Gender Representation Among English Teachers in Secondary Schools in Montserrado County, Liberia: A Case Study of Confidence and Kingsley High Schools
Authors
William V. S. Tubman College of Education, University of Liberia (Liberia)
William V. S. Tubman College of Education, University of Liberia (Liberia)
William V. S. Tubman College of Education, University of Liberia (Liberia)
Article Information
DOI: 10.47772/IJRISS.2026.100700417
Subject Category: Psychology
Volume/Issue: 10/7 | Page No: 6125-6135
Publication Timeline
Submitted: 2026-07-20
Accepted: 2026-07-25
Published: 2026-08-03
Abstract
Gender equity in education remains a global priority, yet disparities in teacher representation persist across many educational systems, particularly in subject-specific teaching positions. This study examined gender representation among English teachers in selected secondary schools in Montserrado County, Liberia, using Confidence and Kingsley High Schools as case studies. Specifically, the study sought to determine the extent of gender representation among English teachers and explore respondents' perceptions regarding gender equality in English language instruction. A quantitative descriptive cross-sectional research design was employed. Data were collected from a target sample of 20 participants using structured questionnaires, interviews, and observation checklists. All 20 completed responses were obtained, representing a 100% response rate. Data were analyzed primarily using descriptive statistics, including frequencies and percentages.
The findings revealed a marked gender imbalance in English teacher deployment, with all English teaching positions in the participating schools occupied by male teachers. Although respondents generally perceived that male and female teachers were treated equally within their respective schools, the staffing data demonstrated a clear disparity in gender representation. Student responses also reflected persistent gender stereotypes, with most participants characterizing male teachers as "strong-hearted" and female teachers as "soft-hearted." Furthermore, only a small proportion of respondents possessed higher professional qualifications, highlighting the need for continued professional development.
The study concludes that despite perceptions of equitable treatment, substantial gender disparities remain in the staffing of English teachers within the selected schools. The findings suggest the need for deliberate recruitment of qualified female English teachers, strengthened mentorship opportunities for aspiring female educators, and collaborative initiatives involving the Ministry of Education, teacher education institutions, and development partners to promote gender-responsive teacher recruitment and professional development. Given the study's small sample size and focus on two schools, the findings should be interpreted cautiously and are not intended to be generalized to all secondary schools in Liberia.
Keywords
Gender representation; English teachers; Secondary education; Educational equity; Liberia; Teacher recruitment.
Downloads
References
1. Aguillon, S. M., Siegmund, G., Petipas, R. H., Drake, A. G., Cotner, S., & Ballen, C. J. (2020). Gender Differences in student participation in an active-learning classroom. CBE—Life Sciences Education, 19(2), ar12. https://doi.org/10.1187/cbe.19-03-0048 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
2. Akbar, M. N. (2026). Students’ perceptions of the benefits and drawbacks of technology during their doctoral studies. In Enlighten: Theses (The University of Glasgow). [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
3. https://doi.org/10.5525/gla.thesis.86122 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
4. Alhumaidan, A. (2026). Exploring gender stereotypes in first-grade school textbooks in the Kingdom of Saudi Arabia. In White Rose eTheses Online (University of Leeds, The University of Sheffield, University of York). https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9678-7172 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
5. Card, D., Domnisoru, C., Sanders, S. G., Taylor, L., & Udalova, V. (2022). The impact of female teachers on female students’ lifetime well-being. (Working Paper 30430). NATIONAL BUREAU OF ECONOMIC RESEARCH. https://www.nber.org/system/files/working_papers/w30430/w30430.pdf [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
6. Condron, C., Power, M., Mathew, M., Lucey, S., Henn, P., Dean, T., Scott, M. K., Eppich, W., & Lucey, S. M. (2025). Gender Equality Training for Students in Higher Education: Scoping review. JMIR Medical Education, 11, e60061. https://doi.org/10.2196/60061 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
7. Cox, W. T. L. (2022). Developing scientifically validated bias and diversity trainings that work: empowering agents of change to reduce bias, create inclusion, and promote equity. Management Decision, 61(4), 1038–1061. https://doi.org/10.1108/md-06-2021-0839 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
8. Crawfurd, L., Saintis-Miller, C., & Todd, R. (2024). Sexist textbooks: Automated analysis of gender bias in 1,255 books from 34 countries. PLoS ONE, 19(10), e0310366. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
9. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0310366 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
10. EIGE. (2019). Gender Equality Index 2019: Work-life Balance. https://doi.org/10.2839/319154 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
11. ElAtia, S., Gomez, L. N., & Corsi, E. (2022). If teaching is a female-dominated profession, why are so few leading the profession? Journal of Research on Leadership Education, 19(1), 102–121. https://doi.org/10.1177/19427751221137926 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
12. Fellström, B., Barratt, J., Flöge, J., Jardine, A., Olusanya, B. O., Sirimanna, T., & McPherson, B. (2017). Timely sensory stimulation and early childhood development. The Lancet, 390(10113), 2626. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0140-6736(17)32596-5 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
13. Global Education Monitoring Report 2019: Migration, Displacement, and Education—Building Bridges, Not Walls. (2019). In UNESCO eBooks. https://doi.org/10.54676/xdzd4287 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
14. Gouvias, D., & Alexopoulos, C. (2016). The language textbooks used in Greek primary schools contain sexist stereotypes, which will be examined through a multidimensional approach. Gender and Education, 30(5), 642–662. https://doi.org/10.1080/09540253.2016.1237620 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
15. Hastomo, T., Hamidah, F. N., Nurchurifiani, E., S, K., Hakim, L. N., Nasution, S. S., & Muliyah, P. (2026). EFL teachers as intercultural gatekeepers: Designing culturally responsive materials with GenAI in Indonesia. Language Education & Assessment, 9, 104539. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
16. https://doi.org/10.29140/lea.2026.104539 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
17. Htun, M., Jensenius, F. R., Dominguez, M. S., Tinkler, J., & Contreras, C. (2022). Effects of mandatory sexual misconduct training on university campuses. Socius Sociological Research for a Dynamic World, 8. https://doi.org/10.1177/23780231221124574 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
18. Jony, M. S. (2025). Investigating the role of gender in teacher-student communication and classroom dynamics. Journal of Education for Sustainable Innovation, 3(1), 87–99. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
19. https://doi.org/10.56916/jesi.v3i1.1250 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
20. Kihwele, G. E., Kinyota, M., & Moses, I. (2025). Pre-service teachers’ conceptualisation of gender-responsive pedagogy as a strategy for achieving gender equality in classrooms. Cogent Education, 12(1). https://doi.org/10.1080/2331186x.2025.2584919 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
21. Lee, T. L., Fiske, S. T., Glick, P., & Chen, Z. (2010). Ambivalent sexism in close relationships: (Hostile) power and (Benevolent) romance shape relationship ideals. Sex Roles, 62(7–8), 583–601. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11199-010-9770-x [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
22. Lindner, K., Pirker, A., Avramidis, E., & Schwab, S. (2026). Secondary school teachers’ attitudes towards inclusive education: a systematic review of recent results and research trends. European Journal of Special Needs Education, 1–22. https://doi.org/10.1080/08856257.2026.2649541 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
23. Lumadi, M. W., & Shongwe, S. S. (2010). The Need for Training Gender-Sensitive Teachers: Addressing Education Challenges for Gender sensitive National Development. Contemporary Issues in Education Research (CIER), 3(3), 41. https://doi.org/10.19030/cier.v3i3.185 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
24. Luyten, H. (2025). Overrepresentation of female teachers in secondary education and gender achievement gaps in PISA 2022. Studies in Educational Evaluation, 88, 101544. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
25. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.stueduc.2025.101544 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
26. Ministry of Education. (2018). Inclusive Education Policy. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
27. https://www.changemakersforchildren.community/system/files/2021-05/Liberia-Inclusive-Education-Policy.pdf [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
28. Miralles-Cardona, C. (2025). Teaching gender equality in teacher education: Does existing practice actually support gender mainstreaming implementation? Frontiers in Education, 10. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
29. https://doi.org/10.3389/feduc.2025.1570115 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
30. Nandi, A., Hader, T., & Das, T. (2024). Gender representation, stereotypes, and bias in English language textbooks: A systematic review of cross-country studies. An-Nisa Jurnal Kajian Perempuan Dan Keislaman, 17(2), 121–136. https://doi.org/10.35719/annisa.v17i2.320 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
31. Nugraha, S. H. (2026). Gender bias in social studies education. Global Journal of Social Learning, 2(2), 32–42. https://doi.org/10.71094/gjsl.v2i2.430 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
32. Oecd. (2021). Education At A Glance 2021. In Education at a glance. OECD indicators/Education at a glance. https://doi.org/10.1787/b35a14e5-en [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
33. Rakhmatillayevna, J. N. (2022). Gender stereotypes in education. In OECD Education Working Papers. https://doi.org/10.1787/a46ae056-en [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
34. Reygan, F., & Swanepoel, E. (2018). Sexual and gender diversity in schools: Belonging, inclusion/exclusion, and the African child. Perspectives in Education, 36(2), 90–102. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
35. https://doi.org/10.18820/2519593x/pie.v36i2.8 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
36. UNESCO, & Education International. (2021). Teachers have their say: motivation, skills and opportunities to teach education for sustainable development and global citizenship. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
37. https://doi.org/10.54675/yxrw9784 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
38. Wright, N. (2024). Let’s Hear it from Them: An Interview-Based Exploration of Male Teachers’ Perceptions of Gender Imbalance in the English Language Teaching Profession. TESOL Quarterly, 59(3), 1199–1224. https://doi.org/10.1002/tesq.3311 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
39. Ydesen, C. (2026). The educational initiatives of the IBE and OECD in the 1960s: Tensions and trajectories for 21st-century global governance in education. Prospects. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11125-026-09759-x [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
Metrics
Views & Downloads
Similar Articles
- A Comparative Study of Adjustment Level, Parental Income and Academic Achievement of Adolescent Girls
- Increase in STIs among Adolescents in Masvingo District
- A Correlation between SDG 4 (Quality Education) and Emotional Disposition of Teacher Educators in Hyderabad District
- Ear Piercing Behaviour and Self-Esteem among Male University Students in Nigeria
- A Study of Religiosity and Psychological Well-Being