From Welfare to Punishment: A Comparative Analysis of Criminal Responses to Child Neglect in Malaysia and the UK

Child neglect continues to be one of the most prevalent yet intricate forms of child maltreatment, prompting fundamental enquiries regarding the appropriate role of criminal law in child protection systems. This paper conducts a doctrinal comparative analysis of the criminal responses to child neglect in Malaysia and England and Wales, investigating whether recent legislative developments indicate a transition from welfare-oriented intervention to punitive enforcement. The study examines the definition of neglect, the construction of criminal liability, and the positioning of penal sanctions within the broader child protection framework of each jurisdiction, utilising statutory provisions, judicial decisions, and safeguarding guidance published between 2020 and 2025.
Despite the shared common law foundations, the results indicate a divergence in normative emphasis. In Malaysia, the law, especially the Child Act 2001, includes criminalisation in the formal definition of neglect, making punishment an essential mechanism to hold people accountable. Reinforcing prosecutorial authority, judicial interpretation reflects relatively broad thresholds based on exposure to injury. In England and Wales, on the other hand, neglect is typically seen as part of a welfare-based safeguarding system that puts the child's welfare first. Criminal responsibility functions as a residual mechanism, generally applied to circumstances characterised by wilfulness or substantial injury.
The comparative analysis shows that the shift "from welfare to punishment" is neither uniform or absolute, but is instead a result of constant adjustments made in response to child rights discussions, public accountability concerns, and broader trends in penal policy. The paper says that criminal remedies are only valid and useful if there are clear limits, principled prosecutorial discretion, and strong welfare systems that work together with them. In the end, combining accountability with child-centred protection is still the most important thing for making sense of modern child neglect law.

Child neglect; Criminalisation; Child protection law; Comparative legal analysis

1. A Local Authority v. M [2020] EWFC 24 (Family Court). [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

2. Ariffin, A., & Ahmad, N. (2022). Criminal liability for child neglect under the Child Act 2001: Developments and challenges in Malaysia. Malayan Law Journal Articles, 3, 1–15. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

3. Baidawi, S., Newton, D., Mendes, P., Bollinger, J., & Purtell, J. (2024). From care to corrections: A scoping review of pathways from child protection to adult criminal justice systems. Trauma, Violence, & Abuse, 26(3), 403–419. https://doi.org/10.1177/15248380241279861 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

4. Bilson, A., & Martin, K. (2020). Referrals and child protection in England: One in five children referred to children’s services and one in nineteen investigated before the age of five. British Journal of Social Work, 50(3), 793–811. https://doi.org/10.1093/bjsw/bcz024 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

5. Child Act 2001 (Act 611). (2001). Laws of Malaysia. Retrieved from [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

6. https://www.commonlii.org/my/legis/consol_act/ca200152/ [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

7. Children Act 1989 (c. 41). (1989). UK Parliament. (Applicable to England and Wales). Retrieved from https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Children_Act_1989 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

8. Department of Statistics Malaysia. (2024). Children statistics Malaysia, 2024. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

9. https://www.dosm.gov.my/portal-main/release-content/children-statistics-malaysia-20244 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

10. Featherstone, B., Gupta, A., Morris, K., & White, S. (2021). Protecting children: A social model. Child & Family Social Work, 26(3), 341–349. https://doi.org/10.1111/cfs.12813 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

11. Garrett, P. M. (2021). Analysing the new penal politics of child protection. Theoretical Criminology, 25(2), 189–206. https://doi.org/10.1177/1362480619893953 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

12. Gibbs, J. (2024). Social workers’ perceptions of the nature of child neglect. British Journal of Social Work, 54(8), 3619–3635. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

13. HM Government. (2023). Working together to safeguard children. Department for Education. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

14. Kharel, R. (2021). Doctrinal legal research methodology: Meaning, scope and limitations. International Journal of Law Management & Humanities, 4(1), 1–12. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

15. Mahyut, S. M. (2023). Enhancing legal safeguards in Malaysian family law. Atlantis Press. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

16. Melander, S. (2023). Preventive turn in criminal law. Peking University Law Journal, 11(1), 11–23. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

17. https://doi.org/10.1080/20517483.2023.2223843 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

18. Public Prosecutor v. Aisyah binti Mohd Nor, (2019) MLJU 1456 (High Court of Malaya). [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

19. Public Prosecutor v. Norazilah binti Mohd Salleh, (2017) MLJU 1234 (High Court of Malaya). [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

20. R v. Hughes [2013] UKSC 56 (Supreme Court). [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

21. R v. Sheppard [1981] AC 394 (House of Lords). [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

22. UK Home Office. (2022). Criminal justice statistics quarterly: England and Wales. Home Office. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

23. UNICEF Malaysia. (2023). Child protection system strengthening in Malaysia: Progress and challenges. UNICEF Malaysia. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

24. UNICEF Malaysia. (2023). UNICEF Malaysia annual report 2023. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

25. https://www.unicef.org/malaysia/media/4816/file/UNICEF%20Malaysia%20Annual%20Report%202023.pdf [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

• Conflict of Law in the Safeguarding of Malaysian Intangible Cultural Heritage: A Way Forward
• Alternative Dispute Resolution in India: A Brief Overview Justice Delayed is Justice Denied. - William E. Gladstone
• The Role of Museums in Safeguarding Cultural Heritage Rights: Balancing Access and Repatriation
• An Evaluation of the Universal Declaration of Human Rights' Significance and Application in Nigeria
• The Role of International Law in Shaping National Immigration Policies.