Gender Differences in Physics Anxiety and Coping Mechanisms: A Quantitative Analysis of Grade 10 Students

Physics anxiety remains a persistent affective barrier in secondary science education, yet empirical evidence from developing-country contexts remains limited. This study examined the level of physics anxiety, coping mechanisms, gender differences, and the relationship between anxiety and coping among 120 Grade 10 students (60 males, 60 females) using a quantitative descriptive–comparative and correlational design. Results indicated a moderate overall level of physics anxiety (M = 3.20), with emotional anxiety emerging as the most pronounced dimension across genders. Independent-samples t-tests revealed no statistically significant gender differences in anxiety levels (p > .05). Students reported frequent use of problem-focused coping strategies (M = 3.56) and emotion-focused coping strategies (M = 3.55), while avoidance coping was used less frequently. Pearson correlation analysis demonstrated a statistically significant but moderate positive association between physics anxiety and coping mechanisms (r = .368, p < .001), indicating increased coping efforts in response to heightened anxiety without implying coping effectiveness. The findings highlight the centrality of emotional responses in physics learning and underscore the need for instructional practices that address affective regulation alongside cognitive support

physics anxiety; coping mechanisms; emotional anxiety

1. Britner, S. L., & Pajares, F. (2006). Sources of Science Self-Efficacy Beliefs Among Middle School Students. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 43(5), 485–499. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

2. Cerezo, J., Estacio, M., & Estacio, R. (2019). Coping mechanisms of Filipino students in science subjects. Journal of Philippine Education. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

3. Data Privacy Act of 2012. Republic Act No. 10173, Republic of the Philippines. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

4. Eboña, M. T., & Villagonzalo, K. (2020). Challenges and barriers in learning physics among Filipino high school students. Philippine Science Letters. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

5. Lazarus, R. S., & Folkman, S. (1984). Stress, appraisal, and coping. Springer Publishing Company. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

6. Mallow, J., Kastrup, H., Bryant, F. B., Hislop, N., Shefner, R., & Udo, M. (2010). Science anxiety, gender, and college major. International Journal of Science Education, 32(11), 1431–1446. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

7. Putwain, D. W., & Daly, A. L. (2013). Do test anxiety, self-efficacy, and emotional intelligence predict academic performance? British Journal of Educational Psychology, 83(1), 75–94. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

8. Spielberger, C. D. (1983). State-trait anxiety inventory for adults. Mind Garden. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

9. Udo, M. K., Ramsey, G. P., & Mallow, J. V. (2004). Science Anxiety and Gender in Students Taking General Education Science Courses Journal of Science Education and Technology, 13(4), 435–446. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

• Assessment of the Role of Artificial Intelligence in Repositioning TVET for Economic Development in Nigeria
• Teachers’ Use of Assure Model Instructional Design on Learners’ Problem Solving Efficacy in Secondary Schools in Bungoma County, Kenya
• “E-Booksan Ang Kaalaman”: Development, Validation, and Utilization of Electronic Book in Academic Performance of Grade 9 Students in Social Studies
• Analyzing EFL University Students’ Academic Speaking Skills Through Self-Recorded Video Presentation
• Major Findings of The Study on Total Quality Management in Teachers’ Education Institutions (TEIs) In Assam – An Evaluative Study