Generative AI in Higher Education: A Narrative Review of Global Adoption, Ethical Challenges, and Behavioural Pathways To Critical Thinking, With Implications for African and Ghanaian Contexts
Authors
Institute for Educational Planning and Administration, University of Cape Coast, Cape Coast (Ghana)
Article Information
DOI: 10.47772/IJRISS.2026.100700550
Subject Category: Education
Volume/Issue: 10/7 | Page No: 8034-8047
Publication Timeline
Submitted: 2026-07-26
Accepted: 2026-07-31
Published: 2026-08-07
Abstract
Generative artificial intelligence (GenAI) has moved from novelty to routine presence in higher education within a few years, yet the evidence on its adoption, ethical implications, and cognitive effects remains fragmented across global, regional, and mechanism-focused literatures that are rarely read together. This narrative review synthesises 43 sources, comprising global systematic reviews and meta-analyses, comparative Global North-South studies, African and Tanzanian policy analyses, Ghana-specific empirical studies, and behavioural models linking GenAI use to critical thinking and ethical creativity. The review traces the evolution of this literature across three waves from 2022 to 2026 and finds that GenAI adoption is high globally, at roughly 74.5% among educators, and is growing rapidly across Africa, but that structural constraints, including limited infrastructure, low AI literacy, and underdeveloped institutional policy, shape a distinctly African pattern of opportunity and risk that global adoption figures obscure. In Ghana specifically, a large tertiary-institution survey shows technical infrastructure as a significant constraint even where urban-rural gaps are not, alongside evidence that roughly a third of surveyed undergraduates report low AI literacy despite substantial GenAI use. Critically, the review identifies that the empirically tested behavioural pathways linking GenAI use to critical thinking and ethical creativity, through self-regulated learning, innovative behaviour, and reduced reliance on prior knowledge, have been tested only in Taiwanese and Chinese settings, leaving open whether the same mechanisms hold under African infrastructural and institutional conditions. The review concludes with practical implications for institutions and policymakers and a concrete future-research agenda centred on this gap, arguing that testing these pathways in Ghana is the field's single most valuable next study.
Keywords
Generative artificial intelligence; higher education; Ghana; critical thinking; digital divide
Downloads
References
1. Abdallah, N., Katmah, R., Khalaf, K., & Jelinek, H. F. (2025). Systematic review of ChatGPT in higher education: Navigating impact on learning, wellbeing, and collaboration. Social Sciences & Humanities Open, 12, 101866. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
2. Albadarin, Y., Saqr, M., Pope, N., & Tukiainen, M. (2024). A systematic literature review of empirical research on ChatGPT in education. Discover Education, 3(1), 1-26. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
3. Amankwah, F., Sarfo, F. K., Aboagye, M. O., Konin, D., & Dzakpasu, R. K. (2022). Concerns of university teachers about the adoption of the Moodle learning management system in a Ghanaian University campus. Education Inquiry, 15(3), 312-332. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
4. Ansari, A. N., Ahmad, S., & Bhutta, S. M. (2024). Mapping the global evidence around the use of ChatGPT in higher education: A systematic scoping review. Education and Information Technologies, 29(9), 11281-11321. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
5. Apata, O. E., Ajose, S. T., Oyewole, P. O., Taheri, M., Olaitan, G. I., Ajamobe, J. O., Hunwathan, O. L., Ogunwale, O. M., Feyijimi, T. R., & Adebambo, O. O. (2026). Generative artificial intelligence use and adoption in African higher education among students and lecturers: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Journal of Service Science and Management, 19(3). [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
6. Aposika, F. (2026). Digital transformation in higher education in Ghana with focus on ICT access utilization and policy challenges. Discover Education, 5(1), 410. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
7. Asamoah, M. K., Oheneba-Sakyi, Y., & Tagoe, M. (2024). Faculty acceptance of the utilization of learning management systems in teaching. E-Learning and Digital Media, 21(4), 346–366. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
8. Baidoo-Anu, D., Asamoah, D., Amoako, I., & Mahama, I. (2024). Exploring student perspectives on generative artificial intelligence in higher education learning. Discover Education, 3(1), 1-21. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
9. Baig, M. I., & Yadegaridehkordi, E. (2024). ChatGPT in the higher education: A systematic literature review and research challenges. International Journal of Educational Research, 127, 102411. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
10. Chang, C.-Y., Chen, I.-H., & Tang, K.-Y. (2024). Roles and research trends of ChatGPT-based learning: A bibliometric analysis and systematic review. Educational Technology & Society, 27(4), 471–486. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
11. Chiu, T. K., Xia, Q., Zhou, X., Chai, C. S., & Cheng, M. (2023). Systematic literature review on opportunities, challenges, and future research recommendations of artificial intelligence in education. Computers and Education: Artificial Intelligence, 4, 100118. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
12. Cotton, D. R. E., Cotton, P. A., & Shipway, J. R. (2023). Chatting and cheating: Ensuring academic integrity in the era of ChatGPT. Innovations in Education and Teaching International, 61(2), 228-239. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
13. Darko, N., Qi, Z., & Wang, Z. (2026). Generative AI adoption and its impact on teachers' self-efficacy and instructional confidence in Ghana. Frontiers in Artificial Intelligence, 9, 1829056. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
14. Deng, R., Jiang, M., Yu, X., Lu, Y., & Liu, S. (2025). Does ChatGPT enhance student learning? A systematic review and meta-analysis of experimental studies. Computers & Education, 227, 105224. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
15. Duhaylungsod, A. V., & Chavez, J. V. (2023). ChatGPT and other AI users: Innovative and creative utilitarian value and mindset shift. Journal of Namibian Studies: History Politics Culture, 33. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
16. Elkhatat, A. M., Elsaid, K., & Almeer, S. (2023). Evaluating the efficacy of AI content detection tools in differentiating between human and AI-generated text. International Journal for Educational Integrity, 19(1), 1-16. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
17. Espartinez, A. S. (2025). Between innovation and tradition: A narrative inquiry of students' and teachers' experiences with ChatGPT in Philippine higher education. Social Sciences, 14(6). [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
18. Essel, H. B., Vlachopoulos, D., Johnson, E. E., & Quansah, E. K. (2026). Undergraduate students' perceptions of generative artificial intelligence as a predictor of learning autonomy in Ghana. Discover Artificial Intelligence, 6(1), 85. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
19. Hassen, M. (2025). The impact of AI on students' reading, critical thinking, and problem-solving skills. American Journal of Education and Information Technology, 9(2), 82–90. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
20. Jin, Y., & Sercu, L. (2025). ChatGPT interventions in higher education: A systematic review of experimental studies. Journal of Computer Assisted Learning, 41, e70072. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
21. Jou, M., & Kao, C.-C. (2026). Reframing human–AI collaboration in higher education: Behavioral pathways from generative AI to critical thinking and ethical creativity. Journal of Computing in Higher Education. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
22. Kilde-Westberg, S., Johansson, A., & Enger, J. (2025). Generative AI as a lab partner: A case study. Physical Review Physics Education Research, 21(2). [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
23. Kwakye, I. N., Kwakye, K. A. P., Adom-Fynn, D., Mensah, F. E., & Agyei, S. D. (2025). Exploring the use of generative artificial intelligence tools among university students in Ghana. Discover Education, 4(1), 432. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
24. Lee, H.-Y., Chen, P.-H., Wang, W.-S., Huang, Y.-M., & Wu, T.-T. (2024). Empowering ChatGPT with guidance mechanism in blended learning: Effect of self-regulated learning, higher-order thinking skills, and knowledge construction. International Journal of Educational Technology in Higher Education, 21(1), 128. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
25. Loglo, F. S. (2024). Towards digital transformation of selected Ghanaian public universities: Leadership enablers, challenges, and opportunities. Open Praxis, 16(3), 374-395. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
26. Guadu, Z. B. (2026). Academic integrity in the age of AI: Challenges and strategies for African higher education. Discover Education, 5, Article 21. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
27. Matto, G., & Ponera, J. (2025). Artificial intelligence in higher education institutions in Tanzania: Analysis of policy perspectives. Interdisciplinary Journal of Education Research, 7(1), a13. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
28. Miao, F., & Holmes, W. (2023). Guidance for generative AI in education and research. UNESCO. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
29. Montenegro-Rueda, M., Fernández-Cerero, J., Fernández-Batanero, J. M., & López-Meneses, E. (2023). Impact of the implementation of ChatGPT in education: A systematic review. Computers, 12(8), 153. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
30. Onyebuchi, C. N., Unachukwu, C. C., & Osawaru, B. (2024). Review of AI in education: Transforming learning environments in Africa. International Journal of Applied Research in Social Sciences, 5(10), 637-654. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
31. Pandey, A., & Pandey, A. (2026). AI integration in education: Global educators' perspectives on adoption, challenges, and ethical imperatives. Innovare Journal of Education, 14(2), 1-121. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
32. Partey, P. A., Quayson, E., Adjei, S. K., & Antwi, J. (2026). Determinants of generative AI adoption in teacher education: A TTF–TPB model tested with PLS-SEM. Journal of Educational Technology Development and Exchange, 19(2). [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
33. Ravšelj, D., Keržič, D., Tomaževič, N., Umek, L., Brezovar, N., Iahad, N. A., et al. (2025). Higher education students' perceptions of ChatGPT: A global study of early reactions. PLoS ONE, 20(2), e0315011. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
34. Ryzheva, N., Nefodov, D., Romanyuk, S., Marynchenko, H., & Kudla, M. (2024). Artificial intelligence in higher education: Opportunities and challenges. Amazonia Investiga, 13(73), 284-296. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
35. Saarela, M., Gunasekara, S., & Kumarage, P. (2026). A meta-analysis of generative AI effects on language proficiency and affective-cognitive outcomes in language learning. Discover Computing, 29(1). [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
36. Sharma, S., & Ha, L. (2025). Generative AI in higher education: A comparative study of ChatGPT adoption, perception, and use among college students in the Global North and Global South. Human-Machine Communication, 11, 107-126. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
37. Xiao, R., Xiao, Q., Hou, X., Moletsane, P. P., Jane Li, H., Shen, H., & Stamper, J. (2026). Do teachers dream of GenAI widening educational (in)equality? Envisioning the future of K-12 GenAI education from global teachers' perspectives. Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems-Proceedings. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
38. Yamson, G. C., Agbamey, J., Yamson, E. D., Gyampo, A. E., Nyarko, J., & Asiamah, T. A. (2026). Transforming higher education: ChatGPT as a tool for enhanced communication and collaboration. Artificial Intelligence in Education, 2(2), 116-139. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
39. Youssef, E., Medhat, M., Abdellatif, S., & Al Malek, M. (2024). Examining the effect of ChatGPT usage on students' academic learning and achievement: A survey-based study in Ajman, UAE. Computers and Education: Artificial Intelligence, 7. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
40. Yu, C., Yan, J., & Cai, N. (2024). ChatGPT in higher education: Factors influencing ChatGPT user satisfaction and continued use intention. Frontiers in Education, 9, 1354929. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
41. Zamfiroiu, A., Vasile, D., & Savu, D. (2023). ChatGPT-A systematic review of published research papers. Informatica Economica, 27(1), 5-16. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
42. Zhao, G., Sheng, H., Wang, Y., Cai, X., & Long, T. (2025). Generative artificial intelligence amplifies the role of critical thinking skills and reduces reliance on prior knowledge while promoting in-depth learning. Education Sciences, 15(5). [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
Metrics
Views & Downloads
Similar Articles
- Assessment of the Role of Artificial Intelligence in Repositioning TVET for Economic Development in Nigeria
- Teachers’ Use of Assure Model Instructional Design on Learners’ Problem Solving Efficacy in Secondary Schools in Bungoma County, Kenya
- “E-Booksan Ang Kaalaman”: Development, Validation, and Utilization of Electronic Book in Academic Performance of Grade 9 Students in Social Studies
- Analyzing EFL University Students’ Academic Speaking Skills Through Self-Recorded Video Presentation
- Major Findings of The Study on Total Quality Management in Teachers’ Education Institutions (TEIs) In Assam – An Evaluative Study