General Equilibrium and Market Incompleteness: A Conceptual Re-Evaluation for Frontier Economies

General Equilibrium (GE) theory provides a foundational framework for understanding how decentralized markets coordinate resource allocation. Yet the classical Arrow-Debreu model and its associated welfare theorems rely on assumptions of complete markets, perfect information, and strong institutions that rarely hold in frontier economies. This paper re-examines GE theory through the lens of market incompleteness and institutional fragility, showing that the predictive and normative power of GE becomes significantly weakened under frontier market conditions. Drawing on literature from incomplete markets theory, sequential equilibria, and institutional economics, the paper demonstrates that missing financial markets, contracting failures, and information asymmetries generate constrained inefficiencies and fragile equilibria that deviate markedly from Walrasian predictions

General Equilibrium Theory; Market Incompleteness; Frontier Economies

1. Acemoglu, D., & Zilibotti, F. (1997). Was Prometheus unbound by chance? Risk, diversification, and growth. Journal of political economy, 105(4), 709-751. https://doi.org/10.1086/262091 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

2. Akerlof, G. A. (1978). The market for “lemons”: Quality uncertainty and the market mechanism. In Uncertainty in economics (pp. 235-251). Academic Press. https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-12-214850-7.50022-X [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

3. Allen, F., Carletti, E., Cull, R., Qian, J. Q., Senbet, L., & Valenzuela, P. (2014). The African financial development and financial inclusion gaps. Journal of African economies, 23(5), 614-642. https://doi.org/10.1093/jae/eju015 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

4. Arrow, K. J. (1964). The Role of Securities in the Optimal Allocation of Risk-bearing. The Review of Economic Studies, 31(2), 91–96. https://doi.org/10.2307/2296188 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

5. Arrow, K. J. (1971). Essays in the theory of risk-bearing. Markham Publishing. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

6. Arrow, K. J., & Debreu, G. (1954). Existence of an equilibrium for a competitive economy. Econometrica, 22(3), 265–290. https://www.math.uchicago.edu/~shmuel/AAT-readings/Econ%20segment/Arrow-DeBreu.pdf [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

7. Arrow, K.J. and Hahn, F.H. (1971) General Competitive Analysis. Holden-Day, Inc., San Francisco. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

8. Banerjee, A. V., & Duflo, E. (2011). Poor economics: A radical rethinking of the way to fight global poverty. MIT Press. https://paxmongolica.org/wp-content/uploads/2019/11/poor-economics-a-radical-rethinking-of-the-way-to-fight-global-poverty-by-abhijit-v-banerjee-and-esther-duflo-pdf.pdf [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

9. Beck, T. (2012). Finance and growth–lessons from the literature and the recent crisis. LSE Growth Commission, 3, 01-06. https://cep.lse.ac.uk/LSE-Growth-Commission/files/LSEGC-beck-finance-growth.pdf [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

10. Debreu, G. (1983). Mathematical economics: Twenty papers of Gérard Debreu. Cambridge University Press. https://books.google.co.ke/books?hl=en&lr=&id=wKJp6DepYncC&oi= fnd&pg =PR11&dq =Debreu,+G.+(1983).+Mathematical+economics:+Twenty+papers+of+G%C3%A9rard+Debreu.+Cambridge+University+Press.&ots=mhmI4C2tDb&sig=tXZ2VuF67rxdmnuCkMKO_mfD3Po&redir_esc=y#v=onepage&q&f=false [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

11. Debreu, G. (1959). Theory of value: An axiomatic analysis of economic equilibrium (Vol. 17). Yale University Press. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

12. Debreu, G. (1986). Mathematical economics: twenty papers of Gerard Debreu (No. 4). Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/CCOL052123736X [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

13. Geanakoplos, J. D., & Polemarchakis, H. M. (1986). Existence, regularity, and constrained. Essays in Honor of Kenneth J. Arrow: Volume 3, Uncertainty, Information, and Communication, 3, 65. https://elischolar.library.yale.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=2004&context=cowles-discussion-paper-series [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

14. Hart, O. D. (1975). On the optimality of equilibrium when the market structure is incomplete. Journal of economic theory, 11(3), 418-443. https://doi.org/10.1016/0022-0531(75)90028-9 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

15. Hart, O. D. (1979). On Shareholder Unanimity in Large Stock Market. Economies. Econometrica, 47(5), 1057–1083. https://doi.org/10.2307/1911950 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

16. Hart, O. (1995). Firms, contracts, and financial structure. Oxford University Press. https://doi.org/10.1093/0198288816.001.0001 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

17. La Porta, R., Lopez‐de‐Silanes, F., Shleifer, A., & Vishny, R. (1998). Law and finance. Journal of Political Economy, 106(6), 1113–1155. https://www.nber.org/system/files/working_papers/w5661/w5661.pdf [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

18. La Porta, R., Lopez-de-Silanes, F., & Shleifer, A. (2008). The economic consequences of legal origins. Journal of Economic Literature, 46(2), 285–332.https://www.nber.org/system/files/working_papers/w13608/w13608.pdf [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

19. Mas-Colell, A., Whinston, M. D., & Green, J. R. (1995). Microeconomic theory. Oxford University Press. https://cdn.gecacademy.cn/oa/upload/2020-07-30%2010-29-26-%E9%98%85%E8%AF%BB%E6%9D%90%E6%96%99.pdf [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

20. Murphy, K., Shleifer, A., & Vishny, R. (1989). Industrialization and the big push. Journal of Political Economy, 97(5), 1003–1026. https://www.nber.org/system/files/working_papers/w2708/w2708.pdf [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

21. Radner, R. (1972). Existence of equilibrium of plans, prices, and price expectations. Econometrica, 40(2), 289–303. https://pages.stern.nyu.edu/~rradner/publishedpapers/25ExistenceofEquilbrium.pdf [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

22. Stiglitz, J. E. (2010). Risk and global economic architecture: Why full financial integration may be undesirable. American Economic Review, 100(2), 388–392.https://www.nber.org/system/files/working_papers/w15718/w15718.pdf [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

23. Stiglitz, J. E., & Weiss, A. (1981). Credit Rationing in Markets with Imperfect Information. The American Economic Review, 71(3), 393–410. http://www.jstor.org/stable/1802787 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

24. Townsend, R. M. (1994). Risk and insurance in village India. Econometrica, 62(3), 539–591.DOI: 10.2307/2951659 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

• Quantitative Assessment of Serum C - Reactive Protein Levels among Smokers and Non Smokers
• Extraction and Characterization of Eco-Friendly Hair Dye from Agricultural Waste: A Study on Coconut Husk
• Intermittent Preventive Treatment among Pregnant Women Attending a Tertiary Healthcare Facility in Jos, North Central Nigeria: Adherence Patterns and Preliminary Assessment of Associated Factors
• Assessment Of Degradative Potentials Of Bacteria Isolated From Palm Oil-Polluted Site Using Spectrophotometric Method
• An Analysis of Machine and Deep Learning Insights on the Use of Artificial Intelligence in Oral and Maxillofacial Pathology