Gabay-Turo Project on Literacy and Numeracy: Process and Progress Evaluation

Authors

Melissa L. Loquere

Faculty, Bohol Island State University-Clarin Campus, Bohol (Philippines)

Jeziel A. Estapia

Faculty, Bohol Island State University-Clarin Campus, Bohol (Philippines)

Richard S. Mula

Faculty, Bohol Island State University-Clarin Campus, Bohol (Philippines)

Mary Cecille A. Labrigas

Faculty, Bohol Island State University-Clarin Campus, Bohol (Philippines)

Article Information

DOI: 10.47772/IJRISS.2025.91200242

Subject Category: Education

Volume/Issue: 9/12 | Page No: 3155-3164

Publication Timeline

Submitted: 2025-12-19

Accepted: 2025-12-27

Published: 2026-01-14

Abstract

Foundational skills in literacy and numeracy are the essential cornerstone of every learner’s educational journey. However, recent reports, such as the Second Congressional Commission on Education (EDCOM II), highlighted that learners failed and struggled to engage with concepts at their level, which raised serious concerns about the state of foundational learning in the Philippines. As a response to these problems, the Gabay-Turo project, a local and school-based project aimed at enhancing learners’ literacy and numeracy, was implemented in the district of Clarin, Bohol, Philippines. With this, the study aimed to determine the process and progress of the Gabay-Turo Project. Specifically, it sought to assess its progress, determine the pressing issues, problems, and challenges, and provide intervention schemes and programs based on the identified problems. Employing a phenomenological methodology, a qualitative design was used in this study. Participants included 8 teachers and 59 students of Bonbon Elementary School who had direct experience with the program. Data were collected using semi-structured interviews and observations, complemented by focus group discussions with the teachers and students. Thematic analysis was utilized to analyze the qualitative data. To enhance the trustworthiness of the findings, strategies such as triangulation were implemented. Results revealed that there is a substantial improvement in the learners’ literacy and numeracy skills, with good practices such as conducting pre- and post-assessments, regular monitoring and evaluation sessions, as well as a year-end culmination to keep track of the ongoing project. Thus, the project remained adaptable. However, beneficiaries faced problems related to a lack of continuity in tutorial classes, an inadequate tutor-tutee ratio, discrepancies between school calendars, and insufficient instructional materials for effective tutoring. To address these issues, the project implementers may enforce continuous tutorial sessions across all grades, establish a 1:1 tutor-tutee ratio, coordinate school calendars, and ensure the provision of instructional materials. Addressing the recommendations could enhance the overall impact of the Gabay-Turo Project on student learning outcomes.

Keywords

literacy and numeracy challenges, extension

Downloads

References

1. Anicet, K., & Aphrodis, N. (2017). The role of monitoring and evaluation on assessing VVOB Rwanda projects paradigm in improving the school management and leadership. International Journal of education, 138-165. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

2. Atuhurra, J., & Kaffenberger, M. (2022). Measuring education system coherence: Alignment of curriculum standards, examinations, and teacher instruction in Tanzania and Uganda. International Journal of Educational Development, 92, 102598. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijedudev.2022.102598 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

3. Bagherzadeh, S. A., Verrett, J., & Creagh, L. (2024). Program-Level Assessment. Proceedings of the Canadian Engineering Education Association (CEEA). https://doi.org/10.24908/pceea.2023.17082 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

4. Bryk, A. S. (2015). 2014 AERA distinguished lecture: Accelerating how we learn to improve. Educational researcher, 44(9), 467-477. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

5. Burke, G., Mac An Bhaird, C., & O’Shea, A. (2013). The effect of a monitoring scheme on tutorial attendance and assignment submission. International Journal of Mathematical Education in Science and Technology, 44(4), 545–553. https://doi.org/10.1080/0020739x.2012.756553 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

6. Crouch, L. & DeStefano J. (2017). Doing Reform Differently: Combining Rigor and Practicality in Implementation and Evaluation of System Reforms. International Development Working paper, No. 2017-01. RTI International. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

7. Gordon, E. M., Lynch, C. J., Gratton, C., Laumann, T. O., Gilmore, A. W., Greene, D. J., ... & Nelson, S. M. (2018). Three distinct sets of connector hubs integrate human brain function. Cell reports, 24(7), 1687-1695. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

8. Kim, Y. -S., Boyle,H. N., (2016). Landscape Report on Early Grade Literacy. Washington, D.C., USAID Murray, J. (2016). Young children are researchers: Children aged four to eight years engage in important research behaviour when they base decisions on evidence. European Early Childhood Education Research Journal, 24(5), 705-720. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

9. Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD). (2023). PISA 2022 results (Volume I): The state of learning and equity in education. OECD Publishing. Ouko O.H. (2018) Early Learning Experiences and Teacher -Efficacy As Predictors of Pupils Competencies in Early Primary School Grades in Rural Kenya World Journal of Innovative Research (WJIR) ISSN: 2454-8236, Volume-5, Issue-4, October 2018 Pages 33-40 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

10. Provost, C. (2014). One in four young people in developing countries unable to read, says UN. Guardian Global Development the Guardian, Thursday 21 August BBC News IUKI Education Poor Basic Skills Mar Progress. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

11. Republic Act No. 9155, An Act Instituting a Framework of Governance for Basic Education (Phil.). (2001). [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

12. Second Congressional Commission on Education (EDCOM II). (2023). Year 1 report: Making basic education work. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

13. House of Representatives and Senate of the Philippines. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

14. Snyder, T. D., & Dillow, S. A. (2015). Digest of Education Statistics 2013. NCES 2015- 011. National Center for Education Statistics. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

15. Topping, K., Duran, D., & Van Keer, H. (2015). Using peer tutoring to improve reading skills: a practical guide for teachers. Routledge. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

16. UNESCO, 2018. Global Education Meeting 2018: Brussels Declaration. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

17. Wilburn, S. (2019). The circulation of expertise in teachers’ professional communities. International studies in sociology of education, 28(2), 146-167. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

Metrics

Views & Downloads

Similar Articles