeping, which often overlooks experiential learning, co-curricular involvement, and professional achievements. This study addresses these challenges by proposing a Comprehensive Learning and Employment Record (CLER) framework tailored for Malaysian university graduates. Using a qualitative research design, semi-structured interviews were conducted with five recent graduates and five professionals in information and records management to explore existing issues and expectations surrounding credential management. Thematic analysis revealed recurring challenges, including vulnerability of physical documents, difficulties in retrieving records, inefficiencies in verification, and the lack of interoperability across institutions. Findings also highlighted the potential of emerging technologies such as blockchain, digital credentialing platforms, and cloud-based solutions to enhance security, accessibility, and self-sovereignty in record management. Drawing from these insights, the study presents a conceptual CLER framework that integrates academic, co-curricular, and professional records into a centralized, verifiable, and learner-owned platform. The proposed framework not only improves graduates’ ability to demonstrate holistic competencies but also streamlines institutional processes and supports employer decision-making. Overall, this research contributes a contextualized solution to enhance graduate employability, institutional efficiency, and Malaysia’s transition to a digital, skills-driven economy.

Comprehensive Learning and Employment Record (CLER), Graduate employability, Academic credential management, Blockchain in education, Malaysian higher education.

1. Accreditation Council for Graduate Medical Education. (2021). Program requirements for graduate medical education. ACGME. https://www.acgme.org [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

2. American Workforce Policy Advisory Board. (2020). The case for a comprehensive learner record. U.S. Department of Commerce. https://www.commerce.gov [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

3. Braxton, J. M., Doyle, W. R., & Lyken-Segosebe, D. (2022). Higher education in transition: Trends, challenges, and innovations. Routledge. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

4. Braun, V., & Clarke, V. (2006). Using thematic analysis in psychology. Qualitative Research in Psychology, 3(2), 77–101. https://doi.org/10.1191/1478088706qp063oa [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

5. Cederquist, S., Fishman, T., & Teasley, S. (2022). Comprehensive learner records: Impacts and challenges in higher education. Journal of Learning Analytics, 9(1), 34–52. https://doi.org/10.18608/jla.2022.7263 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

6. David, M. (2019). Professional networking in the digital era: The case of LinkedIn. Journal of Information Technology Education, 18(1), 123–138. https://doi.org/10.28945/4321 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

7. Djabatey, E. N., & Nartey, C. E. (2012). Records management practices of graduates: Challenges and strategies. International Journal of Information Management, 32(3), 220–227. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijinfomgt.2011.12.005 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

8. Edraw. (2022). Best practices for digital record management. EdrawSoft. https://www.edrawsoft.com [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

9. Eludire, A. A. (2011). The use of information and communication technologies in Nigerian universities: A focus on records management. Library Philosophy and Practice, 2011(1), 1–9. https://digitalcommons.unl.edu/libphilprac/ [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

10. Gendron, B., Hébert, C., & Boivin, M. (2016). The potential of digital credentialing for learning recognition. International Review of Research in Open and Distributed Learning, 17(4), 214–228. https://doi.org/10.19173/irrodl.v17i4.2426 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

11. International Organization for Standardization. (2001). ISO 15489-1: Information and documentation – Records management – Part 1: General. ISO. https://www.iso.org [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

12. Jain, A., & Sharma, A. (2017). Blockchain in education: Ensuring transparency and trust in credentialing. International Journal of Educational Technology, 4(2), 45–56. https://doi.org/10.4018/IJET.20170701.oa2 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

13. Jain, P., Kumar, R., & Singh, A. (2019). Cloud computing in higher education: A review of benefits and challenges. Education and Information Technologies, 24(6), 3603–3620. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10639-019-09945-7 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

14. Kvale, S., & Brinkmann, S. (2015). Interviews: Learning the craft of qualitative research interviewing (3rd ed.). Sage. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

15. Laurie Todd, S. (2021). Digital badges and learner records: Expanding recognition of learning. Journal of Educational Technology Systems, 49(4), 559–577. https://doi.org/10.1177/0047239520976513 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

16. Learning Economy Foundation. (2020). The learning economy: Blockchain in education. LEF. https://www.learningeconomy.io [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

17. Macfadyen, L. P., Dawson, S., Pardo, A., & Gašević, D. (2014). Embracing big data in complex educational systems: The learning analytics imperative. Research & Practice in Assessment, 9(2), 17–33. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

18. Merriam, S. B., & Tisdell, E. J. (2016). Qualitative research: A guide to design and implementation (4th ed.). Jossey-Bass. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

19. National Archives. (2020). Digital continuity and records management. The National Archives, UK. https://www.nationalarchives.gov.uk [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

20. Ocheja, P., Flanagan, B., & Ogata, H. (2021). Managing lifelong learning records through blockchain: A review. IEEE Transactions on Learning Technologies, 14(1), 28–40. https://doi.org/10.1109/TLT.2020.3039934 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

21. Samsudin, S. (2015). Record-keeping practices in Malaysian universities: Challenges and prospects. Records Management Journal, 25(2), 123–136. https://doi.org/10.1108/RMJ-02-2015-0013 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

22. World Economic Forum. (2020). The future of jobs report 2020. World Economic Forum. https://www.weforum.org [Google Scholar] [Crossref]