From Viral Trends to Buying Decisions: How TikTok Shop’s Interactive Features Shape Consumer Intent among University Students

Authors

Zaliha Idris

School of Marketing and Management (SOMM), Asia Pacific University of Technology & Innovation (APU); Faculty of Communication and Media Studies, University Technology MARA (UiTM) (Malaysia)

Muhammad Daniel Shar Kawi Hazim

School of Marketing and Management (SOMM), Asia Pacific University of Technology & Innovation (APU) (Malaysia)

Junainah Idris

Faculty of Economics, Accountancy and Management, University Islam Selangor (UIS) (Malaysia)

Ninderpal Singh Balwant Singh

School of Marketing and Management (SOMM), Asia Pacific University of Technology & Innovation (APU) (Malaysia)

Article Information

DOI: 10.47772/IJRISS.2026.100400461

Subject Category: Social Media

Volume/Issue: 10/4 | Page No: 6438-6444

Publication Timeline

Submitted: 2026-04-18

Accepted: 2026-04-24

Published: 2026-05-14

Abstract

The rapid expansion of social commerce has reshaped digital consumer behaviour, particularly among university students who actively engage with interactive platforms such as TikTok. Despite the growing prominence of TikTok Shop, limited empirical evidence exists on how its platform-specific attributes influence purchase intention within a unified framework. This study addresses this gap by examining the relationships between perceived convenience, perceived usefulness, perceived trust, and online purchase intention among university students in Klang Valley. Grounded in the Technology Acceptance Model (TAM) and Trust Theory, the study provides an integrated perspective on technological and psychological determinants of consumer behaviour in social commerce. A quantitative cross-sectional survey was conducted using data collected from 370 university students through a structured questionnaire. The data were analysed using descriptive statistics, correlation, and multiple regression techniques to assess both the relationships and predictive effects among variables. The results indicate that all three factors, perceived convenience, perceived usefulness, and perceived trust, have significant positive relationships with online purchase intention (p < 0.001). Among these, perceived convenience emerged as the strongest predictor, highlighting the critical role of seamless user experience in influencing consumer decisions. These findings suggest that TikTok Shop’s ability to integrate usability, functional value, and trust-building mechanisms is central to its effectiveness as a social commerce platform. This study contributes to the literature by offering empirical evidence on the combined effects of key determinants within the context of TikTok Shop, an area that remains underexplored. The findings also provide practical insights for platform developers and digital marketers to enhance user experience, strengthen trust, and improve conversion strategies in an increasingly competitive social commerce environment.

Keywords

Social commerce; TikTok Shop

Downloads

References

1. Aboulilah, H. M. A. E., Hossain, S. F. A., Vuong, B. N., & Jebril, T. (2022). Exploring the relationship between WeChat usage and e-purchase intention during the COVID-19 pandemic among university students in China. SAGE Open, 12(1). https://doi.org/10.1177/21582440221139447 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

2. Ao, L., Bansal, R., Pruthi, N., & Khaskheli, M. B. (2023). Impact of Social Media Influencers on Customer Engagement and Purchase Intention: A Meta-Analysis. Sustainability, 15(3), 2744. https://doi.org/10.3390/su15032744 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

3. Hu, S.-Y., & Zhu, Z. H. (2022). Effects of social media usage on consumers’ purchase intention in social commerce: A cross-cultural empirical analysis. Frontiers in Psychology, 13, 837752. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2022.837752 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

4. Jeyaraj, A., Ismagilova, E., Jadil, Y., Sarker, P., Rana, N. P., Hughes, L., & Dwivedi, Y. K. (2022). Mediating role of social commerce trust in behavioral intention and use. Information Systems Management, 40(4), 354–370. https://doi.org/10.1080/10580530.2022.2140370 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

5. Katon, P., & Oktavia, T. (2025). Analysis of factors influencing purchase intention in TikTok Shop live streaming: A study in Indonesia. Journal of Information Systems Engineering and Management. Advance online publication. https://doi.org/10.52783/jisem.v10i34s.5876 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

6. Kumar, P. A., & Subathra, K. (2025). The S-O-R framework in action: The impact of source credibility, interactivity, and perceived usefulness on consumer engagement and trust in live streaming commerce. Innovative Marketing. Advance online publication. https://doi.org/10.21511/im.21(3).2025.01 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

7. Luo, C., Hasan, N.A.M., Zamri bin Ahmad, A.M. et al. Influence of short video content on consumers purchase intentions on social media platforms with trust as a mediator. Sci Rep 15, 16605 (2025). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-025-94994-z [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

8. Qin, C., Zeng, X., Liang, S., & Zhang, K. (2023). Do live streaming and online consumer reviews jointly affect purchase intention? Sustainability, 15(1), 6992. https://doi.org/10.3390/su15086992 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

9. Qing C and Jin S (2022) What Drives Consumer Purchasing Intention in Live Streaming E-Commerce?. Front. Psychol. 13:938726. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2022.938726 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

10. Selem, K.M., Shoukat, M.H., Shah, S.A. et al. The dual effect of digital communication reinforcement drivers on purchase intention in the social commerce environment. Humanit Soc Sci Commun 10, 47 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1057/s41599-023-01539-8 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

11. Siagian, H., Tarigan, Z., Basana, S. R., & Basuki, R. (2022). The effect of perceived security, perceived ease of use, and perceived usefulness on consumer behavioral intention through trust in digital payment platform. International Journal of Data and Network Science, 6(2), 451–460. http://dx.doi.org/10.5267/j.ijdns.2022.2.010 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

12. Wang, J., Shahzad, F., Ahmad, Z., Abdullah, M., & Hassan, N. M. (2022). Trust and consumers’ purchase intention in a social commerce platform: A meta-analytic approach. SAGE Open, 12(2). https://doi.org/10.1177/21582440221091262 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

13. Wang, J., & Shahzad, F. (2024). Deciphering social commerce: A quantitative meta-analysis measuring the social, technological, and motivational dimensions of consumer purchase intentions. SAGE Open, 14(1). https://doi.org/10.1177/21582440241257591 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

14. Wang M, Sun LL, Hou JD. How Emotional Interaction Affects Purchase Intention in Social Commerce: The Role of Perceived Usefulness and Product Type. Psychology Research and Behaviour Management. 2021;14:467-481. https://doi.org/10.2147/PRBM.S301286 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

15. Wu, Y., & Huang, H. (2023). Influence of perceived value on consumers’ continuous purchase intention in live-streaming e-commerce—Mediated by consumer trust. Sustainability, 15(1). https://doi.org/10.3390/su15054432 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

16. Xu, P., Cui, B., & Lyu, B. (2022). Influence of streamer’s social capital on purchase intention in live streaming e-commerce. Frontiers in Psychology, 12, 748172. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2021.748172 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

17. Zhang, H., Zheng, S., & Zhu, P. (2024). Why are Indonesian consumers buying on live streaming platforms? Research on consumer perceived value theory. Heliyon, 10(1), e00000. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.heliyon.2024.e33518 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

18. Zhang L, Chen M and Zamil AMA (2023) Live stream marketing and consumers’ purchase intention: An IT affordance perspective using the S-O-R paradigm. Front. Psychol. 14:1069050. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2023.1069050 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

19. Zhang, Y., Albattat, A., Azman, N., & Wei, M. (2023). The effect of perceived usefulness, perceived ease of use, and social influence toward purchase intention mediated by trust in live streaming platform. Journal of Law and Sustainable Development. https://doi.org/10.55908/sdgs.v11i9.1284 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

Metrics

Views & Downloads

Similar Articles